AzTrials
AzTrials

ChildFCENCT04065542

Determinants of Health and Cancer: Investigating the Conceptions of Children From 6 to 11 Years Old

An observational study of Child and Determinants of Health, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Model and map, from a qualitative multi-phased protocol, the conceptions and systems of conceptions of the determinants of health and cancer expressed and perceived by schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 11 years
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 11 years
  • All sexes
  • Child

Study population: chidren

Who may be able to join

  • School volunteering to participate in the project Primary school
  • children aged 6 to 11
  • Girls and boys
  • All school levels Private and public primary school
  • Rural and urban primary school

Who cannot join

  • Class ULIS
  • Students who benefit from a personalized support plan
  • Individual refusal of participation (child and / or family)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Lise LACLAUTRE

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

    Lise Laclautre, 0473754963, promo-interne-drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr

    Frank PIZON, MCF HDR

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Model and map, from a qualitative multi-phased protocol, the conceptions and systems of conceptions of the determinants of health and cancer expressed and perceived by schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years. The secondary objectives are to analyze the ability to question the conceptions of children's health regardless of their age and to link conceptions and determinants to contextual factors. The informative value and complementarity of the collection tools (photo expression, QC, photo-narration) and the relevance of a mixed analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) in order to highlight the different determinants of health will also be studied.

Read the detailed description

Qualitative observational study of human and social sciences (SHS), multicenter, conducted with schoolchildren.

The qualitative methodology used combines the use of photographs, open questionnaires and focus groups, over very large panels, aiming at both diversity and representativeness.

  • Photo expression: to identify the determinants perceived as having a positive or negative influence on one's health;
  • CQR : Certainty/Question/Rumour on how to take care of one's health (health promotion input following on from school policies, i.e. PES: Politique d'Etablissements Scolaires);
  • Photo narration: to identify argumentative frameworks in health and alternatives perceived as being positive or negative for one's health,
  • Focus groups: to improve understanding of the rationalities built by adolescents in relation to that which determines their health.

This choice is justified by the need to explore and understand the actions from the participants' point of view.

The diversity of schools and pupils (5 classes in 4 schools in the AURA region, i.e. 320 pupils) will make it possible to obtain the data saturation required in qualitative research.

This makes it possible to consider a mixed analysis strategy, both qualitative and quantitative.

This project aims to better understand the rationalities elaborated by children and the way in which their concepts on the determinants of cancer interlink, as well as to describe the declared impact these concepts have on the decision-making regarding their health.

Keywords
Social behaviour, Qualitative research, Child, Cancer
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Social Behavior

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. categorized groups by genre according to the Relation to the environment criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

  2. categorized groups by genre according to a Factors of fulfillment and personal development criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

  3. categorized groups by genre according to the link with a healt theme criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

  4. categorized groups by genre according to Care activities criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

  5. categorized groups by genre according to a Recommendation and support in health in the social sphere criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

  6. categorized groups by genre according to an health capital criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

  7. categorized groups by genre according to the emotional dimension in social relations criteria

    The analysis of the content will be carried out according to the ascending / descending method by categorization, described by Laurence Bardin. According to L. Bardin (2013), categorization is an operation of classification of elements constituting a set by differentiation then grouping by genre (analogy) according to previously defined criteria.

    Measured: day 1

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Incidence of children able to explain their health regardless of their age

    The informative value and complementarity of the collection tools (photo The informative value are measured with collection tools (photo expression, photo-narration) and a mixed analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) is used in order to highlight the different determinants of health.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Incidence of children able to explain their health regardless of their contextual factors

    The informative value are measured with collection tools (photo expression, photo-narration) and a mixed analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) is used in order to highlight the different determinants of health.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Identify child profile

    Identify child profiles / classes / school based :• Socio-demographic data (class / age, sex, class size, number of male and female, school enrollment, class number, geographical location, priority education, team stability, health project, type of project, impression of researchers)

    • Domains or designs: Individual \& collective Domains created during the qualitative analysis

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Aug 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
320 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04065542
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019 FCE
Acronym
FCE
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
28 May 2019
Last updated
22 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Child and Determinants of Health, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Lise Laclautre (0473754963, promo-interne-drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

categorized groups by genre according to the Relation to the environment criteria (time frame: day 1). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in