AzTrials
AzTrials

Non Small Cell Lung CancerLUNG-PREDICTNCT04069442

cDC1 Prognostic and Predictive Role in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

An observational study of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The response rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors remains relatively low and the identification of the new predictive biomarkers is necessary. The rare population of cDC1 is very interesting, as its mouse counterparts is essential for the cross presentation of tumor-associated antigens, tumor immunity and response to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
This is a non-interventional study
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2020to Sep 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Retrospective cohort of pembrolizumab or cisplatin-based chemiotherapy treated patients performing these regimens in first-line according to their PD-L1 score

Who may be able to join

  • NSCLC diagnosis
  • Advanced disease (Stage III-IV) according to the TNM 7th/8th classification
  • Patients have to have performed pembrolizumab in first line if PD-L1 ≥ 50% or cisplastin-based chemotherapy if PD-L1 < 50%
  • FFPE material available from diagnostic sample

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Grenoble-Alpes

    Grenoble, Isère, 38043

Other trials in France

About this study

The response rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors remains relatively low and the identification of the new predictive biomarkers is necessary. The rare population of cDC1 is very interesting, as its mouse counterparts is essential for the cross presentation of tumor-associated antigens, tumor immunity and response to immunotherapies. Their role in humans has not been studied. This proposal aims to study the prognostic role of cDC1 in a cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC, possibly demonstrating their positive predictive value of immune checkpoint inhibitors response.

Read the detailed description

Multicenter study aiming to collect patient's clinical data retrospectively and their histological samples prospectively.

The cohort will include:

  • 30 patients PD-L1 > 50% treated with pembrolizumab in first line and having a progression free survival ≥ 3 months
  • 30 patients PD-L1 > 50% treated with pembrolizumab in first line and having a progression free survival < 3 months
  • 30 patients PD-L1 < 50% treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first line
Being tested
This is a non-interventional study
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • This is a non-interventional studyOther

    This is a non-interventional study

Study groups in NCT04069442
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
cDC-1 positivecDC-1 positive patients according to RNAseq and in situ analysis
Receives: Other: This is a non-interventional study
cDC-1 negativecDC-1 negative patients according to RNAseq and in situ analysis
Receives: Other: This is a non-interventional study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression free survival (PFS)

    To validate the cDC1 infiltration as predictive biomarker of pembrolizumab response

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Overall response rate (ORR)

    To compare the overall response rate (ORR) of cDC1-positive patients to cDC1 negative ones within those treated with pembrolizumab and on the entire cohort

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Time to treatment failure (TTF)

    To compare the time of treatment failure (TTF) on CDC1-positive patients to negatives ones within those treated with pembrolizumaband on the entire cohort

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2019
  2. Study startJun 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2020 (estimated)

Why it stopped: access to human body samples by another existing cohort

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04069442
Sponsor's protocol ID
38RC19.100
Other IDs
2019-A00959-48
Acronym
LUNG-PREDICT
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
12 Aug 2019
Last updated
1 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression free survival (PFS) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in