GlaucomaBeaconNCT04072016
Study of the Beacon Aqueous Microshunt in Patients With Refractory Glaucoma
A study testing Beacon Aqueous Microshunt in people with Glaucoma, run by MicroOptx at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Beacon Aqueous Microshunt in patients with refractory glaucoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma
- What is being tested?
- Beacon Aqueous Microshunt
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 29 Apr 2020to 30 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 22-85 years.
- Refractory glaucoma: Prior failure of filtering/cilioablative procedure and/or uncontrolled IOP on maximum-tolerated medication (i.e. >=4 classes of topical lowering medications, or fewer in the case of tolerability or efficacy issues).
- Primary open-angle, traumatic or neovascular glaucoma.
- Medicated DIOP ≥20 mmHg and ≤45 mmHg on maximum-tolerated medical therapy. Note: No washout; medications stabilized 30 days prior to assessment.
- Baseline BCVA of light perception or better in study eye.
- Visual field defects consistent with glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Glaucomatous optic nerve damage as evidenced by any of the following optic disc or retinal nerve fiber layer structural abnormalities:
- Diffuse thinning, focal narrowing, or notching of the optic disc rim, especially at the inferior or superior poles with or without disc hemorrhage;
- Localized abnormalities of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, especially at the inferior or superior poles; or
- Optic disc neural rim asymmetry of the two eyes consistent with loss of neural tissue 8. Visual field mean deviation (MD) by Humphrey Visual Field: Visual field defects consistent with glaucomatous optic nerve damage and mean deviation worse than -3 dB in the study eye; and at least one of the following two findings:
- A cluster of 3 or more points in an expected location of the visual field depressed below the 5% level, at least 1 of which is depressed below the 1% level on the pattern deviation (PD) plot; and/or
- Glaucoma hemi-field test "outside normal limits".
- 9. At least two contiguous clock hours of intact conjunctiva near the limbus between clock hours of 9:00 and 03:00 in the study eye.
- 10. Adequate space in the anterior chamber by Spaeth Grade C, D or E for iris insertion (with indentation).
- 11. Participant has the understanding, ability, and willingness to fully comply with study procedures and postoperative care instructions.
- 12. Participant understands and signs the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- No light perception vision.
- Conditions of active neovascular conditions, such as active iris or corneal neovascularization, or active proliferative retinopathy in study eye.
- Pigmentary glaucoma in study eye.
- Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in study eye.
- Angle-closure glaucoma in study eye.
- Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome in study eye.
Show all 29Show fewer
- Uveitic glaucoma in the study eye.
- Epithelial or fibrous downgrowth in the study eye.
- Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 20/200 in the non-study eye.
- Corneal conditions in study eye inhibiting normal incisional healing (e.g. Fuch's dystrophy) or impair visualization of implant inside the anterior chamber.
- Prior intraocular surgery in study eye within ≤6 months before the preoperative visit (including phacoemulsification).
- Central corneal endothelial cell count of less than 1600 cells/mm2 in the study eye.
- Anticipated need for ocular surgery or retinal laser procedure in the study eye within the 12-month follow-up period.
- Need for glaucoma surgery combined with other ocular procedures in the study eye at time of implant (e.g. cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, or retinal surgery).
- Unwilling to discontinue contact lens use in the study eye after surgery.
- Central corneal thickness ≤490μm or ≥620μm.
- Clinically significant inflammation or infection in the study eye within 60 days prior to the preoperative visit (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis, herpes simplex infection) or any systemic infection. For purposes of this study, clinically significant is considered any such condition requiring prescription therapy.
- Any condition that prevents the device implantation in the superior region of the study eye.
- Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated.
- Functionally significant cataract in the study eye.
- Other clinical conditions:
- Poorly controlled diabetes (Type I or Type II) as determined by HbA1c >8 within 3 months of implant.
- Cancer requiring treatment during the duration of the study.
- Any drugs (e.g.: immunosuppressive drugs) or co-morbidity that might inhibit wound healing.
- Participation in any other clinical study during participation in this study.
- Engage in activities that involve submerging their head under water, such as diving or swimming.
- Women who are (i) pregnant, (ii) nursing, (iii) planning a pregnancy and (iv) of childbearing potential not using a reliable method of contraception.
- Life expectancy <1 year.
- If both eyes are eligible, the eye with the worse BCVA will be selected.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
United States3 sites
Minnesota Eye Consultants
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431
iWorks Laser and Vision Center
Dayton, Ohio, 45405
Icon Eye Care
Grand Junction, Colorado, 81501
About this study
Official title: The Beacon Study: A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Beacon Aqueous Microshunt for Refractory Glaucoma
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Beacon Aqueous Microshunt in patients with refractory glaucoma.
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Being tested
- Beacon Aqueous Microshunt
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Beacon Aqueous MicroshuntDevice
The Beacon Aqueous Microshunt (BAM) is an implantable device intended to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with refractory glaucoma by shunting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the surface of the eye.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Beacon Aqueous Microshunt | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Beacon Aqueous Microshunt |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effectiveness via Intraocular Pressure Reduction
20% mean diurnal IOP reduction from baseline, on the same number or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications
Measured: 12 Months
Safety via Serious and Adverse Event Reporting
Rate of occurrence of serious procedure-related and/or device-related adverse events.
Measured: 12 Months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Responder rate defined as achieving at least 20% mean diurnal IOP reduction from baseline
Measured: 12 Months
Mean Change from baseline in IOP
Measured: 12 Months
Schirmer tear test - Mean change from baseline
Measured: 12 Months
Proportion of Eyes Achieving Specific IOP Targets (≤18 mmHg, ≤17 mmHg, ≤16 mmHg, ≤15 mmHg, ≤14 mmHg, ≤13 mmHg, and ≤12 mmHg) compared to baseline
Measured: 12 Months
Number of topical IOP-lowering medications - Mean change from baseline
Measured: 12 Months
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Failure
Glaucoma-related secondary surgical intervention with or without device explant, device explant alone, or not achieving >20% IOP reduction on the same number of medications or fewer
Measured: 12 Months
Rate of ocular and non-ocular adverse events
Measured: 12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2019
- Study start29 Apr 2020
- Primary completion16 May 2022
- Study completion30 Nov 2022
Why it stopped: Significant risks (e.g., infection, endothelial cell loss) and high rate of channel plugging associated with product use.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MicroOptx
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04072016
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4046
- Acronym
- Beacon
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Beacon Study: A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Beacon Aqueous Microshunt for Refractory Glaucoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04072016
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Beacon / 4046
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Significant risks (e.g., infection, endothelial cell loss) and high rate of channel plugging associated with product use.
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MicroOptxIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 29 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Beacon Aqueous Microshunt in patients with refractory glaucoma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Beacon Aqueous Microshunt | Experimental | Device: Beacon Aqueous Microshunt |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Age 22-85 years.
- Refractory glaucoma: Prior failure of filtering/cilioablative procedure and/or uncontrolled IOP on maximum-tolerated medication (i.e. >=4 classes of topical lowering medications, or fewer in the case of tolerability or efficacy issues).
- Primary open-angle, traumatic or neovascular glaucoma.
- Medicated DIOP ≥20 mmHg and ≤45 mmHg on maximum-tolerated medical therapy. Note: No washout; medications stabilized 30 days prior to assessment.
- Baseline BCVA of light perception or better in study eye.
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- No light perception vision.
- Conditions of active neovascular conditions, such as active iris or corneal neovascularization, or active proliferative retinopathy in study eye.
- Pigmentary glaucoma in study eye.
- Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in study eye.
- Angle-closure glaucoma in study eye.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Beacon Aqueous MicroshuntThe Beacon Aqueous Microshunt (BAM) is an implantable device intended to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with refractory glaucoma by shunting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the surface of the eye. | Device | Beacon Aqueous Microshunt |
Primary outcome
Effectiveness via Intraocular Pressure Reduction
Time frame: 12 Months
20% mean diurnal IOP reduction from baseline, on the same number or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications
Safety via Serious and Adverse Event Reporting
Time frame: 12 Months
Rate of occurrence of serious procedure-related and/or device-related adverse events.
7 secondary outcomes
Responder rate defined as achieving at least 20% mean diurnal IOP reduction from baseline
Time frame: 12 Months
Mean Change from baseline in IOP
Time frame: 12 Months
Schirmer tear test - Mean change from baseline
Time frame: 12 Months
Proportion of Eyes Achieving Specific IOP Targets (≤18 mmHg, ≤17 mmHg, ≤16 mmHg, ≤15 mmHg, ≤14 mmHg, ≤13 mmHg, and ≤12 mmHg) compared to baseline
Time frame: 12 Months
Number of topical IOP-lowering medications - Mean change from baseline
Time frame: 12 Months
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Failure
Time frame: 12 Months
Rate of ocular and non-ocular adverse events
Time frame: 12 Months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Significant risks (e.g., infection, endothelial cell loss) and high rate of channel plugging associated with product use.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2023.
Related trials for Glaucoma
Not yet recruiting
AI-Assisted vs Conventional Teleglaucoma Referral
Glaucoma
Recruiting
Automated Applanation Tonometry - Updated
Glaucoma, Glaucoma, Suspect
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2a Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pregabalin Eye Drops Comparing With Timolol Eye Drops in Adults With Glaucoma or High Eye Pressure.
Primary Open - Angle Glaucoma (POAG), Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Recruiting
Effects of Balance Training in Individuals With Glaucoma
Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Beacon Aqueous Microshunt in people with Glaucoma, run by MicroOptx at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Significant risks (e.g., infection, endothelial cell loss) and high rate of channel plugging associated with product use.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effectiveness via Intraocular Pressure Reduction (time frame: 12 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.