AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent Pterygium of EyePhase 4NCT04075227

Topical 0.2% Loteprednol Etabonate vs. Topical 0.1% Dexamethasone in Impending Recurrent Pterygium

A Phase 4 study testing 0.2% loteprednol etabonate and 0.1% dexamethasone in people with Recurrent Pterygium of Eye and Steroid-Induced Glaucoma, run by Wannisa Suphachearabhan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of topical 0.2% loteprednol etabonate, a 'soft steroid', compared with topical 0.1% dexamethasone, which is widely used in postoperative pterygium excision to prevent the recurrence of pterygium. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
0.2% loteprednol etabonate and 0.1% dexamethasone
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
16 Oct 2015to 2 Mar 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who had pterygium excision with amniotic membrane transplantation and who had impending recurrent pterygium stage 3 defined as fibrovascular tissue not invading the cornea

Who cannot join

  • recurrent pterygium
  • received adjunctive treatment with beta radiation, mitomycin C or 5-fluorouracil
  • glaucoma or intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg
  • history of 5-fluorouracil or chloramphenicol allergy

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison of the Efficacy of Topical 0.2% Loteprednol Etabonate and Topical 0.1% Dexamethasone in Impending Recurrent Pterygium

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of topical 0.2% loteprednol etabonate, a 'soft steroid', compared with topical 0.1% dexamethasone, which is widely used in postoperative pterygium excision to prevent the recurrence of pterygium. If 0.2% loteprednol etabonate is non-inferior in efficacy compared with 0.1% dexamethasone, it may be used postoperatively in pterygium excision patients with the benefit of a low incidence of ocular hypertension or secondary glaucoma.

Read the detailed description

A prospective randomized control trial was performed from October 2015 to April 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Thammasat Hospital, Thailand and Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Thailand.

Subjects Patients who had pterygium excision with amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) and who had impending recurrent pterygium stage 3 defined as fibrovascular tissue not invading the cornea were included.

Then the participants were randomized into 2 groups. Both groups received subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection 5mg/0.1 mL with 27-gauge needle in the area of fibrovascular tissue, and then the eyes were irrigated with 30 mL of normal saline. 0.2% loteprednol etabonate was prescribed in group 1, and 0.1% dexamethasone (CD-oph) was prescribed in group 2 every 4-6 hours for 4 weeks. After that, the regimen was gradually decreased until cessation at 3 months. 5-FU was repeatedly injected monthly in the presence of marked inflammation and not more than 3 times to prevent complications.

All patients were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months to assess the impending recurrent pterygium severity score, intraocular pressure, complications, detection of true recurrent pterygium, and time to recurrence.

Being tested
0.2% loteprednol etabonate, 0.1% dexamethasone
Keywords
Impending recurrent pterygium, 0.2% loteprednol etabonate, 0.1% dexamethasone
Medical subject headings
Pterygium

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 0.2% loteprednol etabonateDrug

    Also called Alrex

    Use topical 0.2% loteprednol etabonate eyedrop every 4-6 hours for 4 weeks. After that, the regimen was gradually decreased until cessation at 3 months.

  • 0.1% dexamethasoneDrug

    Also called CD-oph

    Use topical 0.1% dexamethasone eyedrop every 4-6 hours for 4 weeks. After that, the regimen was gradually decreased until cessation at 3 months.

Study groups in NCT04075227
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
0.2% loteprednol etabonateExperimentalThis group was treated with subconjunctival 5-FU injection and topical 0.2% loteprednol etabonate every 4-6 hours for 4 weeks. After that, the regimen was gradually decreased until cessation at 3 months.
Receives: Drug: 0.2% loteprednol etabonate
0.1% dexamethasoneActive comparatorThis group was treated with subconjunctival 5-FU injection and topical 0.1% dexamethasone (CD-oph) every 4-6 hours for 4 weeks. After that, the regimen was gradually decreased until cessation at 3 months.
Receives: Drug: 0.1% dexamethasone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. rate of true recurrent pterygium

    true recurrent pterygium is the fibrovascular tissue that invade into cornea

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. severity score of impending recurrent pterygium

    severity score of impending recurrent pterygium included 3 factors; redness, thickness of fibrovascular tissue, and size of fibrovascular tissue at 3 mm from limbus, which are classified into 3 grades in each factor.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. time to recurrent of pterygium

    time from enrolled participants until they developed true recurrent pterygium

    Measured: 6 months

  3. rate of steroid induced ocular hypertension

    number of participants in each group who had intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2019
  2. Study start16 Oct 2015
  3. Primary completion2 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion2 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The participants were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 were treated with subconjunctival 5-FU injection and topical 0.2% loteprednol etabonate while group 2 were treated with subconjunctival 5-FU injection and topical 0.1% dexamethasone (CD-oph: dexamethasone sodium phosphate 1 mg/mL, chloramphenicol 5 mg/mL, tetrahydrozaline hydrochloride 0.25 mg/mL).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04075227
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC006/60
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
28 Aug 2019
Last updated
6 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mahar PS, Manzar N. Pterygium recurrence related to its size and corneal involvement. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Feb;23(2):120-3.

    PubMed 23374515
  • Sherwin JC, Hewitt AW, Kearns LS, Griffiths LR, Mackey DA, Coroneo MT. The association between pterygium and conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence: the Norfolk Island Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;91(4):363-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02314.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

    PubMed 22176664
  • Yaisawang S, Piyapattanakorn P. Role of post-operative topical corticosteroids in recurrence rate after pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Jun;86 Suppl 2:S215-23.

    PubMed 12929992
  • Hirst LW. The treatment of pterygium. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar-Apr;48(2):145-80. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00463-0.

    PubMed 12686302
  • Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: surgical and cosmetic outcome. Cornea. 2007 May;26(4):407-13. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318033b3d4.

    PubMed 17457187
  • Pikkel J, Porges Y, Ophir A. Halting pterygium recurrence by postoperative 5-fluorouracil. Cornea. 2001 Mar;20(2):168-71. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200103000-00011.

    PubMed 11248822
  • Anguria P, Ntuli S, Carmichael T. Young patient's age determines pterygium recurrence after surgery. Afr Health Sci. 2014 Mar;14(1):72-6. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i1.11.

    PubMed 26060460
  • Han SB, Jeon HS, Kim M, Lee SJ, Yang HK, Hwang JM, Kim KG, Hyon JY, Wee WR. Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pterygium Surgery: An Image Analysis Study. Cornea. 2016 Aug;35(8):1097-103. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000853.

    PubMed 27100658
  • Olusanya BA, Ogun OA, Bekibele CO, Ashaye AO, Baiyeroju AM, Fasina O, Ogundipe AO, Ibrahim AO. Risk factors for pterygium recurrence after surgical excision with combined conjunctival autograft (CAG) and intraoperative antimetabolite use. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2014 Mar;43(1):35-40.

    PubMed 25335376
  • Nuzzi R, Tridico F. How to minimize pterygium recurrence rates: clinical perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 19;12:2347-2362. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S186543. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30538417
  • Kim KW, Kim JC. Current approaches and future directions in the management of pterygium. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 May 18;11(5):709-711. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.05.01. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 29862166
  • Prabhasawat P, Tesavibul N, Leelapatranura K, Phonjan T. Efficacy of subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone injection in impending recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology. 2006 Jul;113(7):1102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.026. Epub 2006 May 26.

    PubMed 16730066
  • Makornwattana M, Suphachearaphan W. Incidence of steroid induced-ocular hypertension in postoperative pterygium excision. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Mar;98 Suppl 2:S151-7.

    PubMed 26211117
  • Bodor N, Buchwald P. Soft drug design: general principles and recent applications. Med Res Rev. 2000 Jan;20(1):58-101. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1128(200001)20:13.0.co;2-x.

    PubMed 10608921
  • Comstock TL, Sheppard JD. Loteprednol etabonate for inflammatory conditions of the anterior segment of the eye: twenty years of clinical experience with a retrometabolically designed corticosteroid. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Mar;19(4):337-353. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1439920. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

    PubMed 29430976

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing 0.2% loteprednol etabonate and 0.1% dexamethasone in people with Recurrent Pterygium of Eye and Steroid-Induced Glaucoma, run by Wannisa Suphachearabhan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

rate of true recurrent pterygium (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04075227, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in