AzTrials
AzTrials

Accidental FallNCT04076319

Implementing CAPABLE in PSH

A study testing CAPABLE: Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders in people with Accidental Fall and Frailty, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot project seeks to implement an intervention known as CAPABLE (Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders) for formerly homeless adults living in permanent supportive housing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Accidental Fall, Frailty, Depression
What is being tested?
CAPABLE: Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Dec 2020to 30 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older than 50 years in age
  • cognitively intact or have only mild cognitive impairment
  • have some or a lot of difficulty performing ADLs
  • tenant of Skid Row Housing Trust

Who cannot join

  • see above

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Skid Row Housing Trust

    Los Angeles, California, 90021

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Implementing CAPABLE in Permanent Supportive Housing

This pilot project seeks to implement an intervention known as CAPABLE (Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders) for formerly homeless adults living in permanent supportive housing. This home-based intervention that consists of time-limited services (no more than 6-months) from an occupational therapist, a nurse, and a handyman is intended to improve functioning and decrease falls among this population that prematurely ages and is at increased fall risk.

Read the detailed description

Permanent supportive housing (PSH) using a housing first approach is an evidence-based intervention to end chronic homelessness by providing low-barrier affordable housing paired with flexible health and social services. In Los Angeles County (LAC), where the number of PSH units is expected to increase dramatically over the next 10 years, clinical guidelines and/or standards for support services are lacking. This is especially problematic given the that the target population is older and prematurely aging. The chronically homeless population in the United States has an average age approaching 60 years old and experiences accelerated aging, including an elevated prevalence of geriatric syndromes such as functional impairment, falls, and urinary incontinence that can jeopardize PSH tenants' ability to live independently and age in place. Current support services are not equipped to address these needs, which ultimately jeopardizes the success of PSH to maintain high rates of housing stability while tenants "age in place."

The investigators propose conducting a pilot project to implement the CAPABLE model in PSH. CAPABLE, which stands for "Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders" is a client-directed home-based intervention that consists of time-limited services (no more than 6-months) from an occupational therapist, a nurse, and a handyman working collaboratively with the older adult client. CAPABLE was developed to target older adults who are returning to independent living after hospitalization and has been shown to improve functioning (activities of daily living - ADLs and instrumental activities of daily living - IADLs), decrease falls and nursing home admissions, and reduce healthcare costs based on multiple studies including several randomized control trials. CAPABLE has the potential to be used in PSH as a model of support services that can address needs of prematurely aging tenants, which could help transform PSH from an intervention that ends homeless to an intervention that addresses homelessness and supports successful aging in place.

The specific aims of this study are to:

  1. Examine the impact of CAPABLE on PSH client outcomes (e.g. ADLs, IADLs, falls). This aim will be accomplished using a pre-/post-design with a wait-list control group.
  2. Determine what adaptations, if any, need to be made to implement CAPABLE in PSH. The investigators will accomplish this aim using the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) implementation approach, which was designed to allow for an evidenced-based practice to be adapted in a planned and considered, rather than ad hoc, manner.

Important to note is that this project was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic so that adaptations to CAPABLE may be due to the context of the pandemic as opposed to being implemented in PSH.

Being tested
CAPABLE: Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders
Medical subject headings
Frailty, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CAPABLE: Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for EldersBehavioural

    CAPABLE is a client-directed home-based intervention that consists of time-limited services from an occupational therapist, a nurse, and a handyman working collaboratively with the older adult client. In most cases, the OT makes 6 visits, the RN makes 4 visits, and a handyman makes 1 to 2 visits to make any modifications to a person's home during a 6-month period. The first visits for the OT and RN are usually 90 minutes each and the later ones are usually an hour each. Visits are spaced to enable older adults to practice new strategies learned in the previous visit. There should be a clear "conclusion/graduation," with the older adult understanding how to use their new skills and apply them to future situations.

Study groups in NCT04076319
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CAPABLEOtherCAPABLE Intervention
Receives: Behavioral: CAPABLE: Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Activities of Daily Living Limitations Score

    The modified Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Index is an 8-item questionnaire that was completed by participants to rate their ability to perform daily activities, such as bathing, toileting, eating, and dressing, across a 5-point Likert scale (1 = no difficulty, 2 = a little difficulty, 3 = moderate difficulty, 4 = a lot of difficulty, 5 = unable to do). Items are summed to obtain a score with minimum and maximum values of 8 to 40, respectively, whereby higher scores represent greater difficulty performing ADLs.

    Measured: Change of ability to perform activities of daily living from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

  2. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Score

    The Brief Instrumental Functioning Scale will be used to assess ability to perform in six functions: bathing, dressing, going to toilet, transferring, continence, and feeding. Each area is assessed on a five point scale; participants rated their ability to perform daily tasks on a 5-point scale (1 = no difficulty, 2 = a little difficulty, 3 = moderate difficulty, 4 = a lot of difficulty, 5 = unable to do). Items are summed to obtain a score with minimum and maximum values of 8 to 40, respectively, whereby higher scores represent greater difficulty performing ADLs.

    Measured: Change of ability to perform IADLs from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

  3. Depression

    Eight of the nine items in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to measure depression, rated on a 4-point scale of how frequently participants were bothered by the eight problems during a 2-week period (0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, and 3 = nearly every day). Items are summed to obtain a score with minimum and maximum values of 0 to 24, respectively, whereby higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Change in depression symptoms from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

  4. Falls Efficacy

    Participants rated their confidence they could do each of 10 activities without falling on a 10-point scale, with total scores ranging from 10 (not very confident) to 100 (very confident) using the Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale. Thus, higher scores indicate greater efficacy related to falls.

    Measured: Change of falls efficacy from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

  5. Pain Interference With Usual Activities

    Pain interference with usual activities was assessed using an item from the 3-item PEG to assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G) on a 10-point Likert scale from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

    Measured: Change in the degree that pain interferes with usual activities from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

  6. Number of Falls in the Past Year or 6 Months

    Mean number of falls to the ground during the past year.

    Measured: Number of falls in the past year reported at 6-month follow up.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Self-rated Health

    Self-rated health was measured on a 5-point scale (1 = excellent, 2 = very good, 3 = good, 4 = fair, 5 = poor). A higher score indicates poorer self-rated quality of health.

    Measured: Change in self-rated health from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

  2. Overall Quality of Life

    Quality of life was assessed using a single item: "Overall, how would you rate your quality of life?" Response options ranged from 1 = worst possible quality of life to 11 = best possible quality of life. Thus, a higher value indicated greater self-rated quality of life.

    Measured: Change in quality of life from baseline to 6-month follow up (post-intervention).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Sep 2019
  2. Study start17 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion25 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Waitlist control design
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04076319
Sponsor's protocol ID
UP-19-00361
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
27 Aug 2019
Last updated
15 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in