Patient DischargeIMPROVE-ITNCT04077281
Improving Medication Prescribing-Related Outcomes for Vulnerable Elderly in Transitions
A study testing Medication Coordinated care in people with Patient Discharge and Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, run by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Medication safety is a crucial health issue for every older Canadian since many of the medications causing serious harm are those which also have life-saving or important symptom-relieving benefits. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient Discharge, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Aged
- What is being tested?
- Medication Coordinated care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2023to 7 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults over the age of 65 years.
- Admitted to Medicine or Surgery services for more than 2 days.
- High cost users (defined as):
- Have at least one other hospitalization within the previous year.
- Taking 5 or more chronic medications including at least one TRIIM-Med.
- Provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with "do not approach status".
- Patient or Caregiver not fluent in English.
- Patients who do not provide informed consent.
- Patients admitted for < 2 days.
- Patients < 65 years of age.
- Not a high cost user (as defined above).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Improving Medication Prescribing-Related Outcomes for Vulnerable Elderly in Transitions (IMPROVE-IT): a Pilot Randomized Trial
Medication safety is a crucial health issue for every older Canadian since many of the medications causing serious harm are those which also have life-saving or important symptom-relieving benefits. Very few specialists can accurately advise seniors which medications provide more benefit than harm for them personally, and make changes safely as this requires a very large breadth and depth of knowledge about the patient, the conditions they have and their therapies. Now that telemedicine is compatible with smart phones, this extends the ability of scarce specialists to 'see' any patient in Canada in a way that is more convenient for the patient and may be less expensive than current care. This project will find out whether a unique Clinical Pharmacology specialist team in Hamilton, Ontario can improve medication safety (stop medications no longer needed, reduce doses where appropriate, change to safer medications) for a high risk group of older hospitalized Canadians taking many medications. The hospital where this pilot study will take place was the first to install the world's leading electronic health record and set it up to facilitate and support high quality research. Patients who volunteer will be assigned to their usual care, or to the intervention which is the Clinical Pharmacology specialist team approach starting in hospital and following up with the patient at home using telemedicine and detailed communication with them, their caregiver, family physician, community pharmacist and other specialists. The investigators will study whether the intervention is effective and cost-effective at reducing harmful medication burden, reducing the need to return to hospital, or improving the patient's ratings of their care coordination. The results will determine whether a subsequent large trial is worthwhile.
- Conditions
- Patient Discharge, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Aged, Health Care Costs
- Being tested
- Medication Coordinated care
- Keywords
- Polypharmacy
- Medical subject headings
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medication Coordinated careOther
- Clinical Pharmacology \& Toxicology consult
- CPT team completes detailed circle of care communication
- Telemedicine followup by CPT team (approximately 48 hrs post-discharge \& 1 week to1 month post-discharge)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Clinical Pharmacology specialist team approach starting in hospital and following up with the patient at home using telemedicine and detailed communication with them, their caregiver, family physician, community pharmacist and other specialists. Receives: Other: Medication Coordinated care |
| Control Arm (Usual care) | No intervention | Patients will receive a best possible medication history (BPMH) as do the intervention patients, then usual care by their primary team. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility Outcome: Recruitment rate for eligible patients.
The main trial will be considered feasible if we are able to recruit at least 50% of eligible patients in this pilot.
Measured: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Clinical Outcome: The number of TRIIM-Meds successfully deprescribed.
The number of TRIIM-Meds successfully deprescribed (dose reduction or discontinued) at 2 months post-hospital discharge, aiming to be able to detect a mean difference of 0.5.
Measured: 2 months post discharge
Secondary outcomes (5)
Feasibility Outcomes of CPT consultation volume capacity and potential to apply the intervention entirely through telemedicine.
This will be measured based on the number of successfully enrolled patients, and the number of patients that will entirely undergo the intervention through telemedicine.
Measured: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Feasibility Outcomes of patient retention rate.
This will be measured by looking at the number of patients enrolled, the number of patients that dropped out, and the number of patients that completed the study.
Measured: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Feasibility Outcomes of likelihood of the intervention proving cost-effective.
This will be measured using Healthcare resource utilization questionnaire, which will determine whether the intervention reduced healthcare costs compared to the control group.
Measured: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Patient-important outcomes: Participant ratings of coordination and continuity of transitions in care.
This outcome will be measured using the Coordination and Continuity of Care Questionnaire (CCCQ). Which is a questionnaire we adapted from the brief prepared questionnaire (B-PREPARED) and the three-question care transitions measure questionnaire (CTM-3).
Measured: 2 months post discharge
Patient-important outcomes: Health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
This outcome will be measured using the EuroQol five-dimensional, five-level descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) that asks patients to self-assess their own health quality related quality of life. Whereas a scoring metric is used to assess the overall health related quality of life based on the answers to the questions. The questionnaire scale considers 1 as the best possible health and 5 as the worst health possible.
Measured: 2 months post discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2019
- Study start1 Jun 2023
- Primary completion12 Jun 2024
- Study completion7 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Patient DischargeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Anne Holbrook, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
- Investigators
- Anne Holbrook, Principal investigator, St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonAnne Holbrook, Principal investigator, SJHH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04077281
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIHR#419518
- Acronym
- IMPROVE-IT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Holbrook A, Perri D, Levine M, Mbuagbaw L, Jarmain S, Thabane L, Tarride JE, Dolovich L, Hyland S, Telford V, Silva J, Nieuwstraten C. Improving medication prescribing-related outcomes for vulnerable elderly in transitions on high-risk medications (IMPROVE-IT HRM): a pilot randomized trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 10;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01484-6.
PubMed 38600599
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Medication Prescribing-Related Outcomes for Vulnerable Elderly in Transitions (IMPROVE-IT): a Pilot Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04077281
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMPROVE-IT / CIHR#419518
- Conditions
- Patient Discharge, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Aged, Health Care Costs
- Keywords
- Polypharmacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Medication safety is a crucial health issue for every older Canadian since many of the medications causing serious harm are those which also have life-saving or important symptom-relieving benefits. Very few specialists can accurately advise seniors which medications provide more benefit than harm for them personally, and make changes safely as this requires a very large breadth and depth of knowledge about the patient, the conditions they have and their therapies. Now that telemedicine is compatible with smart phones, this extends the ability of scarce specialists to 'see' any patient in Canada in a way that is more convenient for the patient and may be less expensive than current care. This project will find out whether a unique Clinical Pharmacology specialist team in Hamilton, Ontario can improve medication safety (stop medications no longer needed, reduce doses where appropriate, change to safer medications) for a high risk group of older hospitalized Canadians taking many medications. The hospital where this pilot study will take place was the first to install the world's leading electronic health record and set it up to facilitate and support high quality research. Patients who volunteer will be assigned to their usual care, or to the intervention which is the Clinical Pharmacology specialist team approach starting in hospital and following up with the patient at home using telemedicine and detailed communication with them, their caregiver, family physician, community pharmacist and other specialists. The investigators will study whether the intervention is effective and cost-effective at reducing harmful medication burden, reducing the need to return to hospital, or improving the patient's ratings of their care coordination. The results will determine whether a subsequent large trial is worthwhile.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Other: Medication Coordinated careClinical Pharmacology specialist team approach starting in hospital and following up with the patient at home using telemedicine and detailed communication with them, their caregiver, family physician, community pharmacist and other specialists. |
| Control Arm (Usual care) | No intervention | –Patients will receive a best possible medication history (BPMH) as do the intervention patients, then usual care by their primary team. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adults over the age of 65 years.
- Admitted to Medicine or Surgery services for more than 2 days.
- High cost users (defined as):
- Have at least one other hospitalization within the previous year.
- Taking 5 or more chronic medications including at least one TRIIM-Med.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with "do not approach status".
- Patient or Caregiver not fluent in English.
- Patients who do not provide informed consent.
- Patients admitted for < 2 days.
- Patients < 65 years of age.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medication Coordinated care* Clinical Pharmacology \& Toxicology consult * CPT team completes detailed circle of care communication * Telemedicine followup by CPT team (approximately 48 hrs post-discharge \& 1 week to1 month post-discharge) | Other | Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Feasibility Outcome: Recruitment rate for eligible patients.
Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
The main trial will be considered feasible if we are able to recruit at least 50% of eligible patients in this pilot.
Clinical Outcome: The number of TRIIM-Meds successfully deprescribed.
Time frame: 2 months post discharge
The number of TRIIM-Meds successfully deprescribed (dose reduction or discontinued) at 2 months post-hospital discharge, aiming to be able to detect a mean difference of 0.5.
5 secondary outcomes
Feasibility Outcomes of CPT consultation volume capacity and potential to apply the intervention entirely through telemedicine.
Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Feasibility Outcomes of patient retention rate.
Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Feasibility Outcomes of likelihood of the intervention proving cost-effective.
Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years
Patient-important outcomes: Participant ratings of coordination and continuity of transitions in care.
Time frame: 2 months post discharge
Patient-important outcomes: Health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 2 months post discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38600599Holbrook A, Perri D, Levine M, Mbuagbaw L, Jarmain S, Thabane L, Tarride JE, Dolovich L, Hyland S, Telford V, Silva J, Nieuwstraten C. Improving medication prescribing-related outcomes for vulnerable elderly in transitions on high-risk medications (IMPROVE-IT HRM): a pilot randomized trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 10;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01484-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Patient Discharge
RecruitingObservational study
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Three-day Discharge After Distal Pancreatectomy
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Distal Pancreatectomy (DP)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Early Discharge With Subcutaneous Furosemide Versus Standard Care in Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Wearable Core Body Temperature Monitoring for Early Detection of Cytokine Release Syndrome in Outpatients Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy
Myeloma
Recruiting
Conducting Wound, Ostomy, and Continence (WOC) Nurse Telephone Follow-up for Post-discharge Ostomy Patients to Reduce Hospital Readmission
Ostomy
Active, not recruiting
FreeDom: Innovative Strategy for the Management of COPD Exacerbations
Oxygen Deficiency, COPD Exacerbation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anne Holbrook principal investigator
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Anne Holbrook principal investigator
SJHH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medication Coordinated care in people with Patient Discharge and Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, run by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility Outcome: Recruitment rate for eligible patients. (time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04077281, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024.