AgingNCT04078334
Personalized Exercises Program Prescription to Prevent Functional Decline Throughout Older Adults Hospitalization
A study testing MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 in people with Aging and Hospitalization, run by Université du Québec a Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Bed rest related to hospitalization contributes to the physical decline in capacities of the elderly, the loss of autonomy accelerated in post-hospitalization and the prevalence of the iatrogenic functional decline is about 20 to 50% for the elderly after an hospitalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging, Hospitalization
- What is being tested?
- MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2020to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Prevention of the Functional Decline Throughout Hospitalization Among Older Adults by Using a Systematic Process for Prescribing Personalized, Evidence-based Exercises Via the Implementation of the Tool PATH 2.0
Bed rest related to hospitalization contributes to the physical decline in capacities of the elderly, the loss of autonomy accelerated in post-hospitalization and the prevalence of the iatrogenic functional decline is about 20 to 50% for the elderly after an hospitalization.
Mobilization through physical activity (PA) programs is strongly suggested to counter this phenomenon, but it is not part of the routine clinical hospital practices.The consequences are the functional incapacities, the mobility loss, the re-hospitalization falls and the important use of the health care and health services. In this regard, the Ministry of Health and Social Services adopted in 2011 a framework making mandatory the set up of interventions to prevent the functional decline of hospitalized elderly in every hospital centres in Quebec. The Geriatric Units (GU) admit elderly around 80 years old that present complex health problems. The scientific literature presents effective mobilisation programs to ensure the maintenance of functional capacities and the mobility of frail elderly. However, even with this knowledge, the prescription of physical exercises by the GU does not seem to be integrated in a natural and systematic way by in the professional practices.
Read more
Our research team would like to implant the clinical tools : MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 that is a unique process of systematic prescriptions of physical activity during hospitalization (MATCH), at discharge (PATH) and during hospitalization and at discharge (PATH 2.0) in the GU, adapted to the profile of these patients.
The objective of this project is to evaluate the implementation of the clinical tools MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 in different GU and to evaluate the tools efficiency and estimate the benefits-cost ratio on the use of post-hospitalization health services. Finally, the conclusions would help us refine the procedures to use in the short and medium term which clinical tool is likely a standard practice our GU and to improve the health continuum of elderly.
Read the detailed description
The aging of the population and the increase in longevity are associated with societal issues, both in terms of costs, and the health resources needed to meet the needs of seniors. Moreover, it is recognized that frail elderly people (defined as at risk of developing or aggravating functional limitations or disabilities) are the largest users of health care services. In Canada, as in other industrialized countries, more than a third of hospitalizations annually are among people aged 65 and over, even though they account for only 18% of the population .
However, hospitalizations exacerbate the deterioration of fitness, muscle weakness, loss of balance, and physical inactivity that typically occur during aging and are precursors to functional decline and frailty. One explanation for this deterioration in the health of elderly people during hospital stays is bed rest and general immobility. Thus, the prevention of immobilization syndrome in elderly people in hospitals being a priority issue for both national and international health networks, a project was carried out between 2014 and 2016 within the geriatric unit (GU) of a Canadian university-affiliated geriatric hospital (IUGM). This project aimed to implement in a pragmatic way (adjusted to the human and material resources in place) a physical activity (PA) program for hospitalization according to the functional capacities of the hospitalized patients. This project showed that the implementation of this program was feasible (at least 1 session of PA / day) and acceptable by health professionals, patients and their caregivers.
At the same time, it is recognized that, following hospitalization, 22 to 50% of older people will experience a functional decline that will decrease their ability to perform activities of daily living and, consequently, their quality. of life. These tangible losses lead to a vicious circle as they contribute to readmission for 33% of those affected and additional use of health services in the majority of cases. Prescription of PA is one of the recognized solutions to prevent or reduce these deteriorations. PA, whether practiced in the community or at home, improves the mobility and functional level of pre-frail and frail seniors to moderate effect sizes (mobility).
The post-hospitalization prescription of an PA program, however, does not appear to be integrated into standard care delivery practices, unlike the management of medications or assistance with the performance of activities of daily living, and this, despite the priorities established in this regard by governments and the World Health Organization (WHO). On average, 35% of GU patients at discharge receive a prescription to maintain or improve the strength and balance (internal data of the Regroupement des Unités de courte durée gériatrique et des services hospitaliers de gériatrie-RUSHGQ), even if these communities have rehabilitation services. As part of a project (2016-2018), the research team has created an easy-to-implement decisional tree that can be used to prescribe appropriate programs for GU at discharge, while inducing beneficial effects for patients.
However, these two innovative projects, which aim to prevent functional decline through hospitalization and which meet the policy of the Ministry of Health and Social Services, are the"Adapted Health Care Approach for Older Adults in Quebec Hospital Centres" through systematic, specific and specialized interventions, have not been implemented in a combined and complementary way. However, the implementation of a proactive and adapted approach to prescribing PA per and post-hospitalization, through a simple tool based on the clinical measures available in practice settings, represents a real organizational innovation and should add value to current practices. Thus, the study of the cost-benefit of implementing such a practice is important to validate the scope of such a tool on the use of post-hospital health care services compared to an isolated intervention of PA per or post-hospitalization or usual care. In this sense, a study showed a savings of 22,000 $ / person in health services costs for seniors who improved their mobility via PA in post-hospitalization. Thus, the investigators can sense that preventing the loss of muscle function and mobility as well as falls, the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. In addition, from a collective point of view, this should lead to savings because of the reduction in the costs of care related to injuries caused by a fall or fall after hospitalization that may result in re-hospitalization or even a death.
Considering 1) the importance of the negative impacts of sedentarity / immobilization on seniors, particularly per and post-hospitalization, as well as its potential economic and societal impact; 2) the recognized importance of PA prescription in the prevention of the functional decline of seniors per and post-hospitalization and 3) the absence of organizational processes favoring the implementation of systematic prescribing of PA per and post-hospitalization, The implementation of a systematic process of prescribing adapted, validated and integrated physical exercises in the usual per and or post-hospitalization practices appears crucial to the preservation of the autonomy and quality of life of the elderly.
In the present study, an interventional pragmatic study design with randomization by cluster was selected.
INTERVENTIONS :
MATCH : PA program per hospitalization PATH : PA program post hospitalization PATH 2.0 : Combination of the PA program Per (MATCH) and Post hospitalization (PATH).
Control : usual care by clinical teams
- Conditions
- Aging, Hospitalization
- Being tested
- MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
- Keywords
- Frail older adults, Physical activity, exercise, Hospitalization
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MATCHOther
In the first days of hospitalization, the physiotherapist determines the score linked to the patient's mobility profile using of a decisional tree. The PA program has 2 or 3 exercises to be done with or without supervision 3 times per week day during hospitalization. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist.
PATHOther
In the days prior to discharge, the physiotherapist determines the patient's mobility profile using the decisional tree. When returning home after hospitalization, each PA program includes a daily walk as well as 3 or 4 exercises that can be completed in a 12 to 20 minutes timeframe. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist in 2 sessions.
PATH 2.0Other
In the first days of hospitalization, the physiotherapist determines the score linked to the patient's mobility profile using of a decisional tree. The PA program has 2 or 3 exercises to be done with or without supervision 3 times per week day during hospitalization. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist.
In the days prior to discharge, the physiotherapist determines the patient's mobility profile using the decisional tree. When returning home after hospitalization, each PA program includes a daily walk as well as 3 or 4 exercises that can completed in a 12 to 20 minutes timeframe. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist in 2 sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | PATH Tool : Prescription of exercise programs at discharge Receives: Other: PATH |
| Group 2 | Experimental | PATH 2.0 Tool : Prescription of exercise programs during hospitalization and discharge Receives: Other: PATH 2.0 |
| Group 3 | Experimental | MATCH tool: Prescription of physical exercise programs during hospitalization Receives: Other: MATCH |
| Group 4 | No intervention | Control group: Usual care by the clinical teams |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in short physical performance battery (SPPB) after intervention
SPPB is comprised of 3 tasks: a standing balance test (side by side, semi-tandem and tandem), 4-m habitual gait speed and 5 sit to stand from a chair. Each task is scored (based on time) from 0-4 points.
Measured: Up to 36 weeks
Changes in muscle strength after intervention (upper muscle strength : handgrip strength, lower limb strength: sit to stand-30sec)
Handgrip strengh, sit to stand test (30sec)
Measured: Up to 36 weeks
Changes in walking after intervention (Walking speed :4 m habitual gait speed and walking parameter : 3 meter timed up and go)
4 m habitual gait speed test and 3 m timed up and go test
Measured: Up to 36 weeks
Secondary outcomes (10)
Feasibility of the clinical tools : MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
will be measured using a score (expressed in %) taking into account the ratio of the number of patients who have received an PA program on the number of patients hospitalized and eligible for treatment study.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Usability of the clinical tools : MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
Usability will be measured using the valided SUS questionnaire (10 items/score ranged from 0 to 100).
Measured: Up to 24 months
Acceptability of the clinical tools: MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
Will be evaluated by the administration of a questionnaire with 4 Likert level/question. This questionnaire will presented 3 sub-sections examining :1) its clinical relevance, 2) its applicability in ecological environment; 3) its implementation burden.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Estimate the benefits-cost ratio on the use of post-hospitalization health services
QALY analysis estimating cost reduction related to health service utilization, number of falls / falls with injuries, and benefits through improved quality of life; cost-effectiveness analysis; and confirmatory economic analysis of the "difference-in-differences" type, the following variables will be necessary: the socio-economic portrait of the participants, the quality of life, the cost of care and use of health services : 1) visits to doctors or health professionals, 2) home visiting DAS professionals or 3) emergency room / hospital stays via medical records)
Measured: Up to 36 weeks
Changes in the length of stay after intervention
Number of hospitalization days
Measured: up to 3 months
Changes in the quality of life after intervention (SF-12)
SF-12
Measured: Up to 36 weeks
Use of health resources
Number of admissions before and after hospitalization, visit to general practitioner before and after hospitalization
Measured: Up to 2 years
Changes in caregiver burden after intervention
Mini-zarit
Measured: Up to 36 weeks
Impact of pandemic period
Differences on feasibility, acceptability and effects of MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 during and after COVID-19
Measured: Up to 24 months
Impact of healthcare area
Differences on feasibility, acceptability and effects of MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 between university and non-university hospitals or between urban vs non urban area
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2019
- Study start2 Oct 2020
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Université du Québec a Montréal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
- Investigators
- Mylene Aubertin-Leheudre, Ph. D, Principal investigator, Université du Québec a MontréalMarie-Jeanne Kergoat, M.D., FRCPC, Principal investigator, Centre de recherche de l'institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontrealFonseca Raquel, Ph. D, Principal investigator, Université du Québec a MontréalVeillette Nathalie, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Université de Montréal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04078334
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CER VN 19-20-15
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Peyrusque E, Kergoat MJ, Filali-Mouhim A, Veillette N, Fonseca R, Sirois MJ, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Effect of a Pragmatic Exercise Intervention Pilot Study on Preventing Functional and Physical Decline in Hospitalized Older Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Jul 1;57(7):1570-1578. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003687. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
PubMed 40025670
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of the Functional Decline Throughout Hospitalization Among Older Adults by Using a Systematic Process for Prescribing Personalized, Evidence-based Exercises Via the Implementation of the Tool PATH 2.0
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04078334
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CER VN 19-20-15
- Conditions
- Aging, Hospitalization
- Keywords
- Frail older adults, Physical activity, exercise, Hospitalization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Université du Québec a MontréalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bed rest related to hospitalization contributes to the physical decline in capacities of the elderly, the loss of autonomy accelerated in post-hospitalization and the prevalence of the iatrogenic functional decline is about 20 to 50% for the elderly after an hospitalization.
Mobilization through physical activity (PA) programs is strongly suggested to counter this phenomenon, but it is not part of the routine clinical hospital practices.The consequences are the functional incapacities, the mobility loss, the re-hospitalization falls and the important use of the health care and health services. In this regard, the Ministry of Health and Social Services adopted in 2011 a framework making mandatory the set up of interventions to prevent the functional decline of hospitalized elderly in every hospital centres in Quebec. The Geriatric Units (GU) admit elderly around 80 years old that present complex health problems. The scientific literature presents effective mobilisation programs to ensure the maintenance of functional capacities and the mobility of frail elderly. However, even with this knowledge, the prescription of physical exercises by the GU does not seem to be integrated in a natural and systematic way by in the professional practices.
Our research team would like to implant the clinical tools : MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 that is a unique process of systematic prescriptions of physical activity during hospitalization (MATCH), at discharge (PATH) and during hospitalization and at discharge (PATH 2.0) in the GU, adapted to the profile of these patients.
The objective of this project is to evaluate the implementation of the clinical tools MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 in different GU and to evaluate the tools efficiency and estimate the benefits-cost ratio on the use of post-hospitalization health services. Finally, the conclusions would help us refine the procedures to use in the short and medium term which clinical tool is likely a standard practice our GU and to improve the health continuum of elderly.
Detailed description
The aging of the population and the increase in longevity are associated with societal issues, both in terms of costs, and the health resources needed to meet the needs of seniors. Moreover, it is recognized that frail elderly people (defined as at risk of developing or aggravating functional limitations or disabilities) are the largest users of health care services. In Canada, as in other industrialized countries, more than a third of hospitalizations annually are among people aged 65 and over, even though they account for only 18% of the population .
However, hospitalizations exacerbate the deterioration of fitness, muscle weakness, loss of balance, and physical inactivity that typically occur during aging and are precursors to functional decline and frailty. One explanation for this deterioration in the health of elderly people during hospital stays is bed rest and general immobility. Thus, the prevention of immobilization syndrome in elderly people in hospitals being a priority issue for both national and international health networks, a project was carried out between 2014 and 2016 within the geriatric unit (GU) of a Canadian university-affiliated geriatric hospital (IUGM). This project aimed to implement in a pragmatic way (adjusted to the human and material resources in place) a physical activity (PA) program for hospitalization according to the functional capacities of the hospitalized patients. This project showed that the implementation of this program was feasible (at least 1 session of PA / day) and acceptable by health professionals, patients and their caregivers.
At the same time, it is recognized that, following hospitalization, 22 to 50% of older people will experience a functional decline that will decrease their ability to perform activities of daily living and, consequently, their quality. of life. These tangible losses lead to a vicious circle as they contribute to readmission for 33% of those affected and additional use of health services in the majority of cases. Prescription of PA is one of the recognized solutions to prevent or reduce these deteriorations. PA, whether practiced in the community or at home, improves the mobility and functional level of pre-frail and frail seniors to moderate effect sizes (mobility).
The post-hospitalization prescription of an PA program, however, does not appear to be integrated into standard care delivery practices, unlike the management of medications or assistance with the performance of activities of daily living, and this, despite the priorities established in this regard by governments and the World Health Organization (WHO). On average, 35% of GU patients at discharge receive a prescription to maintain or improve the strength and balance (internal data of the Regroupement des Unités de courte durée gériatrique et des services hospitaliers de gériatrie-RUSHGQ), even if these communities have rehabilitation services. As part of a project (2016-2018), the research team has created an easy-to-implement decisional tree that can be used to prescribe appropriate programs for GU at discharge, while inducing beneficial effects for patients.
However, these two innovative projects, which aim to prevent functional decline through hospitalization and which meet the policy of the Ministry of Health and Social Services, are the"Adapted Health Care Approach for Older Adults in Quebec Hospital Centres" through systematic, specific and specialized interventions, have not been implemented in a combined and complementary way. However, the implementation of a proactive and adapted approach to prescribing PA per and post-hospitalization, through a simple tool based on the clinical measures available in practice settings, represents a real organizational innovation and should add value to current practices. Thus, the study of the cost-benefit of implementing such a practice is important to validate the scope of such a tool on the use of post-hospital health care services compared to an isolated intervention of PA per or post-hospitalization or usual care. In this sense, a study showed a savings of 22,000 $ / person in health services costs for seniors who improved their mobility via PA in post-hospitalization. Thus, the investigators can sense that preventing the loss of muscle function and mobility as well as falls, the quality of life of patients and their caregivers. In addition, from a collective point of view, this should lead to savings because of the reduction in the costs of care related to injuries caused by a fall or fall after hospitalization that may result in re-hospitalization or even a death.
Considering 1) the importance of the negative impacts of sedentarity / immobilization on seniors, particularly per and post-hospitalization, as well as its potential economic and societal impact; 2) the recognized importance of PA prescription in the prevention of the functional decline of seniors per and post-hospitalization and 3) the absence of organizational processes favoring the implementation of systematic prescribing of PA per and post-hospitalization, The implementation of a systematic process of prescribing adapted, validated and integrated physical exercises in the usual per and or post-hospitalization practices appears crucial to the preservation of the autonomy and quality of life of the elderly.
In the present study, an interventional pragmatic study design with randomization by cluster was selected.
INTERVENTIONS :
MATCH : PA program per hospitalization PATH : PA program post hospitalization PATH 2.0 : Combination of the PA program Per (MATCH) and Post hospitalization (PATH).
Control : usual care by clinical teams
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Other: PATHPATH Tool : Prescription of exercise programs at discharge |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Other: PATH 2.0PATH 2.0 Tool : Prescription of exercise programs during hospitalization and discharge |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Other: MATCHMATCH tool: Prescription of physical exercise programs during hospitalization |
| Group 4 | No intervention | –Control group: Usual care by the clinical teams |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MATCHIn the first days of hospitalization, the physiotherapist determines the score linked to the patient's mobility profile using of a decisional tree. The PA program has 2 or 3 exercises to be done with or without supervision 3 times per week day during hospitalization. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist. | Other | Group 3 |
| PATHIn the days prior to discharge, the physiotherapist determines the patient's mobility profile using the decisional tree. When returning home after hospitalization, each PA program includes a daily walk as well as 3 or 4 exercises that can be completed in a 12 to 20 minutes timeframe. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist in 2 sessions. | Other | Group 1 |
| PATH 2.0In the first days of hospitalization, the physiotherapist determines the score linked to the patient's mobility profile using of a decisional tree. The PA program has 2 or 3 exercises to be done with or without supervision 3 times per week day during hospitalization. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist. In the days prior to discharge, the physiotherapist determines the patient's mobility profile using the decisional tree. When returning home after hospitalization, each PA program includes a daily walk as well as 3 or 4 exercises that can completed in a 12 to 20 minutes timeframe. These daily exercises are prescribed by the doctor and taught by the physiotherapist in 2 sessions. | Other | Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Changes in short physical performance battery (SPPB) after intervention
Time frame: Up to 36 weeks
SPPB is comprised of 3 tasks: a standing balance test (side by side, semi-tandem and tandem), 4-m habitual gait speed and 5 sit to stand from a chair. Each task is scored (based on time) from 0-4 points.
Changes in muscle strength after intervention (upper muscle strength : handgrip strength, lower limb strength: sit to stand-30sec)
Time frame: Up to 36 weeks
Handgrip strengh, sit to stand test (30sec)
Changes in walking after intervention (Walking speed :4 m habitual gait speed and walking parameter : 3 meter timed up and go)
Time frame: Up to 36 weeks
4 m habitual gait speed test and 3 m timed up and go test
10 secondary outcomes
Feasibility of the clinical tools : MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Usability of the clinical tools : MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Acceptability of the clinical tools: MATCH, PATH, PATH 2.0
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Estimate the benefits-cost ratio on the use of post-hospitalization health services
Time frame: Up to 36 weeks
Changes in the length of stay after intervention
Time frame: up to 3 months
Changes in the quality of life after intervention (SF-12)
Time frame: Up to 36 weeks
Use of health resources
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Changes in caregiver burden after intervention
Time frame: Up to 36 weeks
Impact of pandemic period
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Impact of healthcare area
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40025670Peyrusque E, Kergoat MJ, Filali-Mouhim A, Veillette N, Fonseca R, Sirois MJ, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Effect of a Pragmatic Exercise Intervention Pilot Study on Preventing Functional and Physical Decline in Hospitalized Older Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Jul 1;57(7):1570-1578. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003687. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
Related trials for Aging
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Tirzepatide and Organ-specific Biological Aging
Longevity, Preventive Medicine
Active, not recruiting
Emotional Well-being and Measures of Healthy Aging
Aging, Aging, Healthy
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Active, not recruiting
Vascular Aging and Lp299v Study in Healthy Adults
Vascular Aging
RecruitingObservational study
Amyloid PET Imaging in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Aging
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mylene Aubertin-Leheudre, Ph. D principal investigator
Université du Québec a Montréal
Marie-Jeanne Kergoat, M.D., FRCPC principal investigator
Centre de recherche de l'institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montreal
Fonseca Raquel, Ph. D principal investigator
Université du Québec a Montréal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MATCH, PATH and PATH 2.0 in people with Aging and Hospitalization, run by Université du Québec a Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mylene Aubertin-Leheudre, PhD (514-987-3000 ext. 5018, aubertin-leheudre.mylene@uqam.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in short physical performance battery (SPPB) after intervention (time frame: Up to 36 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04078334, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2026.