AzTrials
AzTrials

Vaginal ProlapseNCT04078802

0050-19-RMB CTIL - VNOTES Compared to VH for Vaginal Apex Prolapse

A study testing VNOTES/VH in people with Vaginal Prolapse, run by Rambam Health Care Campus.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

VNOTES (Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) is a relatively new surgery for Hysterectomy and Uterosacral ligament suspension to treat Vaginal prolapse. The investigators wish to run a randomized control trial comparing it to classic Vaginal hysterectomy for the same indication. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 75 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Vaginal Prolapse
What is being tested?
VNOTES/VH
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2019to Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 75 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • women with vaginal prolapse
  • capable of having a surgery - assessed by an anesthesiologist
  • women who approve of having the surgery

Who cannot join

  • BMI over 40
  • women who have recurrent PID (pelvic inflammatory disease)
  • women with oncology records

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Compared With Traditional Vaginal Utero-sacral Ligament Suspension for Vaginal Apex Prolapse

VNOTES (Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) is a relatively new surgery for Hysterectomy and Uterosacral ligament suspension to treat Vaginal prolapse. The investigators wish to run a randomized control trial comparing it to classic Vaginal hysterectomy for the same indication.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will recruit 60 women with indication for surgery to treat uterine prolapse. 30 women will undergo VNOTES surgery and 30 women will undergo classic vaginal hysterectomy. The investigators will compare outcomes of the surgeries such as surgery time, bleeding and clinical outcomes after 3 and 6 months post operation.

Being tested
VNOTES/VH
Medical subject headings
Uterine Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VNOTES/VHProcedure or surgery

    same as above

Study groups in NCT04078802
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VNOTES ARMExperimentaltreatment of Vaginal prolapse with VNOTES surgery and apical suspension to the uterosacral ligaments.
Receives: Procedure: VNOTES/VH
Vaginal hysterectomy ArmExperimentaltreatment of Vaginal prolapse with classic vaginal hysterectomy surgery and apical suspension to the uterosacral ligaments.
Receives: Procedure: VNOTES/VH

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. surgery time

    time of surgery

    Measured: from admission up to 6 hours post operation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. bleeding

    bleeding at surgery - volume of blood loss estimated by the surgeon performing the operation.

    Measured: from admission up to 6 hours post operation

  2. hospital days

    how many days after surgery for hospitalization

    Measured: from admission up to 96 hours post operation

  3. PISQ12 score - Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire

    Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire is a scoring index used to measure sexual function of women affected by pelvic organ prolapse. range 0-48. 0 marks good sexual function and 48 measures sexual disability affected from pelvic organ prolapse

    Measured: from admission up to 6 hours post operation

  4. PFDI score - Pelvic Floor Disability Index

    The Pelvic Floor Disability Index is an index used to obtain an objective score regarding pelvic floor disability comprising of bowel, bladder, or pelvic symptoms over the last 3 months prior to answering the questionnaire. score ranges 0-300. 0 outcome is no pelvic floor disability and 300 marks a high level of pelvic floor disability.

    Measured: from admission up to 6 hours post operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Sep 2019
  2. Study startOct 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04078802
Sponsor's protocol ID
RambamMD
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
2 Sep 2019
Last updated
9 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VNOTES/VH in people with Vaginal Prolapse, run by Rambam Health Care Campus.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Omer Mor, mD (972546486414, omermor23@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

surgery time (time frame: from admission up to 6 hours post operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in