Breast NeoplasmNCT04083027
Non-mass Enhancement in Breast MRI
An observational study of Breast Neoplasm, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been proven to be the most sensitive method in detection of breast cancer with sensitivity reaching 68-100%. The most frequent indication for breast MRI is screening for high-risk patients with a 20% or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 33 to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- MRI
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2020to 1 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 33 to 70 years
- Women only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Female patients with mean age 50 ± 17
Who may be able to join
- all female with mean age 50 ± 17 having breast MRI
Who cannot join
- Contraindications of MRI as pacemakers, aneurysmal clipping, retained metallic foreign bodies, or claustrophobic patients
- Pregnant women especially in the first trimester.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Patterns of Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI Using the BI-RADS Lexicon Fifth Edition With Histopathologic Correlation
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been proven to be the most sensitive method in detection of breast cancer with sensitivity reaching 68-100%. The most frequent indication for breast MRI is screening for high-risk patients with a 20% or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Other indications include; assessment of extent of disease and screening of the contralateral breast in patients who are newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer. Evaluation of residual disease post Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) with positive margins, loco-regional recurrence detection, as well as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are also well visualized by breast MRI. Furthermore, assessment of inconclusive mammography finding without a sonographic correlate, suspicious nipple discharge without a sono-mammographic or galacto-graphic correlate and evaluation of metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in case of unknown primary tumor are all indications in which breast MRI has shown high sensitivity.
Breast MRI also helps in identifying multifocal/multicentric or contralateral breast malignancies which was not detected by conventional imaging. Moreover, MRI gives more accurate data about local extension of invasive breast cancer and in situ tumors than other conventional modalities. In some patients newly diagnosed to have cancer breast, breast MRI is able to detect additional lesions that has not been found in mammography or breast ultrasound in 6 - 34% in the ipsilateral breast and 3 - 5% in the contralateral breast. These additional breast lesions are classified into focus, mass, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI.
Read more
Non-mass enhancement (NME) is defined as an enhancing abnormality that is not associated with the three-dimension volume of a mass, shape and outlining, and they are separate from the Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE). The fifth edition of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon has erased some ambiguities, and modified terminologies from the fourth edition to provide more precise evaluation in descriptions of the distribution and Internal Enhancement Patterns (IEPs) of NME, contributes in quality assurance, better communication with physicians, and enhances patient care.
For morphological assessment of NME, distribution is described as focal, linear, segmental, regional, multiple regions, and diffuse. And the IEPs are characterized as homogeneous, heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered ring. NME may be benign as Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH), apocrine metaplasia and radiation effect; high risk such as Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, radial scar or complex sclerosing lesion, or malignant as Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC).
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm
- Being tested
- MRI
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MRIDevice
Breast MRI
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patterns of non-mass enhancement on breast MRI
To estimate the various patterns of NME using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition with histopathologic correlation; to evaluate their clinical significance.
Measured: Within one year; from March 2020 to March 2021
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2019
- Study start1 Mar 2020
- Primary completion1 Mar 2021
- Study completion1 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sara Mohamed Gamal Hassan, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04083027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Breast MRI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Park SY, Han BK, Ko ES, Ko EY, Cho EY. Additional lesions seen in magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer patients: the role of second-look ultrasound and imaging-guided interventions. Ultrasonography. 2019 Jan;38(1):76-82. doi: 10.14366/usg.18002. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
PubMed 30103597Shin K, Phalak K, Hamame A, Whitman GJ. Interpretation of Breast MRI Utilizing the BI-RADS Fifth Edition Lexicon: How Are We Doing and Where Are We Headed? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):26-34. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PubMed 26826797Ha GW, Yi MS, Lee BK, Youn HJ, Jung SH. Clinical outcome of magnetic resonance imaging-detected additional lesions in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer. 2011 Sep;14(3):213-8. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.3.213. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
PubMed 22031803Cho YH, Cho KR, Park EK, Seo BK, Woo OH, Cho SB, Bae JW. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast. Iran J Radiol. 2016 Jan 23;13(1):e30909. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.30909. eCollection 2016 Jan.
PubMed 27127579Lee SM, Nam KJ, Choo KS, Kim JY, Jeong DW, Kim HY, Kim JY. Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition. Acta Radiol. 2018 Nov;59(11):1292-1299. doi: 10.1177/0284185118759139. Epub 2018 May 14.
PubMed 29758996Yang QX, Ji X, Feng LL, Zheng L, Zhou XQ, Wu Q, Chen X. Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement. J Xray Sci Technol. 2017;25(6):1033-1044. doi: 10.3233/XST-17311.
PubMed 29154312Machida Y, Shimauchi A, Tozaki M, Kuroki Y, Yoshida T, Fukuma E. Descriptors of Malignant Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI: Their Correlation to the Presence of Invasion. Acad Radiol. 2016 Jun;23(6):687-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
PubMed 26976623D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013.
Chadashvili T, Ghosh E, Fein-Zachary V, Mehta TS, Venkataraman S, Dialani V, Slanetz PJ. Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):219-27. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12656.
PubMed 25539260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patterns of Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI Using the BI-RADS Lexicon Fifth Edition With Histopathologic Correlation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04083027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Breast MRI
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been proven to be the most sensitive method in detection of breast cancer with sensitivity reaching 68-100%. The most frequent indication for breast MRI is screening for high-risk patients with a 20% or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Other indications include; assessment of extent of disease and screening of the contralateral breast in patients who are newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer. Evaluation of residual disease post Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) with positive margins, loco-regional recurrence detection, as well as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are also well visualized by breast MRI. Furthermore, assessment of inconclusive mammography finding without a sonographic correlate, suspicious nipple discharge without a sono-mammographic or galacto-graphic correlate and evaluation of metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in case of unknown primary tumor are all indications in which breast MRI has shown high sensitivity.
Breast MRI also helps in identifying multifocal/multicentric or contralateral breast malignancies which was not detected by conventional imaging. Moreover, MRI gives more accurate data about local extension of invasive breast cancer and in situ tumors than other conventional modalities. In some patients newly diagnosed to have cancer breast, breast MRI is able to detect additional lesions that has not been found in mammography or breast ultrasound in 6 - 34% in the ipsilateral breast and 3 - 5% in the contralateral breast. These additional breast lesions are classified into focus, mass, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI.
Non-mass enhancement (NME) is defined as an enhancing abnormality that is not associated with the three-dimension volume of a mass, shape and outlining, and they are separate from the Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE). The fifth edition of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon has erased some ambiguities, and modified terminologies from the fourth edition to provide more precise evaluation in descriptions of the distribution and Internal Enhancement Patterns (IEPs) of NME, contributes in quality assurance, better communication with physicians, and enhances patient care.
For morphological assessment of NME, distribution is described as focal, linear, segmental, regional, multiple regions, and diffuse. And the IEPs are characterized as homogeneous, heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered ring. NME may be benign as Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH), apocrine metaplasia and radiation effect; high risk such as Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, radial scar or complex sclerosing lesion, or malignant as Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC).
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 33 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Female patients with mean age 50 ± 17
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all female with mean age 50 ± 17 having breast MRI
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Contraindications of MRI as pacemakers, aneurysmal clipping, retained metallic foreign bodies, or claustrophobic patients
- Pregnant women especially in the first trimester.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MRIBreast MRI | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Patterns of non-mass enhancement on breast MRI
Time frame: Within one year; from March 2020 to March 2021
To estimate the various patterns of NME using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition with histopathologic correlation; to evaluate their clinical significance.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30103597Park SY, Han BK, Ko ES, Ko EY, Cho EY. Additional lesions seen in magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer patients: the role of second-look ultrasound and imaging-guided interventions. Ultrasonography. 2019 Jan;38(1):76-82. doi: 10.14366/usg.18002. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 26826797Shin K, Phalak K, Hamame A, Whitman GJ. Interpretation of Breast MRI Utilizing the BI-RADS Fifth Edition Lexicon: How Are We Doing and Where Are We Headed? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):26-34. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
- Background: PubMed 22031803Ha GW, Yi MS, Lee BK, Youn HJ, Jung SH. Clinical outcome of magnetic resonance imaging-detected additional lesions in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer. 2011 Sep;14(3):213-8. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.3.213. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 27127579Cho YH, Cho KR, Park EK, Seo BK, Woo OH, Cho SB, Bae JW. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast. Iran J Radiol. 2016 Jan 23;13(1):e30909. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.30909. eCollection 2016 Jan.
- Background: PubMed 29758996Lee SM, Nam KJ, Choo KS, Kim JY, Jeong DW, Kim HY, Kim JY. Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition. Acta Radiol. 2018 Nov;59(11):1292-1299. doi: 10.1177/0284185118759139. Epub 2018 May 14.
- Background: PubMed 29154312Yang QX, Ji X, Feng LL, Zheng L, Zhou XQ, Wu Q, Chen X. Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement. J Xray Sci Technol. 2017;25(6):1033-1044. doi: 10.3233/XST-17311.
- Background: PubMed 26976623Machida Y, Shimauchi A, Tozaki M, Kuroki Y, Yoshida T, Fukuma E. Descriptors of Malignant Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI: Their Correlation to the Presence of Invasion. Acad Radiol. 2016 Jun;23(6):687-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
- BackgroundD'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013.
- Background: PubMed 25539260Chadashvili T, Ghosh E, Fein-Zachary V, Mehta TS, Venkataraman S, Dialani V, Slanetz PJ. Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):219-27. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12656.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Breast Neoplasm
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Neoplasm, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patterns of non-mass enhancement on breast MRI (time frame: Within one year; from March 2020 to March 2021). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04083027, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2024.