AzTrials
AzTrials

Onychomycosis of ToenailNCT04084782

An Internet Mediated Research Study to Assess the Quality of Life of Consumers With Self-reported Fungal Nail Infection (Onychomycosis) During Treatment With Scholl Fungal Nail.

An observational study of Onychomycosis of Toenail, run by Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the effect on quality of life of consumers with self-reported onychomycosis during the first 4 weeks of treatment in relation to the appearance of the infected toenail. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Onychomycosis of Toenail
What is being tested?
Fungal Nail Treatment Kit
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
13 Aug 2019to Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study is targeting consumers who chose to self-treat by purchasing the Fungal Nail product from the eCommerce platform. Only consumers who agree to participate in the consumer study after reviewing the information provided and provide electronic Consent will be recruited.

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Consumers who have purchased the product online
  • Consumers who are willing to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Female consumers who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Participants with Diabetes (Type I or II)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Stephen Fincham, MSc contact

+44 1482326151

steve.fincham@rb.com

Carol Hegarty, PhD contact

+44 1482326151

carol.hegarty@rb.com

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • RB Health

    Hull, East Yorkshire, HU78DS

    Stephen Fincham, MSc, 00441482582860, steve.fincham@rb.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

To evaluate the effect on quality of life of consumers with self-reported onychomycosis during the first 4 weeks of treatment in relation to the appearance of the infected toenail.

Read the detailed description

The appearance of the infected toe nail in those suffering from the disease may have a greater impact on quality of life than the severity of the disease. It is believed that a visual improvement in the appearance of the infected toenail at an earlier stage could have a positive impact on quality of life and encourage compliance with treatment. The aim of this consumer study is to evaluate the quality of life of consumers with onychomycosis and investigate its relation to the appearance of the infected toenail within the initial 4 weeks of treatment with Scholl Fungal Nail following its purchase from an eCommerce platform.

Being tested
Fungal Nail Treatment Kit
Keywords
Fungal Nail Infection, Internet Mediated Research Study
Medical subject headings
Onychomycosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fungal Nail Treatment KitDevice

    The treatment kit consists of 5 disposable nail files to be used to remove the top layer of the infected nail at various times throughout the use of the product and a liquid formulation and brush applicator.

Study groups in NCT04084782
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Onychomycosis groupSubjects in this group suffer from onychomycosis of the toenail, who chose to self treat by purchasing the product from an online platform.
Receives: Device: Fungal Nail Treatment Kit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Life Improvement

    Change in mean total score of the OnyCOE-t™ from baseline to end of inital treatment period. The domains are transformed into 0-100 scale where higher scores indicate better functioning. Changes from baseline of the mean total score will be evaluated with repeated measures t-tests.

    The questionnaire contains 7 domains:

    7-item Toenail Symptoms, containing Symptom Frequency (5 categories: 1 = never, 5 = very often) and Symptom Bothersomeness (5 categories: 1 = not at all bothered, 5 = extremely bothered) 8-item Appearance Problems (4 categories: 1 = very much a problem, 4 = not a problem) 7-item Physical Activities Problems (4 categories: 1 = very much a problem, 4 = not a problem)

    1-item Overall Problem (4 categories; 1 = very much a problem, 4 = not a problem) 7-item Stigma (5 categories: 0 = does not describe me at all, 4 = describes me very well) 3-item Treatment Satisfaction scale (5 categories: 1 = very satisfied, 5 very dissatisfied)

    Measured: 28 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Participant perception of the improvement in healthy appearance of their infected toenail.

    The participants will be asked to score the statement "My toenail looks healthy" (prior to product use) and "My toenail looks healthier" (at various time points following product application) using the following categories, strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, Strongly disagree. A successful outcome of this measure would be 70% Top 2 Boxes (T2B) (Strongly Agree or Agree) improvement in the healthier appearance of the target toenail at any post baseline assessment compare to Day 1 (prior to initial product application)

    Measured: Any timepoint up to day 28

  2. Participant perception of improvement in brightness of their infected toenail.

    The participants will be asked to score the statement "My toenail looks bright" (prior to product use) and "My toenail looks brighter" (at various time points following product application) using the following categories, strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, Strongly disagree. A successful outcome of this measure would be 70% T2B (Strongly Agree or Agree) improvement in the brighter appearance of the target toenail as determined by participant perceived questions at any post baseline assessment compare to Day 1 (prior to initial product application)

    Measured: Any timepoint up to day 28

  3. Participant perception of the improvement in colour of their infected toenail.

    The participants will be asked to score the statement "My toenail is its natural colour" (prior to product use) and "My toenail is returning to its natural colour" (at various time points following product application) using the following categories, strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, Strongly disagree. A successful outcome of this measure would be 70% T2B (Strongly Agree or Agree) improvement in the colour of the target toenail as determined by participant perceived questions at any post baseline assessment compare to Day 1 (prior to initial product application)

    Measured: Any timepoint up to day 28

  4. Participant perception of the improvement in smoothness of their infected toenail.

    The participants will be asked to score the statement "My toenail looks smooth" (prior to product use) and "My toenail looks smoother" (at various time points following product application) using the following categories, strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, Strongly disagree. A successful outcome of this measure would be 70% T2B (Strongly Agree or Agree) improvement in the smoothness of the target toenail as determined by participant perceived questions at any post baseline assessment compare to Day 1 (prior to initial product application)

    Measured: Any timepoint up to day 28

  5. Participant perception of improvement of their feelings of embarrassment associated with their infected toenail.

    The participants will be asked to score the statement "I am feeling embarrassed by the appearance of my toenail" (prior to product use and at various time points following product application) using the following categories, strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, Strongly disagree. A successful outcome of this measure would be 70% of responses show improvement from baseline and are in the T2B (Strongly Disagree or Disagree) in the feelings of embarrassment relating to the appearance of the target toenail as determined by participant perceived questions at any post baseline assessment compared to Day 1 (prior to initial product application)

    Measured: Any timepoint up to day 28

  6. Individual OnyCOE-t(TM) domain improvement

    Improvement in the mean scores on the individual OnyCOE-t(TM) domains (as detailed in outcome 1 above).

    The data will be summarised with means, standard deviations, range and 95% confidence intervals, changes from baseline of the mean individual domain score will be evaluated using repeated measures t-tests.

    Measured: 28 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2019
  2. Study start13 Aug 2019
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04084782
Sponsor's protocol ID
NPD89101
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
9 Aug 2019
Last updated
10 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The study sponsor may author journal article outlining the collective results of the study, however IPD will not be shared.

Publications

  • Velasquez-Agudelo V, Cardona-Arias JA. Meta-analysis of the utility of culture, biopsy, and direct KOH examination for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2258-3.

    PubMed 28222676
  • Sigurgeirsson B, Ghannoum MA, Osman-Ponchet H, Kerrouche N, Sidou F. Application of cosmetic nail varnish does not affect the antifungal efficacy of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer in the treatment of distal subungual toenail onychomycosis: results of a randomised active-controlled study and in vitro assays. Mycoses. 2016 May;59(5):319-26. doi: 10.1111/myc.12473. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

    PubMed 26867498
  • Christenson JK, Peterson GM, Naunton M, Bushell M, Kosari S, Baby KE, Thomas J. Challenges and Opportunities in the Management of Onychomycosis. J Fungi (Basel). 2018 Jul 24;4(3):87. doi: 10.3390/jof4030087.

    PubMed 30042327
  • Tosti A, Elewski BE. Treatment of onychomycosis with efinaconazole 10% topical solution and quality of life. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014 Nov;7(11):25-30.

    PubMed 25489379
  • Potter LP, Mathias SD, Raut M, Kianifard F, Tavakkol A. The OnyCOE-t questionnaire: responsiveness and clinical meaningfulness of a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for toenail onychomycosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 15;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-50.

    PubMed 16911778
  • Potter LP, Mathias SD, Raut M, Kianifard F, Landsman A, Tavakkol A. The impact of aggressive debridement used as an adjunct therapy with terbinafine on perceptions of patients undergoing treatment for toenail onychomycosis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007;18(1):46-52. doi: 10.1080/09546630600965004.

    PubMed 17373090

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Onychomycosis of Toenail, run by Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Stephen Fincham, MSc (+44 1482326151, steve.fincham@rb.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Life Improvement (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04084782, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in