Cesarean Section ComplicationsNCT04086277
Continuous Intrapartum Support to Reduce Primary Cesarean
A study testing Continuous Intrapartum Support in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
The objective of the study was to evaluate the intervention of intrapartum continuous support by a professional nurse with a university degree to reduce the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth rate, in women pregnant less than 40 years in the HGZ No. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section Complications
- What is being tested?
- Continuous Intrapartum Support
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 115 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women pregnant
- Nulliparous
- Term pregnancy
- Singleton pregnancy
- Vertex position
Who cannot join
- Patients with maternal, fetal, or mixed cesarean indications were excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The objective of the study was to evaluate the intervention of intrapartum continuous support by a professional nurse with a university degree to reduce the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth rate, in women pregnant less than 40 years in the HGZ No. 4 of the Guanajuato delegation of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico
Read the detailed description
Continuous intrapartum support is a strategy used to decrease the cesarean section rate, where multiple factors influence its effectiveness (start and duration of support, professional training of support staff, and others.). The objective of the study was to decrease the rate of deliveries by cesarean, through continuous intrapartum support during the active phase until birth, by a professional nurse with a university degree, the support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and counseling, for which a quasi-experimental study was conducted, with a study population of 115 women in labour (nulliparous, full-term, single product, vertex position) and under 40 years, a group control was formed (n = 55) who received routine maternal care and a study group (n = 60) who received continuous intrapartum support.
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Being tested
- Continuous Intrapartum Support
- Keywords
- cesarean section, Continuous intrapartum support, nulliparous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous Intrapartum SupportProcedure or surgery
Received the usual obstetric care plus continuous intrapartum support that was provided by a Bachelor of Nursing and Obstetrics who received prior training by a professional doula.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Women in labor with continuous intrapartum support | Experimental | Continuous intrapartum support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and advice. Receives: Procedure: Continuous Intrapartum Support |
| Women in labor without continuous intrapartum support. | No intervention | The no intervention group received the usual obstetric care, without continuous intrapartum support. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cesarean delivery rate
Percentage de cesarean section in the arms
Measured: Until the occurrence of delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time of labour
Labour covered the period of time from the active phase to birth. (Hours)
Measured: From the active phase up to delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)
Apgar score
Is a quick test performed on a baby at 1 and 5 minutes after birth
Measured: At 1 and 5 minutes after delivery
Obstetric analgesia
If obstetric analgesia was applied to reduce the pain of labour. (Yes/No)
If obstetric analgesia was applied to reduce the pain of labour. (Yes/No)
Measured: From the active phase up to delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)
Induction of labour
If oxytocin was used to induce labour. (Yes/No).
Measured: start of active phase (up to 1 hour)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2019
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2018
- Study completion31 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cesarean Section ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The control group was composed of women with labour, who attended the General Hospital of Zone 4 of the Guanajuato Delegation of the IMSS in the period of October-December 2016. The study group was composed of women with labour who presented at the same hospital to receive obstetric care in the period of October - December 2018.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, Mexico
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Fondo de Investigación en Salud (FIS), México
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luz Maria Cardona Torres, IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, Mexico
- Investigators
- Luz M Cardona, Master, Principal investigator, IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, México
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LMCT-02
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Through a public web address
Publications
World Health Organization and Human Reproduction Programme. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research ; 2015.
Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.
PubMed 28681500Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9.
PubMed 28854903McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):92-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x.
PubMed 18507579Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;109(3):198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
PubMed 20152972Khresheh R. Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery. 2010 Dec;26(6):e21-4. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
PubMed 19128863Wang M, Song Q, Xu J, Hu Z, Gong Y, Lee AC, Chen Q. Continuous support during labour in childbirth: a Cross-Sectional study in a university teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2119-0.
PubMed 30522458
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Continuous Intrapartum Support to Reduce Primary Cesarean
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LMCT-02
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Keywords
- cesarean section, Continuous intrapartum support, nulliparous
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, MexicoOther government
- Collaborators
- Fondo de Investigación en Salud (FIS), México
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the intervention of intrapartum continuous support by a professional nurse with a university degree to reduce the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth rate, in women pregnant less than 40 years in the HGZ No. 4 of the Guanajuato delegation of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico
Detailed description
Continuous intrapartum support is a strategy used to decrease the cesarean section rate, where multiple factors influence its effectiveness (start and duration of support, professional training of support staff, and others.). The objective of the study was to decrease the rate of deliveries by cesarean, through continuous intrapartum support during the active phase until birth, by a professional nurse with a university degree, the support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and counseling, for which a quasi-experimental study was conducted, with a study population of 115 women in labour (nulliparous, full-term, single product, vertex position) and under 40 years, a group control was formed (n = 55) who received routine maternal care and a study group (n = 60) who received continuous intrapartum support.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The control group was composed of women with labour, who attended the General Hospital of Zone 4 of the Guanajuato Delegation of the IMSS in the period of October-December 2016. The study group was composed of women with labour who presented at the same hospital to receive obstetric care in the period of October - December 2018.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Women in labor with continuous intrapartum support | Experimental | Procedure: Continuous Intrapartum SupportContinuous intrapartum support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and advice. |
| Women in labor without continuous intrapartum support. | No intervention | –The no intervention group received the usual obstetric care, without continuous intrapartum support. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women pregnant
- Nulliparous
- Term pregnancy
- Singleton pregnancy
- Vertex position
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with maternal, fetal, or mixed cesarean indications were excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Intrapartum SupportReceived the usual obstetric care plus continuous intrapartum support that was provided by a Bachelor of Nursing and Obstetrics who received prior training by a professional doula. | Procedure or surgery | Women in labor with continuous intrapartum support |
Primary outcome
Cesarean delivery rate
Time frame: Until the occurrence of delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)
Percentage de cesarean section in the arms
4 secondary outcomes
Time of labour
Time frame: From the active phase up to delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)
Apgar score
Time frame: At 1 and 5 minutes after delivery
Obstetric analgesia
Time frame: From the active phase up to delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)
Induction of labour
Time frame: start of active phase (up to 1 hour)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2019.
- BackgroundWorld Health Organization and Human Reproduction Programme. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research ; 2015.
- Background: PubMed 28681500Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.
- Background: PubMed 28854903Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9.
- Background: PubMed 18507579McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):92-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x.
- Background: PubMed 20152972Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;109(3):198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 19128863Khresheh R. Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery. 2010 Dec;26(6):e21-4. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 30522458Wang M, Song Q, Xu J, Hu Z, Gong Y, Lee AC, Chen Q. Continuous support during labour in childbirth: a Cross-Sectional study in a university teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2119-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Through a public web address
Related trials for Cesarean Section Complications
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Consciousness Depth (qCON) and Analgesia Depth (qNOX) Indices in General Anesthesia
Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585), Anesthesia
Recruiting
Reducing Chronic Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
Chronic Pain, Cesarean Section Complications
Not yet recruiting
LI4 and SP6 Acupuncture for Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Acute Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery
RecruitingPhase 4
Carbetocin Monotherapy Versus Carbetocin Plus Oxytocin Infusion in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Non-Inferiority Trial
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Recruiting
Effects of Music Therapy, Breathing Exercises, and Virtual Reality on Obstetric Recovery, Pain, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cesarean Section
Cesarean Section, Cesarean Section Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luz M Cardona, Master principal investigator
IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, México
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous Intrapartum Support in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cesarean delivery rate (time frame: Until the occurrence of delivery (expected range from 6 hours to 12 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04086277, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2019.