Esophageal CancerDARTNCT04086901
Dose Escalated Adaptive RadioTherapy in Definitive Chemo-radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
A study testing Radiotherapy dose escalation in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by University of Aarhus at 3 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
In Denmark, 1000 new cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer occur every year. Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Radiotherapy dose escalation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2020to 1 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be included in the study:
- Patients with histologically verified squamous cell or adenocarcinoma (including signet cell carcinoma) of the oesophagus or GEJ.
- Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) assessment and treatment recommendation; deemed nonresectable and/or inoperable.
- TNM stage (8th edition): cT1-4a or cN+, cM0-1 (M1 disease limited to metastatic lymph nodes)
- Age ≥18 years.
- Performance status ≤2.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Adequate cardiac, lung and renal function measured according to local guidelines.
- Adequate laboratory findings:
- haematological: haemoglobin > 90 g/L, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 75 x 109/L
- hepatic: bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, ALAT ≤ 3 x ULN
- renal: creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN
- Suitability to undergo curatively intended chemoradiation therapy.
- Ability to adhere to procedures for study and follow-up.
- Women must present a negative pregnancy test. Fertile men and women must use effective contraception. Fertile women included in the study must use oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, depot injection of progestin subdermal implantation, a hormonal vaginal ring, or transdermal patch during the study treatment and one month after.
- Signed informed consent to participate in the study, including acceptance that dose plan and scans will be stored in a national dose plan bank, and the remaining data stored in a central database.
- A standard plan for radiotherapy with homogenous 50 Gy / 25 fractions, meeting all dose constraints for normal tissue, must be achievable.
Who cannot join
- Patients who will meet one or more of the following exclusion criteria cannot be included in this study:
- Prior oncological treatment or surgical resection for the present disease
- Broncho-pulmonary fistula verified by bronchoscopy
- Any other active malignancies which may compromise study protocol or endpoints except for basal or squamous cell skin cancer
- Any unstable systemic disease (including clinically significant cardiovascular disease, unstable angina, New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade III-IV congestive heart, severe hepatic, renal or metabolic disease or active inflammatory bowel disease)
- Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy greater than grade 1 (CTCAE version 4.03)
- Any other serious or uncontrolled illness which in the opinion of the investigator makes it undesirable for the patient to enter the trial
- Severely decreased lung function
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Denmark3 sites
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Central Jutland, 8200
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2100
Odense Universityhospital
Odense, Fyn, 5000
About this study
Official title: Dose Escalated Adaptive RadioTherapy - a Randomised Phase II Study of Definitive Chemo-radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
In Denmark, 1000 new cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer occur every year. Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies
This study will examine the effect of escalation of increasing the radiation dose to the most Positron Emissions Tomografi (PET) avid part of the tumour and lymph nodes compared to a standard uniform dose distribution.
Read the detailed description
In Denmark, there are almost 900 new cases of oesphageal and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer per year, with a 5-year survival rate below 20% for the entire group and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 40% for the curatively treated patients.
Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies.
Survival is affected by several factors like stage, gender and comorbidity, but also by lack of local and regional tumour control. Several studies examined pattern of failure in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Most patients experience local failure, and most local failures were located in the Gross Tumor volume (GTV). These findings imply that future therapeutic strategies should focus on improving local control in order to increase successful treatment outcome, although care should be taken to ensure that this does not come at the cost of excess treatment related toxicity.
Strategies to overcome in-GTV failures include radiotherapy-sensitizing agents and dose escalation, the latter has been evaluated in several studies with heterogeneous results.
The role of Positron Emissions Tomografi/ComputerTomografi (PET/CT) in radiotherapy planning has been examined and the diagnostic value of PET/CT in oesophageal cancer is widely accepted, whereas the role in assessing tumour response to treatment is less well established. Flour-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG)-PET scans allow for measurement of changes in tumour cell metabolism that precede changes in tumour size, and reduction in FDG uptake during neoadjuvant therapy has been correlated with favourable outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer.
PET-positive areas have been suggested as suitable targets for dose-escalation strategies, since studies suggested that high FDG uptake on pre-treatment PET/CT identifies tumour sub-volumes that are at greater risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
The major concern in a dose escalation study is severe and potentially lethal normal tissue complications. Oesophageal cancer irradiation usually results in irradiation of the oesophagus, lungs and heart due to the anatomical tumour location, which may result in acute toxicities dominated by radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis (leading to inappropriate nutricial intake). Late toxicities include oesophageal fistula/ulcers, cardiac events, pulmonary fibrosis, or even deaths related to radiation exposure. Dose gradients between the target and normal tissue may be sharp, in order to limit the norml tissue dose and hence the risk of unacceptable toxicity, while maintaining high doses to the tumour.
Current study Previous studies have suggested that escalating the radiation dose to the GTV may provide improved local control, but requires great caution in relation to normal tissue irradiation to avoid unacceptable side effects. The investigators propose a study approach where both requirements will be met. FDG-PET scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the GTV will be escalated to a high dose (63Gray (Gy) in the FDG-PET avid areas in the primary tumour and 60 Gy in the lymph nodes) while Clinical target volume (CTV) and Planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose. The patients will be randomized between this dose-escalated arm and a standard arm with 50Gy in 25 fractions. The total number of fractions will be 25 in both arms. Dose escalation will be limited by normal tissues constraints.
The study will be conducted with modern state-of-the-art radiotherapy techniques, including advanced dose calculation algorithms, daily image guidance, and adaptation of the treatment plan during treatment if needed. The participating centres must implement and comply with a quality assurance program in order to maintain high treatment quality in the study.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- Radiotherapy dose escalation
- Keywords
- Radiotherapy, Dose escalation, Definitive chemo-radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiotherapy dose escalationRadiation
Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET) scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the Gross tumor volume (GTV) will be escalated to a high dose while clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dose escalation Arm | Experimental | Chemo-radiotherapy with radiotherapy dose escalation based on Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG/PET) scans Receives: Radiation: Radiotherapy dose escalation |
| Standard | No intervention | Standard chemo-radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Loco-regional control
Loco-regional control evaluated with Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET)
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Acute and late toxicity
Acute and late toxicity during and after treatment and at follow-up visits
Measured: 5 years
Overall survival
Number of patients surviving
Measured: 1 and 5 years
Progression-free survival
Survival without disease progression
Measured: 1 and 5 years
Hospitalization
Time spent at hospital and number of hospitalizations due to radiation-induced toxicity
Measured: 12 months
Mean and maximum dose distributions
Mean and maximum doses for all organs at risk will be compared between proton therapy (in silico) and (clinical) IMRT/VMAT photon therapy.
Measured: 6 months
Dose distributions
V5, V10, V15, V20, V25, V30, V35, V40, V45 and V50 for all organs at risk will be compared between proton therapy (in silico) and (clinical) IMRT/VMAT photon therapy.
Measured: 6 months
Pattern of failure in GTV-T
Number of Participants with failure in the Gross tumor volume-tumor (GTV-T)
Measured: 5 years
Pattern of failure in GTV-N
Number of Participants with failure in the Gross tumor volume-nodes (GTV-N)
Measured: 5 years
Pattern of failure in GTV-PET
Number of Participants with failure in Gross tumor volume-PET avid (GTV-PET)
Measured: 5 years
Pattern of failure in CTV
Number of Participants with failure in the clinical target volume (CTV)
Measured: 5 years
Pattern of failure in PTV
Number of Participants with failure in the Planning target volume (PTV)
Measured: 5 years
Pattern of failure outside PTV
Number of Participants with failure in the outside the Planning target volume (PTV)
Measured: 5 years
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, intensity
Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of intensity
Measured: 12 months
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, shape
Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of shape
Measured: 12 months
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, heterogeniety
Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of heterogeniety
Measured: 12 months
Correlation between loco-regional progression after treatment and changes in FDG-PET uptake pattern during standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy.
Response will be measured based on PERCIST and using radiomics characterizing the tumour in terms of uptake intensity, shape, and volumes.
Measured: 12 months
Treatment completion rate
Number of patients completing all radiotherapy treatments and receiving at least one cycle of chemotherapy
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2019
- Study start1 Jan 2020
- Primary completion1 Mar 2021
- Study completion1 Mar 2021
Why it stopped: New data show no effect of dose escalation and also poor recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Odense University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hanna R Mortensen, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086901
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DART
- Acronym
- DART
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will not be shared
Publications
Sakanaka K, Ishida Y, Fujii K, Ishihara Y, Nakamura M, Hiraoka M, Mizowaki T. Radiation Dose-escalated Chemoradiotherapy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Thoracic Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-institution Phase I Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Mar;33(3):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
PubMed 32768158
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dose Escalated Adaptive RadioTherapy - a Randomised Phase II Study of Definitive Chemo-radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086901
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DART / DART
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- Radiotherapy, Dose escalation, Definitive chemo-radiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: New data show no effect of dose escalation and also poor recruitment
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Odense University Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In Denmark, 1000 new cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer occur every year. Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies
This study will examine the effect of escalation of increasing the radiation dose to the most Positron Emissions Tomografi (PET) avid part of the tumour and lymph nodes compared to a standard uniform dose distribution.
Detailed description
In Denmark, there are almost 900 new cases of oesphageal and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer per year, with a 5-year survival rate below 20% for the entire group and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 40% for the curatively treated patients.
Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies.
Survival is affected by several factors like stage, gender and comorbidity, but also by lack of local and regional tumour control. Several studies examined pattern of failure in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Most patients experience local failure, and most local failures were located in the Gross Tumor volume (GTV). These findings imply that future therapeutic strategies should focus on improving local control in order to increase successful treatment outcome, although care should be taken to ensure that this does not come at the cost of excess treatment related toxicity.
Strategies to overcome in-GTV failures include radiotherapy-sensitizing agents and dose escalation, the latter has been evaluated in several studies with heterogeneous results.
The role of Positron Emissions Tomografi/ComputerTomografi (PET/CT) in radiotherapy planning has been examined and the diagnostic value of PET/CT in oesophageal cancer is widely accepted, whereas the role in assessing tumour response to treatment is less well established. Flour-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG)-PET scans allow for measurement of changes in tumour cell metabolism that precede changes in tumour size, and reduction in FDG uptake during neoadjuvant therapy has been correlated with favourable outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer.
PET-positive areas have been suggested as suitable targets for dose-escalation strategies, since studies suggested that high FDG uptake on pre-treatment PET/CT identifies tumour sub-volumes that are at greater risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
The major concern in a dose escalation study is severe and potentially lethal normal tissue complications. Oesophageal cancer irradiation usually results in irradiation of the oesophagus, lungs and heart due to the anatomical tumour location, which may result in acute toxicities dominated by radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis (leading to inappropriate nutricial intake). Late toxicities include oesophageal fistula/ulcers, cardiac events, pulmonary fibrosis, or even deaths related to radiation exposure. Dose gradients between the target and normal tissue may be sharp, in order to limit the norml tissue dose and hence the risk of unacceptable toxicity, while maintaining high doses to the tumour.
Current study Previous studies have suggested that escalating the radiation dose to the GTV may provide improved local control, but requires great caution in relation to normal tissue irradiation to avoid unacceptable side effects. The investigators propose a study approach where both requirements will be met. FDG-PET scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the GTV will be escalated to a high dose (63Gray (Gy) in the FDG-PET avid areas in the primary tumour and 60 Gy in the lymph nodes) while Clinical target volume (CTV) and Planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose. The patients will be randomized between this dose-escalated arm and a standard arm with 50Gy in 25 fractions. The total number of fractions will be 25 in both arms. Dose escalation will be limited by normal tissues constraints.
The study will be conducted with modern state-of-the-art radiotherapy techniques, including advanced dose calculation algorithms, daily image guidance, and adaptation of the treatment plan during treatment if needed. The participating centres must implement and comply with a quality assurance program in order to maintain high treatment quality in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dose escalation Arm | Experimental | Radiation: Radiotherapy dose escalationChemo-radiotherapy with radiotherapy dose escalation based on Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG/PET) scans |
| Standard | No intervention | –Standard chemo-radiotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- The patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be included in the study:
- Patients with histologically verified squamous cell or adenocarcinoma (including signet cell carcinoma) of the oesophagus or GEJ.
- Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) assessment and treatment recommendation; deemed nonresectable and/or inoperable.
- TNM stage (8th edition): cT1-4a or cN+, cM0-1 (M1 disease limited to metastatic lymph nodes)
- Age ≥18 years.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients who will meet one or more of the following exclusion criteria cannot be included in this study:
- Prior oncological treatment or surgical resection for the present disease
- Broncho-pulmonary fistula verified by bronchoscopy
- Any other active malignancies which may compromise study protocol or endpoints except for basal or squamous cell skin cancer
- Any unstable systemic disease (including clinically significant cardiovascular disease, unstable angina, New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade III-IV congestive heart, severe hepatic, renal or metabolic disease or active inflammatory bowel disease)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy dose escalationFlour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET) scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the Gross tumor volume (GTV) will be escalated to a high dose while clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose. | Radiation | Dose escalation Arm |
Primary outcome
Loco-regional control
Time frame: 12 months
Loco-regional control evaluated with Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET)
17 secondary outcomes
Acute and late toxicity
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 1 and 5 years
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 1 and 5 years
Hospitalization
Time frame: 12 months
Mean and maximum dose distributions
Time frame: 6 months
Dose distributions
Time frame: 6 months
Pattern of failure in GTV-T
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in GTV-N
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in GTV-PET
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in CTV
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in PTV
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure outside PTV
Time frame: 5 years
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, intensity
Time frame: 12 months
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, shape
Time frame: 12 months
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, heterogeniety
Time frame: 12 months
Correlation between loco-regional progression after treatment and changes in FDG-PET uptake pattern during standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy.
Time frame: 12 months
Treatment completion rate
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: New data show no effect of dose escalation and also poor recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32768158Sakanaka K, Ishida Y, Fujii K, Ishihara Y, Nakamura M, Hiraoka M, Mizowaki T. Radiation Dose-escalated Chemoradiotherapy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Thoracic Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-institution Phase I Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Mar;33(3):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will not be shared
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hanna R Mortensen, MD PhD principal investigator
Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radiotherapy dose escalation in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by University of Aarhus at 3 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: New data show no effect of dose escalation and also poor recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Loco-regional control (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04086901, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2021.