AzTrials
AzTrials

StigmatizationNCT04087954

Evaluation the Impact of Self-Stigma Reduction Program on Psychosocial Outcomes Among People Diagnosed With Schizophrenia

A study testing Stigma reduction program in people with Stigmatization, run by Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences at 1 site in Jordan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Backgrounds: Research evidence suggests that people diagnosed with schizophrenia (PDwS) experience higher level of stigma compared with other forms of mental illness, and they are prone to internalize stereotype, which exacerbates severity of psychiatric symptoms, reduces their psychosocial treatment adherence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stigmatization
What is being tested?
Stigma reduction program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
278 participants
Where
1 siteJordan
Study dates
1 Nov 2017to 22 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • People diagnosed with schizophrenia who had a learning disability, with known organic mental disorder, substance abuse

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jordan1 site
  • Ministry of Health

    Amman, 00962

Other trials in Jordan

About this study

Backgrounds: Research evidence suggests that people diagnosed with schizophrenia (PDwS) experience higher level of stigma compared with other forms of mental illness, and they are prone to internalize stereotype, which exacerbates severity of psychiatric symptoms, reduces their psychosocial treatment adherence. The purpose of the study to evaluate the effectiveness of stigma reduction program on the perceived stigma, psychiatric symptoms, compliance with psychosocial intervention and self-efficacy.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 to December 2018 with 278 PDwS. Participants aged 18 years or older with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, from four outpatient mental health clinics in Jordan, were randomly assigned to receive 13 sessions of a booklet form of stigma reduction program (n = 140) (psycho-education, cognitive behavioural therapy and social skills training), and treatment as usual [TAU] (intervention, n = 140), or TAU (control, n = 138). Participants were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention (post-treatment1) and at six months follow-up. The primary outcome measure was change in stigma perception. Secondary outcomes were psychiatric symptoms, compliance with psychosocial interventions and self-efficacy.

Conditions
Stigmatization
Being tested
Stigma reduction program
Medical subject headings
Stereotyping

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stigma reduction programBehavioural

    Participants in the intervention group received treatment as usual, supported with stigma reduction program booklets each fortnight for 26 weeks. The stigma reduction program includes three modules; psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy and social skills training. The program aims to enhance patient understanding of Schizophrenia and foster communication skills which supposed to increase self-confidence and strengthen communication networking with society.

    Psychoeducation module purposes at introducing about the concepts of schizophrenia, providing patient with essential information about schizophrenia, including nature of disease, sign/symptoms, treatment strategies, side effects of medication. Social Skills Training (SST) module purposes at fostering communication skills among patient diagnosed with schizophrenia. This assists the participants to be re-integrated in the society and build a harmonious atmosphere in the community.

Study groups in NCT04087954
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention vs controlExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Stigma reduction program
ControlNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome was stigma perception measured by the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)

    The primary outcome was stigma perception measured by the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI). This scale has 29 items measure service user experience of stigma. It is composed of 5 subscales: alienation (6 items), stereotype endorsement (7 items), discrimination experience (5 items), social withdrawal (6 items), and stigma resistance (5 items). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The five stigma resistance subscale items are reverse-coded, and also serve as a validity check. The stigma resistance score is calculated by subtracting the actual value from five. Therefore, stigma resistance displays the same direction of correlation as the other four subscales. A high total score on the ISMI scale indicates more severe internalized stigmatization. The internal consistency is (α=0.90) and test-retest reliability (r=0.92) have been reported for the ISMI (Ritsher \& Phelan, 2004).

    Measured: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS)

    PANSS measures 30 clinical symptoms of schizophrenia; each symptom is scored from 1 indicating absence of psychopathology to 7 indicating severe psychopathology, with higher scores indicating poorer mental health status. Internal reliability and criterion-related validity are 0.77 (positive scale) and 0.77 (negative scale), and 0.52 with the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) (Kay, Fiszbein, \& Opfer, 1987). The primary researcher (AH) attended training delivered by the PANSS Institute, USA, and trained the outcomes assessors. An inter-rater reliability checked prior to the study, between assessors was 0.75 and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation (ICC) was 0.79. This tool was administered in English by the primary researcher (AH) and research assistants.

    Measured: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)

  2. The Psychosocial Treatment Compliance Scale (PTCS)

    The Psychosocial Treatment Compliance Scale (PTCS) (Tsang et al., 2006) has 17 items rated from "(1) never" to "(5) always". The PTCS has the "participation" (12 items) and "attendance" (5 items) subscales. The scale has two main parts, participation which indicates the level of participants engagement and participation in the psychosocial interventions (e.g., "was willing to follow therapists' instructions"). However, attendance measures that participants commitment to scheduled appointments (e.g., "attended prescribed psychosocial treatment on time"). The scale has good psychometric properties (internal consistency: α=.87-.96; test-retest reliability: ICC=.86-.90) were demonstrated for the subscales (Tsang et al., 2006).

    Measured: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)

  3. The Chinese General Self-efficacy Scale (CGSS)

    The Chinese General Self-efficacy Scale (CGSS) developed by (Chiu \& Tsang, 2004). This scale has a 10-item. Scoring system ranges from "(1) Not at all true" to "(4) Exactly true". Participants with higher score reflect better general self-efficacy. The CGSS demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.92-0.93) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.75-0.94) (Chiu \& Tsang, 2004).

    Measured: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2019
  2. Study start1 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion22 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
278 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04087954
Sponsor's protocol ID
5115
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
7 Sep 2019
Last updated
12 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hasan AA, Alasmee N. Evaluation of the impact of a self-stigma reduction programme on psychosocial outcomes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. J Ment Health. 2022 Feb;31(1):83-91. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1922628. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

    PubMed 34517747

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stigma reduction program in people with Stigmatization, run by Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences at 1 site in Jordan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Jordan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome was stigma perception measured by the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI) (time frame: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04087954, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in