Risk ReductionSTRONG-CSNCT04088968
STRONG for Surgery & Strong for Life - Against All Odds: Intensive Prehabilitation for Risk Reduction in Cancer Surgery
A study testing Prehabilitation in people with Risk Reduction and Urological Cancer, run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Despite knowledge about the effect of preventive measures in lifestyle, smoking,nutrition, alcohol and physical activity (SNAP), there is a lack of systematic assessment of the overall lifestyle of the patient before surgery and knowledge about how lifestyle interventions can be organized in connection with cancer… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Risk Reduction, Urological Cancer, Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Prehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2022to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients > 18 years scheduled for cystectomy due to bladder cancer
- Referral to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Screened positive for minimum 1 SNAP factor
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Allergy to pharmaceutical support (Nicotine Replacement Therapy, Disulfiram)
- Contraindications to exercise.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Dept Urology 2112, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Region H, 2100
Susanne V Lauridsen, PhD, +4535451704, susanne.vahr.lauridsen@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: STRONG for Surgery & Strong for Life - Against All Odds: Intensive Prehabilitation Including Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical Activity for Risk Reduction in Cancer Surgery
Despite knowledge about the effect of preventive measures in lifestyle, smoking,nutrition, alcohol and physical activity (SNAP), there is a lack of systematic assessment of the overall lifestyle of the patient before surgery and knowledge about how lifestyle interventions can be organized in connection with cancer surgery. The intention with prehabilitation is to optimize the individual's risk factors and personal burdens that can affect the clinical and patient reported outcomes after surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive SNAP interventions compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in ptt undergoing urological cancer surgery on surgical risk reduction.
Read the detailed description
The project contains three clinical intervention studies, in total including 100 urological cancer patients screened positive for at least 1 SNAP factor:
- Efficacy and preferences of intensive SNAP-Interventions among patients with at least one SNAP factor and undertaking neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. A randomised controlled trial with nested interviews (42 patients).
II. Implementation and preferences of intensive SNAP-Interventions among patients with kidney cancer undergoing nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy. An implementation feasibility study including interviews (20 patients).
III. Reach out and effect as well as preferences of perioperative intensive smoking cessation intervention via the municipality clinic compared to the surgical department among smokers with non-invasive bladder cancer treated with Trans-Urethral Resection of the Bladder (TUR-B). A randomised controlled trial with nested interviews (38 patients).
The intervention groups receive minimum five educational sessions tailored to individual needs over six weeks perioperatively. The control groups receive standard care.
- Conditions
- Risk Reduction, Urological Cancer, Surgery, Life Style
- Being tested
- Prehabilitation
- Keywords
- Postoperative complications, Prehabilitation, Surgical risk reduction, Smoking, Alcohol drinking, Physical activity, Malnutrition, Obesity, Patient preferences, Randomised controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Risk Reduction Behavior, Urologic Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications, Smoking, Alcohol Drinking, Motor Activity, Malnutrition, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PrehabilitationBehavioural
Also called smoking cessation, alcohol cessation, physical activity, nutritional support for malnutrition and obesity
Patients screened positive for minimun 1 SNAP factor will be offered enrollment in the study and have an individualized plan for the prehabilitation intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation | Experimental | Intervention: Patients allocated to the intervention group receive weekly counselling sessions in 6 weeks as an integrated prehabilitation program tailored to meet the individual patient's need for risk reduction at surgery. It is introduced via the surgical 'Engage in the process of change'. The smoking and alcohol cessation intervention follows the Gold Standard Programme and patients in the intervention group are introduced to a standardized exercise training programme taking individualized needs into account. Nutritional support is also individualized. Receives: Behavioral: Prehabilitation |
| Treatment as usual | No intervention | Treatment as ususal covers shorter interventions, e.g. advice, brief counselling, and handing out the national folders on smoking and alcohol and surgery. Patients are ensured that they are free to access support to lifestyle changes in the community. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with risk reduction at surgery
Corresponding at least 1 step for 1 or more risky lifestyles (but only smoking in study III) on the ASA-score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification from 1-5, lower is better)
Measured: End of intervention/ at surgery
Secondary outcomes (9)
Health related quality of life (HRQoL)
Mean difference of HRQoL between groups measured with EQ5D (5 level quality of life score (level 1 =no problems, level 2-5 =problems)
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with any postoperative complication
Scored by the Comprehensive Complication Index, a linear scale ranging from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death)
Measured: 30 days
Number of successful tobacco quitters
Successful quitting smoking: Study I+ II+ III
- Successful quitting alcohol intake at 6 weeks and below risky limits at 6 months: Study I.
- Physical activity at least 30 minutes per day: Study I.
- Malnutrition: Not at risk of malnutrition: Study I. Obesity: 5% -10 % loss of body fat mass and below 1% gain of body fat mass at 6 months (without developing malnutrition)
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of successful alcohol quitters
Successful quitting alcohol: Study I+II
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients being physical active at least 30 min per day
Minutes physical active measured by an accelerometer (longer time is better) : Study I+II
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients not at risk of malnutrition
NRS2002 (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002) score>2. Lower is better: Study I+II
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients not at risk of obesity
BMI (Body Mass Index)<30. Lower is better : Study I+II
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with improved frailty level
Measured by Lammers definition: Lower is better: Study I+II+III
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with any reduction in lifestyle
Measured by yes/no. Study I+II+III
Measured: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2019
- Study start1 Jan 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Risk ReductionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised Controlled Trials, Implementation feasibilty trial, Interviews nested
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bispebjerg Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hanne Tonnesen, Bispebjerg Hospital
- Investigators
- Hanne Tonnesen, Professor MD, Principal investigator, WHOCC, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, RegH, Copenhagen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04088968
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STRONG Cancer Surg (COMPAS)
- Acronym
- STRONG-CS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Tonnesen H, Lydom LN, Joensen UN, Egerod I, Pappot H, Lauridsen SV. STRONG for Surgery & Strong for Life - against all odds: intensive prehabilitation including smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity for risk reduction in cancer surgery - a protocol for an RCT with nested interview study (STRONG-Cancer). Trials. 2022 Apr 21;23(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06272-2.
PubMed 35449008
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- STRONG for Surgery & Strong for Life - Against All Odds: Intensive Prehabilitation Including Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical Activity for Risk Reduction in Cancer Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04088968
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRONG-CS / STRONG Cancer Surg (COMPAS)
- Conditions
- Risk Reduction, Urological Cancer, Surgery, Life Style
- Keywords
- Postoperative complications, Prehabilitation, Surgical risk reduction, Smoking, Alcohol drinking, Physical activity, Malnutrition, Obesity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bispebjerg HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite knowledge about the effect of preventive measures in lifestyle, smoking,nutrition, alcohol and physical activity (SNAP), there is a lack of systematic assessment of the overall lifestyle of the patient before surgery and knowledge about how lifestyle interventions can be organized in connection with cancer surgery. The intention with prehabilitation is to optimize the individual's risk factors and personal burdens that can affect the clinical and patient reported outcomes after surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive SNAP interventions compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in ptt undergoing urological cancer surgery on surgical risk reduction.
Detailed description
The project contains three clinical intervention studies, in total including 100 urological cancer patients screened positive for at least 1 SNAP factor:
- Efficacy and preferences of intensive SNAP-Interventions among patients with at least one SNAP factor and undertaking neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. A randomised controlled trial with nested interviews (42 patients).
II. Implementation and preferences of intensive SNAP-Interventions among patients with kidney cancer undergoing nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy. An implementation feasibility study including interviews (20 patients).
III. Reach out and effect as well as preferences of perioperative intensive smoking cessation intervention via the municipality clinic compared to the surgical department among smokers with non-invasive bladder cancer treated with Trans-Urethral Resection of the Bladder (TUR-B). A randomised controlled trial with nested interviews (38 patients).
The intervention groups receive minimum five educational sessions tailored to individual needs over six weeks perioperatively. The control groups receive standard care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomised Controlled Trials, Implementation feasibilty trial, Interviews nested
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation | Experimental | Behavioral: PrehabilitationIntervention: Patients allocated to the intervention group receive weekly counselling sessions in 6 weeks as an integrated prehabilitation program tailored to meet the individual patient's need for risk reduction at surgery. It is introduced via the surgical 'Engage in the process of change'. The smoking and alcohol cessation intervention follows the Gold Standard Programme and patients in the intervention group are introduced to a standardized exercise training programme taking individualized needs into account. Nutritional support is also individualized. |
| Treatment as usual | No intervention | –Treatment as ususal covers shorter interventions, e.g. advice, brief counselling, and handing out the national folders on smoking and alcohol and surgery. Patients are ensured that they are free to access support to lifestyle changes in the community. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients > 18 years scheduled for cystectomy due to bladder cancer
- Referral to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Screened positive for minimum 1 SNAP factor
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Allergy to pharmaceutical support (Nicotine Replacement Therapy, Disulfiram)
- Contraindications to exercise.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PrehabilitationAlso: smoking cessation, alcohol cessation, physical activity, nutritional support for malnutrition and obesityPatients screened positive for minimun 1 SNAP factor will be offered enrollment in the study and have an individualized plan for the prehabilitation intervention. | Behavioural | Prehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with risk reduction at surgery
Time frame: End of intervention/ at surgery
Corresponding at least 1 step for 1 or more risky lifestyles (but only smoking in study III) on the ASA-score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification from 1-5, lower is better)
9 secondary outcomes
Health related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with any postoperative complication
Time frame: 30 days
Number of successful tobacco quitters
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of successful alcohol quitters
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients being physical active at least 30 min per day
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients not at risk of malnutrition
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients not at risk of obesity
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with improved frailty level
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with any reduction in lifestyle
Time frame: 6 weeks/day at surgery, at 1 month and through study completion, an average of 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35449008Tonnesen H, Lydom LN, Joensen UN, Egerod I, Pappot H, Lauridsen SV. STRONG for Surgery & Strong for Life - against all odds: intensive prehabilitation including smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity for risk reduction in cancer surgery - a protocol for an RCT with nested interview study (STRONG-Cancer). Trials. 2022 Apr 21;23(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06272-2.
Related trials for Risk Reduction
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Exposure With Air Cleaners and Technology
Asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Active, not recruiting
Eat, Move, Live Program for the Reduction of Cancer and Chronic Disease Risk in Underserved Communities
Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity-Related Malignant Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hanne Tonnesen, Professor MD principal investigator
WHOCC, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, RegH, Copenhagen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prehabilitation in people with Risk Reduction and Urological Cancer, run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hanne Tønnesen, Professor MD (+4538163840, hanne.tonnesen@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with risk reduction at surgery (time frame: End of intervention/ at surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04088968, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2024.