Diaphragm DiseaseNCT04098939
Replaceability of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Hemidiaphragm Excursion
An observational study of Diaphragm Disease, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Precise measurement of diaphragm function is difficult. Several methods exist. No are sufficiently validated. With this study, the investigators wish to investigate the validity of different ultrasound and radiological methods and compare them with inspiratory pressure measurements. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diaphragm Disease
- What is being tested?
- Diaphragm evaluation
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 May 2020to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Healthy participants. Participants with prior COVID-19 infection. Participants with lung diseases. Participants with heart diseases.
Who may be able to join
- Completed informed consent
- one of the following conditions:
- Healthy participants, control group
- Lung disease group.
- COPD or
- Ideopatic pulmonary fibrosis.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Heart disease group.
- Heart disease that lead to:
- heart transplantat or
- left ventricular assist device.
Who cannot join
- Known diaphragm dysfunction.
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Pleural effusion.
- Pneumothorax.
- In the healthy group: Significant comorbidity that affect heart og lung function (arterial hypertention, mild valve disease and COPD without symptoms are accepted).
- In the healthy group and in the lung disease group: Previous thorax surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Replaceability of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Hemidiaphragm Excursion"
Precise measurement of diaphragm function is difficult. Several methods exist. No are sufficiently validated.
With this study, the investigators wish to investigate the validity of different ultrasound and radiological methods and compare them with inspiratory pressure measurements.
Read the detailed description
Fluoroscopy assessment of diaphragm motility is obtained and simultaneously correlated to sonographic assessments of motility.
- Conditions
- Diaphragm Disease
- Being tested
- Diaphragm evaluation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diaphragm evaluationDiagnostic test
Ultrasound and radiographic evaluation of diaphragm function
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | Participants undergoing ultrasound and fluoroscopy assessment of diaphragm excursion. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm evaluation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diaphragm Function
Movement of diaphragm measured with ultrasound Ultrasound measures: Diaphragm excursion in centimeters with M-mode.
Measured: during intervention, up to 1 hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2019
- Study start1 May 2020
- Primary completion1 Jun 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diaphragm DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Søren H Skaarup, Study chair, Aarhus University HospitalPeter Juhl-Olsen, Study chair, Aarhus University HospitalBrian Løgstrup, Study chair, Aarhus University HospitalThomas Birkelund, Study chair, Aarhus University HospitalMorten Bendixen, Study chair, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04098939
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Diaphragm Study AUH
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Replaceability of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Hemidiaphragm Excursion"
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04098939
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Diaphragm Study AUH
- Conditions
- Diaphragm Disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Dec 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Precise measurement of diaphragm function is difficult. Several methods exist. No are sufficiently validated.
With this study, the investigators wish to investigate the validity of different ultrasound and radiological methods and compare them with inspiratory pressure measurements.
Detailed description
Fluoroscopy assessment of diaphragm motility is obtained and simultaneously correlated to sonographic assessments of motility.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | – | Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm evaluationParticipants undergoing ultrasound and fluoroscopy assessment of diaphragm excursion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Healthy participants. Participants with prior COVID-19 infection. Participants with lung diseases. Participants with heart diseases.
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Completed informed consent
- one of the following conditions:
- heart transplantat or
- left ventricular assist device.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Known diaphragm dysfunction.
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Pleural effusion.
- Pneumothorax.
- In the healthy group: Significant comorbidity that affect heart og lung function (arterial hypertention, mild valve disease and COPD without symptoms are accepted).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diaphragm evaluationUltrasound and radiographic evaluation of diaphragm function | Diagnostic test | Participants |
Primary outcome
Diaphragm Function
Time frame: during intervention, up to 1 hour
Movement of diaphragm measured with ultrasound Ultrasound measures: Diaphragm excursion in centimeters with M-mode.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diaphragm Disease
Active, not recruiting
Diaphragm Mobilization in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
North American Fetal Therapy Network Prospective Registry for Long-term Outcome Following Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion in Severe Left and Right Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Active, not recruiting
Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion in Severe Left Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia, Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Recruiting
Inspiratory Muscle Training and Diaphragmatic Breathing in GAD
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Not yet recruiting
Abdominal Air-Pressure Resistance Versus Abdominal Weight Training for Improving Diaphragm Function in Healthy Young Adults
Diaphragm Thickness, Dyspnoea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Søren H Skaarup study chair
Aarhus University Hospital
Peter Juhl-Olsen study chair
Aarhus University Hospital
Brian Løgstrup study chair
Aarhus University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diaphragm Disease, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diaphragm Function (time frame: during intervention, up to 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2024.