AzTrials
AzTrials

Opioid Use, UnspecifiedNCT04099030

Effect of Opioid Shortage on Drug Selection

An observational study of Opioid Use, Unspecified, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will look at the effects of fentanyl shortage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases. The opioid shortage, specifically hydromorphone and fentanyl, caused a decrease in administration of opioid analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy intraoperatively. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Opioid Use, Unspecified
How many people
1,668 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Apr 2019to 13 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center General ORS

Who may be able to join

  • All Genders
  • History of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist classification (ASA) 1-4 emergent and Non emergent
  • Adult >18 years old
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Main Operating rooms

Who cannot join

  • Regional Anesthetic
  • ASA 5 and 6

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effects of the Opioid Drug Shortages on Selection of Nonopioid Analgesics During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

This study will look at the effects of fentanyl shortage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases. The opioid shortage, specifically hydromorphone and fentanyl, caused a decrease in administration of opioid analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy intraoperatively.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to look at the clinical impact of the drug shortage of intravenous (IV) opioids from 2016 to 2018. IV opioids are used in the hospital setting ranging from the Emergency Department to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to the Operating room. This study will look at the usage of IV opioids in the operating room setting and determine how practice has change in the setting of drug shortage. The study team hypothesizes that the average monthly consumption of fentanyl and hydrophone would have been decreased for laparoscopic cholecystectomy intraoperatively during the opioid shortage period as compared to before the shortage period.

Keywords
drug shortage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04099030
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Opioid shortagePatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy during time of Fentanyl drug shortage
Normal Opioid supply (no shortage)Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy during time of normal Fentanyl drug supply

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Fentanyl usage

    Monthly average amount administered per case per kg

    Measured: September 2016 to August 2017

  2. Total Fentanyl usage

    Monthly average amount administered per case per kg

    Measured: September 2017 to May 2018

  3. Total Fentanyl usage

    Monthly average amount administered per case per kg

    Measured: June 2018 to May 2019

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Nonopioid analgesia usage

    Monthly average amount administered per case per kg

    Measured: September 2016 to August 2017

  2. Nonopioid analgesia usage

    Monthly average amount administered per case per kg

    Measured: September 2017 to May 2018

  3. Nonopioid analgesia usage

    Monthly average amount administered per case per kg

    Measured: June 2018 to May 2019

  4. Number of CPR incidents

    post-operative complication

    Measured: September 2016 to August 2017

  5. Number of CPR incidents

    post-operative complication

    Measured: September 2017 to May 2018

  6. Number of CPR incidents

    post-operative complication

    Measured: June 2018 to May 2019

  7. Number of reintubation incidents

    post-operative complication

    Measured: September 2016 to August 2017

  8. Number of reintubation incidents

    post-operative complication

    Measured: September 2017 to May 2018

  9. Number of reintubation incidents

    post-operative complication

    Measured: June 2018 to May 2019

  10. Number of incidents requiring administration of emergency drugs

    post-operative complication

    Measured: September 2016 to August 2017

  11. Number of incidents requiring administration of emergency drugs

    post-operative complication

    Measured: September 2016 to May 2018

  12. Number of incidents requiring administration of emergency drugs

    post-operative complication

    Measured: June 2018 to May 2019

  13. Length of hospital stay

    Measured: September 2016 to August 2017

  14. Length of hospital stay

    Measured: September 2016 to May 2018

  15. Length of hospital stay

    Measured: June 2018 to May 2019

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Sep 2019
  2. Study start5 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion13 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion13 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,668 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04099030
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00057062
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
19 Sep 2019
Last updated
16 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Klaus DA, de Bettignies AM, Seemann R, Krenn CG, Roth GA. Impact of a remifentanil supply shortage on mechanical ventilation in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective comparison. Crit Care. 2018 Oct 26;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2198-3.

    PubMed 30367645

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Opioid Use, Unspecified, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Fentanyl usage (time frame: September 2016 to August 2017). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04099030, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in