Pulmonary EmbolismNCT04099186
Hydro-mechanical Defragmentation of Pulmonary Embolism
A study testing catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolism in people with Pulmonary Embolism, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Evaluating the safety and outcomes of hydro-mechanical defragmentation of high risk pulmonary embolism with contraindication for thrombolytic therapy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Embolism
- What is being tested?
- catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolism
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to 30 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with angiographically confirmed acute high risk pulmonary embolism with shock index >1.
- Pulmonary arterial occlusion with >50% involvement of the central (main and/or lobar) pulmonary , and pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg)
- Patients with high risk pulmonary embolism who cannot receive fibrinolysis
- Patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism with adverse prognosis (new hemodynamic instability, worsening respiratory failure, severe RV (right ventricle) dysfunction, or major myocardial necrosis)
Who cannot join
- Patients with echocardiographically confirmed right sided thrombi.
- Patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism or intermediate-low risk acute pulmonary embolism with minor RV dysfunction, minor myocardial necrosis, and no clinical worsening
- Anaphylactic reaction to contrast media.
- Acute renal failure or severe chronic non-dialysis dependent kidney disease.
- Uncooperative patient
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Hydro-mechanical Defragmentation of High Risk Pulmonary Embolism With Contraindications to Thrombolytic Therapy
Evaluating the safety and outcomes of hydro-mechanical defragmentation of high risk pulmonary embolism with contraindication for thrombolytic therapy
Read the detailed description
In high risk pulmonary embolism , the main aim of therapy is to rapidly recanalize the affected pulmonary arteries with thrombolysis or embolectomy; to decrease right ventricular afterload and reverse right ventricular failure and shock, prevent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension , and decrease the recurrence risk.
The first-line treatment in patients with acute high risk pulmonary embolism presenting with persistent hypotension and/or cardiogenic shock is intravenous thrombolytic therapy. However a significant proportion of patients may not be a candidate for Intravenous thrombolysis because of major contraindications. An alternative option in patients with absolute contraindications or has failed intravenous thrombolysis is surgical embolectomy , but the number of experienced tertiary care centers that can do emergency surgical embolectomy are limited.
Percutaneous catheter mechanical fragmentation of proximal pulmonary arterial clots followed by injection of 200 ml saline at high pressure using power injector can be used as an alternative to intravenous thrombolytic therapy and surgical embolectomy because of their ability to rapidly recanalize occluded pulmonary blood flow.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism
- Being tested
- catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolism
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Embolism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolismProcedure or surgery
A(6)F multipurpose catheter will be advanced over a guide wire under fluoroscopic guidance and used to measure right heart and pulmonary artery pressures, then mechanical catheter fragmentation will be done using a pigtail catheter. The catheter will be quickly spun manually so as to fragment the central thrombus and establish initial flow into pulmonary artery , then 200 ml saline will be injected via power injector to aid fragmentation of thrombus
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| hydro-mechanical pulmonary embolism fragmentation | Experimental | Those patients will undergo catheter directed fragmentation followed by injection of 100 ml of heparinized saline via power injector Receives: Procedure: catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolism |
| thrombolytic treated arm | No intervention | patients with high risk and intermediate high risk PE who received thrombolysis as only treatment modality |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
30-day mortality
measure the estimates of deaths in the 30 days after pulmonary embolism diagnosis
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
oxygen saturation
oxygen saturation will be measured by arterial blood gases analysis at first admission and compared with measurements the following second, eighth, and 24th hours of the intervention
Measured: 24 hours
Changes in blood pressure
systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be measured at first admission and compared with measurements the following second, eighth, and 24th hours of the intervention
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019
- Primary completion1 Nov 2020
- Study completion30 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary EmbolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- non randomized case control trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ayman khairy Mohamed, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04099186
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HMDPE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, Gibbs JS, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 25173341Uflacker R. Interventional therapy for pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Feb;12(2):147-64. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61821-1.
PubMed 11265879Engelberger RP, Kucher N. Reperfusion Treatment for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Hamostaseologie. 2018 May;38(2):98-105. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641717. Epub 2018 May 29.
PubMed 29843174Kuo WT, Banerjee A, Kim PS, DeMarco FJ Jr, Levy JR, Facchini FR, Unver K, Bertini MJ, Sista AK, Hall MJ, Rosenberg JK, De Gregorio MA. Pulmonary Embolism Response to Fragmentation, Embolectomy, and Catheter Thrombolysis (PERFECT): Initial Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. Chest. 2015 Sep;148(3):667-673. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0119.
PubMed 25856269Mohan B, Chhabra ST, Aslam N, Wander GS, Sood NK, Verma S, Mehra AK, Sharma S. Mechanical breakdown and thrombolysis in subacute massive pulmonary embolism: A prospective trial. World J Cardiol. 2013 May 26;5(5):141-7. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i5.141.
PubMed 23710301Dilektasli AG, Demirdogen Cetinoglu E, Acet NA, Erdogan C, Ursavas A, Ozkaya G, Coskun F, Karadag M, Ege E. Catheter-Directed Therapy in Acute Pulmonary Embolism with Right Ventricular Dysfunction: A Promising Modality to Provide Early Hemodynamic Recovery. Med Sci Monit. 2016 Apr 15;22:1265-73. doi: 10.12659/msm.897617.
PubMed 27081754Hassan AKM, Ahmed H, Ahmed Y, Elfadl AA, Omar A. Efficacy and safety of hydro-mechanical defragmentation in intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 25;73(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00204-2.
PubMed 34564780
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Hydro-mechanical Defragmentation of High Risk Pulmonary Embolism With Contraindications to Thrombolytic Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04099186
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HMDPE
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluating the safety and outcomes of hydro-mechanical defragmentation of high risk pulmonary embolism with contraindication for thrombolytic therapy
Detailed description
In high risk pulmonary embolism , the main aim of therapy is to rapidly recanalize the affected pulmonary arteries with thrombolysis or embolectomy; to decrease right ventricular afterload and reverse right ventricular failure and shock, prevent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension , and decrease the recurrence risk.
The first-line treatment in patients with acute high risk pulmonary embolism presenting with persistent hypotension and/or cardiogenic shock is intravenous thrombolytic therapy. However a significant proportion of patients may not be a candidate for Intravenous thrombolysis because of major contraindications. An alternative option in patients with absolute contraindications or has failed intravenous thrombolysis is surgical embolectomy , but the number of experienced tertiary care centers that can do emergency surgical embolectomy are limited.
Percutaneous catheter mechanical fragmentation of proximal pulmonary arterial clots followed by injection of 200 ml saline at high pressure using power injector can be used as an alternative to intravenous thrombolytic therapy and surgical embolectomy because of their ability to rapidly recanalize occluded pulmonary blood flow.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- non randomized case control trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| hydro-mechanical pulmonary embolism fragmentation | Experimental | Procedure: catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolismThose patients will undergo catheter directed fragmentation followed by injection of 100 ml of heparinized saline via power injector |
| thrombolytic treated arm | No intervention | –patients with high risk and intermediate high risk PE who received thrombolysis as only treatment modality |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with angiographically confirmed acute high risk pulmonary embolism with shock index >1.
- Pulmonary arterial occlusion with >50% involvement of the central (main and/or lobar) pulmonary , and pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg)
- Patients with high risk pulmonary embolism who cannot receive fibrinolysis
- Patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism with adverse prognosis (new hemodynamic instability, worsening respiratory failure, severe RV (right ventricle) dysfunction, or major myocardial necrosis)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with echocardiographically confirmed right sided thrombi.
- Patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism or intermediate-low risk acute pulmonary embolism with minor RV dysfunction, minor myocardial necrosis, and no clinical worsening
- Anaphylactic reaction to contrast media.
- Acute renal failure or severe chronic non-dialysis dependent kidney disease.
- Uncooperative patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolismA(6)F multipurpose catheter will be advanced over a guide wire under fluoroscopic guidance and used to measure right heart and pulmonary artery pressures, then mechanical catheter fragmentation will be done using a pigtail catheter. The catheter will be quickly spun manually so as to fragment the central thrombus and establish initial flow into pulmonary artery , then 200 ml saline will be injected via power injector to aid fragmentation of thrombus | Procedure or surgery | hydro-mechanical pulmonary embolism fragmentation |
Primary outcome
30-day mortality
Time frame: 30 days
measure the estimates of deaths in the 30 days after pulmonary embolism diagnosis
2 secondary outcomes
oxygen saturation
Time frame: 24 hours
Changes in blood pressure
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25173341Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, Gibbs JS, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11265879Uflacker R. Interventional therapy for pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Feb;12(2):147-64. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61821-1.
- Background: PubMed 29843174Engelberger RP, Kucher N. Reperfusion Treatment for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Hamostaseologie. 2018 May;38(2):98-105. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641717. Epub 2018 May 29.
- Background: PubMed 25856269Kuo WT, Banerjee A, Kim PS, DeMarco FJ Jr, Levy JR, Facchini FR, Unver K, Bertini MJ, Sista AK, Hall MJ, Rosenberg JK, De Gregorio MA. Pulmonary Embolism Response to Fragmentation, Embolectomy, and Catheter Thrombolysis (PERFECT): Initial Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. Chest. 2015 Sep;148(3):667-673. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0119.
- Background: PubMed 23710301Mohan B, Chhabra ST, Aslam N, Wander GS, Sood NK, Verma S, Mehra AK, Sharma S. Mechanical breakdown and thrombolysis in subacute massive pulmonary embolism: A prospective trial. World J Cardiol. 2013 May 26;5(5):141-7. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i5.141.
- Background: PubMed 27081754Dilektasli AG, Demirdogen Cetinoglu E, Acet NA, Erdogan C, Ursavas A, Ozkaya G, Coskun F, Karadag M, Ege E. Catheter-Directed Therapy in Acute Pulmonary Embolism with Right Ventricular Dysfunction: A Promising Modality to Provide Early Hemodynamic Recovery. Med Sci Monit. 2016 Apr 15;22:1265-73. doi: 10.12659/msm.897617.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34564780Hassan AKM, Ahmed H, Ahmed Y, Elfadl AA, Omar A. Efficacy and safety of hydro-mechanical defragmentation in intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 25;73(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00204-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Long-Term Safety and Outcomes of Treating Pulmonary Embolism With the Indigo Aspiration System
Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study Evaluating Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Device in Acute Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism (PE), Pulmonary Embolism With Right Ventricle Enlargement
RecruitingObservational study
Inari VISION Registry
Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing catheter directed hydro-mechanical fragmentation of pulmonary embolism in people with Pulmonary Embolism, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
30-day mortality (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04099186, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2021.