Non Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyNCT04103671
Pars-plana Vitrectomy vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Severe NPDR
A study testing Prompt panretinal photocoagulation and 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy in people with Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
It is estimated that there are about 600 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients all over the world until 2040,and almost 50% of whom have some degree of diabetic retinopathy (DR) at any given time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Prompt panretinal photocoagulation and 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 272 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 4 Dec 2019to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged ≥18 years, male or female
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Presence of severe NPDR according to the diagnosis of 4-2-1 rule,
- One or more of the following, in the absence of PDR:
- More than 20 intraretinal hemorrhages in each of four quadrants
- Definite venous beading in two or more quadrants
Show all 10Show fewer
- Prominent intraretinal microvascular abnormality (IRMA) in one or more quadrants
- Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity letter score > 24 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/320) on the day of randomization.
- Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient to administer PRP and obtain adequate fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT).
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant
- In the opinion of the investigator, A condition that would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
- Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied.
- Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110).
- If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
- Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization
Show all 21Show fewer
- Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization
- These drugs should not be used during the study
- For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 3 years.
- Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed
- History of prior panretinal photocoagulation (prior PRP is defined as ≥100 burns outside of the posterior pole
- If macular edema is present, it is considered to be primarily due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
- An ocular condition is present (other than diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., retinal vein or artery occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).
- Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye were otherwise normal).
- History of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment at any time in the past 2 months
- History of corticosteroid treatment (intravitreal or peribulbar) at any time in the past 4 months.
- History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
- History of laser capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization
- Aphakia.
- Uncontrolled glaucoma (in investigator's judgment).
- Exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
shida chen, +862066683995, chenshd3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
lin lu, +862066683995, lulin888@126.com
About this study
Official title: Micro-invasive Pars-plana Vitrectomy vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Severe Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy A Randomized Clinical Trial
It is estimated that there are about 600 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients all over the world until 2040,and almost 50% of whom have some degree of diabetic retinopathy (DR) at any given time. About 5% to 10% diabetic retinopathy would develop vision-threatening complications, including proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), capillary non-perfusion, or macular edema. Data from the DRS suggest that given long enough duration of diabetes, approximately 60% of patients with DR will develop PDR, and without intervention, 75% nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) will development PDR within 1 year follow up, 45% will develop high-risk PDR, nearly half of PDR will experience profound visual loss. panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) only reduced 50% risk of sever visual loss and about 25% of the sNPDR patients who finished PRP need Pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) in a 5 year follow up.
Vitreous have been proven to play an important role in the development of NPDR to PDR, which were the collection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) factors and the major component of proliferative lesion in the later stage of PDR.
Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy has been shown as a safe and effective method in the treatment of PDR, through removing the pathological vitreous, proliferative membrane and also the VEGF factors. However, whether or not Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy will be more effective than PRP to control the progression of NDPR remained unknown.
- Conditions
- Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- Being tested
- Prompt panretinal photocoagulation, 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy
- Keywords
- NPDR, Pars-plana vitrectomy, panretinal photocoagulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prompt panretinal photocoagulationProcedure or surgery
Study eyes that receive panretinal photocoagulation (prompt PRP eyes at baseline) should have 1200 to1600 burns with a spot size on the retina of approximately 500 microns given over 1 to 3 sittings and completed within 4 weeks of initiation
25G Pars-plana vitrectomyProcedure or surgery
Study eyes that receive standard 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy that remove all the vitreous, without laser or Silicone oil tamponade, but filled with perfusion fluid. Surgery should be completed within 4 weeks after randomization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Prompt panretinal photocoagulation Receives: Procedure: Prompt panretinal photocoagulation |
| Group B | Experimental | Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy Receives: Procedure: 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
progression rate of severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy
the number of patients with severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy progressed to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in each group from the baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
the change of best corrected visual acuity
The mean change in best corrected visual acuity in each group from baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
the rate of re-treatment
The number of patients who need re-treatment including supplement laser or vitrectomy from baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
The occurrence of diabetic macular edema
The occurrence number of diabetic macular edema in each group from baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
The change of central retinal thickness
the change of central retinal thickness from baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
The change of visual field
the change of visual field from baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
The occurrence of cataract
the occurrence of cataract from baseline to 12 months
Measured: 12 months
The change of quality of life
the change of quality of life as assessed by questionnaire at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2019
- Study start4 Dec 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 272 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04103671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019KYPJ108
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lin Z, Zheng W, Ding X, Liu B, Jin L, Lai K, Xiao S, Lin Y, Liu B, Li J, Ma Y, Wu Y, Liu Y, Meng Y, Li Y, Chen S, Li T. Microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy versus panretinal photocoagulation for severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2026 Jul 17:bjo-2025-328536. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-328536. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42469016Zheng W, Chen S, Ding X, Lai K, Xiao S, Lin Y, Liu B, Jin L, Li J, Wu Y, Ma Y, Lu L, Liu Y, Li T. Microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy versus panretinal photocoagulation in the treatment of severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (the VIP study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e043371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043371.
PubMed 33619191
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Micro-invasive Pars-plana Vitrectomy vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Severe Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04103671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019KYPJ108
- Conditions
- Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- Keywords
- NPDR, Pars-plana vitrectomy, panretinal photocoagulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 272 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is estimated that there are about 600 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients all over the world until 2040,and almost 50% of whom have some degree of diabetic retinopathy (DR) at any given time. About 5% to 10% diabetic retinopathy would develop vision-threatening complications, including proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), capillary non-perfusion, or macular edema. Data from the DRS suggest that given long enough duration of diabetes, approximately 60% of patients with DR will develop PDR, and without intervention, 75% nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) will development PDR within 1 year follow up, 45% will develop high-risk PDR, nearly half of PDR will experience profound visual loss. panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) only reduced 50% risk of sever visual loss and about 25% of the sNPDR patients who finished PRP need Pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) in a 5 year follow up.
Vitreous have been proven to play an important role in the development of NPDR to PDR, which were the collection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) factors and the major component of proliferative lesion in the later stage of PDR.
Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy has been shown as a safe and effective method in the treatment of PDR, through removing the pathological vitreous, proliferative membrane and also the VEGF factors. However, whether or not Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy will be more effective than PRP to control the progression of NDPR remained unknown.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Procedure: Prompt panretinal photocoagulationPrompt panretinal photocoagulation |
| Group B | Experimental | Procedure: 25G Pars-plana vitrectomyMicro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Aged ≥18 years, male or female
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Presence of severe NPDR according to the diagnosis of 4-2-1 rule,
- Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity letter score > 24 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/320) on the day of randomization.
- Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient to administer PRP and obtain adequate fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant
- In the opinion of the investigator, A condition that would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
- Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied.
- Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110).
- If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt panretinal photocoagulationStudy eyes that receive panretinal photocoagulation (prompt PRP eyes at baseline) should have 1200 to1600 burns with a spot size on the retina of approximately 500 microns given over 1 to 3 sittings and completed within 4 weeks of initiation | Procedure or surgery | Group A |
| 25G Pars-plana vitrectomyStudy eyes that receive standard 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy that remove all the vitreous, without laser or Silicone oil tamponade, but filled with perfusion fluid. Surgery should be completed within 4 weeks after randomization. | Procedure or surgery | Group B |
Primary outcome
progression rate of severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Time frame: 12 months
the number of patients with severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy progressed to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in each group from the baseline to 12 months
7 secondary outcomes
the change of best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 12 months
the rate of re-treatment
Time frame: 12 months
The occurrence of diabetic macular edema
Time frame: 12 months
The change of central retinal thickness
Time frame: 12 months
The change of visual field
Time frame: 12 months
The occurrence of cataract
Time frame: 12 months
The change of quality of life
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42469016Lin Z, Zheng W, Ding X, Liu B, Jin L, Lai K, Xiao S, Lin Y, Liu B, Li J, Ma Y, Wu Y, Liu Y, Meng Y, Li Y, Chen S, Li T. Microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy versus panretinal photocoagulation for severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2026 Jul 17:bjo-2025-328536. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-328536. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33619191Zheng W, Chen S, Ding X, Lai K, Xiao S, Lin Y, Liu B, Jin L, Li J, Wu Y, Ma Y, Lu L, Liu Y, Li T. Microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy versus panretinal photocoagulation in the treatment of severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (the VIP study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e043371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043371.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Surabgene Lomparvovec Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space in Adult Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy Without Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Test Whether BI 764524 Helps People With an Eye Condition Called Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered VX-01
Diabetic Retinopathy, NPDR - Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study Intravitreal THN391 in Diabetic Macular Oedema Secondary to Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Diabetic Macular Edema, Diabetic Retinopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Single-site Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of QLS-111 Ophthalmic Solution on Posterior Perfusion and Vessel Dilation
Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR), Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prompt panretinal photocoagulation and 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy in people with Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact tao li, Dr (66683995 ext. +8620, litao2@mail.sysu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
progression rate of severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04103671, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2023.