Preoperative AnxietyImpactNCT04103723
Impact of Premedication on Anxiety
An observational study of Preoperative Anxiety, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
IMPACT aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of premedication in German hospitals and to estimate the influence of premedication on anxiety reduction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Preoperative Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- Preoperative premedication
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 4,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 7 Oct 2019to 30 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients, meeting all inclusion and none exclusion criteria, will be enrolled in the study, independent whether they will receive a premedication or not. The study will be conducted in at least 25-30 German sites.
Who may be able to join
- Only legally competent patients
- Written informed consent prior to study participation
- Age ≥18 years, both genders
- Elective surgery
- Expected surgery duration ≥ 30 minutes
- Planned general or combined regional and general anaesthesia
- Planned extubation (or removal of airway device) at the end of surgery
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Non-fluency in German language
- Alcohol and/ or drug abuse
- Chronic benzodiazepine treatment
- Intracranial surgery
- Local or solely regional anaesthesia
Show all 13Show fewer
- Monitored anaesthesia care/ Sedation
- Cardiac surgery
- Ambulatory surgery
- Repeated surgery with previous participation in the trial
- Expected continuous mandatory ventilation after surgery
- Patients with severe neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Refusal of study participation by the patient
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital RWTH Aachen
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074
Ana Kowark, MD, +49241-8088179, akowark@ukaachen.de
Julia Liebens, MD, +49241-8088179, jliebens@ukaachen.de
About this study
Official title: Impact of Premedication on Anxiety: a Multi-centre, Prospective Observational Cohort Study
IMPACT aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of premedication in German hospitals and to estimate the influence of premedication on anxiety reduction.
Read the detailed description
Generalised premedication with benzodiazepines in all surgical patients has become questionable, regarding the risk-benefit assessment and the lack of evidence for this practice. One of the main justifications for premedication with benzodiazepines is its anxiolytic effect. Anxiety is associated with postoperative cognitive and behavioural changes, physiological reactions, increased need of anaesthetic drugs and altered perception of pain, mood swings, wound-healing problems and alteration of the immune system. However, several investigations revealed negative side-effects like dose-dependent sedation up to respiratory depression, prolonged extubation-time, impaired psychomotor function, paradox reactions, antegrade amnesia, increased pneumonia rates and postoperative delirium.
In Germany midazolam is the most frequently administered premedication. A survey revealed that about one third of the German hospitals withhold a premedication in patients older than 74 years.
The evidence for this practice, as well as the indiscriminate preoperative premedication for all adult patients is low.
The investigators aim to recruit as many as possible centers throughout Germany, to participate in this study. A total sample size of 4000 patients will provide reasonable and valid results for the study aims. The influence of premedication on the primary endpoint change of APAIS-score will be analysed by a multivariable analysis of covariance considering several baseline characteristics. In case of significant interaction terms, subgroup analysis will be performed.
- Conditions
- Preoperative Anxiety
- Being tested
- Preoperative premedication
- Keywords
- Midazolam, Premedication, Preoperative anxiety, Surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Preoperative premedicationProcedure or surgery
Every patient with or without a preoperative premedication with midazolam before surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients with premedication | Patients receiving preoperative premedication with midazolam before surgery. Receives: Procedure: Preoperative premedication | |
| patients without premedication | Patients without preoperative premedication before surgery. Receives: Procedure: Preoperative premedication |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of the preoperative anxiety level
Change of the preoperative anxiety level, measured with the anxiety measuring scale, named: "Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)". The measure of agreement with six statements is graded on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 "not at all" to 5 "extremely." A score of ≥11 identify anxious patients in clinical practice. Assessed at: pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and pre-interventional before surgery (visit 1).
Measured: Up to 30 days
Secondary outcomes (28)
Change in systolic blood pressure
Difference in the haemodynamic variable systolic blood pressure (measured in mmHg) between the assessment pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2.
Measured: Up to 31 day
Change in diastolic blood pressure
Difference in the haemodynamic variable diastolic blood pressure (measured in mmHg) between the assessment pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2.
Measured: Up to 31 day
Change in heart rate
Difference in haemodynamic variable (heart rate) between patients with and without premedication. The assessment is conducted pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0), in the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2. The values are presented as beats per minute.
Measured: Up to 31 day
Change in oxygen saturation
Difference in the respiratory variable (oxygen saturation) between patients with and without premedication. The assessment is conducted pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0), in the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2. The values are presented in percent.
Measured: Up to 31 day
Difference in the cognitive function at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Cognitive function will be assessed at baseline as part of the frailty assessment according to Oresanya, among the patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication. It will be assessed by the Mini-Cog test, which is a 3-minute instrument that can increase detection of cognitive impairment. It consists of two components, a 3-item recall test for memory and a simply scored clock drawing test.
Scale: word recall: 0-3 points; Clock Draw: 0 or 2 points; Total Score: 0-5 points
Measured: 1 day
Difference in the medical history at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Medical history will be assessed at baseline and used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya. Patients will be scored as frail, if ≥ 3 comorbidities are present of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Measured: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value albumin at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Laboratory value Albumin (unit: g/dl or g/l, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.
Measured: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value creatinine at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Laboratory value Creatinine (unit:mg/dl or µmol/l, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.
Measured: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value haemoglobin at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Laboratory value Creatinine (unit: g/dl or mmol/l, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.
Measured: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value haematocrit at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Laboratory value haematocrit (unit: l/l or %, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.
Measured: 1 day
Difference in history of falls at baseline as part of baseline frailty assessment
History of falls in the previous 6 months will be assessed at baseline as part of the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya, among the patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication. Patients will be asked, whether the had one fall, more than one fall, or no fall in the previous 6 months. Patients with more than 1 fall in the last 6 months, has to be marked as "frailty" criterion present according to Oresanya.
Measured: 1 day
Difference in the mobility of the patients as part of baseline frailty assessment
The timed "Up \& Go" test, will be used to assess the mobility of the patients at baseline, as part of the frailty assessment according to Oresanya, among the patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Measured: 1 day
Unintentional weight loss at baseline as part of baseline frailty assessment
Unintentional weight loss will be assessed at baseline as part of the frailty assessment. Patients will be asked if they have lost >4,5kg weight in the last year.
Measured: 1 day
Patient satisfaction: Bauer Satisfaction Questionnaire
Difference in patients satisfaction about the surgery between patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication, measured with the Bauer Satisfaction Questionnaire (Reference 1) on the first postoperative day (visit 3). Patients rate their satisfaction regarding the first ten questions on a 3 point likert scale, regarding the questions #11 to 15 on a 4 point likert scale and the last question #16 is a yes/no question.
Measured: From intervention up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Cognitive recovery
Difference in cognitive recovery (defined as difference between baseline assessment and assessment on the first postoperative day) between the two study-groups, measured by the Mini-cog .
Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Early postoperative delirium
Difference in the number of people with a new diagnosed early postoperative delirium between the two study groups, measured with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). There will be two assessments (visit 0 and 3).
Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Perioperative change of sleeping quality: Numeric Rating Scale
Difference in the change of the perioperative sleeping quality between the two different study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10) at baseline (visit 0), surgery day pre-operative (visit 1) and first postoperative day (visit 3).
Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Perioperative change of pain: Numeric Rating Scale
Difference in the change of pain between the two different study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10) at baseline (visit 0), surgery day pre-operative (visit 1), surgery day post-operative (visit 2) and first postoperative day (visit 3).
Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Perioperative change of well-being
Difference in the change of the perioperative well-being between the different two study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10) at baseline (visit 0) and first postoperative day (visit 3).
Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Patient cooperation directly preoperatively
Difference in the patient cooperation directly preoperative between the two different study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10).
Measured: On the day on surgery (1 day)
Patients with rescue-midazolam application before anaesthesia induction
Difference in the number of patients who require "rescue-midazolam" application (additional midazolam) before anaesthesia induction between the two study groups.
Measured: On the day on surgery (1 day)
Time to extubation
Difference in the needed time to extubation between the two study groups, measured after cessation of the hypnotic agent till removal of endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway.
Measured: At the end of surgery after cessation of the hypnotic agent until extubation (1 day)
Change in the health-related quality of life assessment: European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Difference in the change of the health-related quality of life between the two study-groups, measured with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The respondent is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking (or placing a cross) in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. For analysis, please refer to the website of the test (please see reference 2)
Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 30th day (visit 4) after intervention
Longer-term combined outcome of mortality or the new-onset of serious cardiac or pulmonary complications, or acute stroke, or acute kidney
Difference in the rate of mortality or the new-onset of serious cardiac or pulmonary complications, or acute stroke, or acute kidney injury between the two different study groups, assessed by interview and review of the medical history.
Measured: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)
Predefined complications
Difference in the number of predefined complications on the surgery day according to the medical charts between the two different study groups.
Measured: Surgery day (1 day)
Hospital length of stay (LOS)
Difference in the hospital length of stay (LOS) between the two different study groups.
Measured: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)
Intensive care unit length of stay (ICU)-LOS
Difference in the intensive care unit (ICU)-LOS between the two different study groups.
Measured: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)
Patient's functional status of independency
Difference in the functional recovery between the two study groups, assessed by interview of the patient according to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). The questions contain the classification into independent, partially dependent, and totally dependent.
Measured: From the baseline visit (visit 0) to the 30th postoperative day (visit 4).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2019
- Study start7 Oct 2019
- Primary completion31 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Preoperative AnxietyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RWTH Aachen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ana Kowark, RWTH Aachen University
- Investigators
- Ana Kowark née Stevanovic, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04103723
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19-132
- Acronym
- Impact
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bauer M, Bohrer H, Aichele G, Bach A, Martin E. Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jan;45(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450111.x.
PubMed 11152036https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/EQ-5D-3L_UserGuide_2015.pdf
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Premedication on Anxiety: a Multi-centre, Prospective Observational Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04103723
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Impact / 19-132
- Conditions
- Preoperative Anxiety
- Keywords
- Midazolam, Premedication, Preoperative anxiety, Surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- RWTH Aachen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
IMPACT aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of premedication in German hospitals and to estimate the influence of premedication on anxiety reduction.
Detailed description
Generalised premedication with benzodiazepines in all surgical patients has become questionable, regarding the risk-benefit assessment and the lack of evidence for this practice. One of the main justifications for premedication with benzodiazepines is its anxiolytic effect. Anxiety is associated with postoperative cognitive and behavioural changes, physiological reactions, increased need of anaesthetic drugs and altered perception of pain, mood swings, wound-healing problems and alteration of the immune system. However, several investigations revealed negative side-effects like dose-dependent sedation up to respiratory depression, prolonged extubation-time, impaired psychomotor function, paradox reactions, antegrade amnesia, increased pneumonia rates and postoperative delirium.
In Germany midazolam is the most frequently administered premedication. A survey revealed that about one third of the German hospitals withhold a premedication in patients older than 74 years.
The evidence for this practice, as well as the indiscriminate preoperative premedication for all adult patients is low.
The investigators aim to recruit as many as possible centers throughout Germany, to participate in this study. A total sample size of 4000 patients will provide reasonable and valid results for the study aims. The influence of premedication on the primary endpoint change of APAIS-score will be analysed by a multivariable analysis of covariance considering several baseline characteristics. In case of significant interaction terms, subgroup analysis will be performed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients with premedication | – | Procedure: Preoperative premedicationPatients receiving preoperative premedication with midazolam before surgery. |
| patients without premedication | – | Procedure: Preoperative premedicationPatients without preoperative premedication before surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients, meeting all inclusion and none exclusion criteria, will be enrolled in the study, independent whether they will receive a premedication or not. The study will be conducted in at least 25-30 German sites.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Only legally competent patients
- Written informed consent prior to study participation
- Age ≥18 years, both genders
- Elective surgery
- Expected surgery duration ≥ 30 minutes
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Non-fluency in German language
- Alcohol and/ or drug abuse
- Chronic benzodiazepine treatment
- Intracranial surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Preoperative premedicationEvery patient with or without a preoperative premedication with midazolam before surgery. | Procedure or surgery | patients with premedication, patients without premedication |
Primary outcome
Change of the preoperative anxiety level
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Change of the preoperative anxiety level, measured with the anxiety measuring scale, named: "Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)". The measure of agreement with six statements is graded on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 "not at all" to 5 "extremely." A score of ≥11 identify anxious patients in clinical practice. Assessed at: pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and pre-interventional before surgery (visit 1).
28 secondary outcomes
Change in systolic blood pressure
Time frame: Up to 31 day
Change in diastolic blood pressure
Time frame: Up to 31 day
Change in heart rate
Time frame: Up to 31 day
Change in oxygen saturation
Time frame: Up to 31 day
Difference in the cognitive function at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in the medical history at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value albumin at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value creatinine at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value haemoglobin at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in the laboratory value haematocrit at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in history of falls at baseline as part of baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Difference in the mobility of the patients as part of baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Unintentional weight loss at baseline as part of baseline frailty assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Patient satisfaction: Bauer Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: From intervention up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Cognitive recovery
Time frame: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Early postoperative delirium
Time frame: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Perioperative change of sleeping quality: Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Perioperative change of pain: Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Perioperative change of well-being
Time frame: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).
Patient cooperation directly preoperatively
Time frame: On the day on surgery (1 day)
Patients with rescue-midazolam application before anaesthesia induction
Time frame: On the day on surgery (1 day)
Time to extubation
Time frame: At the end of surgery after cessation of the hypnotic agent until extubation (1 day)
Change in the health-related quality of life assessment: European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 30th day (visit 4) after intervention
Longer-term combined outcome of mortality or the new-onset of serious cardiac or pulmonary complications, or acute stroke, or acute kidney
Time frame: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)
Predefined complications
Time frame: Surgery day (1 day)
Hospital length of stay (LOS)
Time frame: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)
Intensive care unit length of stay (ICU)-LOS
Time frame: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)
Patient's functional status of independency
Time frame: From the baseline visit (visit 0) to the 30th postoperative day (visit 4).
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 11152036Bauer M, Bohrer H, Aichele G, Bach A, Martin E. Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jan;45(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450111.x.
- Backgroundhttps://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/EQ-5D-3L_UserGuide_2015.pdf
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Preoperative Anxiety
Recruiting
Preoperative Music Intervention for Anxiety in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
Anxiety, Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Midazolam Given at Induction on Recall of Propofol Injection Pain
Propofol Injection Pain, Postoperative Recall of Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Anxiety and One-year Patient-reported Outcomes in Orthopedic Surgery Patients Receiving Enhanced Recovery After Surgery or Conventional Care
Preoperative Anxiety, Orthopedic Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety During Thoracic Epidural Placement.
Preoperative Anxiety Score
Recruiting
Positive Affirmations and Preoperative Anxiety
Total Joint Replacement Surgery, Preoperative Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ana Kowark née Stevanovic, MD principal investigator
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Preoperative Anxiety, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ana Kowark née Stevanovic, MD (+49241-8088179, anaesthesiologie@ukaachen.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of the preoperative anxiety level (time frame: Up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04103723, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2020.