AzTrials
AzTrials

Preoperative AnxietyImpactNCT04103723

Impact of Premedication on Anxiety

An observational study of Preoperative Anxiety, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

IMPACT aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of premedication in German hospitals and to estimate the influence of premedication on anxiety reduction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Preoperative Anxiety
What is being tested?
Preoperative premedication
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
4,000 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
7 Oct 2019to 30 Sep 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients, meeting all inclusion and none exclusion criteria, will be enrolled in the study, independent whether they will receive a premedication or not. The study will be conducted in at least 25-30 German sites.

Who may be able to join

  • Only legally competent patients
  • Written informed consent prior to study participation
  • Age ≥18 years, both genders
  • Elective surgery
  • Expected surgery duration ≥ 30 minutes
  • Planned general or combined regional and general anaesthesia
  • Planned extubation (or removal of airway device) at the end of surgery

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years
  • Non-fluency in German language
  • Alcohol and/ or drug abuse
  • Chronic benzodiazepine treatment
  • Intracranial surgery
  • Local or solely regional anaesthesia
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Monitored anaesthesia care/ Sedation
  • Cardiac surgery
  • Ambulatory surgery
  • Repeated surgery with previous participation in the trial
  • Expected continuous mandatory ventilation after surgery
  • Patients with severe neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Refusal of study participation by the patient

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ana Kowark née Stevanovic, MD contact

+49241-8088179

anaesthesiologie@ukaachen.de

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University Hospital RWTH Aachen

    Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074

    Ana Kowark, MD, +49241-8088179, akowark@ukaachen.de

    Julia Liebens, MD, +49241-8088179, jliebens@ukaachen.de

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Impact of Premedication on Anxiety: a Multi-centre, Prospective Observational Cohort Study

IMPACT aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of premedication in German hospitals and to estimate the influence of premedication on anxiety reduction.

Read the detailed description

Generalised premedication with benzodiazepines in all surgical patients has become questionable, regarding the risk-benefit assessment and the lack of evidence for this practice. One of the main justifications for premedication with benzodiazepines is its anxiolytic effect. Anxiety is associated with postoperative cognitive and behavioural changes, physiological reactions, increased need of anaesthetic drugs and altered perception of pain, mood swings, wound-healing problems and alteration of the immune system. However, several investigations revealed negative side-effects like dose-dependent sedation up to respiratory depression, prolonged extubation-time, impaired psychomotor function, paradox reactions, antegrade amnesia, increased pneumonia rates and postoperative delirium.

In Germany midazolam is the most frequently administered premedication. A survey revealed that about one third of the German hospitals withhold a premedication in patients older than 74 years.

The evidence for this practice, as well as the indiscriminate preoperative premedication for all adult patients is low.

The investigators aim to recruit as many as possible centers throughout Germany, to participate in this study. A total sample size of 4000 patients will provide reasonable and valid results for the study aims. The influence of premedication on the primary endpoint change of APAIS-score will be analysed by a multivariable analysis of covariance considering several baseline characteristics. In case of significant interaction terms, subgroup analysis will be performed.

Being tested
Preoperative premedication
Keywords
Midazolam, Premedication, Preoperative anxiety, Surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Preoperative premedicationProcedure or surgery

    Every patient with or without a preoperative premedication with midazolam before surgery.

Study groups in NCT04103723
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients with premedicationPatients receiving preoperative premedication with midazolam before surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Preoperative premedication
patients without premedicationPatients without preoperative premedication before surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Preoperative premedication

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of the preoperative anxiety level

    Change of the preoperative anxiety level, measured with the anxiety measuring scale, named: "Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)". The measure of agreement with six statements is graded on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 "not at all" to 5 "extremely." A score of ≥11 identify anxious patients in clinical practice. Assessed at: pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and pre-interventional before surgery (visit 1).

    Measured: Up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Change in systolic blood pressure

    Difference in the haemodynamic variable systolic blood pressure (measured in mmHg) between the assessment pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2.

    Measured: Up to 31 day

  2. Change in diastolic blood pressure

    Difference in the haemodynamic variable diastolic blood pressure (measured in mmHg) between the assessment pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) and the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2.

    Measured: Up to 31 day

  3. Change in heart rate

    Difference in haemodynamic variable (heart rate) between patients with and without premedication. The assessment is conducted pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0), in the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2. The values are presented as beats per minute.

    Measured: Up to 31 day

  4. Change in oxygen saturation

    Difference in the respiratory variable (oxygen saturation) between patients with and without premedication. The assessment is conducted pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0), in the pre-interventional visit right before surgery (visit 1) and directly post-interventional in the recovery room at visit 2. The values are presented in percent.

    Measured: Up to 31 day

  5. Difference in the cognitive function at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment

    Cognitive function will be assessed at baseline as part of the frailty assessment according to Oresanya, among the patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication. It will be assessed by the Mini-Cog test, which is a 3-minute instrument that can increase detection of cognitive impairment. It consists of two components, a 3-item recall test for memory and a simply scored clock drawing test.

    Scale: word recall: 0-3 points; Clock Draw: 0 or 2 points; Total Score: 0-5 points

    Measured: 1 day

  6. Difference in the medical history at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment

    Medical history will be assessed at baseline and used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya. Patients will be scored as frail, if ≥ 3 comorbidities are present of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

    Measured: 1 day

  7. Difference in the laboratory value albumin at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment

    Laboratory value Albumin (unit: g/dl or g/l, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.

    Measured: 1 day

  8. Difference in the laboratory value creatinine at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment

    Laboratory value Creatinine (unit:mg/dl or µmol/l, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.

    Measured: 1 day

  9. Difference in the laboratory value haemoglobin at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment

    Laboratory value Creatinine (unit: g/dl or mmol/l, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.

    Measured: 1 day

  10. Difference in the laboratory value haematocrit at baseline as part of the baseline frailty assessment

    Laboratory value haematocrit (unit: l/l or %, depending on the hospital routine), will be assessed according to the clinical routine of the centres. This assessment is optional. It will occur at baseline and will be used for the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya.

    Measured: 1 day

  11. Difference in history of falls at baseline as part of baseline frailty assessment

    History of falls in the previous 6 months will be assessed at baseline as part of the combined frailty assessment according to Oresanya, among the patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication. Patients will be asked, whether the had one fall, more than one fall, or no fall in the previous 6 months. Patients with more than 1 fall in the last 6 months, has to be marked as "frailty" criterion present according to Oresanya.

    Measured: 1 day

  12. Difference in the mobility of the patients as part of baseline frailty assessment

    The timed "Up \& Go" test, will be used to assess the mobility of the patients at baseline, as part of the frailty assessment according to Oresanya, among the patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.

    Measured: 1 day

  13. Unintentional weight loss at baseline as part of baseline frailty assessment

    Unintentional weight loss will be assessed at baseline as part of the frailty assessment. Patients will be asked if they have lost >4,5kg weight in the last year.

    Measured: 1 day

  14. Patient satisfaction: Bauer Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Difference in patients satisfaction about the surgery between patients who received a premedication and patients without premedication, measured with the Bauer Satisfaction Questionnaire (Reference 1) on the first postoperative day (visit 3). Patients rate their satisfaction regarding the first ten questions on a 3 point likert scale, regarding the questions #11 to 15 on a 4 point likert scale and the last question #16 is a yes/no question.

    Measured: From intervention up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).

  15. Cognitive recovery

    Difference in cognitive recovery (defined as difference between baseline assessment and assessment on the first postoperative day) between the two study-groups, measured by the Mini-cog .

    Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).

  16. Early postoperative delirium

    Difference in the number of people with a new diagnosed early postoperative delirium between the two study groups, measured with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). There will be two assessments (visit 0 and 3).

    Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).

  17. Perioperative change of sleeping quality: Numeric Rating Scale

    Difference in the change of the perioperative sleeping quality between the two different study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10) at baseline (visit 0), surgery day pre-operative (visit 1) and first postoperative day (visit 3).

    Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).

  18. Perioperative change of pain: Numeric Rating Scale

    Difference in the change of pain between the two different study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10) at baseline (visit 0), surgery day pre-operative (visit 1), surgery day post-operative (visit 2) and first postoperative day (visit 3).

    Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).

  19. Perioperative change of well-being

    Difference in the change of the perioperative well-being between the different two study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10) at baseline (visit 0) and first postoperative day (visit 3).

    Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 1st postoperative day (visit 3).

  20. Patient cooperation directly preoperatively

    Difference in the patient cooperation directly preoperative between the two different study groups, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (numbers from 0-10).

    Measured: On the day on surgery (1 day)

  21. Patients with rescue-midazolam application before anaesthesia induction

    Difference in the number of patients who require "rescue-midazolam" application (additional midazolam) before anaesthesia induction between the two study groups.

    Measured: On the day on surgery (1 day)

  22. Time to extubation

    Difference in the needed time to extubation between the two study groups, measured after cessation of the hypnotic agent till removal of endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway.

    Measured: At the end of surgery after cessation of the hypnotic agent until extubation (1 day)

  23. Change in the health-related quality of life assessment: European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    Difference in the change of the health-related quality of life between the two study-groups, measured with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The respondent is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking (or placing a cross) in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. For analysis, please refer to the website of the test (please see reference 2)

    Measured: Pre-interventional at baseline visit (visit 0) up to the 30th day (visit 4) after intervention

  24. Longer-term combined outcome of mortality or the new-onset of serious cardiac or pulmonary complications, or acute stroke, or acute kidney

    Difference in the rate of mortality or the new-onset of serious cardiac or pulmonary complications, or acute stroke, or acute kidney injury between the two different study groups, assessed by interview and review of the medical history.

    Measured: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)

  25. Predefined complications

    Difference in the number of predefined complications on the surgery day according to the medical charts between the two different study groups.

    Measured: Surgery day (1 day)

  26. Hospital length of stay (LOS)

    Difference in the hospital length of stay (LOS) between the two different study groups.

    Measured: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)

  27. Intensive care unit length of stay (ICU)-LOS

    Difference in the intensive care unit (ICU)-LOS between the two different study groups.

    Measured: 30 days after intervention (visit 4)

  28. Patient's functional status of independency

    Difference in the functional recovery between the two study groups, assessed by interview of the patient according to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). The questions contain the classification into independent, partially dependent, and totally dependent.

    Measured: From the baseline visit (visit 0) to the 30th postoperative day (visit 4).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2019
  2. Study start7 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
4,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04103723
Sponsor's protocol ID
19-132
Acronym
Impact
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
18 Sep 2019
Last updated
12 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Bauer M, Bohrer H, Aichele G, Bach A, Martin E. Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jan;45(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450111.x.

    PubMed 11152036
  • https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/EQ-5D-3L_UserGuide_2015.pdf

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Preoperative Anxiety, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ana Kowark née Stevanovic, MD (+49241-8088179, anaesthesiologie@ukaachen.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of the preoperative anxiety level (time frame: Up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04103723, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in