Nasal PolypsOIPNNCT04104594
Olfaction and Inflammation in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
A study testing Sniffin Stick Test, numerical evaluation scale for olfaction and numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstruction in people with Nasal Polyps and Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Impaired olfaction is one of the major complaints of patients with nasosinus polyposis, with nasal obstruction. In case of failure of medical treatment for patients with polyposis nasosinusal, they may use endoscopic surgery nasosinusal. Before surgery, 73% are hyposmic or anosmic, compared to 43% after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasal Polyps, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Olfaction Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Sniffin Stick Test, numerical evaluation scale for olfaction and numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstruction
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2020to 29 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with nasosinus polyposis requiring nasosinus surgery
- Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security
- signed consent
- Patients with an indication for septoplasty
- Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security
- signed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with nasosinus polyposis secondary to another disease
- Patients with hyposmia or anosmia prior to naso-sinus polyposis
- Patients with diagnosed neurodegenerative disease
- Patients who are mentally or physically unable to perform olfactory tests
- Patients on anti-TNF-alpha therapy, long-term oral corticosteroid therapy, or other immunomodulatory therapy.
- Patients with nasosinus polyposis
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with chronic rhino-sinusitis
- Patients with hyposmia or anosmia
- Patients with diagnosed neurodegenerative disease
- Patients who are mentally or physically unable to perform olfactory tests
- Patients on anti-TNF-alpha therapy, long-term oral corticosteroid therapy, or other immunomodulatory therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Impaired olfaction is one of the major complaints of patients with nasosinus polyposis, with nasal obstruction. In case of failure of medical treatment for patients with polyposis nasosinusal, they may use endoscopic surgery nasosinusal. Before surgery, 73% are hyposmic or anosmic, compared to 43% after surgery. Persistence of hyposmia or anosmia despite the removal of polyps can be explained by mechanisms inflammatory in the mucous membrane of the olfactory cleft. In addition, studies in mice have shown a degeneration of primary olfactory neurons at the level of the olfactory mucosa in connection with directly with TNF alpha, a pro-inflammatory molecule.
- Being tested
- Sniffin Stick Test, numerical evaluation scale for olfaction, numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstruction, nasal outcome test, dosage of 17 cytokines
- Keywords
- TNF alpha
- Medical subject headings
- Nasal Polyps, Olfaction Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sniffin Stick TestDiagnostic test
The test consists of odorous rods that are presented to the patient's nose. It consists of 3 parts different, with 3 sets of corresponding sticks: an olfactory threshold test, an olfactory discrimination test and an olfactory identification test.
The final score, out of 48, is the sum of the olfactory threshold, discrimination and identification scores. Normal test values are defined as greater than the tenth percentile of the general population, so the test result is compared to reference values on a chart to determine whether the patient is normosmic, hyposmic or anosmic.
numerical evaluation scale for olfactionOther
numerical rating scale from 0 (no smell) to 10 (perfect smell)
numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstructionOther
numerical rating scale from 0 (no freedom of the nasal passages) to 10 (maximum nasal freedom)
nasal outcome testOther
list of symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhino-sinusitis. 16 questions that the patient must code from "no problem" to "serious problem" over the last 15 days
dosage of 17 cytokinesBiological
dosage of 17 cytokines : G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-17A, MCP-1 (MCAF), MIP-1β,TNF-α
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Sniffin Stick Test; Other: numerical evaluation scale for olfaction; Other: numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstruction; Other: nasal outcome test; Biological: dosage of 17 cytokines |
| Patients with an indication for septoplasty = control group | Other | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Sniffin Stick Test; Other: nasal outcome test; Biological: dosage of 17 cytokines |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
expression rate of TNF-alpha in biopsies
The main evaluation criterion is based on two variables: the expression rate of TNF-alpha in olfactory slit biopsies and the Sniffin Stick test score.
Measured: 2 months
Sniffin Stick test score
The main evaluation criterion is based on two variables: the expression rate of TNF-alpha in olfactory slit biopsies and the Sniffin Stick test score.
Sniffin Stick test score :
The final score, out of 48, is the sum of the olfactory threshold (out of 16), discrimination (out of 16) and identification (out of 16) scores.
Normal test values are defined as greater than the tenth percentile of the general population, so the test result is compared to reference values on a chart to determine whether the patient is normosmic, hyposmic or anosmic.
Measured: 2 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Olfactory Cleft Endoscopic Score
measured at control and patients. 5 endoscopic feature to be completed :
- discharge : 0= none or scant clear/thin drainage (normal) ; 1= more abundant, thicker clear/white drainage (not normal but not purulent) ; 2= thicker, more abundant, discolored/purulent drainage.
- polyps : 0= none ; 1= discrete polyps partially narrowing/blocking the olfactory cleft (<50%) ; 2= discrete polyps completely narrowing/blocking the olfactory cleft (>50%).
- edema : 0= none ; 1= swelling partially narrowing/blocking the olfactory cleft (<50%) ; 2= swelling completely narrowing/blocking the olfactory cleft (>50%).
- crusting : 0= none ; 1= mild ; 2= severe
- scarring : 0= none ; 1= mild ; 2= severe
Measured: 2 months
expression rate of TNF-alpha in polyps
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines G-CSF
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines GM-CSF
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines IFN-γ
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines MCP-1
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines MIP-1β
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
dosage of cytokines MCAF
measured at control and patients.
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2019
- Study start5 Feb 2020
- Primary completion6 Jul 2021
- Study completion29 Jul 2021
Why it stopped: The laboratory in which the analyses on nasosinusal polyposis were to be carried out did not want to continue the research on this subject, so it was decided to stop this study prematurely.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nasal PolypsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- control and patients
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marie GAVID, MD, Principal investigator, CHU de Saint Etienne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04104594
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19CH099
- Other IDs
- 2019-A01625-52
- Acronym
- OIPN
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 24 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Olfaction and Inflammation in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04104594
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OIPN / 19CH099
- Keywords
- TNF alpha
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The laboratory in which the analyses on nasosinusal polyposis were to be carried out did not want to continue the research on this subject, so it was decided to stop this study prematurely.
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Impaired olfaction is one of the major complaints of patients with nasosinus polyposis, with nasal obstruction. In case of failure of medical treatment for patients with polyposis nasosinusal, they may use endoscopic surgery nasosinusal. Before surgery, 73% are hyposmic or anosmic, compared to 43% after surgery. Persistence of hyposmia or anosmia despite the removal of polyps can be explained by mechanisms inflammatory in the mucous membrane of the olfactory cleft. In addition, studies in mice have shown a degeneration of primary olfactory neurons at the level of the olfactory mucosa in connection with directly with TNF alpha, a pro-inflammatory molecule.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- control and patients
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Sniffin Stick Test, Other: numerical evaluation scale for olfaction, Other: numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstruction, Other: nasal outcome test, Biological: dosage of 17 cytokines |
| Patients with an indication for septoplasty = control group | Other | Diagnostic Test: Sniffin Stick Test, Other: nasal outcome test, Biological: dosage of 17 cytokines |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with nasosinus polyposis requiring nasosinus surgery
- Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security
- signed consent
- Patients with an indication for septoplasty
- Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with nasosinus polyposis secondary to another disease
- Patients with hyposmia or anosmia prior to naso-sinus polyposis
- Patients with diagnosed neurodegenerative disease
- Patients who are mentally or physically unable to perform olfactory tests
- Patients on anti-TNF-alpha therapy, long-term oral corticosteroid therapy, or other immunomodulatory therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sniffin Stick TestThe test consists of odorous rods that are presented to the patient's nose. It consists of 3 parts different, with 3 sets of corresponding sticks: an olfactory threshold test, an olfactory discrimination test and an olfactory identification test. The final score, out of 48, is the sum of the olfactory threshold, discrimination and identification scores. Normal test values are defined as greater than the tenth percentile of the general population, so the test result is compared to reference values on a chart to determine whether the patient is normosmic, hyposmic or anosmic. | Diagnostic test | Patients with an indication for septoplasty = control group, patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
| numerical evaluation scale for olfactionnumerical rating scale from 0 (no smell) to 10 (perfect smell) | Other | patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
| numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstructionnumerical rating scale from 0 (no freedom of the nasal passages) to 10 (maximum nasal freedom) | Other | patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
| nasal outcome testlist of symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhino-sinusitis. 16 questions that the patient must code from "no problem" to "serious problem" over the last 15 days | Other | Patients with an indication for septoplasty = control group, patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
| dosage of 17 cytokinesdosage of 17 cytokines : G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-17A, MCP-1 (MCAF), MIP-1β,TNF-α | Biological | Patients with an indication for septoplasty = control group, patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
Primary outcome
expression rate of TNF-alpha in biopsies
Time frame: 2 months
The main evaluation criterion is based on two variables: the expression rate of TNF-alpha in olfactory slit biopsies and the Sniffin Stick test score.
Sniffin Stick test score
Time frame: 2 months
The main evaluation criterion is based on two variables: the expression rate of TNF-alpha in olfactory slit biopsies and the Sniffin Stick test score. Sniffin Stick test score : The final score, out of 48, is the sum of the olfactory threshold (out of 16), discrimination (out of 16) and identification (out of 16) scores. Normal test values are defined as greater than the tenth percentile of the general population, so the test result is compared to reference values on a chart to determine whether the patient is normosmic, hyposmic or anosmic.
9 secondary outcomes
Olfactory Cleft Endoscopic Score
Time frame: 2 months
expression rate of TNF-alpha in polyps
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines G-CSF
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines GM-CSF
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines IFN-γ
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines MCP-1
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines MIP-1β
Time frame: 2 months
dosage of cytokines MCAF
Time frame: 2 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The laboratory in which the analyses on nasosinusal polyposis were to be carried out did not want to continue the research on this subject, so it was decided to stop this study prematurely.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Oct 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GSK5784283 (Felcorekibart) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Treated With Intranasal Corticosteroids (CONTRAST-NP)
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
RecruitingPhase 4
Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Changes in Symptoms in Adult Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Initiating Treatment With Tezepelumab
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Intraoperative Outcomes of Microdebrider-Assisted Versus Conventional Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With Sinonasal Polyposis
Nasal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marie GAVID, MD principal investigator
CHU de Saint Etienne
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sniffin Stick Test, numerical evaluation scale for olfaction and numerical evaluation scale for nasal obstruction in people with Nasal Polyps and Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The laboratory in which the analyses on nasosinusal polyposis were to be carried out did not want to continue the research on this subject, so it was decided to stop this study prematurely.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
expression rate of TNF-alpha in biopsies (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2022.