AzTrials
AzTrials

Aneurysm, BrainSURFNCT04106583

Assessing the WAVE Extra Soft Coil in Intracranial Aneurysms and Comparing Imaging Modalities

An observational study of Aneurysm, Brain, run by Penumbra Inc. at 43 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Penumbra SMART COIL® System, including the WAVE™ Extra Soft Coils (WAVE) as a fill and finish coil, in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aneurysm, Brain
What is being tested?
WAVE, as part of the SMART COIL System
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
572 participants
Where
43 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
5 Nov 2019to 2 Aug 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with WAVE, as part of the Penumbra SMART COIL System

Who may be able to join

  • Patient age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient having embolization of intracranial aneurysms
  • WAVE Extra Soft Coil is final finishing coil
  • Penumbra SMART COIL System accounts for at least 75% of total number of coils implanted
  • Informed consent obtained per Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee (IRB/EC) requirements

Who cannot join

  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Patient previously enrolled in the SURF Study
  • Known multiple intracranial aneurysms requiring treatment during index procedure
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with protocol follow up schedule and/or based on the Investigator's judgment the patient is not a good study candidate
  • Participation in an interventional drug or device study that may confound the results of the study

Trial locations and contacts

43 sites in 6 countries.

43 sites in 6 countries

United States34 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • SSM Health Care

    Bridgeton, Missouri, 63044

  • MUSC

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Baylor University Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Geisinger Medical Center

    Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822

  • Southeast Health Medical Center

    Dothan, Alabama, 36301

  • HRI - Swedish

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • Vidant Medical Center

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834

  • Greenville Memorial Hospital

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

  • Indiana University Health

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Amita Health

    Joliet, Illinois, 60435

  • University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996

  • Sharp Grossmont

    La Mesa, California, 91942

  • St. Anthony's Hospital

    Lakewood, Colorado, 80228

  • Northwell Health

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • McAllen Medical Center

    McAllen, Texas, 78503

  • University of Miami (Jackson Memorial)

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Yale New Haven

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06320

  • Ochsner Medical Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Riverside Regional Medical Center

    Newport News, Virginia, 23601

  • University of Oklahoma

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • UPenn

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Allegheny General Hospital

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212

  • Texas Stroke Institute - DFW

    Plano, Texas, 75075

  • University of South Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • Morton Plant

    Tampa, Florida, 33756

  • Los Robles

    Thousand Oaks, California, 91360

  • Mercy St. Vincent

    Toledo, Ohio, 43608

  • Banner UMC Tucson

    Tucson, Arizona, 85719

  • Westchester Medical Center

    Valhalla, New York, 10595

  • Metro Health

    Wyoming, Michigan, 49519

Other trials in United States

Germany3 sites
  • Bremen-Mitte

    Bremen

  • Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH

    Chemnitz, 09116

  • UKSH - Campus Lübeck

    Lübeck, 23538

Other trials in Germany

Canada2 sites
  • Foothills Medical Center

    Calgary, T2N 2T9

  • University Health Network

    Toronto, M5T 2S8

Other trials in Canada

Spain2 sites
  • Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona

  • Donostia

    San Sebastián

Other trials in Spain

Italy1 site
  • Maggiore della Carità

    Novara

Other trials in Italy

Switzerland1 site
  • Universitätsspital Basel

    Basel

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter Study Assessing the Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms Using WAVE™ Extra Soft Coils, a Part of the Penumbra SMART COIL® System

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Penumbra SMART COIL® System, including the WAVE™ Extra Soft Coils (WAVE) as a fill and finish coil, in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Imaging will be analyzed by an independent core lab to assess aneurysm occlusion rates and perform a comparative analysis between imaging modalities.

Conditions
Aneurysm, Brain
Being tested
WAVE, as part of the SMART COIL System
Medical subject headings
Intracranial Aneurysm

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • WAVE, as part of the SMART COIL SystemDevice

    WAVE, as part of the SMART COIL System

Study groups in NCT04106583
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single ArmSingle Arm - Patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with WAVE, as part of the Penumbra SMART COIL System
Receives: Device: WAVE, as part of the SMART COIL System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy: Adequate Occlusion

    Adequate occlusion defined as Raymond-Roy Class I and II at final follow-up

    Raymond-Roy Class grading ranges I to III higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

  2. Safety: Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    The primary safety endpoints are SAEs within 24 hours post-procedure

    Measured: Up to 24 Hours Post-Procedure

  3. Safety: Device-Related SAE

    Device-related SAE up to 7 days or discharge

    Measured: Through Discharge, up to 7 Days Post-Procedure

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Efficacy: Occlusion Rate

    Immediate post-procedure occlusion rates:

    Class 1 - Complete occlusion Class 2 - Residual neck Class 3 - Residual aneurysm

    The classification of angiographic results was adopted from Roy, Milot, and Raymond. Stroke 2001;32:1998-2004

    Measured: Immediate Post-Procedure

  2. Efficacy: Retreatment Rate

    Retreatment rate at final follow-up

    Measured: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

  3. Efficacy: Aneurysm Occlusion Raymond I

    Raymond-Roy Class grading ranges I to III higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: Immediate Post-Treatment

  4. Efficacy: Aneurysm Occlusion Raymond I

    Raymond-Roy Class grading ranges I to III higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

  5. Efficacy: Aneurysm Recanalization or Progressive Thrombosis

    Aneurysm recanalization or progressive thrombosis from post procedure to final follow-up

    Measured: From Immediate Post Procedure Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

  6. Safety: Major Ipsilateral Stroke

    Occurrence of Major Ipsilateral Stroke

    Measured: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

  7. Safety: Device-Related SAE

    Device related SAE at final follow-up

    Measured: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

  8. Safety: Morbidity and Mortality

    All-cause morbidity and mortality at final follow-up

    Measured: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2019
  2. Study start5 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion2 Aug 2023
  4. Study completion2 Aug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
572 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04106583
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLP 13669
Acronym
SURF
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
25 Sep 2019
Last updated
4 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Schirmer CM, Yoo AJ, Spiotta AM, Kaminsky I, Alshekhlee A, Starke RM, Nicholson A, Zaidat OO, Bohnstedt B, Psychogios MN, Viets R, Asif KS, Stapleton CJ, Mitha AP, Goren O; SURF Study Investigators. Intracranial aneurysm embolization using Penumbra fill and finish coils: 1-year results of a prospective, real-world, multicenter SURF study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2026 Apr 16;18(5):1297-1303. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2025-023633.

    PubMed 40908130

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aneurysm, Brain, run by Penumbra Inc. at 43 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 43 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, Spain, Italy and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy: Adequate Occlusion (time frame: Through Study Completion, An Average of 1 Year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04106583, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in