AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry EyeNCT04109170

Dry Eye Evaluation System Based on Bioinformatics

An observational study of Dry Eye, run by Huaxia Eye Hospital Group at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dry eye is a common ocular surface disease of multifactorial etiology characterized by elevated tear osmolality and inflammation leading to a disrupted ocular surface. The latter is a risk factor for ocular surface infection, yet overt infection is not commonly seen clinically in the typical dry eye patient. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
23 Sep 2019to 23 Jan 2020
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: People who meet the experimental conditions among the outpatients in our hospital will be selected into the group

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Dye Eye

Who cannot join

  • systemic disease (such as diabetes, glaucoma, or systemic collagen vascular disease), ocular disease, a history of tear supplement usage or contact lens wear during the past year,and pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Gangping Zhao, MD contact

+86(757)83903600

gpzhao@126.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Huaxia Eye Hosptial of Foshan

    Foshan, Guangdong, 528000

    Chi Zhang, MD,PhD, +86(757)83908461, zhangc94@huaxiaeye.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Dry eye is a common ocular surface disease of multifactorial etiology characterized by elevated tear osmolality and inflammation leading to a disrupted ocular surface. The latter is a risk factor for ocular surface infection, yet overt infection is not commonly seen clinically in the typical dry eye patient. This suggests that important innate mechanisms operate to protect the dry eye from invading pathogens. Understand the pathogenesis of dry eye will be the measure to prevention and treatment of dry eye.

In this essay, the investigators use the data of experiment in the patients with dry eye and normal, acquire their tear production, tear film stability, and surface damage. The investigators use weka to calculate the prediction accuracy of the 6 algorithm and select the best one, optimize the parameters to get the final prediction accuracy.

Conditions
Dry Eye
Keywords
Dry Eye, Bioinformatics, Data mining
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04109170
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dry Eye GroupThis group of subjects were diagnosed with dry eye.
Normal Control GroupThis group of subjects had no dry eye symptoms and signs and belonged to the normal control group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. OSDI

    The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI; Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA)consists of a 12-item questionnaire and is used to assess dry eye disease; the OSDI questions are drawn from three different categories: vision-related functions, ocular symptoms and environmental triggers. The OSDI is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (indicating no problems) to 4 (indicating a significant problem). Responses to all of the questions are combined to generate a composite OSDI score that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher OSDI scores representing greater disability. Subjects were asked questions regarding the dry eye symptoms that they experience.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  2. Schirmer I test

    The Schirmer I test (SIT) without anesthesia for tear secretion function was conducted by placing a 30-mm sterile Schirmer Tear Test strip into the junction of the middle and lateral thirds of the inferior fornix of each eye for 5 minutes. The wet portion of the strip was subsequently measured, with lower scores indicating less tear production.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  3. Fluorescein staining

    The cornea was divided into upper, lower, nasal, temporal and central zones. Superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) in the cornea was scored from 0 to 3 in each area. Where 0 indicated no staining in the cornea; 1,<5 punctate stains; 2,5-10 punctate stains; and 3,>10 or filamentous staining detected. The total score was recorded by adding the scores of the five zones for each eye (range: 0-15).

    Measured: up to 2 months

  4. Noninvasive Tear Breakup Time

    Noninvasive Tear Breakup Time (NI-TBUT) measurements of subjects' eyes were obtained by Keratograph 5. At the start of the recording, the patients were asked to blink three times and then keep their eyes open as long as possible. Irregularities in the reflected image indicated the instability of the tear film. Meanwhile, the examination was recorded on video and a single eye of each subject was assessed three times. All the tests were performeded the same temperature and humidity conditions.

    Measured: up to 2 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Tear meniscus height

    Tear meniscus height was also performed by the Keratograph 5 and the image of tear meniscus height was obtained by the instrument. The observer measured the tear meniscus height the center of the lower lid margin. This evaluation was taken three times and the average value was recorded.

    Measured: up to 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2019
  2. Study start23 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion23 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion23 Jan 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04109170
Sponsor's protocol ID
FSHX2019-01
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
24 Sep 2019
Last updated
30 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dry Eye, run by Huaxia Eye Hospital Group at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chi Zhang, PhD,MD (+86(757)83908467, zhangc94@huaxiaeye.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

OSDI (time frame: up to 2 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Dry Eye Evaluation System Based on Bioinformatics | AzTrials