Mitral Valve StenosisNCT04112108
Late Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Mitral Commissurotomy in Patients With Mitral Stenosis
An observational study of Mitral Valve Stenosis, run by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
Trial summary
In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Peri-procedural clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for these patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 52 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mitral Valve Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- PTMC
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIran
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 20 Sep 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 52 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: : In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Peri-procedural clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for these patients. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events in follow-up for the purpose of this study. Patients with no history of these events were contacted and asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥50% of initial area gain
Who may be able to join
- each patient with mitral stenosis undergone successful PTMC
Who cannot join
- patient refuse to took part
- inability to follow patient
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Late (up to 12 Years) Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy in Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Continuing Secondary Antibiotic Prophylaxis Does Not Protect Against Late Events
In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Peri-procedural clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for these patients. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events in follow-up for the purpose of this study. Patients with no history of these events were contacted and asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥50% of initial area gain
Read the detailed description
This research was designed as single-technique (Inoue balloon), multicenter retrospective- prospective cohort study. The target group of this study consisted of 220 patients with symptomatic MS who had undergone PTMC at in 4 hospitals (Baqiyatallah, Namazi, Shahid-Faghihi and Kowsar) under the supervision of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences between April 2006 and January 2018. The demographic data of the patients were obtained from the medical records departments at each center.
The inclusion criteria for the participants were: 1) age more than 20 years at the time of PTMC; 2) immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area (IMVA) ≥1.5 cm2, or for lower values, at least 50% increase in pre-PTMC mitral valve area (MVA); 3) an initial cardiovascular event-free period of at least 6 months after the procedure.
The exclusion criteria consisted of: 1) more than 2+ mitral regurgitation (MR) immediately after the procedure; 2) immediate cardiovascular event during the hospital stay after the procedure; 3) more than mild aortic stenosis or sufficiency before PTMC; 4) history of previous PTMC or surgical mitral procedures.
The study design and steps were approved by the ethics committees at both Baqiyatallah and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
PTMC Technique All PTMC procedures were done with an Inoue balloon catheter by skilled interventional cardiologists via anterograde trans-septal approach in all patients. Right and left cardiac catheterization was performed before and during the procedure to assess hemodynamic changes. Optimal balloon size (in millimeters) was estimated with the height (cm)/10 + 10 formula. The balloon was inflated in a step-wise fashion from lower to higher volumes. After each inflation, changes in trans-mitral mean pressure gradient (TMPG) and the degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) were monitored. Based on interventionist's judgement and in order to achieve optimal results, balloon inflation could be continued up to 1-2 mm more than the estimated size. In the last stage, left ventriculography was conducted to assess the degree of final MR.
Echocardiography All the patient included underwent transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in the week before PTMC by expert cardiologists with an advanced echocardiography fellowship. All general echocardiographic findings and significant mitral valve-related characteristics were reported. MVA was measured by planimetry in the short axis view, and also by pressure half-time quantification when atrial fibrillation (AF) or MR were not serious enough to interfere with its interpretation. The degree of MR was reported on a semi-quantitative scale of 0 to 4 based on Doppler color flow mapping. Mitral valve morphology was also evaluated with the standard Wilkins echocardiographic scoring system in the spectrum of 4 to 16. Pulmonary arterial pressure was estimated by measuring systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) in mmHg based on the trans-tricuspid regurgitation jet. Other significant variables in this study were left atrial diameter in centimeters, and mean trans-mitral pressure gradient (TMPG) in mmHg.
Each patient also had one session of transesophageal echocardiography during the day before the procedure in order to rule out thrombi in the left atrium or the left atrial appendage. Another session of TTE was performed during the first day after the procedure to confirm the immediate success of PTMC, with the main focus on mitral valve-related parameters, and also to rule out acute complications such as severe MR or cardiac tamponade.
Follow-up The clinical condition of the patients was recorded as their New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class before the procedure. Their clinical status was also followed in their inpatient and outpatient records. For the purpose of this study, the patients or their first-degree relatives were contacted by telephone in order to record the occurrence and exact timing of any adverse cardiac events, and also to reassess their current NYHA functional class status. Clinical events considered significant for the purpose of this study included: 1) cardiac-related death, 2) another session of PTMC, or 3) surgical procedure of mitral valve replacement (MVR). Patients who had been event-free until that time were asked to undergo another TTE evaluation after providing their informed consent, in order to compare the echocardiographic variables noted above with their previous records.
Statistical Analysis Continuous variables are reported as the mean ± SD. Categorical and nominal variables are shown as the number and percentage, and were pooled in some cases in order to facilitate the interpretation of the results. Initially, univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between variables and adverse cardiac events at follow-up. In the next stage, Cox multivariable regression was also performed to single out the independent variables. To evaluate the variables for the occurrence of restenosis during follow-up, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the best cut-off point for IMVA in interpreting the results. For all analyses a p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. All data analyses were done with IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 software.
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Stenosis
- Being tested
- PTMC
- Keywords
- percutaneous mitral commissurotomy, follow up
- Medical subject headings
- Mitral Valve Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PTMCProcedure or surgery
Also called mitral ballooning
percutaneous mitral ballooning with Inoue balloon
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| mitral stenosis post percutaneous mitral commissurotomy(PTMC) | successful PTMC after follow up Receives: Procedure: PTMC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
mitral stenosis
mitral valve area in echocardiographic evaluation<1.5 cm2
Measured: 5.6 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
functional class
New York heart association functional class
Measured: 5.6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2019
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion1 Sep 2018
- Study completion20 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mitral Valve StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 6 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Javad Kojuri, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04112108
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 97-55318
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: we have not to share data, unless all requests be evaluated by all authors
Publications
Dadjo Y, Moshkani Farahani M, Nowshad R, Sadeghi Ghahrodi M, Moaref A, Kojuri J. Mid-term (up to 12 years) clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02175-3.
PubMed 34320949
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Late (up to 12 Years) Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy in Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Continuing Secondary Antibiotic Prophylaxis Does Not Protect Against Late Events
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04112108
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 97-55318
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Stenosis
- Keywords
- percutaneous mitral commissurotomy, follow up
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shiraz University of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences University
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Peri-procedural clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for these patients. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events in follow-up for the purpose of this study. Patients with no history of these events were contacted and asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥50% of initial area gain
Detailed description
This research was designed as single-technique (Inoue balloon), multicenter retrospective- prospective cohort study. The target group of this study consisted of 220 patients with symptomatic MS who had undergone PTMC at in 4 hospitals (Baqiyatallah, Namazi, Shahid-Faghihi and Kowsar) under the supervision of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences between April 2006 and January 2018. The demographic data of the patients were obtained from the medical records departments at each center.
The inclusion criteria for the participants were: 1) age more than 20 years at the time of PTMC; 2) immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area (IMVA) ≥1.5 cm2, or for lower values, at least 50% increase in pre-PTMC mitral valve area (MVA); 3) an initial cardiovascular event-free period of at least 6 months after the procedure.
The exclusion criteria consisted of: 1) more than 2+ mitral regurgitation (MR) immediately after the procedure; 2) immediate cardiovascular event during the hospital stay after the procedure; 3) more than mild aortic stenosis or sufficiency before PTMC; 4) history of previous PTMC or surgical mitral procedures.
The study design and steps were approved by the ethics committees at both Baqiyatallah and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
PTMC Technique All PTMC procedures were done with an Inoue balloon catheter by skilled interventional cardiologists via anterograde trans-septal approach in all patients. Right and left cardiac catheterization was performed before and during the procedure to assess hemodynamic changes. Optimal balloon size (in millimeters) was estimated with the height (cm)/10 + 10 formula. The balloon was inflated in a step-wise fashion from lower to higher volumes. After each inflation, changes in trans-mitral mean pressure gradient (TMPG) and the degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) were monitored. Based on interventionist's judgement and in order to achieve optimal results, balloon inflation could be continued up to 1-2 mm more than the estimated size. In the last stage, left ventriculography was conducted to assess the degree of final MR.
Echocardiography All the patient included underwent transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in the week before PTMC by expert cardiologists with an advanced echocardiography fellowship. All general echocardiographic findings and significant mitral valve-related characteristics were reported. MVA was measured by planimetry in the short axis view, and also by pressure half-time quantification when atrial fibrillation (AF) or MR were not serious enough to interfere with its interpretation. The degree of MR was reported on a semi-quantitative scale of 0 to 4 based on Doppler color flow mapping. Mitral valve morphology was also evaluated with the standard Wilkins echocardiographic scoring system in the spectrum of 4 to 16. Pulmonary arterial pressure was estimated by measuring systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) in mmHg based on the trans-tricuspid regurgitation jet. Other significant variables in this study were left atrial diameter in centimeters, and mean trans-mitral pressure gradient (TMPG) in mmHg.
Each patient also had one session of transesophageal echocardiography during the day before the procedure in order to rule out thrombi in the left atrium or the left atrial appendage. Another session of TTE was performed during the first day after the procedure to confirm the immediate success of PTMC, with the main focus on mitral valve-related parameters, and also to rule out acute complications such as severe MR or cardiac tamponade.
Follow-up The clinical condition of the patients was recorded as their New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class before the procedure. Their clinical status was also followed in their inpatient and outpatient records. For the purpose of this study, the patients or their first-degree relatives were contacted by telephone in order to record the occurrence and exact timing of any adverse cardiac events, and also to reassess their current NYHA functional class status. Clinical events considered significant for the purpose of this study included: 1) cardiac-related death, 2) another session of PTMC, or 3) surgical procedure of mitral valve replacement (MVR). Patients who had been event-free until that time were asked to undergo another TTE evaluation after providing their informed consent, in order to compare the echocardiographic variables noted above with their previous records.
Statistical Analysis Continuous variables are reported as the mean ± SD. Categorical and nominal variables are shown as the number and percentage, and were pooled in some cases in order to facilitate the interpretation of the results. Initially, univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between variables and adverse cardiac events at follow-up. In the next stage, Cox multivariable regression was also performed to single out the independent variables. To evaluate the variables for the occurrence of restenosis during follow-up, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the best cut-off point for IMVA in interpreting the results. For all analyses a p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. All data analyses were done with IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 software.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 6 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| mitral stenosis post percutaneous mitral commissurotomy(PTMC) | – | Procedure: PTMCsuccessful PTMC after follow up |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 52 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- : In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Peri-procedural clinical and echocardiographic data were collected for these patients. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events in follow-up for the purpose of this study. Patients with no history of these events were contacted and asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥50% of initial area gain
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- each patient with mitral stenosis undergone successful PTMC
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patient refuse to took part
- inability to follow patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PTMCAlso: mitral ballooningpercutaneous mitral ballooning with Inoue balloon | Procedure or surgery | mitral stenosis post percutaneous mitral commissurotomy(PTMC) |
Primary outcome
mitral stenosis
Time frame: 5.6 years
mitral valve area in echocardiographic evaluation<1.5 cm2
1 secondary outcome
functional class
Time frame: 5.6 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34320949Dadjo Y, Moshkani Farahani M, Nowshad R, Sadeghi Ghahrodi M, Moaref A, Kojuri J. Mid-term (up to 12 years) clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02175-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. we have not to share data, unless all requests be evaluated by all authors
Related trials for Mitral Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of a Management Algorithm for TAVI Patients With Concomitant Mitral or Tricuspid Regurgitation
Aortic Stenosis, Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruiting
Importance of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Early Detection of Valvular and Cardiac Diseases (IMPROVE)
Valvular Heart Disease Patients, Aortic Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Korea VHD Echo Study: Surveillance of Aortic, Mitral & Tricuspid Patients - Insights From Real-world Practice
Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) vs Standard Sizing Strategy TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0)
Aortic Stenosis With Bicuspid Valve
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Mitral Valve Stenosis, run by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
mitral stenosis (time frame: 5.6 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04112108, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2019.