AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Knee OsteoarthritisNCT04112264

Ultrasound-guided Monopolar Versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Genicular Nerves in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis

A study testing Monopolar radiofrequency ablation and Bipolar radiofrequency ablation in people with Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound is safe and effective for treating intractable knee osteoarthritis pain by using either monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency ablation. This technique is based on anatomical studies demonstrating that genicular nerves are accompanied by genicular arteries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Monopolar radiofrequency ablation and Bipolar radiofrequency ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
4 Oct 2020to 1 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Radiologic tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-4).
  • Patients not responding to other treatments as physiotherapy, oral analgesics, and intraarticular injection with hyaluronic acids or steroids.
  • Patients refused surgery.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Prior knee surgery.
  • Acute knee pain.
  • Intra-articular knee corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection in the past 3 months.
  • Connective tissue diseases that affected the knee.
  • Anticoagulant medication use.
  • Local skin infection and sepsis at the site of intervention

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sherif A Mousa, MD contact

00201001637298

S_abdomousa@yahoo.com

Ola T Abd El-Dayem, MD contact

00201202811110

Olataha2007@yahoo.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mansoura University

    Al Mansurah, DK, 050

    Sherif A Mousa, MD, 00201001637298, S_abdomousa@yahoo.com

    Ola T Abd El-Dayem, MD, 00201202811110, Olataha2007@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Effect of Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Genicular Nerves Compared to Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using Ultrasound in Treating Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis

Radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound is safe and effective for treating intractable knee osteoarthritis pain by using either monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency ablation.

This technique is based on anatomical studies demonstrating that genicular nerves are accompanied by genicular arteries. Ultrasound-guided RF genicular ablation yielded both significant reductions in knee pain and improvements in functional capacity.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare between ultrasound guided monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency ablation in chronic knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis of knee joint is one of the most common disease conditions with advanced age and leads to considerable morbidity in terms of pain, stiffness, limitation in functions, disturbance in sleep and psychological disturbance

A diagnostic genicular nerve block (GNB) with local anesthetic is performed before RF genicular ablation, and a successful response to GNB is considered to indicate the need for RF genicular ablation

Being tested
Monopolar radiofrequency ablation, Bipolar radiofrequency ablation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Monopolar radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery

    a radiofrequency cannula is advanced under USG guidance towards the nerve. The final position will be confirmed by using nerve stimulator with elicitation of paraesthesia along the area of knee joint supplied by that respected genicular nerve by stimulation at 50 Hz current of <0.5 mV. The motor stimulation will be negative at all instances. For each genicular nerve, two conventional RF lesions are done for 120s at 80° of temperature using the Neurotherm 1100 RF generator.

  • Bipolar radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery

    Two radiofrequency cannula are advanced under USG guidance towards the nerve. The final position will be confirmed by using nerve stimulator with elicitation of paraesthesia by stimulation at 50 Hz current of <0.5 mV. The motor stimulation will be negative at all instances. For each genicular nerve, two conventional RF lesions are done for 120s at 80° of temperature using the Neurotherm 1100 RF generator.

Study groups in NCT04112264
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Monopolar radiofrequency ablationExperimentalPatients will receive ultrasound-guided monopolar radiofrequency ablation
Receives: Procedure: Monopolar radiofrequency ablation
Bipolar radiofrequency ablationActive comparatorPatients will receive ultrasound-guided bipolar radiofrequency ablation
Receives: Procedure: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Osteoarthritis pain

    The mean changes from baseline levels of osteoarthritis pain using visual analogue scale used to measure pain intensity. It is 10 cm scale where 0 cm represent no pain and 10 cm represent the worst pain ever

    Measured: basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Oxford Knee Score

    A specific score to assess the functional changes in the knee using Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The scores are 12-item questionnaires ranging from 12-60, with 12 representing the optimal outcome.

    Measured: basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure

  2. The procedure time

    The procedure time taken by each mode of radiofrequency from the start of advancement of the cannula under US guidance to the end of the procedure.

    Measured: from the start of advancement of the cannula to end of procedure.

  3. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction score with treatment which is scored from 1 to 10. A score of 1-4 was considered "dissatisfied," 5-8 was "satisfied," and 9 or 10 was "very satisfied

    Measured: up to 24 weeks post procedure

  4. Changes in doses of rescue analgesics

    Measured: up to 24 weeks post procedure

  5. The incidence of numbness

    Measured: up to 24 weeks post procedure

  6. The incidence of paresthesia

    Measured: up to 24 weeks post procedure

  7. The incidence of motor weakness

    Measured: up to 24 weeks post procedure

  8. the proportion of successful responders

    the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of at least 50% of median VAS score and no increase from baseline OKS

    Measured: up to 24 weeks post procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2019
  2. Study start4 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04112264
Sponsor's protocol ID
MD.19.03.152
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
25 Sep 2019
Last updated
8 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: study protocol Statistical analysis plan Informed consent form

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Monopolar radiofrequency ablation and Bipolar radiofrequency ablation in people with Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sherif A Mousa, MD (00201001637298, S_abdomousa@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Osteoarthritis pain (time frame: basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in