AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative RecoveryNCT04112394

Does Erector Spinal Block Improve Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A study testing local anesthetic injection and Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol. in people with Postoperative Recovery, run by Konya Meram State Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of this prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the effect of erector spinae block (ESP) on quality of recovery with the QoR-40 questionnaire in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Recovery
What is being tested?
local anesthetic injection and Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol.
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
82 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
29 Sep 2019to 4 Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Who cannot join

  • a history of allergy to local anesthetics
  • known coagulation disorders
  • infection near the puncture site
  • Chronic opioid intake
  • Patient with psychiatric disorders
  • inability to communicate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Konya Education and Training Hospital

    Konya

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Recovery Quality (QoR-40) in Patients Undergoing Erector Spinal Area (ESP) Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The primary aim of this prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the effect of erector spinae block (ESP) on quality of recovery with the QoR-40 questionnaire in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, one of the most common general surgical procedures, is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder diseases. Although it is considered as minimally invasive surgery, pain in the early postoperative period is still meaningful. Proper pain control is essential for optimizing clinical outcomes and earlier ambulation after surgery. Traditional pain management with opioids provide good pain control, however, have undesirable side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression. Multimodal analgesia strategies with different classes of analgesics or local anesthetics may enhance pain relief and reduce side effects after surgery. The ESP a newer regional nerve blockade, has been used as part of a multimodal strategy to optimize postoperative pain control. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ESP block on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with QoR-40 recovery questionnaire. Secondary aim is to assess the effect of ESP block on postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting.

Study hypothesize is that patients who receive an ESP block in addition to the current standard of care, consisting of parenteral opioids and paracetamol, will have a clinically significant improvement in their QoR-40 at postoperative day 1 and lower pain levels, as measured by NRS in comparison to those patients who receive the current standard of care along.

Being tested
local anesthetic injection, Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • local anesthetic injectionOther

    A linear ultrasound transducer will be place in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation about 3 cm lateral to spinous process. Local anesthetic mixture will be injected bilaterally into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of erector spinae muscle. Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol will be given and postoperative pain levels will be determined by Numerical rating scale (NRS).

  • Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol.Other

    Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol will be given consisting of paracetamol 1 gr IV and tenoxicam 20 mg IV initiated after induction of anesthesia. At the end of the operation patients will receive contramal 1 mg/kg IV before extubation. Postoperative pain levels will be determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) system, 20 minutes intervals in the first hour and at 2th, 6th, 12th and 24 th hour. For the first hour in the postoperative care unit, tramadol 50 mg IV will be given for rescue analgesia with minimum 20 minutes between doses, in patients showing a NRS ≥ 4. Paracetamol 1 g / 12 hour will be given during ward follow-up. In the ward in patients showing a NRS ≥ 4 tramadol 50 mg IV will be given for analgesia.

Study groups in NCT04112394
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESP GroupExperimentalIn addition to routine standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol patients will receive a single shot of local anesthetic injection at the erector spinae plane.
Receives: Other: local anesthetic injection
ControlOtherPatients will receive standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol.
Receives: Other: Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score

    QoR-40, a 40-item questionnaire that provides a global score and subscores across five dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, and pain. Each item is rated on a scale of 1-5, providing a minimum score of 40 and maximum of 200.

    Measured: postoperative 24 hour

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Postoperative pain: numeric rating scale (NRS)

    NRS use numbers to rate pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Measured: Postoperative 24 hours

  2. Analgesic consumption

    Total opioid consumption after the surgery

    Measured: Postoperative 24 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2019
  2. Study start29 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion20 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion4 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04112394
Sponsor's protocol ID
ESP-Quality of Recovery
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
30 Sep 2019
Last updated
7 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Canitez A, Kozanhan B, Aksoy N, Yildiz M, Tutar MS. Effect of erector spinae plane block on the postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

    PubMed 34340839

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing local anesthetic injection and Standard perioperative and postoperative analgesia protocol. in people with Postoperative Recovery, run by Konya Meram State Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score (time frame: postoperative 24 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04112394, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in