AzTrials
AzTrials

Concussion, BrainNCT04112914

Developing an Implementation Strategy for Post-concussion Communication With Low Health Literacy Parents in the Emergency Department

A study testing Post-concussion education for families in people with Concussion, Brain, run by Seattle Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigators will conduct a hybrid implementation-effectiveness evaluation of an educational intervention that supports communication with families post-concussion in the emergency department. Primary outcomes will be parent self-report of specific concussion management behaviors two weeks post-visit. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Concussion, Brain
What is being tested?
Post-concussion education for families
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Jan 2021to 27 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Parent/guardian of a child between the ages of 5 and 17 who presented to the Seattle Children's Hospital Emergency Department and was treated for closed head injury.
  • Child for whom care was sought was not admitted for inpatient care
  • Parent/guardian of child without chronic disease or with non-complex chronic disease
  • Parent/guardian with a preferred language for medical care of English or Spanish
  • Parent/guardian present in the ED is child's legal guardian

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Seattle Children's Hospital Emergency Department

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

Other trials in United States

About this study

Investigators will conduct a hybrid implementation-effectiveness evaluation of an educational intervention that supports communication with families post-concussion in the emergency department. Primary outcomes will be parent self-report of specific concussion management behaviors two weeks post-visit. Investigators will also explore whether successful implementation is associated with (1) improved parent knowledge and self-efficacy related to helping their child adhere to CDC guidelines for returning to daily activities, school and sports, and (2) decreased disparity in knowledge and self-efficacy between high and low health literacy parents.

Read the detailed description

Parents can play an important role in evidence-based concussion management by (1) monitoring their child's activity and level of stimulation, (2) communicating with school personnel about potential need for short-term academic accommodations, and (3) ensuring their child does not return to contact or collision sport prematurely and risk greater injury. However, not all parents follow these evidence-based guidelines, in part due to health literacy deficits, and further compounded by the poor fit and inconsistent implementation of educational materials. The initial medical encounter following a concussion provides an important opportunity for evidence-based knowledge translation to parents. Families at risk of low health literacy most often seek initial post-concussion care in emergency departments (ED) and often do not follow-up with a primary care provider or concussion specialist. Knowledge translation to parents in the ED is often inconsistent in terms of content and delivery, and existing approaches often do not meet the needs of families with low health literacy. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit provides an evidence-based approach to supporting the implementation of parent education that has not as yet been adapted for use post-concussion in the ED setting. Investigators will work with stakeholders to develop toolkit to support evidence-based parent education post-concussion in the ED. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, investigators will adapt the AHRQ RED Toolkit to facilitate post-concussion parent education in the ED. The evidence-based parent education to be shared will be an asynchronous text-based intervention, adapted to meet learning needs of parents with low health literacy and limited English proficiency. Investigators will use parent and provider interviews to iteratively develop the implementation toolkit in consultation with an advisory board comprised of parents. The clinical trial component of the study will be a hybrid implementation-effectiveness evaluation of the educational intervention. Primary outcomes will be parent self-report of specific concussion management behaviors two weeks post-visit. Investigators will also explore whether successful implementation is associated with (1) improved parent knowledge and self-efficacy related to helping their child adhere to CDC guidelines for returning to daily activities, school and sports, and (2) decreased disparity in knowledge and self-efficacy between high and low health literacy parents. Achieving these aims will result in a scalable approach to the implementation of the developed parent education toolkit in the pediatric ED post-concussion. If parents are better able to follow evidence-based guidelines for concussion, they will better advocate and care for their children, and this should improve outcomes for all youth. More broadly, achieving these aims will provide a model for engaging low health literacy parents in adapting evidence-based educational practices for implementation in ED settings.

Being tested
Post-concussion education for families
Medical subject headings
Brain Concussion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Post-concussion education for familiesBehavioural

    An educational intervention for families will be developed based on the CDC guidelines for returning to daily activities, school, and sports, adapted with stakeholder feedback to meet the learning needs of low health literacy parents.

Study groups in NCT04112914
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Education as usualNo interventionParticipants receive education/healthcare provider communication as usual during their visit to the ED for concussion care.
New educationExperimentalParticipants receive the newly developed educational intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Post-concussion education for families

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Concussion Management Behaviors: Communication

    Parent self-report of specific emotionally supportive concussion management behaviors in the home setting using the emotionally supportive behaviors index. This index is comprised of three communication practices: whether they had talked to their child about "how they are feeling emotionally (e.g., sadness, anxiety)", "the time it takes to recover from a head injury can be different from person to person," and "their concerns about their recovery from head injury." Responses were summed to create a communication index with a possible range of 3 to 9, with higher scores indicating more supportive communication with their child during recovery (Cronbach's alpha=0.59).

    Measured: Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

  2. Change in Concussion Management Behaviors: Supportive/Rehabilitation-related

    Parent self-report of specific instrumentally-supportive concussion management behaviors in the home setting using the instrumentally supportive behaviors index. This index was comprised of three rehabilitation-related behaviors: "helped child do more physical activity as symptoms improved," "allowed child to return to normal media use as symptoms improved," "and helped child adjust bedtime or sleep environment." Responses were summed to create an instrumental support behavioral index with a possible range of 3 to 9, with higher scores indicating more supportive/rehabilitation-related behaviors (Cronbach's alpha=0.55).

    Measured: Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

  3. Change in Concussion Management Behaviors: Follow-up Appointment

    Percentage of participants who reported they had scheduled a follow-up appointment for their child.

    Measured: Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in Concussion Management Self-efficacy: Communication

    Self-report of parent confidence in their ability to engage in specific emotionally supportive concussion management behaviors in the home setting using the communication self-efficacy scale. For each of the behaviors, parents were asked to report how challenging it would be to engage in each. Responses were obtained on a 5-point scale where higher scores indicate that performing the behavior would be more challenging (i.e., they have lower self-efficacy). For each domain-specific measure, item level means were calculated, meaning there was a possible range of 1 to 5. In this sample, internal consistency reliability was adequate for the communication subscale (Cronbach's alpha=0.90).

    Measured: Timepoint 1 [At ED visit], Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

  2. Change in Concussion Management Self-efficacy: Supportive/Rehabilitation-related

    Self-report of parent confidence in their ability to engage in specific instrumentally-supportive concussion management behaviors in the home setting using the rehabilitation self-efficacy scale. For each of the parenting behaviors, parents were asked to report how challenging it would be to engage in each. Responses were obtained on a 5-point scale where higher scores indicate that performing the behavior would be more challenging (i.e., they have lower self-efficacy). For each domain-specific measure, item level means were calculated, meaning there was a possible range of 1 to 5. In this sample, internal consistency reliability was adequate for the rehabilitation subscale (Cronbach's alpha=0.79).

    Measured: Timepoint 1 [At ED visit], Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

  3. Change in Concussion Management Self-efficacy: Follow-up

    Parent self-report of how challenging it would be to make a follow-up appointment for their child. Responses were obtained on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicate that performing the behavior would be more challenging (i.e., they have lower self-efficacy). Item level means were calculated, meaning there was a possible range of 1 to 5.

    Measured: Timepoint 1 [At ED visit], Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

  4. Change in Concussion Knowledge

    Self-report of parent knowledge about the benefits of engaging in specific concussion management behaviors in the home setting was measured using the concussion knowledge index. This index was comprised of 10 true or false questions reflecting the knowledge parents need to perform the targeted guideline-consistent communication, rehabilitation, and external engagement behaviors. The index has a potential range of 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.

    Measured: Timepoint 1 [At ED visit], Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2019
  2. Study start5 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion27 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Consecutive cohort design with randomization
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04112914
Sponsor's protocol ID
R21NS111065
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
29 Jul 2019
Last updated
29 Apr 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Post-concussion education for families in people with Concussion, Brain, run by Seattle Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Apr 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Concussion Management Behaviors: Communication (time frame: Timepoint 3 [Two weeks post-visit]). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in