AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient SatisfactionCORANCT04113577

COgilus Remediation in Alzheimer Patients (CORA)

An observational study of Patient Satisfaction and Neurocognitive Disorders, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the usability of a new tablet PC application to stimulate cognitive functions. Patients hospitalized in a geriatric ward (day or complete hospitalisation) but also their informal and professional caregivers will assess the usability of the application using a structured survey. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
usability survey
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
30 Oct 2019to 30 Oct 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients are recruited during their complet or day hospitalisation in geriatric medicine. Relatives / unformal caregivers are recruited during the hospitalisation of patients in geriatric medicine. Professionnal caregivers are recruited in the acute care geriatric unit or in the day hospitalisation geriatric unit.

Who may be able to join

  • no opposition to be part of the study
  • patients:
  • over 65 years old
  • to be hospitalised in geriatric medicine department of Angers University Hospital
  • mild cognitive impairment (winblad criterion) or minor neurocognitive disorder du to alzheimer disease or early major neurocognitive disorder du to alzheimer disease (DSM V and NINCDS-ADRDA criterion)
  • unformal cargivers and health profesionnals:
  • over 18 years old

Who cannot join

  • depression (geriatric depression scale 15 items: over 10/15)
  • delirum (assessed with the confusion assessment methode)
  • to be under legal protection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Cedric ANNWEILER, MD, PhD contact

0241354725 ext. +33

allegro@chu-angers.fr

France1 site
  • Angers University Hospital

    Angers, 49933 cedex 9

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: COgilus Remediation in Alzheimer Patients

This study evaluates the usability of a new tablet PC application to stimulate cognitive functions. Patients hospitalized in a geriatric ward (day or complete hospitalisation) but also their informal and professional caregivers will assess the usability of the application using a structured survey.

Read the detailed description

Attention span is one of the most frequently and early impaired cognitive functions during aging, especially in neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. Decline of attention span can lead to a cognitive complaint by the patient or his or her relatives, even in the prodromal phase of the disease (DSM V: minor neurocognitive disorder). The current challenge is to develop strategies to prevent the cognitive decline in patients with minor neurocognitive disorder or major cognitive disorder with slight impairment, and thus to limit cognitive decline. However, to date, no strategy has shown clear effectiveness in preventing cognitive decline in patients with neurocognitive disorder.

Interestingly, the integration of perceptual skills are modified in patients with neurocognitive disorders, and in particular visuomotor skills (from early stages). Measurements of evoked potientials during visual stimulation in patients with minor neurocognitive disorder have shown a preservation of sensory responses but a decrease in cognitive responses. Based on this observation, a US team had recently tested the effectiveness of computer-based visual cognitive exercises performed regularly for 8 weeks in patients free of major neurocognitive disorder. They had reported an improvement in information processing speed and walking performance. These results suggest that regular cognitive stimulation exercises using tablet PC visual exercices could improve attention span and in particular the information processing speed in patient with minor or early major neurocognitive disorder.

In particular, Cogilus, a cross-platform tablet PC application (Android, iOS, Microsoft) has recently been developed for this purpose. The Cogilus project, is designed for health professionals who support patients with neurological syndromes including cognitive or attentional dysfunctions. The application is also open to carers and family members, who will be able to support the patient in using the application (based on the exercices proposed by professionals).

The finale objective of the Cogilus project is to assess the impact of the regular use of Cogilus on patient with minor or early major neurocognitive disorder. Considering the specific needs in usability for this population, the first step to devoloppe such technology is to assess the usability of the application in patients but also in unformal and professional cargivers.

Being tested
usability survey
Keywords
old people, elderly, minor neurocognitive disorder, major neurocognitive disorder, neurocognitive disorder, mild cogntitive impairment, MCI, alzheimer disease, app, usability, ergonomic, satisfaction
Medical subject headings
Patient Satisfaction, Neurocognitive Disorders, Alzheimer Disease, Personal Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • usability surveyOther

    usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about global ergonomics of the app, questions about eronomics of the exerecices, question about global satisfaction.

Study groups in NCT04113577
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
geriatric inpatients with neurocognitive disorderusability assessment after 30 minutes to test the app
Receives: Other: usability survey
unformal cargiversusability assessment after 30 minutes to test the app with their relatives
Receives: Other: usability survey
health professionalsusablity assessment after the enrollement of all patients and unformal caregivers
Receives: Other: usability survey

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Usability regarding the Cogilus app

    Average of the usability scores. Usability score is calculated using the responses to the validated System Usability Scale (SUS). SUS is composed of 10 questions. Each response is ranking from 0 to 5. The total score ranges between 0 and 100. It is calculted considering the sum of the result on each question multiplicated by 2. An average score equal or over 70/100 will be considered as satisfying.

    Measured: after 30 minutes of test of the app

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Satisfaction regarding the Cogilus app

    Average recommendation score. Satisfaction score is calculated using the responses to the recommendation scale. This scale is a ten point's scale from 0 (I don't recommend at all) to 10 (I fully recommend). An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.

    Measured: after 30 minutes of test of the app

  2. Global ergonomics regarding the Cogilus app

    Average ergonomics score: The ergonomics score is a composite score based on the average of the answers to four ergonomics questions on a four-level Likert scale. The Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The average score is reported on ten. An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.

    Measured: after 30 minutes of test of the app

  3. Ergonomics regarding the exercices proposed in the Cogilus app

    Average ergonomics score: The ergonomics score is a composite score based on the average of the answers to four ergonomics questions on a four-level Likert scale. The Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The average score is reported on ten. An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.

    Measured: after 30 minutes of test of the app

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2019
  2. Study start30 Oct 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04113577
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019/39
Acronym
CORA
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
1 Oct 2019
Last updated
4 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patient Satisfaction and Neurocognitive Disorders, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cedric ANNWEILER, MD, PhD (0241354725 ext. +33, allegro@chu-angers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Usability regarding the Cogilus app (time frame: after 30 minutes of test of the app). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in