AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3PENGUIN 1NCT04115748

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic DMARD Therapy

A Phase 3 study testing Filgotinib and Adalimumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Gilead Sciences at 74 sites in 13 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Filgotinib and Adalimumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
67 participants
Where
74 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
3 Dec 2019to 11 May 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) and have a history consistent with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) ≥ 6 months at Screening
  • Have active PsA defined as ≥ 3 swollen joints (from a 66 swollen joint count [SJC]) and ≥ 3 tender joints (from a 68 tender joint count [TJC]) at Screening and Day 1; these may or may not be the same joints at Screening and Day 1
  • Must have a documented history or active signs of at least one of the following at Screening:
  • Plaque psoriasis
  • Nail changes attributed to psoriasis
  • Have had inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD), apremilast and / or NSAID, administered over the course of ≥ 12 weeks for the treatment of PsA, as per local guidelines / standard of care

Who cannot join

  • Prior PsA or psoriasis treatment with a biologic DMARD
  • Prior exposure to a janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor > 2 doses
  • Any active / recent infection
  • Any chronic and / or uncontrolled medical condition that would put the individual at increased risk during study participation or circumstances which may make an individual unlikely or unable to complete or comply with study procedures and requirements, per investigator judgement
  • Any moderately to severely active musculoskeletal or skin disorder other than PsA or plaque psoriasis that would interfere with assessment of study parameters, as per judgement of investigator
  • NOTE: Prior history of reactive arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis is permitted if there is documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or additional diagnosis of PsA
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Any history of an inflammatory arthropathy with onset before age 16 years old
  • Active autoimmune disease that would interfere with assessment of study parameters or increase risk to the individual by participating in the study (e.g. uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled thyroiditis, systemic vasculitis, transverse myelitis), per judgement of investigator
  • Pregnancy or nursing females
  • Active drug or alcohol abuse, as per judgement of investigator
  • Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

74 sites in 13 countries.

74 sites in 13 countries

United States24 sites
  • Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis

    Brandon, Florida, 33511

  • Joint and Muscle Research Institute

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic of Brazos Valley (Drug Shipment Address)

    College Station, Texas, 77845

  • Articularis Healthcare Inc, dba, Columbia Arthritis Center, PA

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29204

  • Medvin Clinical Research

    Covina, California, 91723

  • Omega Research Debary, LLC

    DeBary, Florida, 32713

  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • St. Paul Rheumatology, P.A.

    Eagan, Minnesota, 55121

  • Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • North Georgia Rheumatology Group

    Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046

  • Physician Research Collaaboration, LLCs

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.

    Miami, Florida, 33015

  • Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130

  • ACME Research, LLC

    Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118

  • Hmd Research Llc

    Orlando, Florida, 32819

  • Arthritis Center, Inc.

    Palm Harbor, Florida, 85234

  • Clinical Research Source Inc

    Perrysburg, Ohio, 43551

  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081

  • West Virginia Research Institute PLLC

    South Charleston, West Virginia, 25309

  • Arthritis Consultants, Inc.

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • ForCare Clinical Research

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • BayCare Medical Group, Inc.

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Atlantic Coast Research

    Toms River, New Jersey, 08755

Other trials in United States

Poland13 sites
  • Gabinet Internistyczno-Reumatologiczny Piotr Adrian Klimiuk

    Bialystok, Podlaskie, 15-099

  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. dr Jana Biziela

    Bydgoszcz, 85-168

  • NSZOZ Unica CR

    Dabrówka, 62096

  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Gdynia

    Gdynia, 81-338

  • Malopolskie Badania Kliniczne SP Z O O Sp. k.

    Krakow, 30-349

  • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED s.c.

    Nadarzyn, 05-830

  • ETYKA Osrodek Badan Klinicznych

    Olsztyn, 10-117

  • Medycyna Kliniczna Marzena Waszczak-Jeka

    Warsaw, 00-874

  • Pheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej

    Warsaw, 02-118

  • Centrum Medyczne AMED Warszawa

    Warsaw, 03-921

  • REUMATOLOG WARSZAWA Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Dr n. med. Jakub Trefler

    Warsaw, 04-305

  • ARS RHEUMATICA Sp. Z.o.o., "REUMATIKA-Centrum Reumatologii", NZOZ

    Warszawa, Mazowieckie, 02-691

  • Centrum Medyczne Oporow

    Wroclaw, 52-416

Other trials in Poland

Taiwan7 sites
  • Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital

    Dailin Township, 622

  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 833

  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Keelung, 204

  • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

    New Taipei City, 220

  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital

    Tainan, 70403

  • Chi Mei Medical Center

    Tainan, 71004

  • Taipei Medical University Hospital

    Taipei, 11031

Other trials in Taiwan

Bulgaria5 sites
  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Plovdiv AD, Department Of Rheumatology

    Plovdiv, 4003

  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Lyulin" EAD, Department of Rheumatology

    Sofia, 1336

  • Diagnostic consultative center 17 Sofia EOOD

    Sofia, 1505

  • "Medical center Synexus Sofia" EOOD

    Sofia, 1784

  • "Medical center SYNEXUS SOFIA" EOOD, branch Stara Zagora

    Stara Zagora, 6000

Other trials in Bulgaria

Japan4 sites
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center

    Kawachi-Nagano, 586-8521

  • Daido Clinic

    Nagoya, 457-8511

  • Nagoya City University Hospital

    Nagoya, 467-8602

  • Keio University Hospital

    Tokyo, 160-8582

Other trials in Japan

New Zealand4 sites
  • Optimal Clinical Trials

    Auckland, 1010

  • Waikato Hospital

    Hamilton, WKO, 3240

  • Capital & Coast District Health Board

    Newtown, 6021

  • Clinical Trials Unit, Timaru Hospital

    Timaru, 7910

Other trials in New Zealand

Spain4 sites
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba s/n, Rheumatology Service, Madrid, Spain, 28041

    Madrid, 28041

  • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli

    Sabadell, 8208

  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Rheumatology Service, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, Santander, Cantabria, 39008

    Santander, 39008

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena

    Seville, 41007

Other trials in Spain

Australia3 sites
  • Genesis Research Services

    Broadmeadow, New South Wales, 2292

  • Emeritus Research

    Camberwell, Victoria, 3124

  • Rheumatology Research Unit

    Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558

Other trials in Australia

Russia3 sites
  • Ulitsa Delegatskaya, 20, Building 1, Ulitsa Kasatkina, 7 Moscow, Russia, 127473/129301

    Moskva, 127473

  • LLC "Biomed"

    Vladimir, 600005

  • Center for medical advice and research - PRACTICE LTD

    Yaroslavl, 150003

Other trials in Russia

South Korea3 sites
  • CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University

    Seongnam, 13496

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • SMG - SNU Boramae Medical Center

    Seoul, 07061

Other trials in South Korea

Hungary2 sites
  • Synexus (DRS) - Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. Budapest

    Budapest, 1036

  • Synexus (DRS) - Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. Gyula

    Gyula, 5700

Other trials in Hungary

Canada1 site
  • G.R.M.O. (Groupe de recherche en maladies osseuses) Inc.

    Québec, G1V3M7

Other trials in Canada

Czechia1 site
  • CCR Ostrava, s.r.o.

    Ostrava, 702 00

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Adalimumab-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic DMARD Therapy

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. The study consists of two parts, the Main Study and the Long Term Extension (LTE).

Being tested
Filgotinib, Adalimumab, Placebo to match filgotinib, Placebo to match adalimumab
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FilgotinibDrug

    Also called GS-6034, GLPG0634

    Tablets administered orally once daily with or without food

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Injection administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks

  • Placebo to match filgotinibDrug

    Tablets administered orally once daily with or without food

  • Placebo to match adalimumabDrug

    Injection administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks

Study groups in NCT04115748
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)ExperimentalParticipants will receive filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match (PTM) filgotinib 100 mg + PTM adalimumab injection for up to 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match adalimumab
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)ExperimentalParticipants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + filgotinib 100 mg + PTM adalimumab for up to 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match adalimumab
Adalimumab (Main Study)Active comparatorParticipants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + PTM filgotinib 100 mg + adalimumab 40 mg injection for up to 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib
Placebo (Main Study)Placebo comparatorParticipants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + PTM filgotinib 100 mg + PTM adalimumab injection for up to 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match adalimumab
Filgotinib 200 mg (Long Term Extension [LTE])ExperimentalParticipants will receive filgotinib 200 mg + PTM filgotinib 100 mg for up to 34 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib
Filgotinib 100 mg (LTE)ExperimentalParticipants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + filgotinib 100 mg for up to 34 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Filgotinib; Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 12

    ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68), swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGADA) using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); physician's global assessment of disease activity (PHGADA) using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (39)
  1. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16

    PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor]; PhGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity];36-item short form survey (SF-36) [a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) [assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis];Tender dactylitis count (TDC) [with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis];C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; Psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASI) ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA <3% [PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; patient's global assessment of PsA pain intensity (PGAPI) ≤15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)]; PGADA ≤20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    VLDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the VLDA if the participant fulfills all the seven criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; PASI score ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA <3% [PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; PGAPI ≤15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to (serious pain)]; PGADA ≤20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 with participants with enthesitis at baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  4. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline

    The PhGAP is used to determine the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. The participant's psoriasis disease activity is assessed by a physician according to the grades of induration, erythema, and scaling on a scale of 0 to 5. The sum of the three grades is used to obtain the total average score. PhGAP is based on the total average score on a scale of 0-5 where, 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, and 5 = severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  6. Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at Baseline

    mNAPSI is used to assess each nail abnormality for each of the participant's nails. Three features or groups of features (pitting, onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, and crumbling) of each fingernail are graded on a scale from 0 (no onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, no pitting, no crumbling) to 3 (>30 onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, >50 pitting, >50% crumbling). Four features (leukonychia, splinter, hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula) are graded with the score of 1 = present or 0 = absent for each fingernail. Each finger has a score between 0 and 13. The total mNAPSI score is the sum of all abnormalities individual score across all fingers, and the total mNAPSI score ranges from 0 to 130. Lower numbers indicate fewer nail abnormalities. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

    Enthesitis is assessed using LEI. The enthesitis examination by LEI evaluates the presence or absence of pain by applying local pressure on 6 anatomical sites: medial femoral condyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), and the achilles tendon insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16

    The PsAID questionnaire assesses the impact of PsA on people's lives. The PsAID is calculated based on 12 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10. Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores, (some of which were multiplied by a weighting factor) divided by 20 for a total possible score of 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse impact of disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

  9. Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16

    PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor]; PhGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) [a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status]; TJC68; SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) [assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) [with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS LDA is defined as PASDAS ≤ 3.2.

    Measured: Weeks 4, and 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16

    PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor]; PhGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) [a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) [assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) [with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS remission is defined as PASDAS ≤ 1.9.

    Measured: Weeks 4, and 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    ACR50 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    TJC68 is an assessment of 68 joints. Each joint is evaluated as 'normal', 'tender', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all tender joints. The overall tender joint count ranged from 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  15. Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    SJC66 is an assessment of 66 joints. Each joint was evaluated as 'normal', 'swollen', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  16. Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    PGADA is assessed by the participants using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  17. Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    PhGADA is assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  18. Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    HAQ-DI's pain assessment is done using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  19. Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The hsCRP is the ACR core set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of filgotinib on the participant's psoriatic arthritis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  20. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)] and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  21. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  22. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  23. Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA

    The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28 (CRP) ≤ 3.2. Time to achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAS28 (CRP) LDA.

    Measured: Up to 19 weeks

  24. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA ≤ 14.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  25. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA remission is defined as DAPSA ≤ 4.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  26. Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA

    DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. Time to achieve DAPSA LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAPSA LDA. If the DAPSA LDA is not achieved during main study phase, the time to achieve DAPSA LDA will be censored at the last non-missing DAPSA LDA assessment date during main study phase. If the component scores of DAPSA LDA are at different dates for a visit, the latest date will be used for the derivation of time to achieve DAPSA LDA.

    Measured: Up to 19 weeks

  27. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following 4 criteria; ≥ 30% decrease in SJC66, ≥ 30% decrease in TJC68, ≥ 20% decrease in PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), ≥ 20% decrease in PhGADA (VAS; 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity), and with at least one of the 2 joint criteria, with no deterioration in any other criteria.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  28. Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

    PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). A higher score indicates more severe disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  29. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

    PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI50, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 50%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  30. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

    PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI75, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 75%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  31. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

    PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI90, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 90%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  32. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

    PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI100, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 100%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  33. Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

    The enthesitis examination is based on the 16 anatomical sites: the medial epicondyle (left and right), the lateral epicondyle (left and right), the supraspinatus insertion (left and right), the bilateral greater trochanter (left and right), the quadriceps tendon insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), the patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tuberosity (left and right), the achilles tendon insertion (left and right), and the plantar fascia insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as either 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). SPARCC enthesitis index has an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  34. Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline

    LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with an at least 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Total score= {{[Circumference involved digit/ Circumference contralateral Digit (or Tables)] - 1}x 100} x Tenderness score. Tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, and 1 = tender). The difference between circumference of affected finger and contralateral not affected digit cannot be defined for maximum value. Therefore, it is difficult to provide scale range for the final score. No theoretical range exists for the Leeds Dactylitis Index. Lower Leeds Dactylitis Index score represent better outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  35. Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline

    Tender score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender, 2 = tender and wince, 3 = tender and withdraw) is collected for Dactylitis Assessments on the Dactylitis Score Sheet that is used for calculation of LDI total score. Tender dactylitis count (TDC) equals the number of tender fingers and toes (tendor score >0). For participants with dactylitis status absent for all the fingers and toes, the TDC is set as 0. The total score range of TDC is from 0 to 60, higher scores indicate greater presence of dactylitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  36. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually completed by the participant. Responses in each functional category are collected as 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). When 6 or more categories are non-missing, total possible score is 3. If more than 2 categories are missing, the HAQ-DI score is set to missing. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (less disability).

    Measured: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

  37. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16

    FACIT-Fatigue scale is a brief, 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning in the past 7 days. The FACIT-Fatigue uses 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) numeric rating scales for a total possible score of 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate less fatigue. Positive change in value indicates improvement (no or less severity of fatigue).

    Measured: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

  38. Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16

    The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement (better health status).

    Measured: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

  39. Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16

    The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement (better health status).

    Measured: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Oct 2019
  2. Study start3 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion19 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion11 May 2021

Why it stopped: Development program terminated

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
67 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04115748
Sponsor's protocol ID
GS-US-431-4566
Other IDs
2019-001996-35, JapicCTI-205202, 2019
Acronym
PENGUIN 1
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
2 Oct 2019
Last updated
16 May 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Filgotinib and Adalimumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Gilead Sciences at 74 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 74 sites in United States, Poland, Taiwan, Bulgaria, Japan and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 May 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in