WorkflowNCT04116957
RTLS for Healthcare Process Validation
A study testing RTLS current tag and RTLS tag revised in people with Workflow and Nursing, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the project is to develop a new way to understand patient care data analytics by using a real-time location system (RTLS). The investigators will deploy the RTLS-based nursing activity analysis system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- RTLS current tag and RTLS tag revised
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Feb 2020to 31 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- English speaking, RN or LPN licensure
Who cannot join
- Nurses helping to provide care but not having a patient assignment and nurse managers
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University Hospital, MU Health Care
Columbia, Missouri, 65211
About this study
Official title: A Next Generation, Low Cost Tracking System for Healthcare Process Validation
The purpose of the project is to develop a new way to understand patient care data analytics by using a real-time location system (RTLS). The investigators will deploy the RTLS-based nursing activity analysis system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. The investigators will validate location system performance against manual observation of nursing activity. The investigators will correlate nursing activity metrics against patient outcomes as measured by SOFA score.
Read the detailed description
Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) identify and locate tagged assets, staff, or patients as they move through a hospital. RTLS can address a variety of other practical problems in healthcare such as inventory management and patient tracking and monitoring. Most RTLS employ some flavor of Radio Frequency (RF) angle-of-arrival, time-of-flight, time-difference-of-arrival, or Received Signal Strength Indicators (RSSI). However, these techniques have several significant disadvantages. Among these are confusion from multipath and environmental clutter, line-of-sight operation, need for synchronization, range restrictions, and expense. Furthermore the human body, composed mainly of salt water, occults high frequency signals making fading a serious problem. Wi-Fi tracking, in particular is, limited to an accuracy of 10-20ft and cannot provide the precision data required for high-fidelity applications in healthcare such as workflow management.
In the current study, the investigators will validate location system performance against manual observation of nursing activity. The investigators will correlate nursing activity metrics against patient outcomes as measured by SOFA score. The anticipated outcome is actionable, location-based data to describe, analyze, or validate healthcare processes with a maximum error of 5% relative to manual observation. Also, the investigators will identify specific location-based metrics useful in monitoring nursing activity. The investigators will deploy and test the system in a medical ICU at the University Hospital ICU. The anticipated outcome is a real-time statistical quality control chart capable of monitoring nursing processes and detecting anomalies with user-configurable statistical power.
Prospective participants will receive an individual email from co-investigator explaining study including the need for participants willing to wear location tag for the duration of their shift. The Informed Consent form and Demographic Question will be attached to this email. Those willing to participate will also be asked to send the completed Demographics Questionnaire attached to their email response. Receipt of the completed Demographics Questionnaire will signify their consent to participate.
The co-investigator will explain in the individual email that this study is to solely gain knowledge regarding their workflow as they deliver patient care and is not an evaluation of their performance or clinical judgment. Their participation in the study will not be revealed to their manager unless the participant wishes. The co-investigator will explain that participation is voluntary, they can withdraw at any time without risk to their employment and all aspects of their participation will be confidential.
A Waiver of documentation of consent form will be attached to the individual's email as well as the Demographic Questionnaire. The Waiver of Documentation of Consent form will provide an overview of the study. They will be informed both in the form and in the text of the email that the return of the completed Demographic Questionnaire signifies their consent to participate in the study and that participation is voluntary and confidential. They will be provided with the co-investigator's contact information should they have questions or concerns. In addition, information from the EMRs of patients assigned to the nurse participants will be abstracted retrospectively under the Waiver of Consent after the patients have been transferred from the ICU. Patient factors will be used to help interpret the nurse participant data. However, concurrent patient data abstraction is not necessary for data analysis in this research project as there will be no intervention introduced that would impact the patient data. Further, patients in this ICU are usually unable to provide informed consent due to the presence of mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation.
Recruited nurses will receive one RTLS location tag prior to their shift from trained undergraduate industrial and manufacturing systems engineering (IMSE) students who will keep a log of the nurses' name and tag identification. The nurses will carry the tags for the duration of their shift and then return the tags to the students. While they carry the RTLS tags, IMSE students will stand at the corner of the nurse's station in each pod to record the nurses' activities and the time spent in these activities using a data collection form previously developed during earlier pilot work when IMSE students collected time-motion data regarding ICU nursing care activities. If any special events occur during the observation period, they will record a description of these events, which include but not be limited to unscheduled medical activities or admission of a new patient to the ICU from the Emergency Department (ED). The RTLS location tag distribution and nurse observation will occur four to five days per week until a total of 80 days of location and observation data is obtained. For each patient that is assigned to an observed ICU nurse, data will be extracted retrospectively from their EMR. The abstracted data will include: age, gender, hospital admitting diagnosis, medical ICU admitting diagnosis, past medical diagnoses, laboratory values occurring during, or 24 hours prior to observation time, neurological status, mean arterial pressures during observation time, intravenous medications administered during observation time, any diagnostic studies performed outside of the ICU during the observation time, and any in-room procedures performed during the observation time.
There is minimal risk to the participants in this study. There are no potential risks or discomfort for the participant as there will be no change in their work process. Methods to avoid inadvertent coercion in the recruitment process will be deployed.
Analyzing the ICU nurse's workflow can furnish an understanding of the causes of delayed and missed care delivery. The findings from this research will highlight opportunities to improve the workflow management design. Such information can guide future workflow management to reduce the ICU nurse's workload and the risk of delayed or missed care in the ICU resulting in improved patient outcomes.
- Being tested
- RTLS current tag, RTLS tag revised
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RTLS current tagDevice
Validate location system performance against manual observation of nursing activity
RTLS tag revisedDevice
Test a next-generation RTLS tag for healthcare process validation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking System | Other | Nurse location data collection using the original NFER system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. Receives: Device: RTLS current tag |
| New Tracking System | Other | Nurse location data collection using the upgraded NFER system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. Receives: Device: RTLS tag revised |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-Room Activity Time Difference Between RTLS System and Manual Observation
To compare the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation data, all In-Room activity times collected from the RTLS system are statistically compared to the In-Room activity time collected from the time study data done by observers. A paired t-test is used to determine whether the means of the two groups are statistically different from each other. The anticipated outcome is actionable, location-based data to describe, analyze, or validate healthcare processes with a maximum error of 5% relative to manual observation. In other words, the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation should be less than 15 minutes during the day shift (up to 12 hours).
Measured: Up to 12 hours
Patient Severity of Illness - Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a measuring system that determines the extent of a person's organ function or failure rate. This scoring system consists of six organ systems (respiratory, coagulation, liver, cardiovascular, renal, and neurologic). It assesses critically ill patients in an intensive care unit. The SOFA score has shown decent predictive validity for inpatient mortality. Each system is assigned a score from 0 to 4 based on the degree of dysfunction, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction. The sum of the scores for each organ system is reported. The total score can range from 0 to 24. A higher total score indicates greater organ dysfunction and a higher risk of mortality. The anticipated outcome is that there is no significant difference in the patient severity of illness between the first and second data collection.
Measured: Assessed at ICU admission
Out-of-Room Activity Time Difference Between RTLS System and Manual Observation
To compare the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation data, all Out-of-Room activity times collected from the RTLS system are statistically compared to the Out-of-Room activity times collected from the time study data done by observers. A paired t-test is used to determine whether the means of the two groups are statistically different from each other. The anticipated outcome is actionable, location-based data to describe, analyze, or validate healthcare processes with a maximum error of 5% relative to manual observation. In other words, the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation should be less than 15 minutes for the day shift (up to 12 hours)
Measured: Up to 12 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2019
- Study start17 Feb 2020
- Primary completion16 Apr 2021
- Study completion31 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for WorkflowStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jung Kim, University of Missouri-Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04116957
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016906
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Next Generation, Low Cost Tracking System for Healthcare Process Validation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04116957
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016906
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Aug 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the project is to develop a new way to understand patient care data analytics by using a real-time location system (RTLS). The investigators will deploy the RTLS-based nursing activity analysis system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. The investigators will validate location system performance against manual observation of nursing activity. The investigators will correlate nursing activity metrics against patient outcomes as measured by SOFA score.
Detailed description
Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) identify and locate tagged assets, staff, or patients as they move through a hospital. RTLS can address a variety of other practical problems in healthcare such as inventory management and patient tracking and monitoring. Most RTLS employ some flavor of Radio Frequency (RF) angle-of-arrival, time-of-flight, time-difference-of-arrival, or Received Signal Strength Indicators (RSSI). However, these techniques have several significant disadvantages. Among these are confusion from multipath and environmental clutter, line-of-sight operation, need for synchronization, range restrictions, and expense. Furthermore the human body, composed mainly of salt water, occults high frequency signals making fading a serious problem. Wi-Fi tracking, in particular is, limited to an accuracy of 10-20ft and cannot provide the precision data required for high-fidelity applications in healthcare such as workflow management.
In the current study, the investigators will validate location system performance against manual observation of nursing activity. The investigators will correlate nursing activity metrics against patient outcomes as measured by SOFA score. The anticipated outcome is actionable, location-based data to describe, analyze, or validate healthcare processes with a maximum error of 5% relative to manual observation. Also, the investigators will identify specific location-based metrics useful in monitoring nursing activity. The investigators will deploy and test the system in a medical ICU at the University Hospital ICU. The anticipated outcome is a real-time statistical quality control chart capable of monitoring nursing processes and detecting anomalies with user-configurable statistical power.
Prospective participants will receive an individual email from co-investigator explaining study including the need for participants willing to wear location tag for the duration of their shift. The Informed Consent form and Demographic Question will be attached to this email. Those willing to participate will also be asked to send the completed Demographics Questionnaire attached to their email response. Receipt of the completed Demographics Questionnaire will signify their consent to participate.
The co-investigator will explain in the individual email that this study is to solely gain knowledge regarding their workflow as they deliver patient care and is not an evaluation of their performance or clinical judgment. Their participation in the study will not be revealed to their manager unless the participant wishes. The co-investigator will explain that participation is voluntary, they can withdraw at any time without risk to their employment and all aspects of their participation will be confidential.
A Waiver of documentation of consent form will be attached to the individual's email as well as the Demographic Questionnaire. The Waiver of Documentation of Consent form will provide an overview of the study. They will be informed both in the form and in the text of the email that the return of the completed Demographic Questionnaire signifies their consent to participate in the study and that participation is voluntary and confidential. They will be provided with the co-investigator's contact information should they have questions or concerns. In addition, information from the EMRs of patients assigned to the nurse participants will be abstracted retrospectively under the Waiver of Consent after the patients have been transferred from the ICU. Patient factors will be used to help interpret the nurse participant data. However, concurrent patient data abstraction is not necessary for data analysis in this research project as there will be no intervention introduced that would impact the patient data. Further, patients in this ICU are usually unable to provide informed consent due to the presence of mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation.
Recruited nurses will receive one RTLS location tag prior to their shift from trained undergraduate industrial and manufacturing systems engineering (IMSE) students who will keep a log of the nurses' name and tag identification. The nurses will carry the tags for the duration of their shift and then return the tags to the students. While they carry the RTLS tags, IMSE students will stand at the corner of the nurse's station in each pod to record the nurses' activities and the time spent in these activities using a data collection form previously developed during earlier pilot work when IMSE students collected time-motion data regarding ICU nursing care activities. If any special events occur during the observation period, they will record a description of these events, which include but not be limited to unscheduled medical activities or admission of a new patient to the ICU from the Emergency Department (ED). The RTLS location tag distribution and nurse observation will occur four to five days per week until a total of 80 days of location and observation data is obtained. For each patient that is assigned to an observed ICU nurse, data will be extracted retrospectively from their EMR. The abstracted data will include: age, gender, hospital admitting diagnosis, medical ICU admitting diagnosis, past medical diagnoses, laboratory values occurring during, or 24 hours prior to observation time, neurological status, mean arterial pressures during observation time, intravenous medications administered during observation time, any diagnostic studies performed outside of the ICU during the observation time, and any in-room procedures performed during the observation time.
There is minimal risk to the participants in this study. There are no potential risks or discomfort for the participant as there will be no change in their work process. Methods to avoid inadvertent coercion in the recruitment process will be deployed.
Analyzing the ICU nurse's workflow can furnish an understanding of the causes of delayed and missed care delivery. The findings from this research will highlight opportunities to improve the workflow management design. Such information can guide future workflow management to reduce the ICU nurse's workload and the risk of delayed or missed care in the ICU resulting in improved patient outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking System | Other | Device: RTLS current tagNurse location data collection using the original NFER system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. |
| New Tracking System | Other | Device: RTLS tag revisedNurse location data collection using the upgraded NFER system at an ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- English speaking, RN or LPN licensure
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Nurses helping to provide care but not having a patient assignment and nurse managers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RTLS current tagValidate location system performance against manual observation of nursing activity | Device | Tracking System |
| RTLS tag revisedTest a next-generation RTLS tag for healthcare process validation | Device | New Tracking System |
Primary outcome
In-Room Activity Time Difference Between RTLS System and Manual Observation
Time frame: Up to 12 hours
To compare the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation data, all In-Room activity times collected from the RTLS system are statistically compared to the In-Room activity time collected from the time study data done by observers. A paired t-test is used to determine whether the means of the two groups are statistically different from each other. The anticipated outcome is actionable, location-based data to describe, analyze, or validate healthcare processes with a maximum error of 5% relative to manual observation. In other words, the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation should be less than 15 minutes during the day shift (up to 12 hours).
Patient Severity of Illness - Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Time frame: Assessed at ICU admission
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a measuring system that determines the extent of a person's organ function or failure rate. This scoring system consists of six organ systems (respiratory, coagulation, liver, cardiovascular, renal, and neurologic). It assesses critically ill patients in an intensive care unit. The SOFA score has shown decent predictive validity for inpatient mortality. Each system is assigned a score from 0 to 4 based on the degree of dysfunction, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction. The sum of the scores for each organ system is reported. The total score can range from 0 to 24. A higher total score indicates greater organ dysfunction and a higher risk of mortality. The anticipated outcome is that there is no significant difference in the patient severity of illness between the first and second data collection.
Out-of-Room Activity Time Difference Between RTLS System and Manual Observation
Time frame: Up to 12 hours
To compare the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation data, all Out-of-Room activity times collected from the RTLS system are statistically compared to the Out-of-Room activity times collected from the time study data done by observers. A paired t-test is used to determine whether the means of the two groups are statistically different from each other. The anticipated outcome is actionable, location-based data to describe, analyze, or validate healthcare processes with a maximum error of 5% relative to manual observation. In other words, the time difference between the RTLS system and manual observation should be less than 15 minutes for the day shift (up to 12 hours)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Workflow
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Augmenting Clinical Workflow With a Structured Chatbot for Patient History Collection and Diagnostic Support
Medical History Taking, Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Workflow
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of an AI-powered Physician Assistant in Improving Patients' and Physician's Satisfaction in an Outpatient Setting of a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Patient Centered Care, Integration in Clinical Workflows
RecruitingObservational study
Digital Anticipatory Protocols at Triage to Improve ED Flow.
Length of Stay, Emergency Department Crowding
Recruiting
Enhancing Operational Efficiency in Eye Care Services
Quality Improvement, Appointments and Schedules
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Deployment and Evaluation of Humanoid Robotics in Coalition-Aligned Clinical Care Settings
Mobility Impairment, Clinical Workflow Optimization
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RTLS current tag and RTLS tag revised in people with Workflow and Nursing, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-Room Activity Time Difference Between RTLS System and Manual Observation (time frame: Up to 12 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.