AzTrials
AzTrials

Tin X RayNCT04119141

Benefit of Tin Filter in Regards to Image Quality and Radiation Dose in CT Scan Study of Pulmonary Parenchyma

A study testing X ray imaging in people with Tin X Ray and Pulmonary Parenchyma, run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Main objective: to demonstrate that the diagnostic quality associated with the acquisition mode with tin filter, evaluated in a subjective way, is not inferior to that associated with the acquisition mode without filter. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tin X Ray, Pulmonary Parenchyma
What is being tested?
X ray imaging
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
10 May 2019to 30 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient aged 18 and over.
  • Patient referred for chest CT scan in the context of screening or monitoring of occupational exposure to asbestos.
  • Patient with health insurance or beneficiary of a social security scheme.
  • Patient having given their express consent.

Who cannot join

  • Woman who is pregnant or likely to be pregnant.
  • Lactating or parturient women
  • Minors.
  • Protected patients: Adults under trusteeship, guardianship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision; hospitalised without consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hôpital Privé d'Antony Antony

    Antony, IDF, 92160

    Jean Francois OUDET, +33683346567 ext. +33683346567, jf.oudet@ecten.eu

    Marie Barba, +330664888704 ext. +330664888704, mh.barba@ecten.eu

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Benefit of Tin Filter in Regards to Image Quality and Radiation Dose in CT Scan

Main objective: to demonstrate that the diagnostic quality associated with the acquisition mode with tin filter, evaluated in a subjective way, is not inferior to that associated with the acquisition mode without filter.

Read the detailed description

The chest x-ray is the first-line exam for the study of pulmonary parenchyma. Nevertheless, it does not make it possible to reveal all pulmonary pathologies, and in particular those of very small sizes. Thanks to its very high spatial resolution and contrast resolution, the scanner is able to detect all infra-millimetric pathologies of the pulmonary parenchyma but also mediastinal pathologies that could not have been seen on the standard x-ray.

This study fits into the context of pleural pathology screening for patients exposed to asbestos in their professional environment.

Today, the chest CT scan in millimetric sections isth e standardised method used in the context of this screening.Tin filtration is an additional filtration at the output of the X-ray tube made available on premium Siemens scanners. In diagnostic medical imaging, the photon beam has an energetic spectrum ranging from 0 to 150 keV. However the weak energies do not participate in the formation of the image but, on the other hand, to the overall radiation of the patient. The purpose of the addition of the tin filter is to be able to suppress, at the output of the tube, all low and medium energy levels, only allowing high energy levels to pass through. A previous study comparing the same group of patients on two different machines (one with tin filtration, one without tin filtration) showed a significant decrease in the radiation dose; nevertheless, a certain number of parameters differed between the two scanners used. In order to get rid of the different biases encountered on previous published studies, we propose to carry out this study on the same machine, by activating and deactivating tin filtration, all other parameters of acquisition and reconstruction of the image being equal in all respects.

Being tested
X ray imaging

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • X ray imagingDiagnostic test

    Acquisition:

    • 140 kVp,
    • 1/2 mAs/kg,
    • Pitch: 1.35,
    • Rotation time: 0.5 sec.

    Reconstruction:

    • I70f filter, 3 iteration loops,
    • Cutting thickness 1 mm/0.7 mm
    • Fenestration: C -600/W 1600
    • Field of view (Size, x \& y coordinates) identical on both acquisitions.
Study groups in NCT04119141
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard ArmActive comparatorthe first acquisition will be carried out without a tin filter in supine position and the second with tin filter in procubitus.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: X ray imaging
Tin filter ArmExperimentalthe first acquisition will be carried out with tin filter in supine position and the second without tin filter in procubitus.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: X ray imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Likert score scale score

    Primary endpoint: score obtained on the Likert scale.

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2019
  2. Study start10 May 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04119141
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-A00918-47
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
3 Oct 2019
Last updated
8 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing X ray imaging in people with Tin X Ray and Pulmonary Parenchyma, run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jean Francois OUDET (+33683346567, jeanfrancois.oudet@free.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Likert score scale score (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in