COPDNCT04119856
Outgoing Lung Team - a Cross-sectorial Intervention in Patients With COPD
A study testing Affiliation with the outgoing lung team in people with COPD and COPD Exacerbation, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study examines the effects of the work of an outgoing lung team in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark to patients with COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) at risk of exacerbation of COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- COPD, COPD Exacerbation
- What is being tested?
- Affiliation with the outgoing lung team
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 25 Sep 2017to 30 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Citizens of the Municipality of Aarhus
- FEV1 <50% predicted and at least one hospitalisation due to COPD and/or two tablet-treated episodes of exacerbation (prednisolone and /or antibiotics) within the last year
- Special needs due to anxiety, dyspnea etc. that cause frequent hospitalisations
Who cannot join
- Participation in the pilot project
- Inability to speak, read and understand Danish
- Severe cognitive disability and thus inability to understand and fill in questionnaires (e.g. dementia)
- No wish to participate in the project
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Outgoing Lung Team - a Cross-sectorial and Preventive Intervention in Patients at Risk of Hospitalisation Due to Exacerbation of COPD
This study examines the effects of the work of an outgoing lung team in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark to patients with COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) at risk of exacerbation of COPD.
The outgoing lung team is a cross-sectorial team of nurses and doctors from Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital and nurses from the Acute Team in the Municipality of Aarhus.
Read more
The work of the outgoing lung team takes place in the patient's home and involves the following:
- The outgoing lung team teaches the patients, relatives and primary care staff about symptoms, treatments and instructions related to COPD.
- The patients, relatives and primary care staff can contact the outgoing lung team by telephone day and night.
- The outgoing lung team initiates appropriate treatment by telephone or a home visit in consultation with a doctor.
- The patients report symptoms and measurements to the outgoing lung team using telemedicine solutions (AmbuFlex).
- The outgoing lung team initiates acute consultations at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy based on patient reported outcomes, home visit or telephone call.
Half of the participants are affiliated to the outgoing lung team, while the other half are not, and continue their usual practice by contacting the general practitioners in case of exacerbation of COPD.
The main hypothesis of the project is that outgoing lung team has a positive impact on continuity of care across sectors in the Danish healthcare system for patients with COPD. More specifically the hypotheses are:
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces admissions, readmissions, length of hospital stay and outpatient consultations.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces anxiety and depression and increases patient involvement, and improves patients' health status and self-efficacy.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team increases patients' level of health literacy.
Read the detailed description
Background
Worldwide, COPD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is currently the fourth leading cause of death and projected to be the third leading cause of death by 2020. In 2010, the estimated number of COPD cases worldwide was 384 million with a prevalence of 11% (95% confidence interval: 8,4%-15,0%).
COPD is characterised by airway obstruction due to inflammation and destruction of lung tissue. The disease causes breathlessness, cough, mucus and frequent respiratory infections and leads to decreased lung function. COPD often affects patients' quality of life negatively as many experience anxiety because of breathlessness. Breathing difficulties reduce patients' level of activity and can lead to social isolation. In Denmark, it is estimated that 320,000 Danes have COPD. In 2018, the number of admissions due to COPD in Denmark was 34,961 with a readmission rate (new hospitalisation within 30 days after the last hospitalisation) of 19% and a 30-day mortality rate of 11%.There were 49,424 outpatient visits due to COPD in Denmark in 2018, and approximately 5,500 annual deaths where COPD is the direct or contributory cause.
It is estimated that the total annual treatment costs for patients with COPD in Denmark amount to approximately DKK 3,345 billion, and most of these costs are related to acute admissions.
Previous research shows that patients with COPD experience not being offered the same quality of treatment as other chronic patients. Furthermore, patients with COPD report that they are not taken seriously by healthcare professionals, which induces insecurity.
As patients with COPD constitute a large group in both the primary and secondary care, we intend to improve the collaboration between the two sectors based on patients´ preferences. The patients emphasized the importance of having the possibility to contact a specialised respiratory nurse 24-7. Patients reported that they preferred education to take place close to home, as transportation to hospital or the community support centre for older people were both mentally and physically straining.
Research showed that home visits by a respiratory nurse from the hospital reduce admissions and readmissions. Furthermore, research showed that home visits by the nurses in primary care also decrease admissions and readmissions. Some of the interventions were treatment at home and some comprised education regarding management of acute exacerbations and observations of symptoms, inhalation, smoking cessation, nutrition etc.
The interventions consisted of collaboration between primary care nurses and the general practitioners (GPs), and in other interventions primary care nurses were supervised by the specialist respiratory nurses at the hospital often by phone or at joint visits in the patients' home.
Home visits after discharge paid by a respiratory nurse and interdisciplinary cooperation showed that patients with COPD felt safe and comforted and were motivated to make changes to achieve better health.
However, other studies showed that education improved patients' knowledge but it did not prevent readmissions.
So far, no studies have been performed investigating cross-sectorial collaboration with a lung team and preventive intervention in patients at risk of hospitalisation due to exacerbation of COPD.
Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark and the Acute Team in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark started a pilot project from September 2015 until October 2016. The project concerned establishment of an outgoing lung team comprised by a team of nurses from both the primary and secondary sector. The aim was to increase knowledge and competences among patients, relatives and staff in relation to care and treatment, to reduce the rate of hospitalisation and readmission and to evaluate the impact of the outgoing lung team on participants' health status. The pilot project had several limitations 1) It was only possible to evaluate the effect of the outgoing lung team during six months. We were thus unable to evaluate variety over the year which may have impacted on the number of hospitalisations, readmissions and episodes of exacerbation. 2) The pilot project had no control group. We thus wanted to qualify the project by using a randomised controlled trial design.
We also wanted to examine the impact of the outgoing lung team on the level of patient involvement, anxiety, depression and health literacy. Health literacy is linked to literacy and entails people's knowledge, motivation and competences to access, understand, appraise and apply health information in order to make judgements and take decisions in everyday life concerning health care, disease prevention and health promotion to maintain or improve quality of life during the life course. Studies show that patients with COPD have lower levels of health literacy compared with people with no chronic diseases. Increasing the level of health literacy in this population would thus be relevant.
Furthermore, we wished to examine the effect of the outgoing lung team on patients' health status, their experiences of being affiliated to the outgoing lung team as well as their self-efficacy.
Objective
The aim is to examine the effects of the work of an outgoing lung team in the Municipality of Aarhus to patients with COPD at risk of exacerbation of COPD.
Hypothesis
The main hypothesis is that outgoing lung team has a positive impact on continuity of care across sectors in the Danish healthcare system for patients with COPD. To examine this we have three subhypotheses.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces admissions, readmissions, length of hospital stay and outpatient consultations.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces anxiety and depression and increases patient involvement, and improves patients' health status and self-efficacy.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team increases patients' level of health literacy.
Materials and method
Setting and location
The outgoing lung team is a cross-sectorial team of nurses and doctors from Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark and nurses from the Acute Team in the Municipality of Aarhus in Denmark. The outgoing lung team intends to preserve, detect, diagnose and treat patients with an exacerbation of COPD. The outgoing lung team is physically located at the office of the Acute Team; in this office knowledge sharing and upgrading of skills take place.
The work of the outgoing lung team takes place in the patient's home and involves the following:
- The outgoing lung team teaches the patients, relatives and primary care staff about symptoms, treatments and instructions related to COPD.
- The patients, relatives and primary care staff can contact the outgoing lung team by telephone day and night.
- The patients report symptoms and measurements to the outgoing lung team using telemedicine solutions, also known as patient reported outcomes.
- The outgoing lung team initiates appropriate treatment by telephone or a home visit. The outgoing lung team always consults a doctor from the Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy before initiating treatment.
- The outgoing lung team initiates acute consultations at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy based on patient reported outcomes, home visit or telephone call.
Doctors at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy are responsible for the medical treatment as long as the patient participates in the project. The GPs in the Municipality of Aarhus have agreed to this. The GPs can refer patients to the project and some of them participate in a project advisory board.
Study design
The project is designed as a mixed-method study based on a randomised controlled trial with an intervention group connected to the outgoing lung team and a control group attending the standard pathway programme at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Sample size
Based on a retrospective sample of admissions related to COPD in the period from February to August 2014-2016, an expected decrease in length of hospital stay can be calculated as the outgoing lung team was introduced in 2016. Mean number of admission days in the retrospective sample followed a normal distribution after logarithmic transformation, as assessed by histograms. Number of admission days (geometric mean) was 5.69 (95% CI: 2.78-11.6) in 2014-2015, and 4.50 (2.62-7.76) in 2016. Based on these numbers, the power calculation resulted in inclusion of 64 patients in the intervention and control group, respectively to be able to demonstrate a significant difference with a power of 80% and at a significance level of 5%.
In the pilot project the withdrawal was 23%. With an estimated withdrawal at 23% we will need 83 patients in each group.
Missing data
After one year, we contact all participants and arrange a plan for answering the questionnaires. The missing data, will be registered in Stata and mentioned in the study.
Analysis
Data will be statistically analysed both descriptive and analytically. Correlations and significant factors as lung function, gender, age etc. will be examined and significant differences between the two groups (intervention group and control group) in the studies which may have an impact on results.
To identify predictors of the impact on the dependent variable we will use bivariate x 2 test and calculation of odds ratios, multiple logistic regression and logarithmic data. The statistical analysis will be performed in Stata 16.
Qualitative data from the interviews in will be transcribed and analysed based on meaning condensation analysis.
Ethics
Ethical approval will be obtained from Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics and approval of data archives and storage will be obtained from the Danish Data Protection Agency in Central Denmark Region in RedCap. All collected personal data will be anonymised, processed, analysed and stored in accordance with the Danish Data Protection Agency. All participants will receive oral and written information. Patients who agree to participate will provide written informed consent.
- Conditions
- COPD, COPD Exacerbation
- Being tested
- Affiliation with the outgoing lung team
- Keywords
- Cross-sectorial, Hospitalization, Self-efficacy, Patient Involvement, Health Literacy, Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Patient Participation, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Affiliation with the outgoing lung teamOther
The work of the outgoing lung team takes place in the patient's home and involves the following:
- The outgoing lung team teaches the patients, relatives and primary care staff about symptoms, treatments and instructions related to COPD.
- The patients, relatives and primary care staff can contact the outgoing lung team by telephone day and night.
- The patients report symptoms and measurements to the outgoing lung team using telemedicine as patient reported outcomes.
- The outgoing lung team initiates appropriate treatment by telephone or a home visit. The outgoing lung team always consults a doctor from the Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy before initiating treatment.
- The outgoing lung team initiates acute consultations at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy based on patient reported outcomes, home visit or telephone call.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Other | Affiliation with outgoing lung team
* Instructions and teaching by the outgoing lung team.
* Needs-based consultation at Dept. of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy.
* Contact to the outgoing lung team in case of exacerbation of COPD. Receives: Other: Affiliation with the outgoing lung team |
| Control group | No intervention | The usual practice * Scheduled consultations at Dept. of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy. * Contact to GP/doctor on call in case of exacerbation of COPD. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in admissions and re-admissions.
Data from the patients records.
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Length of hospitalisation related to COPD.
Data from the patients records.
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year
Secondary outcomes (8)
Number of outpatient consultations related COPD.
Data from the patients records.
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Measure level of patient involvement
Self reported level of patient involvement. The questionnaire PACIC (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care) comprised of 20-items. Each item is scored "Never", "Usually not", "Sometimes" "Usually" or "Always"
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in health status
Self reported health status. The questionnaire CAT (COPD Assessment Test) comprised of 8 items. Each item is scored 0-5 (O = never, and 5 = always)
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in quality of life
Self reported data based on the questionaire EQ-5D-3L (Euro-quality of life group- 5 dimensions- 3 level). Each item is scores 1-3 (1= No problems, 3= Many problems)
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in anxiety and depression
Self reported data based on the questionaire HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). It consists of 14 items. Each items is scored 1-4 (1 = Most of the time/ definitely to 4= very rare/ definitely not)
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in level of health literacy
Self reported data based on the questionaire HLQ (Health Literacy Questionnaire). It comprises of 9 domains. In this study we use 3 domains and it consists of 15 items. 1 domain comprised of 5 items, and each item is scored from "totally not agree" to " not agree", "agree" and "totally agree". The two other domains comprises in total of 10 domains, where each item is scored from "Always difficult", "Often difficult", "Sometimes difficult", "Often easy" and "Always easy".
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in self-efficacy
Self reported data based on the questionaire CSES (COPD Self-Efficacy Scale). It comprises of 34 items, and each item is scores from "very sure", "pretty Sure", "partly sure", "not very sure" and definitely not sure"
Measured: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Experiences of affiliation with the outgoing lung team.
Interviews with patients who have been affiliated with the outgoing lung team.
Measured: One time after, they have been affiliated with the outgoing lung team for at least 7 month.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2019
- Study start25 Sep 2017
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion30 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COPDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Birgit R Iversen, Ph.d.-stud., Study director, Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04119856
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Outgoing Lung Team
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD - 2019. 2019; Available at: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GOLD-2019-v1.7-FINAL-14Nov2018-WMS.pdf. Accessed 15.04, 2019.
Sundhedsstyrelsen. Anbefalinger for tværsektorielle forløb for mennesker med KOL. 2017; Available at: https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2017/~/media/8365DCEC9BB240A0BD6387A81CBDBB49.ashx. Accessed 04.07, 2017.
Dansk Register for Kronisk Obstruktiv Lungesygdom. Appendiks til National årsrapport 2018. 2019; Available at: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/90/4690_appendix_drkol-aarsrapport-2018_05052019_offentlig.pdf. Accessed 12.08, 2019.
Dansk Register for Kronisk Obstruktiv Lungesygdom. National årsrapport 2018. 2019; Available at: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/90/4690_drkol-aarsrapport-2018_offentlig.pdf. Accessed 12.08, 2019.
Witzel S, Nielsen PB, Jensen M. Patienternes perspektiv på kronisk sygdom - Oplevelser på tværs af sundhedsvæsenet i Region Midtjylland. CFK - Folkesundhed og Kvalitetsudvikling. 2012; Available at: http://www.defactum.dk/publikationer/ShowPublication?id=421&pageId=309986. Accessed 05.07, 2016.
Martin HM, Borst L. Sammenhæng i tværsektorielle KOL - forløb. En undersøgelse af patient er og pårørendes oplevelser. KORA - Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning. 2013; Available at: https://www.vive.dk/media/pure/9106/2043881. Accessed 05.07, 2019.
Rasmussen L, Ølsgaard G. Forslag til kvalitetsforbedringer fra patienter og fagpersoner i indsatsen for kronisk syge - en opfølgning på rapporten "Patientens perspektiv på kronisk sygdom". CFK - Folkesundhed og Kvalitetsudvikling. 2014; Available at: http://www.defactum.dk/publikationer/ShowPublication?id=435&pageId=309986. Accessed 05.07, 2016.
Haggerty MC, Stockdale-Woolley R, Nair S. Respi-Care. An innovative home care program for the patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):607-12. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.607.
PubMed 1889241Pearson S, Inglis SC, McLennan SN, Brennan L, Russell M, Wilkinson D, Thompson DR, Stewart S. Prolonged effects of a home-based intervention in patients with chronic illness. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 27;166(6):645-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.6.645.
PubMed 16567604Transition reduced readmission rate for COPD patients. Hosp Case Manag. 2010 May;18(5):71-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 20449991Ward S, Barnes H, Ward R. Evaluating a respiratory intermediate care team. Nurs Stand. 2005 Oct 12-18;20(5):46-50. doi: 10.7748/ns2005.10.20.5.46.c3975.
PubMed 16255486Rea H, McAuley S, Stewart A, Lamont C, Roseman P, Didsbury P. A chronic disease management programme can reduce days in hospital for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intern Med J. 2004 Nov;34(11):608-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00672.x.
PubMed 15546454Matsumura T, Takarada K, Oki Y, Fujimoto Y, Kaneko H, Ohira M, Ishikawa A. Long-term Effect of Home Nursing Intervention on Cost and Healthcare Utilization for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study. Rehabil Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):384-9. doi: 10.1002/rnj.189. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
PubMed 25425110Spiliopoulos N, Donoghue J, Clark E, Dunford M. Outcomes from a Respiratory Coordinated Care Program (RCCP) providing community-based interventions for COPD patients from 1998 to 2006. Contemp Nurse. 2008 Dec;31(1):2-8. doi: 10.5172/conu.673.31.1.2.
PubMed 19117496Cox K, Macleod SC, Sim CJ, Jones AW, Trueman J. Avoiding hospital admission in COPD: impact of a specialist nursing team. Br J Nurs. 2017 Feb 9;26(3):152-158. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.3.152.
PubMed 28185492
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outgoing Lung Team - a Cross-sectorial and Preventive Intervention in Patients at Risk of Hospitalisation Due to Exacerbation of COPD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04119856
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Outgoing Lung Team
- Conditions
- COPD, COPD Exacerbation
- Keywords
- Cross-sectorial, Hospitalization, Self-efficacy, Patient Involvement, Health Literacy, Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study examines the effects of the work of an outgoing lung team in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark to patients with COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) at risk of exacerbation of COPD.
The outgoing lung team is a cross-sectorial team of nurses and doctors from Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital and nurses from the Acute Team in the Municipality of Aarhus.
The work of the outgoing lung team takes place in the patient's home and involves the following:
- The outgoing lung team teaches the patients, relatives and primary care staff about symptoms, treatments and instructions related to COPD.
- The patients, relatives and primary care staff can contact the outgoing lung team by telephone day and night.
- The outgoing lung team initiates appropriate treatment by telephone or a home visit in consultation with a doctor.
- The patients report symptoms and measurements to the outgoing lung team using telemedicine solutions (AmbuFlex).
- The outgoing lung team initiates acute consultations at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy based on patient reported outcomes, home visit or telephone call.
Half of the participants are affiliated to the outgoing lung team, while the other half are not, and continue their usual practice by contacting the general practitioners in case of exacerbation of COPD.
The main hypothesis of the project is that outgoing lung team has a positive impact on continuity of care across sectors in the Danish healthcare system for patients with COPD. More specifically the hypotheses are:
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces admissions, readmissions, length of hospital stay and outpatient consultations.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces anxiety and depression and increases patient involvement, and improves patients' health status and self-efficacy.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team increases patients' level of health literacy.
Detailed description
Background
Worldwide, COPD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is currently the fourth leading cause of death and projected to be the third leading cause of death by 2020. In 2010, the estimated number of COPD cases worldwide was 384 million with a prevalence of 11% (95% confidence interval: 8,4%-15,0%).
COPD is characterised by airway obstruction due to inflammation and destruction of lung tissue. The disease causes breathlessness, cough, mucus and frequent respiratory infections and leads to decreased lung function. COPD often affects patients' quality of life negatively as many experience anxiety because of breathlessness. Breathing difficulties reduce patients' level of activity and can lead to social isolation. In Denmark, it is estimated that 320,000 Danes have COPD. In 2018, the number of admissions due to COPD in Denmark was 34,961 with a readmission rate (new hospitalisation within 30 days after the last hospitalisation) of 19% and a 30-day mortality rate of 11%.There were 49,424 outpatient visits due to COPD in Denmark in 2018, and approximately 5,500 annual deaths where COPD is the direct or contributory cause.
It is estimated that the total annual treatment costs for patients with COPD in Denmark amount to approximately DKK 3,345 billion, and most of these costs are related to acute admissions.
Previous research shows that patients with COPD experience not being offered the same quality of treatment as other chronic patients. Furthermore, patients with COPD report that they are not taken seriously by healthcare professionals, which induces insecurity.
As patients with COPD constitute a large group in both the primary and secondary care, we intend to improve the collaboration between the two sectors based on patients´ preferences. The patients emphasized the importance of having the possibility to contact a specialised respiratory nurse 24-7. Patients reported that they preferred education to take place close to home, as transportation to hospital or the community support centre for older people were both mentally and physically straining.
Research showed that home visits by a respiratory nurse from the hospital reduce admissions and readmissions. Furthermore, research showed that home visits by the nurses in primary care also decrease admissions and readmissions. Some of the interventions were treatment at home and some comprised education regarding management of acute exacerbations and observations of symptoms, inhalation, smoking cessation, nutrition etc.
The interventions consisted of collaboration between primary care nurses and the general practitioners (GPs), and in other interventions primary care nurses were supervised by the specialist respiratory nurses at the hospital often by phone or at joint visits in the patients' home.
Home visits after discharge paid by a respiratory nurse and interdisciplinary cooperation showed that patients with COPD felt safe and comforted and were motivated to make changes to achieve better health.
However, other studies showed that education improved patients' knowledge but it did not prevent readmissions.
So far, no studies have been performed investigating cross-sectorial collaboration with a lung team and preventive intervention in patients at risk of hospitalisation due to exacerbation of COPD.
Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark and the Acute Team in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark started a pilot project from September 2015 until October 2016. The project concerned establishment of an outgoing lung team comprised by a team of nurses from both the primary and secondary sector. The aim was to increase knowledge and competences among patients, relatives and staff in relation to care and treatment, to reduce the rate of hospitalisation and readmission and to evaluate the impact of the outgoing lung team on participants' health status. The pilot project had several limitations 1) It was only possible to evaluate the effect of the outgoing lung team during six months. We were thus unable to evaluate variety over the year which may have impacted on the number of hospitalisations, readmissions and episodes of exacerbation. 2) The pilot project had no control group. We thus wanted to qualify the project by using a randomised controlled trial design.
We also wanted to examine the impact of the outgoing lung team on the level of patient involvement, anxiety, depression and health literacy. Health literacy is linked to literacy and entails people's knowledge, motivation and competences to access, understand, appraise and apply health information in order to make judgements and take decisions in everyday life concerning health care, disease prevention and health promotion to maintain or improve quality of life during the life course. Studies show that patients with COPD have lower levels of health literacy compared with people with no chronic diseases. Increasing the level of health literacy in this population would thus be relevant.
Furthermore, we wished to examine the effect of the outgoing lung team on patients' health status, their experiences of being affiliated to the outgoing lung team as well as their self-efficacy.
Objective
The aim is to examine the effects of the work of an outgoing lung team in the Municipality of Aarhus to patients with COPD at risk of exacerbation of COPD.
Hypothesis
The main hypothesis is that outgoing lung team has a positive impact on continuity of care across sectors in the Danish healthcare system for patients with COPD. To examine this we have three subhypotheses.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces admissions, readmissions, length of hospital stay and outpatient consultations.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team reduces anxiety and depression and increases patient involvement, and improves patients' health status and self-efficacy.
- Affiliation to the outgoing lung team increases patients' level of health literacy.
Materials and method
Setting and location
The outgoing lung team is a cross-sectorial team of nurses and doctors from Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark and nurses from the Acute Team in the Municipality of Aarhus in Denmark. The outgoing lung team intends to preserve, detect, diagnose and treat patients with an exacerbation of COPD. The outgoing lung team is physically located at the office of the Acute Team; in this office knowledge sharing and upgrading of skills take place.
The work of the outgoing lung team takes place in the patient's home and involves the following:
- The outgoing lung team teaches the patients, relatives and primary care staff about symptoms, treatments and instructions related to COPD.
- The patients, relatives and primary care staff can contact the outgoing lung team by telephone day and night.
- The patients report symptoms and measurements to the outgoing lung team using telemedicine solutions, also known as patient reported outcomes.
- The outgoing lung team initiates appropriate treatment by telephone or a home visit. The outgoing lung team always consults a doctor from the Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy before initiating treatment.
- The outgoing lung team initiates acute consultations at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy based on patient reported outcomes, home visit or telephone call.
Doctors at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy are responsible for the medical treatment as long as the patient participates in the project. The GPs in the Municipality of Aarhus have agreed to this. The GPs can refer patients to the project and some of them participate in a project advisory board.
Study design
The project is designed as a mixed-method study based on a randomised controlled trial with an intervention group connected to the outgoing lung team and a control group attending the standard pathway programme at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Sample size
Based on a retrospective sample of admissions related to COPD in the period from February to August 2014-2016, an expected decrease in length of hospital stay can be calculated as the outgoing lung team was introduced in 2016. Mean number of admission days in the retrospective sample followed a normal distribution after logarithmic transformation, as assessed by histograms. Number of admission days (geometric mean) was 5.69 (95% CI: 2.78-11.6) in 2014-2015, and 4.50 (2.62-7.76) in 2016. Based on these numbers, the power calculation resulted in inclusion of 64 patients in the intervention and control group, respectively to be able to demonstrate a significant difference with a power of 80% and at a significance level of 5%.
In the pilot project the withdrawal was 23%. With an estimated withdrawal at 23% we will need 83 patients in each group.
Missing data
After one year, we contact all participants and arrange a plan for answering the questionnaires. The missing data, will be registered in Stata and mentioned in the study.
Analysis
Data will be statistically analysed both descriptive and analytically. Correlations and significant factors as lung function, gender, age etc. will be examined and significant differences between the two groups (intervention group and control group) in the studies which may have an impact on results.
To identify predictors of the impact on the dependent variable we will use bivariate x 2 test and calculation of odds ratios, multiple logistic regression and logarithmic data. The statistical analysis will be performed in Stata 16.
Qualitative data from the interviews in will be transcribed and analysed based on meaning condensation analysis.
Ethics
Ethical approval will be obtained from Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics and approval of data archives and storage will be obtained from the Danish Data Protection Agency in Central Denmark Region in RedCap. All collected personal data will be anonymised, processed, analysed and stored in accordance with the Danish Data Protection Agency. All participants will receive oral and written information. Patients who agree to participate will provide written informed consent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Other | Other: Affiliation with the outgoing lung teamAffiliation with outgoing lung team * Instructions and teaching by the outgoing lung team. * Needs-based consultation at Dept. of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy. * Contact to the outgoing lung team in case of exacerbation of COPD. |
| Control group | No intervention | –The usual practice * Scheduled consultations at Dept. of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy. * Contact to GP/doctor on call in case of exacerbation of COPD. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Citizens of the Municipality of Aarhus
- FEV1 <50% predicted and at least one hospitalisation due to COPD and/or two tablet-treated episodes of exacerbation (prednisolone and /or antibiotics) within the last year
- Special needs due to anxiety, dyspnea etc. that cause frequent hospitalisations
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participation in the pilot project
- Inability to speak, read and understand Danish
- Severe cognitive disability and thus inability to understand and fill in questionnaires (e.g. dementia)
- No wish to participate in the project
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Affiliation with the outgoing lung teamThe work of the outgoing lung team takes place in the patient's home and involves the following: * The outgoing lung team teaches the patients, relatives and primary care staff about symptoms, treatments and instructions related to COPD. * The patients, relatives and primary care staff can contact the outgoing lung team by telephone day and night. * The patients report symptoms and measurements to the outgoing lung team using telemedicine as patient reported outcomes. * The outgoing lung team initiates appropriate treatment by telephone or a home visit. The outgoing lung team always consults a doctor from the Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy before initiating treatment. * The outgoing lung team initiates acute consultations at Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy based on patient reported outcomes, home visit or telephone call. | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Change in admissions and re-admissions.
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Data from the patients records.
Length of hospitalisation related to COPD.
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year
Data from the patients records.
8 secondary outcomes
Number of outpatient consultations related COPD.
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Measure level of patient involvement
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in health status
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in quality of life
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in anxiety and depression
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in level of health literacy
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Change in self-efficacy
Time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.
Experiences of affiliation with the outgoing lung team.
Time frame: One time after, they have been affiliated with the outgoing lung team for at least 7 month.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2021.
- BackgroundGlobal Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD - 2019. 2019; Available at: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GOLD-2019-v1.7-FINAL-14Nov2018-WMS.pdf. Accessed 15.04, 2019.
- BackgroundSundhedsstyrelsen. Anbefalinger for tværsektorielle forløb for mennesker med KOL. 2017; Available at: https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2017/~/media/8365DCEC9BB240A0BD6387A81CBDBB49.ashx. Accessed 04.07, 2017.
- BackgroundDansk Register for Kronisk Obstruktiv Lungesygdom. Appendiks til National årsrapport 2018. 2019; Available at: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/90/4690_appendix_drkol-aarsrapport-2018_05052019_offentlig.pdf. Accessed 12.08, 2019.
- BackgroundDansk Register for Kronisk Obstruktiv Lungesygdom. National årsrapport 2018. 2019; Available at: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/90/4690_drkol-aarsrapport-2018_offentlig.pdf. Accessed 12.08, 2019.
- BackgroundWitzel S, Nielsen PB, Jensen M. Patienternes perspektiv på kronisk sygdom - Oplevelser på tværs af sundhedsvæsenet i Region Midtjylland. CFK - Folkesundhed og Kvalitetsudvikling. 2012; Available at: http://www.defactum.dk/publikationer/ShowPublication?id=421&pageId=309986. Accessed 05.07, 2016.
- BackgroundMartin HM, Borst L. Sammenhæng i tværsektorielle KOL - forløb. En undersøgelse af patient er og pårørendes oplevelser. KORA - Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning. 2013; Available at: https://www.vive.dk/media/pure/9106/2043881. Accessed 05.07, 2019.
- BackgroundRasmussen L, Ølsgaard G. Forslag til kvalitetsforbedringer fra patienter og fagpersoner i indsatsen for kronisk syge - en opfølgning på rapporten "Patientens perspektiv på kronisk sygdom". CFK - Folkesundhed og Kvalitetsudvikling. 2014; Available at: http://www.defactum.dk/publikationer/ShowPublication?id=435&pageId=309986. Accessed 05.07, 2016.
- Background: PubMed 1889241Haggerty MC, Stockdale-Woolley R, Nair S. Respi-Care. An innovative home care program for the patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):607-12. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.607.
- Background: PubMed 16567604Pearson S, Inglis SC, McLennan SN, Brennan L, Russell M, Wilkinson D, Thompson DR, Stewart S. Prolonged effects of a home-based intervention in patients with chronic illness. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 27;166(6):645-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.6.645.
- Background: PubMed 20449991Transition reduced readmission rate for COPD patients. Hosp Case Manag. 2010 May;18(5):71-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16255486Ward S, Barnes H, Ward R. Evaluating a respiratory intermediate care team. Nurs Stand. 2005 Oct 12-18;20(5):46-50. doi: 10.7748/ns2005.10.20.5.46.c3975.
- Background: PubMed 15546454Rea H, McAuley S, Stewart A, Lamont C, Roseman P, Didsbury P. A chronic disease management programme can reduce days in hospital for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intern Med J. 2004 Nov;34(11):608-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00672.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for COPD
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study for GSK3862995B in Healthy Participants and Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Birgit R Iversen, Ph.d.-stud. study director
Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Affiliation with the outgoing lung team in people with COPD and COPD Exacerbation, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in admissions and re-admissions. (time frame: One year. From date of randomization and after one year.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04119856, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2021.