Gynecologic CancerLETSGONCT04122235
The Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology Study
A study testing LETSGO follow-up in people with Gynecologic Cancer and Gynecologic Neoplasm, run by Sorlandet Hospital HF at 12 sites in Norway.
Trial summary
This study compares traditional follow-up of gynaecological cancer patients to an alternative follow-up model. In the alternative follow-up model the patients will meet a nurse at every second consultation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Gynecologic Cancer, Gynecologic Neoplasm, Ovarian Cancer
- What is being tested?
- LETSGO follow-up
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 755 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesNorway
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2019to 27 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically verified gynaecological cancer
- Cervical cancer restricted to squameous cell carcinoma, adeno carcinoma and adeno-squameous carcinoma) or
- Endometrial cancer or
- Ovarian cancer (restricted to epithelial type) or
- Vulvar cancer
- Must have completed primary treatment and scheduled to follow-up
Who cannot join
- Participating in other cancer treatment trial or follow-up trial
- Cervical cancer patients treated with trachelectomy
- On maintenance therapy
- Dementia or other mental/cognitive impairment
- Illiterate in Norwegian
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Norway12 sites
Sørlandet hospital Arendal
Arendal
Nordland Hospital
Bodø
Innlandet Hospital Gjøvik
Gjøvik, Oppland, 2819
Sorlandet Hospital
Kristiansand, Vest Agder, 4604
Innlandet Hospital Lillehammer
Lillehammer, 2609
Akershus University Hospital
Lørenskog
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo
Østfold Hospital Trust
Sarpsborg
Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger
Vestfold Hospital Trust
Tønsberg
University Hospital of North Norway
Tromsø
St.Olavs Hospital
Trondheim
About this study
Official title: Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology
This study compares traditional follow-up of gynaecological cancer patients to an alternative follow-up model. In the alternative follow-up model the patients will meet a nurse at every second consultation. The nurse will focus on psychosocial health and educate the patients in the use of a study specific smartphone-application.
Read the detailed description
The goal is to improve follow-up of past and present cancer patients to have the best quality of life possible, despite having a serious illness. Todays' survivors differ from the survival population for whom the traditional follow-up was designed. Improvements in treatment assure that many cancer patients survive longer after diagnosis often with age-related comorbidities. Consequently, new evidence-based models for follow-up after cancer treatment with focus on techniques to improve coping with and management of late effects without increasing the costs are warranted. The chronic care model, which uses self-management interventions, is used for many chronic diseases-such as diabetes and asthma and is a valid model to consider for cancer follow-up care(1). Another relevant model is the risk stratified model where patients are stratified into low, moderate, or high-risk on the basis of expected recurrence rate and late-effects(2). Gynecological cancer patients constitute an underrepresented group in clinical cancer research.
The research group has developed a follow-up model based on the principles of the risk-stratified model and the chronic care model with one or three year's hospital follow-up for low- versus medium/high-risk patients. Physicians will be replaced by nurses in 50% of the consultations. The nurses will use evidence-based behavior change techniques to coach the cancer patients on how to take an active role in management of their physical and mental late effects. These techniques will be further reinforced with a multifunctional smart phone-application (app). The "Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology-app" (LETSGO-app) has three main functions: 1) Self-evaluated symptoms (on recurrence or late effects) regularly reported through the app; 2) Targeted information on treatment, signs of recurrence, and late-effects on each cancer type and 3) Facilitation of early rehabilitation through physical activity instructions, goal-setting and electronic reminders.
The investigators will conduct a multicenter study including 754 cancer survivors in Norway. Ten Norwegian hospitals will participate whereof five hospitals are intervention hospitals and five are control hospitals.
- Conditions
- Gynecologic Cancer, Gynecologic Neoplasm, Ovarian Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Vulvar Cancer
- Being tested
- LETSGO follow-up
- Keywords
- follow-up, app, lifestyle, empowerment, nurse-led
- Medical subject headings
- Genital Neoplasms, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Vulvar Neoplasms, Alzheimer Disease, Empowerment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LETSGO follow-upOther
Nurse-led follow-up in 50% of the consultations Access to the LETSGO-app
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | New follow-up model Receives: Other: LETSGO follow-up |
| Control arm | No intervention | Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients' score on the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEI-Q)
Evaluating the immediate effects of self-management interventions in cancer follow-up. It contains the following domains: Health-directed activities, Positive and active engagement in life, Emotional distress, Constructive attitudes and approaches, Self-monitoring and insight, Skill and technique acquisition, Social integration and support, Health service navigation. Individuals are asked to indicate their level of agreement with 42 statements across the eight domains on four-point Likert scales (1 "strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree"). Higher scores indicate greater performance of specific self-management behaviors. Higher scores on the emotional well-being domain denote higher levels of negative affect. Data from each domain will be used individually and the results reported as mean domain score. The primary outcome is the change of the insight subscale scores of the HEI-Q from right after treatment (baseline) to 12 months after treatment.
Measured: Assessed right after initial treatment, and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
Secondary outcomes (19)
Patients' score on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 uses for the questions 1 to 28 a 4-point scale. The scale scores from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit") and 4 ("Very much"). Half points are not allowed. For the raw score, lower scored are considered a better outcome. The EORTC QLQ-C30 uses for the questions 29 and 30 a 7-points scale. The scale scores from 1 to 7: 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent"). Half points are not allowed. Firstly, raw score has to be calculated with mean values. Afterwards linear transformation is performed Higher transformed scores are considered a better outcome. We will analyze change in Global Health Status and other subscales of the C30 questionnaire from end of treatment to 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively.
Measured: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
Change adherence to physical activity recommendations
Physical activity level recorded objectively with an activity monitor. Daily steps recorded by the activity device will be averaged over the time periods between patient visits, with days of zero daily steps excluded from the average. The data will be recoded into 10-min epochs of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Measured: Change from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Physical activity goals
The investigators have developed an app where the participants may choose activity goals. Number and type of goals will be reported with descriptive statistics.
Measured: Change from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Changes in physical activity level based on International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ)
Physical activity level will be measured using the short-form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The measure uses open-ended questions covering an individual's last 7-day recall of physical activity. There are no subscales. IPAQ-SF quantifies physical activity during the last seven days divided into four categories: vigorous intensity, moderate intensity, walking and sitting. In addition to intensity, frequency and duration of physical activity are assessed. Using the instrument's scoring protocol, weekly physical activity will be estimated by weighting time spent in each activity intensity with its estimated metabolic equivalent (MET) energy expenditure. The scoring protocol assigns the following MET values to walking, moderate, and vigorous intensity activity: 3.3 METs, 4.0 METs, and 8.0 METs, respectively.
Measured: Change from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Patients' score on the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEI-Q)
Evaluating immediate effects of self-management interventions in cancer follow-up. It contains the following domains: Health-directed activities, Positive and active engagement in life, Emotional distress, Constructive attitudes and approaches, Self-monitoring and insight, Skill and technique acquisition, Social integration and support, Health service navigation. Individuals are asked to indicate their level of agreement with 42 statements across the eight domains on four point Likert scales (1 "strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree"). Higher scores indicate greater performance of specific self-management behaviors. Higher scores on the emotional well-being domain denote higher levels of negative affect. Each domain is assessed separately and the scores are reported as the overall mean for each domain. We intend to assess change in the remaining subscales of the HEI-Q from end of treatment to 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment in addition to the primary outcome subscale.
Measured: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
Costs-effectiveness using the EuroQol 5-Dimensional (EQ5D)
Cost-effectiveness from the health care perspective using the EuroQol five-Dimensional (EQ5D) measure. EQ5D measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale ranging from 0-100). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention. Crude differences between groups will be assessed.
Measured: Change from end of treatment (baseline) to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Frequency of health care use
Frequency of health care use will be obtained through registries on health care services
Measured: Change from baseline to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Time to recurrence
In this study we will compare proportions of women who experienced their first recurrence in both groups, and for those who had a recurrence, compare the times from inclusion to the first recurrence assessed at 36 months after the end of primary treatment
Measured: Compare findings between intervention group and control group at 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Time to recurrence
In this study we will compare proportions of women who experienced their first recurrence in both groups, and for those who had a recurrence, compare the times from inclusion to the first recurrence assessed at 60 months after the end of primary treatment
Measured: Differences between intervention group and control group at 60 months after completion of primary treatment
Survival
In this study we will describe cause specific survival and overall survival defined as time from the inclusion to death or end of follow up (whichever comes first) and compare crude survival between the intervention group and control group. The end of follow up is set at 60 months after completion of primary treatment.
Measured: Differences between intervention group and control group at 60 months after completion of primary treatment
Differences in expression of biomarkers in cancer tissue in relation to recurrence of disease
Biomarker expression including CXCR4, SMAD4, SOX9 and IFIT3 in cancer tissue will be assessed by immunohistochemistry and verified by PCR from tumor
Measured: Compare differences between patients with and without recurrence at 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Impact of physical activity changes on inflammatory biomarkers in blood
Change in inflammatory biomarkers including PGE2, TNF alpha, IL1 beta, IL-8 and IL-10 will be assessed in blood samples. Differences in concentrations between the two study groups will be assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and multiplex bead assays.
Measured: Change from baseline to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Impact of physical activity changes on insulin biomarkers in blood
Change in the insulin pathway including adiponectin, leptin, insulin, IGF1, and IGFBP3 will be assessed in blood samples. Differences in concentrations between the two study groups will be assessed by immunoassays.
Measured: Change from baseline to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Examination of Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at the point of disease progression compared with 3 months values
Analyze of absolute quantities of ctDNA molecules presenting in blood at 3 months and at progression
Measured: At 3 months and at progression
Changes in the use of a study specific smartphone application
We will explore how frequent different parts of the app are used. Which elements of the app and frequency of use will be reported with descriptive statistics.
Measured: 36 months after completion of primary treatment
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24)
EORTC QLQ-EN24 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall health-related quality of life in patients with all stages of endometrial cancer, and consists of 24 questions including multi-item scales and single item measures. These include three functional scales (sexual interest, activity, and enjoyment), five symptom scales (lymphoedema, urological symptoms, GI symptoms, poor body image, and sexual/vaginal problems), and five single items (back/pelvis pain, tingling/numbness, muscular pain, hair loss, and taste change). Questions use a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score represents a more severe overall side effect of treatment. Change from baseline to 6, 12, 24 and 36 months respectively.
Measured: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28)
EORTC QLQ-OV28 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall health-related quality of life in patients with all stages of ovarian cancer, and consists of 28 questions including multi-item scales and single item measures. The module covers abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, other chemotherapy side-effects, hormonal/menopausal symptoms, body image, attitude to disease/treatment and sexual functioning. Questions use a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score represents a more severe overall side effect of treatment. Change from baseline to 6, 12, 24 and 36 months respectively.
Measured: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Cervical Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CX24)
EORTC QLQ-CX24 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall health-related quality of life in patients with all stages of cervical cancer, and consists of 24 questions including multi-item scales and single item measures. The EORTC QLQ-CX24 can be summarized in three multi-item scales, namely, symptom experience (eleven items), body image (three items), and sexual/vaginal functioning (four items). The other dimensions of the questionnaire are single-item scales, covering lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, menopausal symptoms, sexual worry, sexual activity, and sexual enjoy. Questions use a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score represents a more severe overall side effect of treatment. Change from baseline to 6, 12, 24 and 36 months respectively.
Measured: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Vulvar Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-VU34)
EORTC QLQ-VU34 is a questionnaire to assess the overall health-related quality of life in patients with all stages of vulvar cancer, and consists of 34 questions including multi-item scales and single item measures. The module covers abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, vaginal and inguinal problems, other treatment related side-effects, hormonal/menopausal symptoms, body image, attitude to disease/treatment and sexual functioning. Questions use a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score represents a more severe overall side effect of treatment. Change from baseline to 6, 12, 24 and 36 months respectively.
Measured: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2019
- Study start18 Nov 2019
- Primary completion27 Mar 2026
- Study completion27 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gynecologic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A multicenter controlled clinical trial of individualized nurse/physician-led follow-up (treatment group) versus standard care (control group) in approximately 754 women treated for gynecological cancer
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 755 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sorlandet Hospital HF
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- University of Agder, Uppsala University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ingvild Vistad, Sorlandet Hospital HF
- Investigators
- Ingvild Vistad, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Sorlandet Hospital HF
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04122235
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 813476
- Acronym
- LETSGO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: At the end of the study, data will be made available (after anonymisation) upon request to the corresponding author. The data collected will be stored for up to 15 years after the end of study. This timeperiod will take into account possible national and international legal restrictions (ie, Norwegian and EU regulations).
Publications
Fosstveit SH, Vistad I, Skorstad M, Berntsen S. Long-Term Engagement With a Physical Activity App Among Gynecologic Cancer Survivors in the LETSGO Trial: 12-Month Prospective, Multicenter, Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2026 Aug 13;14:e84838. doi: 10.2196/84838.
PubMed 42594257Vistad I, Skorstad M, Demmelmaier I, Smastuen MC, Lindemann K, Wisloff T, van de Poll-Franse LV, Berntsen S. Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynaecologic Oncology (LETSGO study): a study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal interventional study using mobile health technology and biobanking. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):e050930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050930.
PubMed 34253678
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04122235
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LETSGO / 813476
- Conditions
- Gynecologic Cancer, Gynecologic Neoplasm, Ovarian Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Vulvar Cancer
- Keywords
- follow-up, app, lifestyle, empowerment, nurse-led
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 755 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sorlandet Hospital HFOther government
- Collaborators
- University of Agder, Uppsala University
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compares traditional follow-up of gynaecological cancer patients to an alternative follow-up model. In the alternative follow-up model the patients will meet a nurse at every second consultation. The nurse will focus on psychosocial health and educate the patients in the use of a study specific smartphone-application.
Detailed description
The goal is to improve follow-up of past and present cancer patients to have the best quality of life possible, despite having a serious illness. Todays' survivors differ from the survival population for whom the traditional follow-up was designed. Improvements in treatment assure that many cancer patients survive longer after diagnosis often with age-related comorbidities. Consequently, new evidence-based models for follow-up after cancer treatment with focus on techniques to improve coping with and management of late effects without increasing the costs are warranted. The chronic care model, which uses self-management interventions, is used for many chronic diseases-such as diabetes and asthma and is a valid model to consider for cancer follow-up care(1). Another relevant model is the risk stratified model where patients are stratified into low, moderate, or high-risk on the basis of expected recurrence rate and late-effects(2). Gynecological cancer patients constitute an underrepresented group in clinical cancer research.
The research group has developed a follow-up model based on the principles of the risk-stratified model and the chronic care model with one or three year's hospital follow-up for low- versus medium/high-risk patients. Physicians will be replaced by nurses in 50% of the consultations. The nurses will use evidence-based behavior change techniques to coach the cancer patients on how to take an active role in management of their physical and mental late effects. These techniques will be further reinforced with a multifunctional smart phone-application (app). The "Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology-app" (LETSGO-app) has three main functions: 1) Self-evaluated symptoms (on recurrence or late effects) regularly reported through the app; 2) Targeted information on treatment, signs of recurrence, and late-effects on each cancer type and 3) Facilitation of early rehabilitation through physical activity instructions, goal-setting and electronic reminders.
The investigators will conduct a multicenter study including 754 cancer survivors in Norway. Ten Norwegian hospitals will participate whereof five hospitals are intervention hospitals and five are control hospitals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A multicenter controlled clinical trial of individualized nurse/physician-led follow-up (treatment group) versus standard care (control group) in approximately 754 women treated for gynecological cancer
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Other: LETSGO follow-upNew follow-up model |
| Control arm | No intervention | –Usual care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically verified gynaecological cancer
- Must have completed primary treatment and scheduled to follow-up
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participating in other cancer treatment trial or follow-up trial
- Cervical cancer patients treated with trachelectomy
- On maintenance therapy
- Dementia or other mental/cognitive impairment
- Illiterate in Norwegian
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LETSGO follow-upNurse-led follow-up in 50% of the consultations Access to the LETSGO-app | Other | Intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Patients' score on the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEI-Q)
Time frame: Assessed right after initial treatment, and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
Evaluating the immediate effects of self-management interventions in cancer follow-up. It contains the following domains: Health-directed activities, Positive and active engagement in life, Emotional distress, Constructive attitudes and approaches, Self-monitoring and insight, Skill and technique acquisition, Social integration and support, Health service navigation. Individuals are asked to indicate their level of agreement with 42 statements across the eight domains on four-point Likert scales (1 "strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree"). Higher scores indicate greater performance of specific self-management behaviors. Higher scores on the emotional well-being domain denote higher levels of negative affect. Data from each domain will be used individually and the results reported as mean domain score. The primary outcome is the change of the insight subscale scores of the HEI-Q from right after treatment (baseline) to 12 months after treatment.
19 secondary outcomes
Patients' score on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)
Time frame: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
Change adherence to physical activity recommendations
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Physical activity goals
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Changes in physical activity level based on International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Patients' score on the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEI-Q)
Time frame: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
Costs-effectiveness using the EuroQol 5-Dimensional (EQ5D)
Time frame: Change from end of treatment (baseline) to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Frequency of health care use
Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Time to recurrence
Time frame: Compare findings between intervention group and control group at 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Time to recurrence
Time frame: Differences between intervention group and control group at 60 months after completion of primary treatment
Survival
Time frame: Differences between intervention group and control group at 60 months after completion of primary treatment
Differences in expression of biomarkers in cancer tissue in relation to recurrence of disease
Time frame: Compare differences between patients with and without recurrence at 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Impact of physical activity changes on inflammatory biomarkers in blood
Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Impact of physical activity changes on insulin biomarkers in blood
Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months after completion of primary treatment
Examination of Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at the point of disease progression compared with 3 months values
Time frame: At 3 months and at progression
Changes in the use of a study specific smartphone application
Time frame: 36 months after completion of primary treatment
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24)
Time frame: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28)
Time frame: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Cervical Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CX24)
Time frame: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
4.Cancer type specific quality of life using the EORTC Vulvar Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-VU34)
Time frame: Questionnaires are administered at end of treatment, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment, respectively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42594257Fosstveit SH, Vistad I, Skorstad M, Berntsen S. Long-Term Engagement With a Physical Activity App Among Gynecologic Cancer Survivors in the LETSGO Trial: 12-Month Prospective, Multicenter, Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2026 Aug 13;14:e84838. doi: 10.2196/84838.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34253678Vistad I, Skorstad M, Demmelmaier I, Smastuen MC, Lindemann K, Wisloff T, van de Poll-Franse LV, Berntsen S. Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynaecologic Oncology (LETSGO study): a study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal interventional study using mobile health technology and biobanking. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):e050930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050930.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. At the end of the study, data will be made available (after anonymisation) upon request to the corresponding author. The data collected will be stored for up to 15 years after the end of study. This timeperiod will take into account possible national and international legal restrictions (ie, Norwegian and EU regulations).
Related trials for Gynecologic Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Use of Neratinib or the Combination of Neratinib and Palbociclib Targeted Treatment for HER2+ Solid Tumors (A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial)
Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recruiting
INtegrating Systematic PatIent-Reported Evaluations in Multi-Disciplinary Tumor Boards: The INSPIRE Study
Breast Cancer, Corpus Uteri Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Gut Microbiome in Patients With Lung and Melanoma Cancer and Intestinal Microbiota in Gynecologic Cancers
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
Enrolling by invitation
Peer Ambassador in Gyn Onc Trials
Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Surgical Thromboprophylaxis Practices in Oncology Patients Within the NCORP Network, STOP-VTE Study
Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm, Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ingvild Vistad, MD, PhD principal investigator
Sorlandet Hospital HF
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing LETSGO follow-up in people with Gynecologic Cancer and Gynecologic Neoplasm, run by Sorlandet Hospital HF at 12 sites in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients' score on the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEI-Q) (time frame: Assessed right after initial treatment, and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04122235, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.