Irritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaPhase 2NCT04129619
A Comparison of the Effects of ORP-101 Versus Placebo in Adult Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
A Phase 2 study testing ORP-101 in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea, run by OrphoMed, Inc. at 74 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the effects of ORP-101 versus placebo on stool consistency and abdominal pain in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D). It will also assess the safety and tolerability of ORP-101 in patients with IBS-D. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
- What is being tested?
- ORP-101
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 321 participants
- Where
- 74 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Nov 2019to 4 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Willing and able to comply with protocol, including completion of electronic daily diary as required.
- Has a diagnosis of IBS-D (Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea) and meets the Rome IV Criteria, by history, for both IBS and IBS-D.
- Has abdominal pain intensity score, and stool consistency as determined by protocol and assessed by Investigator for the week prior to randomization.
- Has not used loperamide within the 14 days prior to randomization.
- Is on a stable diet for the past 12 weeks and is not planning to change lifestyle and/or diet during study.
Who cannot join
- History of clinically relevant pancreatic conditions including pancreatitis, pancreas divisum, or Sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction with pancreatic manifestations.
- History of biliary pathology including acute cholecystitis within 6 months or biliary pain including post-cholecystectomy pain.
- Patients who have had biliary sphincterotomy with post-procedure persistent abnormal liver function transaminases (LFTs).
- Planned elective surgery within the next 4 months.
- Significant and/or severe medical illnesses such as cardiovascular, neurological, infectious, renal, hepatic or respiratory disorders that would interfere with the patient's medical care, participation in, or conduct of the study.
- History of intestinal obstruction, stricture, toxic megacolon, GI (gastro-intestinal) perforation, fecal impaction, gastric banding, bariatric surgery, adhesions, ischemic colitis, or impaired intestinal circulation (e.g. aorto-iliac disease).
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of lactose intolerance uncontrolled on a lactose-free diet, or other malabsorption syndromes (e.g. fructose malabsorption).
- Dysphagia or difficulty swallowing pills.
- History of inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, Clostridium difficile colitis or have had recent unexplained GI bleeding within 3 months prior to screening.
- History of major gastric, hepatic, pancreatic or intestinal surgery (appendectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, or polypectomy allowed as long as occurred > 3 months prior to trial screening; uncomplicated laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy is allowed if no history of post-operative biliary tract pain and surgery occurred > 3 months prior to screening).
- Patients >40 years of age at high risk for colon cancer must have had a screening colonoscopy within the past 3 years prior to trial screening visit or > 50 years of age, must have had a normal screening colonoscopy within the past 10 years prior to trial screening visit. Patients with Lynch Syndrome or Familial Polyposis are excluded from the study.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
74 sites in 1 country.
74 sites in 1 country
United States74 sites
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Akron (Site 122)
Akron, Ohio, 44311
Lovelace Scientific Resources Inc. (Site 176)
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Agile Clinical Research Trials, LLC (Site 163)
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Benchmark Research - Austin (Site 178)
Austin, Texas, 78704
Northwest Clinical Research Center - ClinEdge (Site 148)
Bellevue, Washington, 98007
Achieve Clinical Research (Site 155)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35216
Northwest Clinical Trials - ClinEdge (Site 133)
Boise, Idaho, 83704
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Site 115)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Imagine Research of Palm Beach County (Site 187)
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33435
Connecticut Clinical Research Foundation (Site 136)
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
NY Scientific (Site 153)
Brooklyn, New York, 11235
Investigators Research Group, LLC (Site 188)
Brownsburg, Indiana, 46112
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Phoenix Southeast (Site 123)
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
OnSite Clinical Solutions, LLC - ClinEdge (Site 147)
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
OnSite Clinical Solutions, LLC - ClinEdge (Site 146)
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
WR-ClinSearch, LLC (Site 129)
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Chicago (Site 120)
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Hometown Urgent Care and Research (Site 150)
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45215
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Cincinnati (Site 127)
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236
Gastrointestinal Diseases, Inc. Research (Site 137)
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Columbus (Site 108)
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Hometown Urgent Care and Research (Site 149)
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Remington Davis Inc (Site 144)
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
PriMed Clinical Research - ClinEdge (Site 121)
Dayton, Ohio, 45419
Hometown Urgent Care and Research (Site 151)
Dayton, Ohio, 45424
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Allaw (Site 102)
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Piedmont Research Partners LLC - BTC (Site 157)
Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707
Advanced Medical Trials (SIte 142)
Georgetown, Texas, 78628
Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group LLP (Site 107)
Great Neck, New York, 11023
Synexus clinical Research US, Inc. - Greer (Site 105)
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Peters Medical Research, LLC - ClinEdge (SIte 111)
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Pioneer Research Solutions (Site 125)
Houston, Texas, 77099
The Jackson Clinic PA - ClinEdge (Site 135)
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Queens (Site 119)
Jamaica, New York, 11432
New Phase Research & Development (Site 181)
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Meridien Research - Lakeland (Site 167)
Lakeland, Florida, 33803
Jubilee Clinical Research - BTC (Site 162)
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Sierra Clinical Research (Site 179)
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Precision Clinical Research LLC (Site 139)
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
Preferred Research Partners - ClinEdge (Site 103)
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
Applied Research Center (Site 158)
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72212
Meridien Research, Maitland - Inpatient (Site 141)
Maitland, Florida, 32751
Synergy Group US, LLC - Missouri City - Hunt (Site 156)
Missouri City, Texas, 77459
Exemplar Research, Inc. - Morgantown (Site 172)
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Salt Lake City (Site 101)
Murray, Utah, 84123
Mid Hudson Medical Research PLLC (Site 174)
Newburgh, New York, 12553
Health Research of Hampton Roads Inc. (Site 173)
Newport News, Virginia, 23606
Advanced Research Institute (Site 117)
Ogden, Utah, 84405
Medical Research international (Site 180)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Omaha (Site 113)
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Oviedo Medical Research (Site 140)
Oviedo, Florida, 32765
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - McGill Family Practice, P.C. (Site 126)
Papillion, Nebraska, 68046
DM Clinical Research - LinQ Research - ERN (Site 109)
Pearland, Texas, 77584
The Center of Gastrointestinal Health (Site 152)
Petersburg, Virginia, 23805
Tristar Clinical Investigations, P.C. (Site 168)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Elite Clinical Studies - Phoenix (Site 116)
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Clinical Research Center of Florida (Site 186)
Pompano Beach, Florida, 33060
AES-DRS-Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.-Minneapolis (site 114)
Richfield, Minnesota, 55423
PMG Research of Salisbury LLC (Site 110)
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - San Antonio (Site 112)
San Antonio, Texas, 48229
Clinical Trials of Texas Incorporated - ClinEdge (Site 134)
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Meridian Clinical Research (Site 169)
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Sundance Clinical Research (Site 175)
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Meridien Research - St. Petersburg (Site 132)
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
In Quest Medical Research, LLC (Site 131)
Suwanee, Georgia, 30024
Del Sol Research Management - BTC (Site 165)
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Orange Grove Family Practice (Site 118)
Tucson, Arizona, 85741
Del Sol Research Management - BTC (Site 130)
Tucson, Arizona, 85745
Frontier Clinical Research, LLC (Site 171)
Uniontown, Pennsylvania, 15401
GNP Research (Site 145)
Valdosta, Georgia, 31605
Alliance for Multispecialty Research, LLC (Site 159)
Wichita, Kansas, 67207
Upstate Clinical Research Associates LLC - ClinEdge (Site 164)
Williamsville, New York, 14221
PMG Research of Wilmington (Site 185)
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
PMG Research of Winston-Salem (Site 124)
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2, Responsive Adaptive Randomization Study of ORP-101 in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
This study will evaluate the effects of ORP-101 versus placebo on stool consistency and abdominal pain in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D). It will also assess the safety and tolerability of ORP-101 in patients with IBS-D.
Read the detailed description
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ORP-101 in patients with IBS-D. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm, 12-week, parallel proof-of-concept study with 2 active arms (50 mg and 100 mg ORP-101, QD) and 1 matching placebo arm, using a responsive adaptive randomization approach. After screening, patients who qualify will enter the baseline symptom assessment period, during which they will be instructed on completion of an electronic diary for daily collection of data related to their IBS symptoms, bowel function and loperamide rescue usage (not allowed during baseline).
Patients who meet all entry criteria will be randomized to receive one of two different doses of ORP-101 tablets or placebo for 12 weeks. The study drug will be taken once daily, approximately 30 minutes prior to breakfast. Patients will return to the clinic on Days 14, 28, 56, 84 (12 weeks) and 2 weeks after dosing has completed (Day 98) for a follow-up visit.
Study subjects will include both male and female adults. Approximately 320 patients with IBS-D will be randomized to receive study drug or placebo. Randomization will be stratified by history of cholecystectomy/gallbladder agenesis.
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
- Being tested
- ORP-101, Placebo
- Keywords
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, IBS
- Medical subject headings
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ORP-101Drug
Also called dibuprenorphine-ethyl-ether
Oral tablet
PlaceboDrug
Oral tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ORP-101 50 mg | Experimental | ORP-101 (50 mg) once daily Receives: Drug: ORP-101 |
| ORP-101 100 mg | Experimental | ORP-101 (100 mg), once daily Receives: Drug: ORP-101 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo, once daily Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Are Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores
Composite responders are defined as participants who met the daily response criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entries over the 12-week interval. A participant must meet both of the following criteria on a given day to be a daily responder: 1) Daily pain response: worst abdominal pain scores in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization). 2) Average of daily stool consistency response for all reported bowel movements on the specific day: Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score <5 (ie, score of 1, 2, 3, or 4) or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (9)
Percentage of Participants Who Are Responders in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores
Pain responders over the interval from Weeks 1-12 are defined as those patients who meet the daily pain response criteria for at least 50% of days with diary entry during the interval. To be eligible to be a responder, a patient must have a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Are Responders in Daily Stool Consistency Scores
Stool consistency responders over the interval from Weeks 1-12 are defined as those patients who meet the daily stool consistency response criteria for at least 50% of days with diary entry during the interval. To be eligible to be a responder, a patient must have a minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who are Responders in IBS Global Symptom Scores
IBS Global Symptom Score: Change from baseline for interval from Weeks 1-12: A responder is defined as a patient who has an IBS global symptom score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) or daily IBS symptom score improved by ≥ 2.0 compared to the average in the week prior to randomization. A minimum of 60 days of diary entries over the 12-week interval is required for responders.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who are Responders in IBS Adequate Relief Scores
IBS Adequate Relief: Percent of responders over the interval from Weeks 1-12. Responders are defined as those patients with a weekly response of "Yes" to adequate relief of their IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the total weeks during the interval.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Are Modified Composite Responders Based on Responder Endpoints
A modified composite responder endpoint in which a daily responder will be defined as having both: 1) Pain response: worst abdominal pain score in the past 24 hours improved ≥ 30% compared to the average in the week prior to randomization. 2) Stool consistency response: all bowel movements on the specific day must have BSFS score < 5 or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥ 30% improvement in worst abdominal pain.
Measured: Week 12
Change from Baseline in Daily Abdominal Discomfort Scores
Discomfort: Change from baseline in daily abdominal discomfort scores
Measured: Week 12
Change from Baseline in Daily Abdominal Bloating Scores
Bloating: Change from baseline in daily abdominal bloating scores
Measured: Week 12
Number of Bowel Movements Per Day
Frequency: Change from baseline in mean number of bowel movements per day
Measured: Week 12
Number of Bowel Incontinence Free Days
Change from baseline in mean number of bowel incontinence episodes per day as well as the number of incontinence-free days
Measured: Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2019
- Study start22 Nov 2019
- Primary completion4 Oct 2021
- Study completion4 Oct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 321 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- OrphoMed, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04129619
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OM-201
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Singh P, Nee JW, Ballou S, Lee A, Loesch J, Iturrino J, Rangan V, Lembo A. ORP-101 in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea: A Phase II Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Aug;24(8):2297-2304. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.03.012. Epub 2026 Mar 24.
PubMed 41887552
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2, Responsive Adaptive Randomization Study of ORP-101 in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04129619
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OM-201
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
- Keywords
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, IBS
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 321 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- OrphoMed, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP
- Study start
- 22 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the effects of ORP-101 versus placebo on stool consistency and abdominal pain in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D). It will also assess the safety and tolerability of ORP-101 in patients with IBS-D.
Detailed description
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ORP-101 in patients with IBS-D. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm, 12-week, parallel proof-of-concept study with 2 active arms (50 mg and 100 mg ORP-101, QD) and 1 matching placebo arm, using a responsive adaptive randomization approach. After screening, patients who qualify will enter the baseline symptom assessment period, during which they will be instructed on completion of an electronic diary for daily collection of data related to their IBS symptoms, bowel function and loperamide rescue usage (not allowed during baseline).
Patients who meet all entry criteria will be randomized to receive one of two different doses of ORP-101 tablets or placebo for 12 weeks. The study drug will be taken once daily, approximately 30 minutes prior to breakfast. Patients will return to the clinic on Days 14, 28, 56, 84 (12 weeks) and 2 weeks after dosing has completed (Day 98) for a follow-up visit.
Study subjects will include both male and female adults. Approximately 320 patients with IBS-D will be randomized to receive study drug or placebo. Randomization will be stratified by history of cholecystectomy/gallbladder agenesis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ORP-101 50 mg | Experimental | Drug: ORP-101ORP-101 (50 mg) once daily |
| ORP-101 100 mg | Experimental | Drug: ORP-101ORP-101 (100 mg), once daily |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching placebo, once daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Willing and able to comply with protocol, including completion of electronic daily diary as required.
- Has a diagnosis of IBS-D (Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea) and meets the Rome IV Criteria, by history, for both IBS and IBS-D.
- Has abdominal pain intensity score, and stool consistency as determined by protocol and assessed by Investigator for the week prior to randomization.
- Has not used loperamide within the 14 days prior to randomization.
- Is on a stable diet for the past 12 weeks and is not planning to change lifestyle and/or diet during study.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- History of clinically relevant pancreatic conditions including pancreatitis, pancreas divisum, or Sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction with pancreatic manifestations.
- History of biliary pathology including acute cholecystitis within 6 months or biliary pain including post-cholecystectomy pain.
- Patients who have had biliary sphincterotomy with post-procedure persistent abnormal liver function transaminases (LFTs).
- Planned elective surgery within the next 4 months.
- Significant and/or severe medical illnesses such as cardiovascular, neurological, infectious, renal, hepatic or respiratory disorders that would interfere with the patient's medical care, participation in, or conduct of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ORP-101Also: dibuprenorphine-ethyl-etherOral tablet | Drug | ORP-101 100 mg, ORP-101 50 mg |
| PlaceboOral tablet | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Are Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Composite responders are defined as participants who met the daily response criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entries over the 12-week interval. A participant must meet both of the following criteria on a given day to be a daily responder: 1) Daily pain response: worst abdominal pain scores in the past 24 hours improved by ≥30% compared to baseline (average of daily worst abdominal pain the week prior to randomization). 2) Average of daily stool consistency response for all reported bowel movements on the specific day: Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score <5 (ie, score of 1, 2, 3, or 4) or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥30% improvement in worst abdominal pain compared to baseline pain.
9 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Are Responders in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Are Responders in Daily Stool Consistency Scores
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who are Responders in IBS Global Symptom Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who are Responders in IBS Adequate Relief Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Are Modified Composite Responders Based on Responder Endpoints
Time frame: Week 12
Change from Baseline in Daily Abdominal Discomfort Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Change from Baseline in Daily Abdominal Bloating Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Bowel Movements Per Day
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Bowel Incontinence Free Days
Time frame: Week 12
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41887552Singh P, Nee JW, Ballou S, Lee A, Loesch J, Iturrino J, Rangan V, Lembo A. ORP-101 in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea: A Phase II Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Aug;24(8):2297-2304. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.03.012. Epub 2026 Mar 24.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Recruiting
Lactic Acid Bacteria in Functional Diarrheal Disorders
IBS-D (Diarrhea-predominant), IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Huanghou Zhixie Diwan in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation of Hewei Anchang Formula for Overlapping Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients With Coexisting Functional Dyspepsia and Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Functional Dyspepsia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Jingfang Granules in Treating Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Cold-Dampness Disturbing Spleen Syndrome
Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
74 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ORP-101 in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea, run by OrphoMed, Inc. at 74 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 74 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Are Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain and Daily Stool Consistency Scores (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04129619, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.