Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationNCT04131855
The Omission of Pumice Prophylaxis on Bracket Failure Rates Using Self Etch Primers
A study testing Pumice prophylaxis and No pumice prophylaxis in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by University of Malaya.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to investigate the role of pumice prophylaxis in the self etch primer method on clinical bond strengths. The relevance is that removal of the pumicing step in the SEP method could potentially save time \& cost for clinicians, and decrease discomfort for patients if it does not affect bond… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- What is being tested?
- Pumice prophylaxis and No pumice prophylaxis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2019to 1 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients receiving fixed appliance therapy with only metal brackets on both upper and lower arches.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Balanced extractions in both upper and lower arches.
- Right-handed patients
Who cannot join
- Enamel defects, hypoplasia or buccal restorations that would preclude bonding to enamel.
- Orthognathic cases.
- Surgically exposed teeth or teeth where bracket placement will be delayed.
- Patients with craniofacial anomalies.
- Previous use of fixed appliances.
- Patients that will require partial ligation of teeth immediately after bond-up.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: The Omission of Pumice Prophylaxis on Bracket Failure Rates Using Self Etch Primers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
The aim of the study is to investigate the role of pumice prophylaxis in the self etch primer method on clinical bond strengths. The relevance is that removal of the pumicing step in the SEP method could potentially save time \& cost for clinicians, and decrease discomfort for patients if it does not affect bond strengths.
The null hypothesis that will be tested is that pumice prophylaxis does not affect orthodontic bracket failure rates when used with the self etch primer. The alternative hypothesis is that there are less orthodontic bracket failures in the pumiced group while using the self etch primer.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
There is a clinically significant variation in individual understandings and approaches among orthodontists to pumicing prior to using the SEP to bond brackets. There is also a lack of current studies in the last decade comparing bond strengths between pumiced and non-pumiced teeth while using the latest SEP products in the market. Therefore the aim of this research is to the investigate the relevance of pumicing prior to bonding orthodontic brackets. The investigators also then aim to recommend either the continued usage of, or to highlight it's clinical redundancy in the bond-up process, hence reducing cost and saving time for both the patient and clinician.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION:
Based on the expected proportions of bracket breakages in pumiced and non-pumiced groups, a one-tailed priori power calculation determined that 266 orthodontic brackets would be required to give a power of 0.9 at significance level of 0.05, assuming failure proportions of 2.46% and 11.41% (Lill, 2008), which was deemed a clinically significant difference.
Incorporating an attrition rate of 20%, the ideal sample size to achieve a statistically significant result would be 319 brackets, equivalent to 20 patients with 16 orthodontic brackets each.
RANDOMIZATION:
The block randomization technique will be used. A 1:1 ratio will be used with fixed block sizes of 4:4:4:4:4. There will be no stratification used in the randomisation. A computer generated random number list will be prepared by a supervisor with no clinical involvement in the trial. The allocation sequence will be concealed from the main investigator enrolling the participants in sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes.
To prevent subversion of the allocation sequence, the name and date of birth of the participant will be written on the envelope. Corresponding envelopes were opened only after the enrolled participants for that block completed all baseline assessments and it was time to allocate the intervention. Each participant will receive either an odd or even numbered envelope. The split mouth contra-lateral technique will be used. Patients receiving an even number will receive pumicing on the maxillary left and mandibular right quadrants, and patients receiving an odd number will receive pumicing on the maxillary right and mandibular left quadrants.
INTERVENTIONS:
Patients who attend the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya requesting orthodontic treatment will be screened. Patients who fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be selected for this study. During screening, the participants will receive information leaflets and detailed explanations on the study. Informed consent will then be taken from the patients. A total of 20 participants will be recruited for the study.
The first appointment will be for bond-up.At the bond up appointment, the teeth will be isolated with a cheek retractor and a saliva ejector. In the control quadrants, the teeth are polished with a slurry of plain pumice and water for 5 seconds per tooth, using a rubber cup in a slow contra-angle handpiece. In the study quadrants, no pumicing will be performed. All quadrants will then washed with water and each tooth air-dried for 5 seconds. The single etch primer (SEP) Transbond Plus 3M will be then applied according to manufacturer's instructions. For each tooth, the applicator will be used to rub the enamel to be bonded for 3 seconds, the applicator returned to the well, and the process repeated for each tooth. Transbond XT adhesive will be applied to the bracket base, the brackets are placed on the teeth with brackets holders and firmly seated .Excess adhesive will be removed from around the periphery using a probe, and each bracket light-cured for 5 seconds per interspace with an LED curing light. (Planmeca Lumion).
The brackets used will be mesh-based stainless steel orthodontic brackets (3M Unitek Gemini MBT 0.022"x 0.028) and the wires used will be 3M Unitek Nitinol (NiTi) HANT \& Stainless Steel (SS) wires. A check for occlusal interferences will be made and the initial 0.014 NiTi archwires will be placed in all four quadrants after band cementation and secured with elastomeric ligatures. Post-operative patient instructions will be given.
To maximize moisture control and standardize all patients, the teeth will be bonded in a specific order as follows: first, the upper labial segment followed by the lower labial segment, then the right premolars (uppers then lowers) and finally the left premolars(uppers then lowers).
The wire sequence used will be 0.014 Niti to 0.018 NiTi to 17x25 NiTi to 19x25 Stainless Steel archwire. Patients are required to be in the 19x25 SS wire for at least a month.
DATA COLLECTION:
Any bond failure that occurs until the patient is in the 19x25 SS wire for a month, will be verified by the clinician. The patient's name along with the position of the bracket and the amount of adhesive remnant left on the surface will be recorded in a logbook as per the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).
Any brackets that debond during treatment will be rebonded with Transbond XT after conventional acid-etching with 37% phosphoric acid. They will then be subsequently excluded from the trial to avoid recounts. Bond failures were recorded prospectively, as was the adhesive remnant index (ARI) results. Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.
The central and lateral incisors will be grouped as anterior teeth, and the canines and premolars will be grouped as posterior teeth for recording purposes.
STATISTICAL METHODS:
Statistical Analysis will be done using SPSS software version 22. P < 0.05 will be set as the level of significance.
The Shapiro-Wilk test of normality (n<50) will be done to determine if the data is normally distributed.
The independent T-test will then be used to compare the means of both groups, pumiced and non-pumiced to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between both the groups.
If the results are not distributed normally, the non-parametric Mann Whitney U-test will be used to compare the means.
ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS:
- The independent T-test/ Mann-Whitney U-test will be used to compare means to assess the difference in breakage failures between the anterior and posterior groups.
- The Levene's test of variance will be applied to the results of the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI), if the variances are equal, the one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test will be used to determine if there is a statistically significant differences between the means of the results. If the variances are assumed to be unequal, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for this purpose.
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Being tested
- Pumice prophylaxis, No pumice prophylaxis
- Keywords
- self etch primers, pumice, orthodontic bracket failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pumice prophylaxisOther
Also called Pumice slurry, Pumice powder
Pumicing the teeth is the recommended prophylaxis to be used prior to the application of the self etch primer by the manufacturer - 3M Unitek Transbond Plus Self Etch Primer which will be used in the experiment.
No pumice prophylaxisOther
Pumice prophylaxis will not be used as per manufacturers instructions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pumice prophylaxis. | Active comparator | Will receive pumice prophylaxis in a slurry of plain pumice and water for 5 seconds per tooth using a rubber cup in a slow contra-angle handpiece. The teeth involved will then be washed and dried prior to using the self etch primer. Receives: Other: Pumice prophylaxis |
| No pumice prophylaxis. | Experimental | Will not receive pumice prophylaxis. Teeth will be washed and dried before using the self etch primer. Receives: Other: No pumice prophylaxis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To compare the bond failure rates between pumiced and non-pumiced teeth.
Done by calculating and comparing the percentage of bracket breakages between the pumiced and non-pumiced quadrants.
Measured: Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.
Secondary outcomes (2)
To compare the bracket breakage rates between anterior and posterior teeth.
Done by calculating and comparing the percentage of bracket breakages in anterior and posterior teeth in both the groups.
Measured: Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.
To determine the interfaces at which the bond failures occur after bracket breakage.
Done by assessing the amount of adhesive remnant remaining on the tooth surface.
Measured: Data on adhesive remnant will be collected from the tooth surface immediately after bracket breakage.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MalayaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be placed in two different groups based on the randomization and will receive, or not receive the intervention, which is pumicing prior to bond-up, for the duration of the study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Kaminii A/P Thevadass, University of Malaya
- Investigators
- Dr Kaminii Thevadass, BDS, Principal investigator, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics,University of Malaya.Prof Dr Siti Adibah Othman, BDS, Study director, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics,University of Malaya.Dr Nor Nadia Zakaria, BDS, Study director, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics,University of Malaya.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04131855
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DF CD1909/0057(P)
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Consent has not yet been gained from participants as recruiting has not begun.
Publications
Burgess AM, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Self-etching primers: is prophylactic pumicing necessary? A randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):114-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0114:SPIPPN]2.0.CO;2.
PubMed 16448279Lill DJ, Lindauer SJ, Tufekci E, Shroff B. Importance of pumice prophylaxis for bonding with self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Mar;133(3):423-6; quiz 476.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.039.
PubMed 18331943
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Omission of Pumice Prophylaxis on Bracket Failure Rates Using Self Etch Primers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04131855
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DF CD1909/0057(P)
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Keywords
- self etch primers, pumice, orthodontic bracket failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalayaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to investigate the role of pumice prophylaxis in the self etch primer method on clinical bond strengths. The relevance is that removal of the pumicing step in the SEP method could potentially save time \& cost for clinicians, and decrease discomfort for patients if it does not affect bond strengths.
The null hypothesis that will be tested is that pumice prophylaxis does not affect orthodontic bracket failure rates when used with the self etch primer. The alternative hypothesis is that there are less orthodontic bracket failures in the pumiced group while using the self etch primer.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
There is a clinically significant variation in individual understandings and approaches among orthodontists to pumicing prior to using the SEP to bond brackets. There is also a lack of current studies in the last decade comparing bond strengths between pumiced and non-pumiced teeth while using the latest SEP products in the market. Therefore the aim of this research is to the investigate the relevance of pumicing prior to bonding orthodontic brackets. The investigators also then aim to recommend either the continued usage of, or to highlight it's clinical redundancy in the bond-up process, hence reducing cost and saving time for both the patient and clinician.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION:
Based on the expected proportions of bracket breakages in pumiced and non-pumiced groups, a one-tailed priori power calculation determined that 266 orthodontic brackets would be required to give a power of 0.9 at significance level of 0.05, assuming failure proportions of 2.46% and 11.41% (Lill, 2008), which was deemed a clinically significant difference.
Incorporating an attrition rate of 20%, the ideal sample size to achieve a statistically significant result would be 319 brackets, equivalent to 20 patients with 16 orthodontic brackets each.
RANDOMIZATION:
The block randomization technique will be used. A 1:1 ratio will be used with fixed block sizes of 4:4:4:4:4. There will be no stratification used in the randomisation. A computer generated random number list will be prepared by a supervisor with no clinical involvement in the trial. The allocation sequence will be concealed from the main investigator enrolling the participants in sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes.
To prevent subversion of the allocation sequence, the name and date of birth of the participant will be written on the envelope. Corresponding envelopes were opened only after the enrolled participants for that block completed all baseline assessments and it was time to allocate the intervention. Each participant will receive either an odd or even numbered envelope. The split mouth contra-lateral technique will be used. Patients receiving an even number will receive pumicing on the maxillary left and mandibular right quadrants, and patients receiving an odd number will receive pumicing on the maxillary right and mandibular left quadrants.
INTERVENTIONS:
Patients who attend the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya requesting orthodontic treatment will be screened. Patients who fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be selected for this study. During screening, the participants will receive information leaflets and detailed explanations on the study. Informed consent will then be taken from the patients. A total of 20 participants will be recruited for the study.
The first appointment will be for bond-up.At the bond up appointment, the teeth will be isolated with a cheek retractor and a saliva ejector. In the control quadrants, the teeth are polished with a slurry of plain pumice and water for 5 seconds per tooth, using a rubber cup in a slow contra-angle handpiece. In the study quadrants, no pumicing will be performed. All quadrants will then washed with water and each tooth air-dried for 5 seconds. The single etch primer (SEP) Transbond Plus 3M will be then applied according to manufacturer's instructions. For each tooth, the applicator will be used to rub the enamel to be bonded for 3 seconds, the applicator returned to the well, and the process repeated for each tooth. Transbond XT adhesive will be applied to the bracket base, the brackets are placed on the teeth with brackets holders and firmly seated .Excess adhesive will be removed from around the periphery using a probe, and each bracket light-cured for 5 seconds per interspace with an LED curing light. (Planmeca Lumion).
The brackets used will be mesh-based stainless steel orthodontic brackets (3M Unitek Gemini MBT 0.022"x 0.028) and the wires used will be 3M Unitek Nitinol (NiTi) HANT \& Stainless Steel (SS) wires. A check for occlusal interferences will be made and the initial 0.014 NiTi archwires will be placed in all four quadrants after band cementation and secured with elastomeric ligatures. Post-operative patient instructions will be given.
To maximize moisture control and standardize all patients, the teeth will be bonded in a specific order as follows: first, the upper labial segment followed by the lower labial segment, then the right premolars (uppers then lowers) and finally the left premolars(uppers then lowers).
The wire sequence used will be 0.014 Niti to 0.018 NiTi to 17x25 NiTi to 19x25 Stainless Steel archwire. Patients are required to be in the 19x25 SS wire for at least a month.
DATA COLLECTION:
Any bond failure that occurs until the patient is in the 19x25 SS wire for a month, will be verified by the clinician. The patient's name along with the position of the bracket and the amount of adhesive remnant left on the surface will be recorded in a logbook as per the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).
Any brackets that debond during treatment will be rebonded with Transbond XT after conventional acid-etching with 37% phosphoric acid. They will then be subsequently excluded from the trial to avoid recounts. Bond failures were recorded prospectively, as was the adhesive remnant index (ARI) results. Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.
The central and lateral incisors will be grouped as anterior teeth, and the canines and premolars will be grouped as posterior teeth for recording purposes.
STATISTICAL METHODS:
Statistical Analysis will be done using SPSS software version 22. P < 0.05 will be set as the level of significance.
The Shapiro-Wilk test of normality (n<50) will be done to determine if the data is normally distributed.
The independent T-test will then be used to compare the means of both groups, pumiced and non-pumiced to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between both the groups.
If the results are not distributed normally, the non-parametric Mann Whitney U-test will be used to compare the means.
ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS:
- The independent T-test/ Mann-Whitney U-test will be used to compare means to assess the difference in breakage failures between the anterior and posterior groups.
- The Levene's test of variance will be applied to the results of the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI), if the variances are equal, the one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test will be used to determine if there is a statistically significant differences between the means of the results. If the variances are assumed to be unequal, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for this purpose.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be placed in two different groups based on the randomization and will receive, or not receive the intervention, which is pumicing prior to bond-up, for the duration of the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pumice prophylaxis. | Active comparator | Other: Pumice prophylaxisWill receive pumice prophylaxis in a slurry of plain pumice and water for 5 seconds per tooth using a rubber cup in a slow contra-angle handpiece. The teeth involved will then be washed and dried prior to using the self etch primer. |
| No pumice prophylaxis. | Experimental | Other: No pumice prophylaxisWill not receive pumice prophylaxis. Teeth will be washed and dried before using the self etch primer. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients receiving fixed appliance therapy with only metal brackets on both upper and lower arches.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Balanced extractions in both upper and lower arches.
- Right-handed patients
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Enamel defects, hypoplasia or buccal restorations that would preclude bonding to enamel.
- Orthognathic cases.
- Surgically exposed teeth or teeth where bracket placement will be delayed.
- Patients with craniofacial anomalies.
- Previous use of fixed appliances.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pumice prophylaxisAlso: Pumice slurry, Pumice powderPumicing the teeth is the recommended prophylaxis to be used prior to the application of the self etch primer by the manufacturer - 3M Unitek Transbond Plus Self Etch Primer which will be used in the experiment. | Other | Pumice prophylaxis. |
| No pumice prophylaxisPumice prophylaxis will not be used as per manufacturers instructions. | Other | No pumice prophylaxis. |
Primary outcome
To compare the bond failure rates between pumiced and non-pumiced teeth.
Time frame: Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.
Done by calculating and comparing the percentage of bracket breakages between the pumiced and non-pumiced quadrants.
2 secondary outcomes
To compare the bracket breakage rates between anterior and posterior teeth.
Time frame: Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.
To determine the interfaces at which the bond failures occur after bracket breakage.
Time frame: Data on adhesive remnant will be collected from the tooth surface immediately after bracket breakage.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 16448279Burgess AM, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Self-etching primers: is prophylactic pumicing necessary? A randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):114-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0114:SPIPPN]2.0.CO;2.
- Results publication: PubMed 18331943Lill DJ, Lindauer SJ, Tufekci E, Shroff B. Importance of pumice prophylaxis for bonding with self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Mar;133(3):423-6; quiz 476.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.039.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Consent has not yet been gained from participants as recruiting has not begun.
Related trials for Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
Bacterial Diversity Study Using 16S rRNA Sequencing of Periodontal Samples From Patients With Orthodontic Retainers
Fixed Orthodontic Retainer, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
Recruiting
Comparison of MI Paste Plus and Resin Infiltration in White Spot Lesions Following Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesions, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
Orthodontic Appliance, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of a 3-step Bonding System (Transbond™ XT) and a 2-step System (GC Ortho Connect™) on Demineralization Around Maxillary Orthodontic Brackets
Tooth Demineralization, White Spot Lesion
Recruiting
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr Kaminii Thevadass, BDS principal investigator
Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics,University of Malaya.
Prof Dr Siti Adibah Othman, BDS study director
Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics,University of Malaya.
Dr Nor Nadia Zakaria, BDS study director
Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics,University of Malaya.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pumice prophylaxis and No pumice prophylaxis in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by University of Malaya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr Kaminii Thevadass, BDS (+60175811526, kaminiithevadass86@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To compare the bond failure rates between pumiced and non-pumiced teeth. (time frame: Data on bond failure will be collected at 1 month after placement of the 19x25 SS wire.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04131855, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2019.