Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT04132596
Spinal Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and Activity Based Therapy in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by The Neurokinex Charitable Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Electrical spinal stimulation combined with activity-based rehabilitation (ABR) can improve motor and autonomic function in individuals suffering from varying degrees of paralysis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and Activity Based Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2019to 3 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Aged 18 years or over
- Injury level C4-T12
- At least one year post spinal cord injury
- Medically stable and cognitively intact
- Independent respiration, not requiring any ventilatory support
Who cannot join
- Any active implanted metallic device including, but not limited to neurostimulators, cochlear implants, pacemakers, implantable defibrillators or drug delivery pump
- Implanted surgical hardware that is not compatible with MRI scanners
- Possible, suspected or confirmed pregnancy and/or lactation
- Active Heterotopic Ossification
- Recent history or fracture, contractures or pressure sore, deep vein thrombosis or urinary tract or other infection that may interfere with the intervention and training.
- History of epilepsy and/or seizures.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Severe spasticity which have been unstable over the past 3 months prior to enrolment and not expected to change; taking varying doses of anti-spasticity medications which could not be tapered to a stable dose and is not expected to change
- Botulinum toxin injections within 6 months of participation (excluding bladder)
- Non-injury related neurological impairment
- Clinically significant severe depression in spite of treatment
- Patients who have cardiovascular disease
- Patients with Autonomic Dysreflexia that is severe, ongoing and has required medical treatment within the past one month
- Active aggressive tumour within or surrounding the spinal cord or brain stem
- A syrinx (fluid filled cavity) in the spinal cord
- Skin conditions or allergies that may affect electrode placement
- Bodyweight over 120kg (due to inability to use some of the study equipment)
- Patients who do not understand English
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Neurokinex
Gatwick, RH10 9NE
Neurokinex
Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BW
About this study
Official title: Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Activity-based Rehabilitation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Electrical spinal stimulation combined with activity-based rehabilitation (ABR) can improve motor and autonomic function in individuals suffering from varying degrees of paralysis. Spinal stimulation studies have included invasive implanted devices and non-invasive transcutaneous systems using different combinations of stimulation current, waveform, amplitude, duration and spinal levels targeted. Invasive and non-invasive systems have been demonstrated to permit individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), previously considered to have complete injuries on the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (ISNCSCI) scale (Classification A), to regain some degree of voluntary and autonomic function during periods of stimulation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel non-invasive transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation system (tSCS) combined with activity-based rehabilitation in patients who have paralysis of their legs and/or arms. We will examine participants for any changes in sensory, motor or autonomic function. We will use a transcutaneous spinal cord stimulator that has been designed to deliver safe and tolerable bursts of high frequency pulsed current that minimise the capacitance efforts of the skin surface and maximise conductance of a second waveform using low frequency current to target neural structures. We aim to investigate this form of neuromodulation with a small group of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Our goal is to observe and describe any short term or lasting changes in function that can safely and comfortably be derived from this combination of spinal stimulation and activity-based rehabilitation. If this therapy can cause lasting improvements in sensory, motor, respiratory or autonomic function, then this may lead to a greater degree of functional independence for these individuals.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Activity Based Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulationDevice
Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord via transcutaneous hydrogel electrodes
Activity Based TherapyOther
Physical therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Complete Tetraplegia | Experimental | C4-T1 American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale Classification A or B spinal cord injury tscs with activity based therapy intervention Receives: Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; Other: Activity Based Therapy |
| Motor Complete Paraplegia | Experimental | T2-12 ASIA Impairment Scale A or B spinal cord injury tscs with activity based therapy intervention Receives: Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; Other: Activity Based Therapy |
| Motor incomplete SCI | Experimental | C4-T12 ASIA Impairment Scale C or D spinal cord injury tscs with activity based therapy intervention Receives: Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; Other: Activity Based Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Classification scores (ISNCSCI ASIA chart)
Sensory and motor scores. Sensory scale 0-224, motor scale 0-100 with higher scores relating to increased sensation and motor power
Measured: 1 year
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Functional independence tool for spinal cord injury. Scale of 0-100, with higher scores meaning increased function
Measured: 1 year
Berg Balance Score (where applicable)
Measure of standing balance. Scale of 0-56, with higher values meaning increased standing balance and reduced risk of falls
Measured: 1 year
NeuroRecovery Scale (NRS)
Functional independence measure rated from 1a, the lowest classification of functioning to 4C, the highest classification of functioning
Measured: 1 year
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) Test
Upper limb measure of sensation and function. Strength scored 0-100, sensation scored 0-24 and prehension scored 0-64. Increased score relates to increased hand strength, sensation and function
Measured: 1 year
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE)
Upper limb capability questionnaire with 32 items. Scores between 32-124 with higher scores associated with higher levels of function of the upper limb
Measured: 1 year
Force dynamometry - hand
Grip and pinch strength using JTech force transducers. Measurements taken in Newtons
Measured: 1 year
Electromyography (EMG) of muscle activity
Upper limb, trunk and lower limb EMG using the Delsys Trigno System
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (7)
World Health Organisation Quality Of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Quality of Life self report questionnaire with 26 items, subdivided into Physical Health (raw score range 7-35), Psychological Health (raw score range 6-30), Social Relationships (raw score range 3-15), Environment (raw score range 8-40)
Measured: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Bladder function questionnaire to document method of bladder management
Measured: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Bowel function questionnaire to document method of bowel management
Measured: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Cardiovascular function questionnaire to document ability to regulate cardiovascular system
Measured: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Sexual function questionnaire to document symptoms and impairments resulting from spinal cord injury
Measured: 1 year
Modified Ashworth Scale
Spasticity measure, scores of 0 - no increase in spasticity to 4 - affected part rigid
Measured: 1 year
Respiratory function tests of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures
Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures in breathing,
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2019
- Study start11 Nov 2019
- Primary completion3 Oct 2022
- Study completion3 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Cohort study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Neurokinex Charitable Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- International Spinal Research Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jane Symonds, Physio, Principal investigator, Clinical Lead Physiotherapist
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04132596
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pathfinder 2.0
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Suggitt J, Symonds J, D'Amico JM. Safety and Effectiveness of Multisite Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Activity-Based Therapy When Delivered in a Community Rehabilitation Setting: A Real-World Pilot Study. Neuromodulation. 2025 Oct;28(7):1144-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
PubMed 39998450
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Activity-based Rehabilitation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04132596
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pathfinder 2.0
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Neurokinex Charitable TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- International Spinal Research Trust
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Electrical spinal stimulation combined with activity-based rehabilitation (ABR) can improve motor and autonomic function in individuals suffering from varying degrees of paralysis. Spinal stimulation studies have included invasive implanted devices and non-invasive transcutaneous systems using different combinations of stimulation current, waveform, amplitude, duration and spinal levels targeted. Invasive and non-invasive systems have been demonstrated to permit individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), previously considered to have complete injuries on the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (ISNCSCI) scale (Classification A), to regain some degree of voluntary and autonomic function during periods of stimulation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel non-invasive transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation system (tSCS) combined with activity-based rehabilitation in patients who have paralysis of their legs and/or arms. We will examine participants for any changes in sensory, motor or autonomic function. We will use a transcutaneous spinal cord stimulator that has been designed to deliver safe and tolerable bursts of high frequency pulsed current that minimise the capacitance efforts of the skin surface and maximise conductance of a second waveform using low frequency current to target neural structures. We aim to investigate this form of neuromodulation with a small group of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Our goal is to observe and describe any short term or lasting changes in function that can safely and comfortably be derived from this combination of spinal stimulation and activity-based rehabilitation. If this therapy can cause lasting improvements in sensory, motor, respiratory or autonomic function, then this may lead to a greater degree of functional independence for these individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Cohort study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Complete Tetraplegia | Experimental | Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Other: Activity Based TherapyC4-T1 American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale Classification A or B spinal cord injury tscs with activity based therapy intervention |
| Motor Complete Paraplegia | Experimental | Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Other: Activity Based TherapyT2-12 ASIA Impairment Scale A or B spinal cord injury tscs with activity based therapy intervention |
| Motor incomplete SCI | Experimental | Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Other: Activity Based TherapyC4-T12 ASIA Impairment Scale C or D spinal cord injury tscs with activity based therapy intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Aged 18 years or over
- Injury level C4-T12
- At least one year post spinal cord injury
- Medically stable and cognitively intact
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Any active implanted metallic device including, but not limited to neurostimulators, cochlear implants, pacemakers, implantable defibrillators or drug delivery pump
- Implanted surgical hardware that is not compatible with MRI scanners
- Possible, suspected or confirmed pregnancy and/or lactation
- Active Heterotopic Ossification
- Recent history or fracture, contractures or pressure sore, deep vein thrombosis or urinary tract or other infection that may interfere with the intervention and training.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulationElectrical stimulation of the spinal cord via transcutaneous hydrogel electrodes | Device | Motor Complete Paraplegia, Motor Complete Tetraplegia, Motor incomplete SCI |
| Activity Based TherapyPhysical therapy | Other | Motor Complete Paraplegia, Motor Complete Tetraplegia, Motor incomplete SCI |
Primary outcome
International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Classification scores (ISNCSCI ASIA chart)
Time frame: 1 year
Sensory and motor scores. Sensory scale 0-224, motor scale 0-100 with higher scores relating to increased sensation and motor power
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Time frame: 1 year
Functional independence tool for spinal cord injury. Scale of 0-100, with higher scores meaning increased function
Berg Balance Score (where applicable)
Time frame: 1 year
Measure of standing balance. Scale of 0-56, with higher values meaning increased standing balance and reduced risk of falls
NeuroRecovery Scale (NRS)
Time frame: 1 year
Functional independence measure rated from 1a, the lowest classification of functioning to 4C, the highest classification of functioning
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) Test
Time frame: 1 year
Upper limb measure of sensation and function. Strength scored 0-100, sensation scored 0-24 and prehension scored 0-64. Increased score relates to increased hand strength, sensation and function
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE)
Time frame: 1 year
Upper limb capability questionnaire with 32 items. Scores between 32-124 with higher scores associated with higher levels of function of the upper limb
Force dynamometry - hand
Time frame: 1 year
Grip and pinch strength using JTech force transducers. Measurements taken in Newtons
Electromyography (EMG) of muscle activity
Time frame: 1 year
Upper limb, trunk and lower limb EMG using the Delsys Trigno System
7 secondary outcomes
World Health Organisation Quality Of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time frame: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Time frame: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Time frame: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Time frame: 1 year
International Spinal Cord Society Autonomic Standards Assessment Form
Time frame: 1 year
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: 1 year
Respiratory function tests of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39998450Suggitt J, Symonds J, D'Amico JM. Safety and Effectiveness of Multisite Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Activity-Based Therapy When Delivered in a Community Rehabilitation Setting: A Real-World Pilot Study. Neuromodulation. 2025 Oct;28(7):1144-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Andecaliximab in People With Spinal Cord Injury at Risk for Bone Growth Outside of the Normal Skeleton.
Heterotopic Ossification (HO)
Enrolling by invitation
Brief Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Clinical Standard to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress Post Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, PTSD
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Reticulospinal Control of Movements
Spinal Cord Injuries, Healthy
RecruitingPhase 4
Individualised Cryoneurolysis to Treat Pain in the Context of Spasticity in the Upper and Lower Extremities
Centreal Neurological Condition, Acquired Brain Injury (Including Stroke)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jane Symonds, Physio principal investigator
Clinical Lead Physiotherapist
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and Activity Based Therapy in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by The Neurokinex Charitable Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Classification scores (ISNCSCI ASIA chart) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04132596, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2022.