AzTrials
AzTrials

Degenerative DiseaseNCT04133103

Early Mobilisation in the Surgical Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery

A study testing first ambulation at 4 hour after operation in people with Degenerative Disease and Fracture, run by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery in our hospital were included. A prospective study was conducted to investigate the effects of early mobilisation on postoperative complications, functual outcomes and patient satisfaction after robotic assisted lumbar spinal surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Degenerative Disease, Fracture
What is being tested?
first ambulation at 4 hour after operation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
16 Oct 2019to 2 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosis of degenerative diseases or spinal fracture
  • single level instrumentation sugery
  • sign informed consent

Who cannot join

  • multilevel instrumentaion surgery
  • diagnosis of severe osteoperosis (BMD < 60mg/cm3) by QCT
  • coagulant function abnormality
  • severe internal disease
  • not suitable for inclusion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Wei Tian, MD contact

tianwei2019@yeah.net

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Wei Tian

    Beijing, 100035

    Wei Tian, tianwei2019@yeah.net

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Study of Early Mobilisation in the Surgical Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery

In this study, patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery in our hospital were included. A prospective study was conducted to investigate the effects of early mobilisation on postoperative complications, functual outcomes and patient satisfaction after robotic assisted lumbar spinal surgery.

Being tested
first ambulation at 4 hour after operation
Keywords
early mobilisation, robot, spine, enhanced recovery
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • first ambulation at 4 hour after operationProcedure or surgery

    Two groups were conducted for first ambulation at 4 or 24 hours aftër operation

Study groups in NCT04133103
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
First ambulation at 24 hours after operationNo interventionNot described
First ambulation at 4 hours after operationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: first ambulation at 4 hour after operation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale

    Low back pain and leg pain is an important sign and a frequent patient complaint. The VAS pain scoring standard (scores from 0 to 10) was as following: 0 means painless; 1-3 means mild pain that the patient could endure; 4-6 means patient was in pain that could be endured and be able to sleep; and 7-10 means patient had intense pain and was unable to tolerate the pain.

    Measured: preoperative

  2. Visual Analogue Scale

    Low back pain and leg pain is an important sign and a frequent patient complaint. The VAS pain scoring standard (scores from 0 to 10) was as following: 0 means painless; 1-3 means mild pain that the patient could endure; 4-6 means patient was in pain that could be endured and be able to sleep; and 7-10 means patient had intense pain and was unable to tolerate the pain.

    Measured: 4 hours postoperatively

  3. Visual Analogue Scale

    Low back pain and leg pain is an important sign and a frequent patient complaint. The VAS pain scoring standard (scores from 0 to 10) was as following: 0 means painless; 1-3 means mild pain that the patient could endure; 4-6 means patient was in pain that could be endured and be able to sleep; and 7-10 means patient had intense pain and was unable to tolerate the pain.

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Visual Analogue Scale

    Low back pain and leg pain is an important sign and a frequent patient complaint. The VAS pain scoring standard (scores from 0 to 10) was as following: 0 means painless; 1-3 means mild pain that the patient could endure; 4-6 means patient was in pain that could be endured and be able to sleep; and 7-10 means patient had intense pain and was unable to tolerate the pain.

    Measured: 3 months postoepratively

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Japanese Orthopedic Association

    The Japanese Orthopedic Association score was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients with lumbar degeneration and treatment effectiveness. The highest possible total score from categories for a normal person is 29 points. Therefore, treatment improvement rate = [(post-treatment score - pre-treatment score) / (29 - pre-treatment score)] × 100%, and ≥75% means excellent; 50%-74% means good; 25%-49% means fair; 0-24% means poor.

    Measured: preoperative

  2. Japanese Orthopedic Association

    The Japanese Orthopedic Association score was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients with lumbar degeneration and treatment effectiveness. The highest possible total score from categories for a normal person is 29 points. Therefore, treatment improvement rate = [(post-treatment score - pre-treatment score) / (29 - pre-treatment score)] × 100%, and ≥75% means excellent; 50%-74% means good; 25%-49% means fair; 0-24% means poor.

    Measured: 3 months postoperatively

  3. Oswestry Disability Index

    The Oswestry Disability Index is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. Rounding the percentage to a whole number is suggested for convenience. So the final score may be summarized as: [total score / (5 × number of questions answered)] × 100%. It is suggested rounding the percentage to a whole number for convenience. We defined that 0-20% means mild; 21%-40% means moderate; 41%-60% means severe; 61%-80% means very severe;80%-100% means patients very exaggerated symptoms.

    Measured: preoperative

  4. Oswestry Disability Index

    The Oswestry Disability Index is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. Rounding the percentage to a whole number is suggested for convenience. So the final score may be summarized as: [total score / (5 × number of questions answered)] × 100%. It is suggested rounding the percentage to a whole number for convenience. We defined that 0-20% means mild; 21%-40% means moderate; 41%-60% means severe; 61%-80% means very severe;80%-100% means patients very exaggerated symptoms.

    Measured: 3 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2019
  2. Study start16 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion2 Mar 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04133103
Sponsor's protocol ID
Jilunke201909-24
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
13 Oct 2019
Last updated
11 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing first ambulation at 4 hour after operation in people with Degenerative Disease and Fracture, run by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Wei Tian, MD (tianwei2019@yeah.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: preoperative). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in