Zoster Without ComplicationsNCT04133142
Regional Anesthesia to Relief Zoster Pain
A study testing peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block in people with Zoster Without Complications, run by Vinmec Healthcare System at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
Pain in Herpes is a serious issue for patients. at the acute phase it is a moderate to severe pain . 30% patients will develop a post herpetic neuralgia this percentage up to 70 % after 60 years old. this post herpetic neuralgia will affect their life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Zoster Without Complications
- What is being tested?
- peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- 15 May 2020to 12 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute zona diagnosed by the dermatologist
- o Acute skin rash with blisters in a limited area on one side of the body
- Eruption
- Unilateral
- On dermatome between C5 and S2
- Age 18 to 85 years old, males and females
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Score [ASA ]grades I \& II
- Patient who accepted to participate as volunteers and signed an informed consent
Who cannot join
- Psychiatric disease
- Central nervous system disease or pre-existing neuropathy
- Coagulation abnormalities or anti-coagulant treatment (heparins Anti vit K anti thrombin)
- Contra indication to perform a peripheral nerve block or interfascial block
- Infection of the skin overlying the puncture site of the block
- Allergy to local anaesthetic or prednisolone
Show all 10Show fewer
- Contra indication to prednisolone
- ASA III and IV
- Morbidity Obese BMI > 30
- Pregnant woman
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Does Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Blocks Vs Single Peripheral Nerve Block Vs Standard Medical Treatment Provide a Better Pain Relief on Zoster Pain at the Acute Phase and Reduce the Risk of Post Herpetic Neuralgia?
Pain in Herpes is a serious issue for patients. at the acute phase it is a moderate to severe pain . 30% patients will develop a post herpetic neuralgia this percentage up to 70 % after 60 years old. this post herpetic neuralgia will affect their life. Publication showed the efficiency of regional anesthesia on pain at the acute phase and a recent meta-analysis showed the role of efficient pain relief on the prevention of post herpetic neuralgia. there are still 2 questions to answer: 1/ do we need to perform the regional anesthesia to relief the pain at an early stage of after no response to the medical treatment? 2/ Are repeated blocks more efficient than a single block?
Read the detailed description
Study Model:
Randomized prospective registered After approval by the ethical committee of VinMec international Hospitals Institution , after approved registration prior to start the study to www.clinicaltrial.gov, 80 patients will be enrolled to participate to the study.
Inclusion criteria; Acute zona diagnosed by the dermatologist Acute skin rash with blisters in a limited area on one side of the body Eruption Unilateral On dermatome between C5 and S2 Age 18 to 85 years Old [YO], males and females American Society of Anesthesiologists score [ASA] grades I \& II Patient who accepted to participate as volunteers and signed an informed consent
Exclusion criteria; Psychiatric disease Central nervous system disease or pre-existing neuropathy Coagulation abnormalities or anti-coagulant treatment (heparins Anti vit K anti thrombin) Contra indication to perform a peripheral nerve block or interfascial block Infection of the skin overlying the puncture site of the block Allergy to local anaesthetic or prednisolone Contra indication to prednisolone ASA III and IV Morbidity Obese BMI > 30 Pregnant woman Baseline evaluation; Date of first rash appeared Pain VAS score from 0 no Pain to 10 the worst imaginable pain Localization of the pain (Skin mapping of the painful area and allodynia area) Quality of life before the rash evaluated by the quality of Life questionnaire SF36 published with a certified translation in Vietnamese As soon as the diagnosis will be done by dermatologist the following treatment will be prescribed according to international published standards of Herpes; Oral administration of Acyclovir 800 mg 5 times a day for 7 days Oral administration of prednisolone except if contra indication 30mg twice daily on d1 > 7 15mg twice daily on d8 > 14 7.5mg twice daily on d15 > 21
Patient flow chart:
Randomization Done by an administrative assistant using a computer program with block randomization.
Group Control = medical treatment with the following pain killers Pain medications Oral administration of Gabapentin 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 600 mg on day 3 and 4 if pain persists 900 mg on day 5 and 6 if pain persists Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day Use of oral narcotic contra-indicated A pain assessment will be done at day 7 if Pain scores < 4 medical treatment will be continued. If Pain score > 4 Patient will be shifted to the group Intervention and will follow the same protocols of this group with randomization done by an administrative assistant using a third computer program table of randomization.
Group Intervention = Early block a second randomization will be done immediately after the first one by an administrative assistant using a second computer program table of randomization.
Single Shot [SS] block : the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment Repeated [R] Blocks : the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery.
all the blocks will be performed under US guidance combined if peripheral nerve block or peri plexic block with Neurostimulation guidance to increase the safety of the block performance at the higher level.
The choice of Local anesthetics used will be Ropivacaine 0.5% with the same posology used to performed a regional anaesthesia for surgery.
The patient will be discharged 2 hours after the block performance Follow up
The follow up will be done by :
an pain nurse to analyse VAS at Week 1, 2 and 3 after the inclusion of the patient Satisfaction of patient 0-10 a pain physician to analyse at Month 1, 2 3 and 6 after 1st eruptive sign of Herpes Zona [HZ] eruption development of post herpetic neuralgia defined as Persisting pain beyond the crusting of lesion Pain lasting more than 1, 2 ,3 or 6 months after the acute infection Neuropathic pain with a Douleur Neuropathic 4 [DN4] scale score > 4 DetectPain scale score > 19 Pain level VAS Mapping area of pain to calculate surface Quality of life score at Month 2 3 6 after start of eruptive phase Primary Outcome Quality of pain relief in acute phase VAS score at 1 day / 3 day/ 7 day / 14 Day / 21 day Mapping area surface at day 1, 7 , 14 and 21
Secondary Outcome Development of Neuropathic pain Scale DN4 score > 4 Scale Pain detect Score > 17 Pain intensity Quality of life (QoL) Using the 36 item Short form Health survey [SF36] variation compared to initial assessment
Sample size calculation An estimated 14 patients per group were required to detect a 25% reduction in the mean VAS score in block groups compared to standard treatment group, with a power of 80%, a 2-tailed α of 5%, and a mean VAS-score of 7.25 (SD 1.51) [14] of standard treatment group in the pre-test.
The sample size of 80 patients allowed for a 10% loss to follow-up. Statistical analysis plan Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA 14.0 software. Statistical significant will be set at 5% level (2-tailed). A QoL score will be derived from related variables as stated above, using factor analysis.
Data will be summarized using n (%) for categorical data and median (inter-quartile ranges) for continuous data. Analyses will include Chi-square or Fisher's exact test where appropriate for binomial data. Continuous data will be compared by non-parametric tests.
- Conditions
- Zoster Without Complications
- Being tested
- peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
- Keywords
- Zoster,, Pain relief, regional anesthesia, Prevention post herpetic neuralgia
- Medical subject headings
- Herpes Zoster
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockProcedure or surgery
regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. local anesthetic will be ropivacaine 0.5% posology according to the type of block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Medical treatment | No intervention | Patients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day prescription for 7 day and continue for 3 weeks after evaluation |
| Early block Single | Experimental | the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block |
| Early Repeated block | Experimental | the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery. Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block |
| Late block single | Experimental | Patients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain
* Oral administration of Gabapentin
* 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2
* 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists
* 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists
* Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day at day 7 if pain more than VAS 4 the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block . Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block |
| late block repeated | Experimental | Patients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain
* Oral administration of Gabapentin
* 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2
* 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists
* 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists
* Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day prescription for 7 day and continue for 3 weeks after evaluation At day 7 if pain more than VAS 4 the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery. Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain intensity between baseline and the end of treatment
Measure by change in the numeric Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. The pain-VAS is a single-item scale which is score from 0 -10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable") 0 is the best score 10 is the worse one
Measured: baseline - end of treatment at day 30
Secondary outcomes (3)
Incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after treatment
PHN is defined as persisting pain beyond the crusting of cutaneous lesion. Pain lasts more than 1 month after the acute infection with the DN4 scale score > 4 and DetectPain scale score > 19
Measured: day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180
Chang in quality of life score
Using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) for quality-of-life measurement. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Higher score defines a more favorable health state.
The overall quality-of-life score at each time-point will be created from all items using an ad-hoc analysis.
Measured: Day 1 day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180
The total pain burden during 180 days of follow-up
The total pain burden is quantified using an area-under-the-curve (AUC) method, using the measures of pain intensity and pain duration. Each patient's AUC is calculated as the sum of all areas obtained by multiplying the average of 2 consecutive pain scores by the number of days between the scores.
Measured: baseline- every 2 days until day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2019
- Study start15 May 2020
- Primary completion12 Nov 2022
- Study completion12 Nov 2022
Why it stopped: No enrollement and covid
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Zoster Without ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patient randomized in Medical treatment group or Early block group * medical treatment group will have standard pain medications and evaluation of pain relief at day 7 * If pain reduce less or egal to VAS 4 medical treatment will continue it will be the control group * If no pain relief VAS more than 4 patient will be randomized to have * single block = Group late block single * or repeated blocks = Group late block repeated * ealy block group will be randomized to have * single block = Group early block single * or repeated blocks = Group early block repeated
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vinmec Healthcare System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philippe Macaire, Vinmec Healthcare System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04133142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Zona Blocks
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kost RG, Straus SE. Postherpetic neuralgia--pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 4;335(1):32-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607043350107. No abstract available.
PubMed 8637540Galluzzi KE. Management strategies for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3 Suppl 1):S8-S13.
PubMed 17488885Pavan-Langston D. Herpes zoster antivirals and pain management. Ophthalmology. 2008 Feb;115(2 Suppl):S13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.012.
PubMed 18243927Dworkin RH. Prevention of postherpetic neuralgia. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1636-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00003-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 10335778Kimberlin DW, Whitley RJ. Varicella-zoster vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 29;356(13):1338-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct066061. No abstract available.
PubMed 17392303Tyring SK. Management of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Dec;57(6 Suppl):S136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.016.
PubMed 18021865Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, Gnann JW, Levin MJ, Backonja M, Betts RF, Gershon AA, Haanpaa ML, McKendrick MW, Nurmikko TJ, Oaklander AL, Oxman MN, Pavan-Langston D, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Tyring SK, van Wijck AJ, Wallace MS, Wassilew SW, Whitley RJ. Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;44 Suppl 1:S1-26. doi: 10.1086/510206.
PubMed 17143845Schmader KE, Dworkin RH. Natural history and treatment of herpes zoster. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1 Suppl 1):S3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.002.
PubMed 18166460Johnson R. Herpes zoster--predicting and minimizing the impact of post-herpetic neuralgia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Feb;47 Suppl T1:1-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.suppl_1.1.
PubMed 11160029Schmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):350-4. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00002.
PubMed 12441828Nahm FS, Kim SH, Kim HS, Shin JW, Yoo SH, Yoon MH, Lee DI, Lee YW, Lee JH, Jeon YH, Jo DH. Survey on the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in Korea; multicenter study of 1,414 patients. Korean J Pain. 2013 Jan;26(1):21-6. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.21. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
PubMed 23342203Sacks GM. Unmet need in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan;19(1 Suppl):S207-13.
PubMed 23448093Zhao P, Mei L. A clinical study of paraspinal nerve block on treatment of herpes zoster under ultrasonic guidance. Neurochirurgie. 2019 Dec;65(6):382-386. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PubMed 31348920Richebe P, Capdevila X, Rivat C. Persistent Postsurgical Pain: Pathophysiology and Preventative Pharmacologic Considerations. Anesthesiology. 2018 Sep;129(3):590-607. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002238.
PubMed 29738328Woolf CJ. A new strategy for the treatment of inflammatory pain. Prevention or elimination of central sensitization. Drugs. 1994;47 Suppl 5:1-9; discussion 46-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199400475-00003.
PubMed 7525180
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Blocks Vs Single Peripheral Nerve Block Vs Standard Medical Treatment Provide a Better Pain Relief on Zoster Pain at the Acute Phase and Reduce the Risk of Post Herpetic Neuralgia?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04133142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Zona Blocks
- Conditions
- Zoster Without Complications
- Keywords
- Zoster,, Pain relief, regional anesthesia, Prevention post herpetic neuralgia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: No enrollement and covid
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vinmec Healthcare SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain in Herpes is a serious issue for patients. at the acute phase it is a moderate to severe pain . 30% patients will develop a post herpetic neuralgia this percentage up to 70 % after 60 years old. this post herpetic neuralgia will affect their life. Publication showed the efficiency of regional anesthesia on pain at the acute phase and a recent meta-analysis showed the role of efficient pain relief on the prevention of post herpetic neuralgia. there are still 2 questions to answer: 1/ do we need to perform the regional anesthesia to relief the pain at an early stage of after no response to the medical treatment? 2/ Are repeated blocks more efficient than a single block?
Detailed description
Study Model:
Randomized prospective registered After approval by the ethical committee of VinMec international Hospitals Institution , after approved registration prior to start the study to www.clinicaltrial.gov, 80 patients will be enrolled to participate to the study.
Inclusion criteria; Acute zona diagnosed by the dermatologist Acute skin rash with blisters in a limited area on one side of the body Eruption Unilateral On dermatome between C5 and S2 Age 18 to 85 years Old [YO], males and females American Society of Anesthesiologists score [ASA] grades I \& II Patient who accepted to participate as volunteers and signed an informed consent
Exclusion criteria; Psychiatric disease Central nervous system disease or pre-existing neuropathy Coagulation abnormalities or anti-coagulant treatment (heparins Anti vit K anti thrombin) Contra indication to perform a peripheral nerve block or interfascial block Infection of the skin overlying the puncture site of the block Allergy to local anaesthetic or prednisolone Contra indication to prednisolone ASA III and IV Morbidity Obese BMI > 30 Pregnant woman Baseline evaluation; Date of first rash appeared Pain VAS score from 0 no Pain to 10 the worst imaginable pain Localization of the pain (Skin mapping of the painful area and allodynia area) Quality of life before the rash evaluated by the quality of Life questionnaire SF36 published with a certified translation in Vietnamese As soon as the diagnosis will be done by dermatologist the following treatment will be prescribed according to international published standards of Herpes; Oral administration of Acyclovir 800 mg 5 times a day for 7 days Oral administration of prednisolone except if contra indication 30mg twice daily on d1 > 7 15mg twice daily on d8 > 14 7.5mg twice daily on d15 > 21
Patient flow chart:
Randomization Done by an administrative assistant using a computer program with block randomization.
Group Control = medical treatment with the following pain killers Pain medications Oral administration of Gabapentin 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 600 mg on day 3 and 4 if pain persists 900 mg on day 5 and 6 if pain persists Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day Use of oral narcotic contra-indicated A pain assessment will be done at day 7 if Pain scores < 4 medical treatment will be continued. If Pain score > 4 Patient will be shifted to the group Intervention and will follow the same protocols of this group with randomization done by an administrative assistant using a third computer program table of randomization.
Group Intervention = Early block a second randomization will be done immediately after the first one by an administrative assistant using a second computer program table of randomization.
Single Shot [SS] block : the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment Repeated [R] Blocks : the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery.
all the blocks will be performed under US guidance combined if peripheral nerve block or peri plexic block with Neurostimulation guidance to increase the safety of the block performance at the higher level.
The choice of Local anesthetics used will be Ropivacaine 0.5% with the same posology used to performed a regional anaesthesia for surgery.
The patient will be discharged 2 hours after the block performance Follow up
The follow up will be done by :
an pain nurse to analyse VAS at Week 1, 2 and 3 after the inclusion of the patient Satisfaction of patient 0-10 a pain physician to analyse at Month 1, 2 3 and 6 after 1st eruptive sign of Herpes Zona [HZ] eruption development of post herpetic neuralgia defined as Persisting pain beyond the crusting of lesion Pain lasting more than 1, 2 ,3 or 6 months after the acute infection Neuropathic pain with a Douleur Neuropathic 4 [DN4] scale score > 4 DetectPain scale score > 19 Pain level VAS Mapping area of pain to calculate surface Quality of life score at Month 2 3 6 after start of eruptive phase Primary Outcome Quality of pain relief in acute phase VAS score at 1 day / 3 day/ 7 day / 14 Day / 21 day Mapping area surface at day 1, 7 , 14 and 21
Secondary Outcome Development of Neuropathic pain Scale DN4 score > 4 Scale Pain detect Score > 17 Pain intensity Quality of life (QoL) Using the 36 item Short form Health survey [SF36] variation compared to initial assessment
Sample size calculation An estimated 14 patients per group were required to detect a 25% reduction in the mean VAS score in block groups compared to standard treatment group, with a power of 80%, a 2-tailed α of 5%, and a mean VAS-score of 7.25 (SD 1.51) [14] of standard treatment group in the pre-test.
The sample size of 80 patients allowed for a 10% loss to follow-up. Statistical analysis plan Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA 14.0 software. Statistical significant will be set at 5% level (2-tailed). A QoL score will be derived from related variables as stated above, using factor analysis.
Data will be summarized using n (%) for categorical data and median (inter-quartile ranges) for continuous data. Analyses will include Chi-square or Fisher's exact test where appropriate for binomial data. Continuous data will be compared by non-parametric tests.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
- Model description
- Patient randomized in Medical treatment group or Early block group * medical treatment group will have standard pain medications and evaluation of pain relief at day 7 * If pain reduce less or egal to VAS 4 medical treatment will continue it will be the control group * If no pain relief VAS more than 4 patient will be randomized to have * single block = Group late block single * or repeated blocks = Group late block repeated * ealy block group will be randomized to have * single block = Group early block single * or repeated blocks = Group early block repeated
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Medical treatment | No intervention | –Patients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day prescription for 7 day and continue for 3 weeks after evaluation |
| Early block Single | Experimental | Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockthe patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment |
| Early Repeated block | Experimental | Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockthe patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery. |
| Late block single | Experimental | Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockPatients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day at day 7 if pain more than VAS 4 the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block . Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment |
| late block repeated | Experimental | Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockPatients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day prescription for 7 day and continue for 3 weeks after evaluation At day 7 if pain more than VAS 4 the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Acute zona diagnosed by the dermatologist
- o Acute skin rash with blisters in a limited area on one side of the body
- Eruption
- Age 18 to 85 years old, males and females
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Score [ASA ]grades I \& II
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Psychiatric disease
- Central nervous system disease or pre-existing neuropathy
- Coagulation abnormalities or anti-coagulant treatment (heparins Anti vit K anti thrombin)
- Contra indication to perform a peripheral nerve block or interfascial block
- Infection of the skin overlying the puncture site of the block
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockregional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. local anesthetic will be ropivacaine 0.5% posology according to the type of block | Procedure or surgery | Early Repeated block, Early block Single, Late block single, late block repeated |
Primary outcome
Change in pain intensity between baseline and the end of treatment
Time frame: baseline - end of treatment at day 30
Measure by change in the numeric Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. The pain-VAS is a single-item scale which is score from 0 -10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable") 0 is the best score 10 is the worse one
3 secondary outcomes
Incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after treatment
Time frame: day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180
Chang in quality of life score
Time frame: Day 1 day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180
The total pain burden during 180 days of follow-up
Time frame: baseline- every 2 days until day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 8637540Kost RG, Straus SE. Postherpetic neuralgia--pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 4;335(1):32-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607043350107. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17488885Galluzzi KE. Management strategies for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3 Suppl 1):S8-S13.
- Background: PubMed 18243927Pavan-Langston D. Herpes zoster antivirals and pain management. Ophthalmology. 2008 Feb;115(2 Suppl):S13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.012.
- Background: PubMed 10335778Dworkin RH. Prevention of postherpetic neuralgia. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1636-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00003-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17392303Kimberlin DW, Whitley RJ. Varicella-zoster vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 29;356(13):1338-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct066061. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18021865Tyring SK. Management of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Dec;57(6 Suppl):S136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.016.
- Background: PubMed 17143845Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, Gnann JW, Levin MJ, Backonja M, Betts RF, Gershon AA, Haanpaa ML, McKendrick MW, Nurmikko TJ, Oaklander AL, Oxman MN, Pavan-Langston D, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Tyring SK, van Wijck AJ, Wallace MS, Wassilew SW, Whitley RJ. Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;44 Suppl 1:S1-26. doi: 10.1086/510206.
- Background: PubMed 18166460Schmader KE, Dworkin RH. Natural history and treatment of herpes zoster. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1 Suppl 1):S3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.002.
- Background: PubMed 11160029Johnson R. Herpes zoster--predicting and minimizing the impact of post-herpetic neuralgia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Feb;47 Suppl T1:1-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.suppl_1.1.
- Background: PubMed 12441828Schmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):350-4. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 23342203Nahm FS, Kim SH, Kim HS, Shin JW, Yoo SH, Yoon MH, Lee DI, Lee YW, Lee JH, Jeon YH, Jo DH. Survey on the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in Korea; multicenter study of 1,414 patients. Korean J Pain. 2013 Jan;26(1):21-6. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.21. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
- Background: PubMed 23448093Sacks GM. Unmet need in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan;19(1 Suppl):S207-13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block in people with Zoster Without Complications, run by Vinmec Healthcare System at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain intensity between baseline and the end of treatment (time frame: baseline - end of treatment at day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04133142, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2022.