AzTrials
AzTrials

Zoster Without ComplicationsNCT04133142

Regional Anesthesia to Relief Zoster Pain

A study testing peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block in people with Zoster Without Complications, run by Vinmec Healthcare System at 1 site in Vietnam.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pain in Herpes is a serious issue for patients. at the acute phase it is a moderate to severe pain . 30% patients will develop a post herpetic neuralgia this percentage up to 70 % after 60 years old. this post herpetic neuralgia will affect their life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Zoster Without Complications
What is being tested?
peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
15 May 2020to 12 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute zona diagnosed by the dermatologist
  • o Acute skin rash with blisters in a limited area on one side of the body
  • Eruption
  • Unilateral
  • On dermatome between C5 and S2
  • Age 18 to 85 years old, males and females
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Score [ASA ]grades I \& II
  • Patient who accepted to participate as volunteers and signed an informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Psychiatric disease
  • Central nervous system disease or pre-existing neuropathy
  • Coagulation abnormalities or anti-coagulant treatment (heparins Anti vit K anti thrombin)
  • Contra indication to perform a peripheral nerve block or interfascial block
  • Infection of the skin overlying the puncture site of the block
  • Allergy to local anaesthetic or prednisolone
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Contra indication to prednisolone
  • ASA III and IV
  • Morbidity Obese BMI > 30
  • Pregnant woman

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • Vinmec Health System

    Hanoi

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: Does Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Blocks Vs Single Peripheral Nerve Block Vs Standard Medical Treatment Provide a Better Pain Relief on Zoster Pain at the Acute Phase and Reduce the Risk of Post Herpetic Neuralgia?

Pain in Herpes is a serious issue for patients. at the acute phase it is a moderate to severe pain . 30% patients will develop a post herpetic neuralgia this percentage up to 70 % after 60 years old. this post herpetic neuralgia will affect their life. Publication showed the efficiency of regional anesthesia on pain at the acute phase and a recent meta-analysis showed the role of efficient pain relief on the prevention of post herpetic neuralgia. there are still 2 questions to answer: 1/ do we need to perform the regional anesthesia to relief the pain at an early stage of after no response to the medical treatment? 2/ Are repeated blocks more efficient than a single block?

Read the detailed description

Study Model:

Randomized prospective registered After approval by the ethical committee of VinMec international Hospitals Institution , after approved registration prior to start the study to www.clinicaltrial.gov, 80 patients will be enrolled to participate to the study.

Inclusion criteria; Acute zona diagnosed by the dermatologist Acute skin rash with blisters in a limited area on one side of the body Eruption Unilateral On dermatome between C5 and S2 Age 18 to 85 years Old [YO], males and females American Society of Anesthesiologists score [ASA] grades I \& II Patient who accepted to participate as volunteers and signed an informed consent

Exclusion criteria; Psychiatric disease Central nervous system disease or pre-existing neuropathy Coagulation abnormalities or anti-coagulant treatment (heparins Anti vit K anti thrombin) Contra indication to perform a peripheral nerve block or interfascial block Infection of the skin overlying the puncture site of the block Allergy to local anaesthetic or prednisolone Contra indication to prednisolone ASA III and IV Morbidity Obese BMI > 30 Pregnant woman Baseline evaluation; Date of first rash appeared Pain VAS score from 0 no Pain to 10 the worst imaginable pain Localization of the pain (Skin mapping of the painful area and allodynia area) Quality of life before the rash evaluated by the quality of Life questionnaire SF36 published with a certified translation in Vietnamese As soon as the diagnosis will be done by dermatologist the following treatment will be prescribed according to international published standards of Herpes; Oral administration of Acyclovir 800 mg 5 times a day for 7 days Oral administration of prednisolone except if contra indication 30mg twice daily on d1 > 7 15mg twice daily on d8 > 14 7.5mg twice daily on d15 > 21

Patient flow chart:

Randomization Done by an administrative assistant using a computer program with block randomization.

Group Control = medical treatment with the following pain killers Pain medications Oral administration of Gabapentin 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 600 mg on day 3 and 4 if pain persists 900 mg on day 5 and 6 if pain persists Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day Use of oral narcotic contra-indicated A pain assessment will be done at day 7 if Pain scores < 4 medical treatment will be continued. If Pain score > 4 Patient will be shifted to the group Intervention and will follow the same protocols of this group with randomization done by an administrative assistant using a third computer program table of randomization.

Group Intervention = Early block a second randomization will be done immediately after the first one by an administrative assistant using a second computer program table of randomization.

Single Shot [SS] block : the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment Repeated [R] Blocks : the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery.

all the blocks will be performed under US guidance combined if peripheral nerve block or peri plexic block with Neurostimulation guidance to increase the safety of the block performance at the higher level.

The choice of Local anesthetics used will be Ropivacaine 0.5% with the same posology used to performed a regional anaesthesia for surgery.

The patient will be discharged 2 hours after the block performance Follow up

The follow up will be done by :

an pain nurse to analyse VAS at Week 1, 2 and 3 after the inclusion of the patient Satisfaction of patient 0-10 a pain physician to analyse at Month 1, 2 3 and 6 after 1st eruptive sign of Herpes Zona [HZ] eruption development of post herpetic neuralgia defined as Persisting pain beyond the crusting of lesion Pain lasting more than 1, 2 ,3 or 6 months after the acute infection Neuropathic pain with a Douleur Neuropathic 4 [DN4] scale score > 4 DetectPain scale score > 19 Pain level VAS Mapping area of pain to calculate surface Quality of life score at Month 2 3 6 after start of eruptive phase Primary Outcome Quality of pain relief in acute phase VAS score at 1 day / 3 day/ 7 day / 14 Day / 21 day Mapping area surface at day 1, 7 , 14 and 21

Secondary Outcome Development of Neuropathic pain Scale DN4 score > 4 Scale Pain detect Score > 17 Pain intensity Quality of life (QoL) Using the 36 item Short form Health survey [SF36] variation compared to initial assessment

Sample size calculation An estimated 14 patients per group were required to detect a 25% reduction in the mean VAS score in block groups compared to standard treatment group, with a power of 80%, a 2-tailed α of 5%, and a mean VAS-score of 7.25 (SD 1.51) [14] of standard treatment group in the pre-test.

The sample size of 80 patients allowed for a 10% loss to follow-up. Statistical analysis plan Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA 14.0 software. Statistical significant will be set at 5% level (2-tailed). A QoL score will be derived from related variables as stated above, using factor analysis.

Data will be summarized using n (%) for categorical data and median (inter-quartile ranges) for continuous data. Analyses will include Chi-square or Fisher's exact test where appropriate for binomial data. Continuous data will be compared by non-parametric tests.

Being tested
peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
Keywords
Zoster,, Pain relief, regional anesthesia, Prevention post herpetic neuralgia
Medical subject headings
Herpes Zoster

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve blockProcedure or surgery

    regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. local anesthetic will be ropivacaine 0.5% posology according to the type of block

Study groups in NCT04133142
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Medical treatmentNo interventionPatients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day prescription for 7 day and continue for 3 weeks after evaluation
Early block SingleExperimentalthe patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment
Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
Early Repeated blockExperimentalthe patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery.
Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
Late block singleExperimentalPatients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day at day 7 if pain more than VAS 4 the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block . Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ration benefit risks. Choice of Block by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. After the block performance if the pain comes back patient will receive the standard medical treatment as in the group medical treatment
Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block
late block repeatedExperimentalPatients receive the standard medical medication for herpes pain * Oral administration of Gabapentin * 300 mg/d on day 1 and 2 * 600 mg/d on day 3 and 4 if pain persists * 900 mg/d on day 5 and 6 if pain persists * Oral administration of Paracetamol up to 3 g per day prescription for 7 day and continue for 3 weeks after evaluation At day 7 if pain more than VAS 4 the patient will receive a regional anaesthesia by Inter fascial block, peripheral nerve block. The type of block would be the most appropriate to cover the dermatomes involved in the Herpes according to the mapping done with the higher ratio benefit risks. Local anesthetic used will be ropivacaine 0.5% dose according to the type of block and never exceeding 3mg/kg The choice of the block will be done by an anesthesiologist expert in regional anaesthesia techniques. The block will be repeated every 48h until the pain will reach VAS < 3 6 h after block recovery.
Receives: Procedure: peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in pain intensity between baseline and the end of treatment

    Measure by change in the numeric Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. The pain-VAS is a single-item scale which is score from 0 -10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable") 0 is the best score 10 is the worse one

    Measured: baseline - end of treatment at day 30

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after treatment

    PHN is defined as persisting pain beyond the crusting of cutaneous lesion. Pain lasts more than 1 month after the acute infection with the DN4 scale score > 4 and DetectPain scale score > 19

    Measured: day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180

  2. Chang in quality of life score

    Using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) for quality-of-life measurement. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Higher score defines a more favorable health state.

    The overall quality-of-life score at each time-point will be created from all items using an ad-hoc analysis.

    Measured: Day 1 day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180

  3. The total pain burden during 180 days of follow-up

    The total pain burden is quantified using an area-under-the-curve (AUC) method, using the measures of pain intensity and pain duration. Each patient's AUC is calculated as the sum of all areas obtained by multiplying the average of 2 consecutive pain scores by the number of days between the scores.

    Measured: baseline- every 2 days until day 30 - day 60 - day 90 - day 180

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2019
  2. Study start15 May 2020
  3. Primary completion12 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion12 Nov 2022

Why it stopped: No enrollement and covid

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patient randomized in Medical treatment group or Early block group * medical treatment group will have standard pain medications and evaluation of pain relief at day 7 * If pain reduce less or egal to VAS 4 medical treatment will continue it will be the control group * If no pain relief VAS more than 4 patient will be randomized to have * single block = Group late block single * or repeated blocks = Group late block repeated * ealy block group will be randomized to have * single block = Group early block single * or repeated blocks = Group early block repeated
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04133142
Sponsor's protocol ID
Zona Blocks
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
11 Oct 2019
Last updated
17 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kost RG, Straus SE. Postherpetic neuralgia--pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 4;335(1):32-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607043350107. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8637540
  • Galluzzi KE. Management strategies for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3 Suppl 1):S8-S13.

    PubMed 17488885
  • Pavan-Langston D. Herpes zoster antivirals and pain management. Ophthalmology. 2008 Feb;115(2 Suppl):S13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.012.

    PubMed 18243927
  • Dworkin RH. Prevention of postherpetic neuralgia. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1636-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00003-3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10335778
  • Kimberlin DW, Whitley RJ. Varicella-zoster vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 29;356(13):1338-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct066061. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17392303
  • Tyring SK. Management of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Dec;57(6 Suppl):S136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.016.

    PubMed 18021865
  • Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, Gnann JW, Levin MJ, Backonja M, Betts RF, Gershon AA, Haanpaa ML, McKendrick MW, Nurmikko TJ, Oaklander AL, Oxman MN, Pavan-Langston D, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Tyring SK, van Wijck AJ, Wallace MS, Wassilew SW, Whitley RJ. Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;44 Suppl 1:S1-26. doi: 10.1086/510206.

    PubMed 17143845
  • Schmader KE, Dworkin RH. Natural history and treatment of herpes zoster. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1 Suppl 1):S3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.002.

    PubMed 18166460
  • Johnson R. Herpes zoster--predicting and minimizing the impact of post-herpetic neuralgia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Feb;47 Suppl T1:1-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.suppl_1.1.

    PubMed 11160029
  • Schmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):350-4. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00002.

    PubMed 12441828
  • Nahm FS, Kim SH, Kim HS, Shin JW, Yoo SH, Yoon MH, Lee DI, Lee YW, Lee JH, Jeon YH, Jo DH. Survey on the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in Korea; multicenter study of 1,414 patients. Korean J Pain. 2013 Jan;26(1):21-6. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.21. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

    PubMed 23342203
  • Sacks GM. Unmet need in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan;19(1 Suppl):S207-13.

    PubMed 23448093
  • Zhao P, Mei L. A clinical study of paraspinal nerve block on treatment of herpes zoster under ultrasonic guidance. Neurochirurgie. 2019 Dec;65(6):382-386. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

    PubMed 31348920
  • Richebe P, Capdevila X, Rivat C. Persistent Postsurgical Pain: Pathophysiology and Preventative Pharmacologic Considerations. Anesthesiology. 2018 Sep;129(3):590-607. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002238.

    PubMed 29738328
  • Woolf CJ. A new strategy for the treatment of inflammatory pain. Prevention or elimination of central sensitization. Drugs. 1994;47 Suppl 5:1-9; discussion 46-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199400475-00003.

    PubMed 7525180

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing peripheral nerve block, inter fascial nerve block in people with Zoster Without Complications, run by Vinmec Healthcare System at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in pain intensity between baseline and the end of treatment (time frame: baseline - end of treatment at day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04133142, which also lists 31 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in