Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderNCT04136626
Digital Health Interventions for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
A study testing Perspectives OCD and The Health and Well-Being Program in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators are testing two digital health interventions for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The investigators hope that these digital health programs will increase access to treatment for OCD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Perspectives OCD and The Health and Well-Being Program
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Jul 2021to 25 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years of age
- Current diagnosis of primary obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
- Currently living in the United States
Who cannot join
- Psychotropic medication changes within 2 months prior to enrollment (Participants taking psychotropic medication must have been on a stable dose for at least 2 months prior to enrollment and not change medication during study period)
- Past participation in ≥4 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCD
- Past use of a CBT for OCD app
- Current severe substance use disorder
- Lifetime bipolar disorder or psychosis
- Acute, active suicidal ideation as indicated by clinical judgment and/or a score ≥2 on the suicidal ideation subscale of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Current severe comorbid major depression, as indicated by clinical judgment and/or a Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-report version (QIDS-SR), total score ≥ 21
- Current post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
- Concurrent psychological treatment
- Does not own a supported mobile smartphone with a data plan
- Lack of technology literacy that would interfere with ability to engage with smartphone treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: Digital Health Interventions for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The investigators are testing two digital health interventions for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The investigators hope that these digital health programs will increase access to treatment for OCD.
Read the detailed description
The primary aims of this study are to test the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of two digital health interventions for adults with OCD recruited nationally. Eligible subjects (N=120) will be randomly assigned (50/50 chance) to 12 weeks of app-based CBT on their personal Smartphone or 12 weeks of web-based health and well-being education in addition to completing clinical assessments and questionnaires from home. All participants will have access to a coach to help guide them through their assigned program. Total participation time for the study is approximately 6 months, and all study appointments (5 total) occur over secure phone or video conference call.
- Conditions
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- Being tested
- Perspectives OCD, The Health and Well-Being Program
- Keywords
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, OCD, randomized controlled trial, digital health
- Medical subject headings
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perspectives OCDDevice
The app-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in this project includes modules such as cognitive skills (e.g., cognitive restructuring, core belief work) and behavioral skills (e.g., exposure and response prevention).
The Health and Well-Being ProgramDevice
The website includes 12 modules related to general health and well-being (e.g., sleep and nutrition). Each module contains educational information and questions about an indvidual's experience with the given topic.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Perspectives OCD | Experimental | 12 week Smartphone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCD. Receives: Device: Perspectives OCD |
| The Health and Well-Being Program | Active comparator | 12 week health and well-being education Receives: Device: The Health and Well-Being Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in OCD Symptom Severity at the End of Week 12
Symptom severity for OCD was measured with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the gold-standard, semi-structured clinician-administered assessment of OCD severity. It contains 10 items ranging from 0 to 4, which are summed to generate a total score (range 0 to 40). Higher scores indicate more severe OCD symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), mid-treatment (week 6), end-of-treatment (week 12)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Difference in Depression at the End of Week 12
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-report; QIDS-SR) is a self-report measure of depressive symptoms consisting of 16 scale items with responses ranging from 0 to 3, including one suicide item (item #12). Total scores range from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating greater depression severity. The measure is a well-validated, sensitive measure of symptom severity in depression.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), mid-treatment (week 6), end-of-treatment (week 12)
Difference in Functional Impairment at the End of Week 12
Functional impairment was assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). This scale uses a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) to assess impairment in a person's ability to function in terms of work, home management, leisure activities. Total scores total range from 0-40, where higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Measured: Week 0, Week 6, and Week 12
Difference in Quality of Life at the End of Week 12
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a self-report measure of subjective quality of life, containing Likert items ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 5 (Very Good). Total scores are presented as a percentage of the maximum value (i.e., ranging from 0 to 100), with higher scores indicating greater quality of life).
Measured: Week 0, Week 6, and Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2019
- Study start26 Jul 2021
- Primary completion6 Oct 2023
- Study completion25 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Koa Health B.V.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sabine Wilhelm, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Sabine Wilhelm, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04136626
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018P001669
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Wilhelm S, Greenberg JL, Jacoby RJ, Weingarden H, Hoeppner SS, Klare D, Snorrason I, Jaroszewski AC, McCoy TH, Harrison O. A randomized clinical trial of app cognitive behavior therapy vs. HealthWatch for obsessive compulsive disorder. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Dec 15;8(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02230-9.
PubMed 41398456
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Digital Health Interventions for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04136626
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018P001669
- Conditions
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- Keywords
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, OCD, randomized controlled trial, digital health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Koa Health B.V.
- Study start
- 26 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators are testing two digital health interventions for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The investigators hope that these digital health programs will increase access to treatment for OCD.
Detailed description
The primary aims of this study are to test the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of two digital health interventions for adults with OCD recruited nationally. Eligible subjects (N=120) will be randomly assigned (50/50 chance) to 12 weeks of app-based CBT on their personal Smartphone or 12 weeks of web-based health and well-being education in addition to completing clinical assessments and questionnaires from home. All participants will have access to a coach to help guide them through their assigned program. Total participation time for the study is approximately 6 months, and all study appointments (5 total) occur over secure phone or video conference call.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Perspectives OCD | Experimental | Device: Perspectives OCD12 week Smartphone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCD. |
| The Health and Well-Being Program | Active comparator | Device: The Health and Well-Being Program12 week health and well-being education |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- At least 18 years of age
- Current diagnosis of primary obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
- Currently living in the United States
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Psychotropic medication changes within 2 months prior to enrollment (Participants taking psychotropic medication must have been on a stable dose for at least 2 months prior to enrollment and not change medication during study period)
- Past participation in ≥4 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCD
- Past use of a CBT for OCD app
- Current severe substance use disorder
- Lifetime bipolar disorder or psychosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perspectives OCDThe app-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in this project includes modules such as cognitive skills (e.g., cognitive restructuring, core belief work) and behavioral skills (e.g., exposure and response prevention). | Device | Perspectives OCD |
| The Health and Well-Being ProgramThe website includes 12 modules related to general health and well-being (e.g., sleep and nutrition). Each module contains educational information and questions about an indvidual's experience with the given topic. | Device | The Health and Well-Being Program |
Primary outcome
Difference in OCD Symptom Severity at the End of Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), mid-treatment (week 6), end-of-treatment (week 12)
Symptom severity for OCD was measured with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the gold-standard, semi-structured clinician-administered assessment of OCD severity. It contains 10 items ranging from 0 to 4, which are summed to generate a total score (range 0 to 40). Higher scores indicate more severe OCD symptoms.
3 secondary outcomes
Difference in Depression at the End of Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), mid-treatment (week 6), end-of-treatment (week 12)
Difference in Functional Impairment at the End of Week 12
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, and Week 12
Difference in Quality of Life at the End of Week 12
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, and Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41398456Wilhelm S, Greenberg JL, Jacoby RJ, Weingarden H, Hoeppner SS, Klare D, Snorrason I, Jaroszewski AC, McCoy TH, Harrison O. A randomized clinical trial of app cognitive behavior therapy vs. HealthWatch for obsessive compulsive disorder. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Dec 15;8(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02230-9.
Related trials for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Recruiting
Focused Ultrasound for Behavioral Health
Depression, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Linear Accelerator Radiosurgical Anterior Capsulotomy With Task-based fMRI Identification of PERSonalized and PrEdictiVE Biomarkers of REsponse in Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (PERSEVERE Trial)
Treatment-refractory Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (trOCD)
Recruiting
tDCS Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Resistant Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Recruiting
Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological and Family Dynamics in Children With Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors
Mindfulness Skills, Psychosocial Education
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sabine Wilhelm, Ph.D. principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Perspectives OCD and The Health and Well-Being Program in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in OCD Symptom Severity at the End of Week 12 (time frame: Baseline (week 0), mid-treatment (week 6), end-of-treatment (week 12)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04136626, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2024.