AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT04136912

3-D Super Resolution Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging

A Phase 2 study testing Definity and Acoustic Angiography in people with Breast Cancer and Thyroid Cancer, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a 3-arm single center study of 45 patients. These cohorts will include 15 breast patients scheduled to undergo a biopsy, and 15 thyroid patients scheduled to undergo fine needle aspiration, biopsy, or thyroidectomy that consent to undergo an acoustic angiography in conjunction with b-mode ultrasound prior to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer, Thyroid Cancer
What is being tested?
Definity and Acoustic Angiography
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
27 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
26 May 2022to 1 Aug 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
  • Women
  • Patient had a diagnostic breast ultrasound study performed at UNC
  • Scheduled for a core needle or surgical breast biopsy of at least one breast lesion that is 2 cm or less in size and 3 cm in depth from the skin surface
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
  • BIRADS score of 4 or 5.

Who cannot join

  • Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
  • Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid (Definity®)
  • Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
  • Severe congestive heart failure
  • Unstable angina.
Show all 39Show fewer
  • Severe arrhythmia
  • Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Cardiac shunts
  • Breast Imaging Patients
  • Male
  • Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
  • Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Sonographically visible breast lesion larger than 2cm or greater than 3cm in depth from the skin surface
  • Known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid (Definity®)
  • Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
  • Severe congestive heart failure
  • Unstable angina.
  • Severe arrhythmia
  • Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Cardiac shunts
  • Thyroid Imaging Patients Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient had a diagnostic thyroid ultrasound study performed at UNC
  • TIRADS risk score of 4c or 5
  • Scheduled for a core needle or surgical thyroid biopsy, fine needle aspiration, or thyroidectomy of at least one sonographically visible thyroid lesion that is 3 cm in depth from the skin surface
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
  • Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
  • Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid (Definity®)
  • Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
  • Severe congestive heart failure
  • Unstable angina.
  • Severe arrhythmia
  • Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Cardiac shunts

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Univeristy of North Carolina Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: High Frame Rate 3-D Super Resolution Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging

This is a 3-arm single center study of 45 patients. These cohorts will include 15 breast patients scheduled to undergo a biopsy, and 15 thyroid patients scheduled to undergo fine needle aspiration, biopsy, or thyroidectomy that consent to undergo an acoustic angiography in conjunction with b-mode ultrasound prior to their scheduled biopsy. Prior to imaging clinical patients, the third arm will include 15 healthy volunteers that will be imaged to optimize imaging parameters.

Read the detailed description

Increasing the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic imaging in patients at high risk for breast or thyroid cancer could provide substantial clinical benefit by improving diagnosis, preventing over-treatment, and reducing healthcare costs. Acoustic angiography is a new type of contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging which is specifically sensitive to microvascular structure and density. It evaluates tumor micro-vasculature and may provide a powerful prognostic tool for the diagnosis of breast cancer, and eventually for treatment evaluation.

Being tested
Definity, Acoustic Angiography
Keywords
Cancer Screening
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Thyroid Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DefinityDrug

    Also called perflutren

    Perflutren will be administered in split doses using the dosing range and administration type IV bolus) within the perflutren prescribing information. When administered as a bolus, the package insert recommends 10 uL/kg patient weight administered within 30-60 seconds, followed by a 10mL saline flush with a second dose of 10 uL/kg patient weight 30 minutes following the first dose, if needed.

  • Acoustic AngiographyDevice

    Acoustic angiography imaging involves a research ultrasound scanner as well as conventional b-mode ultrasound to guide the location of the imaging. The conventional ultrasound will be conducted just prior to the acoustic angiography for localization. Imaging will be performed within the package insert guidelines for ultrasound system mechanical index (a measurement of output power) when imaging perflutren contrast agent (less than 0.8).

    Acoustic angiography imaging will be performed by trained medical personnel using mild compression to eliminate motion. Total imaging time is estimated to be less than 15 minutes.

Study groups in NCT04136912
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Breast Imaging CohortExperimentalA total of 15 women with known breast lesions that are already scheduled to undergo a clinical biopsy
Receives: Drug: Definity; Device: Acoustic Angiography
Thyroid Imaging CohortExperimentalA total of 15 participants with known thyroid lesions that are already scheduled to undergo a clinical biopsy
Receives: Drug: Definity; Device: Acoustic Angiography
Healthy Volunteers CohortExperimentalA total of 15 participants will be included to optimize imaging parameters.
Receives: Drug: Definity; Device: Acoustic Angiography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography; Breast Imaging

    The sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions.

    Sensitivity (%) = True Positives (TP)+False Negatives (FN)True Positives (TP)

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Specificity of Acoustic Angiography; Breast Imaging (Percent of Negative Scans)

    Specificity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions. Specificity was calculated based on the formula, which is true negative / (true negative + false positive).

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography; Thyroid Imaging (Percent of Positive Scans)

    Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of know thyroid lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions. The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment. No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Specificity of Acoustic Angiography; Thyroid Imaging (Percent of Negative Scans)

    Specificity of Acoustic Angiography in the analysis of known thyroid lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions. The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment. No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Area Under the Curve of Acoustic Angiography (Arbitrary Units)

    To compare the area under the curve (AUC) of acoustic angiography to the AUC of the B-mode ultrasound. Readers assigned a malignancy likelihood score from 1 to 5, with 1 likely benign to 5 likely malignant. An AUC was then calculated based on these scores. The Receiver operating curve (ROC ) was then plotted from this curve, and the AUC was estimated from the ROC curve.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Radiologist Preference (Arbitrary Units)

    To compare radiologist preference of acoustic angiography (AA) to conventional b-mode ultrasound, for each lesion characteristics which are shape, margins, and vascularity, were examined. Radiologists rated their preferences on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 1 strongly preferring conventional ultrasound and 5 strongly preferring AA.

    Shape, margin, and vascularity values appear to represent mean or median rather than counts. We should select either the mean or the median and provide the standard deviation, which will be 0 if all radiologists assign the same score.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Breast (Arbitrary Units)

    Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography relative to conventional ultrasound in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions for both modalities. Sensitivity was calculated based on the formula, which is true positive / (true positive + false negative). The ratio between the sensitivity of AA over the sensitivity of conventional ultrasound was then calculated.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Specificity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Breast (Arbitrary Units)

    Specificity of Acoustic Angiography (AA) and conventional ultrasound in the analysis of known breast lesions will be evaluated by comparing image analyses to the pathological results for these lesions for each modality. Specificity was calculated based on the formula, which is true negative / (true negative + false positive). The ratio between the sensitivity of AA over the sensitivity of conventional ultrasound was then calculated.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Thyroid (Arbitrary Units)

    To compare (using a reader study) the sensitivity of acoustic angiography to the sensitivity of conventional b-mode ultrasound in evaluation of known thyroid lesions for predicting malignancy. The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment. No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Specificity of Acoustic Angiography Compared to Conventional Ultrasound: Thyroid (Arbitrary Units)

    To compare (using a reader study) the specificity of acoustic angiography to the specificity of conventional b-mode ultrasound in evaluation of known thyroid lesions for predicting malignancy. The study closed early due to insufficient funding and did not reach target enrollment. No participants were enrolled in Arm 2 (Thyroid Imaging); therefore, no outcome measure results are available.

    Measured: Calculated once all imaging is complete [Anticipated 1.5 years]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2019
  2. Study start26 May 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2024

Why it stopped: Grant ended

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Acoustic angiography is a new type of contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging which is specifically sensitive to microvascular structure and density.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04136912
Sponsor's protocol ID
LCCC1915
Other IDs
R01CA220681
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
21 Oct 2019
Last updated
6 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified individual data that supports the results

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Definity and Acoustic Angiography in people with Breast Cancer and Thyroid Cancer, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 39 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Sep 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of Acoustic Angiography; Breast Imaging (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in