Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT04137159
An Exercise Intervention to Reduce Neuropathic Pain and Brain Inflammation After Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exercise in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) leads to alterations in brain structure and function by spinal nerve damage, secondary inflammatory responses, and by the consequences of living with paralysis and neuropathic pain. Physical inactivity due to lower body paralysis rapidly leads to loss of muscle, and risk of heart disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2020to 1 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- SCI at or below neurological level C5 with American Spinal Injury Association grade A, B or C, within 3-24 months after injury.
Who cannot join
- pregnancy
- breast feeding
- contraindications to MRI
- contraindications to PET current or past history of:
- major medical illness
- major neurological illness other than SCI
Show all 23Show fewer
- major psychiatric illness
- diabetes
- major kidney or liver problems
- use of tobacco
- use of recreational drugs
- an abnormal physical exam (e.g., heart murmurs or peripheral edema).
- unresponsive to FES stimulation
- heart disease
- physical limitations to FES-RT success
- blood pressure>140/90 mmHg
- significant arrhythmias
- cancer
- epilepsy
- current use of cardioactive medications
- current grade 2 or greater pressure injuries at relevant contact sites
- peripheral nerve compressions or rotator cuff tears that limit the ability to row
- history of bleeding disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02129
About this study
Official title: An Exercise Intervention to Educe Neuropathic Pain and Brain Inflammation After Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) leads to alterations in brain structure and function by spinal nerve damage, secondary inflammatory responses, and by the consequences of living with paralysis and neuropathic pain. Physical inactivity due to lower body paralysis rapidly leads to loss of muscle, and risk of heart disease. The leading cause of death after a spinal cord injury is cardiovascular disease, and just a year after injury, those with SCI have a peak exercise capacity half that of the unfit general population.
The good news is that aerobic exercise reduces the risk of chronic metabolic and cardiorespiratory diseases, reduces inflammation and pain, and increases mood and quality of life. Exercise can also reduce brain inflammation, enhance endogenous analgesia, and increases the size of the hippocampus.
Read more
The issue is that muscle paralysis in SCI restricts the ability to achieve the levels of exercise that is necessary for broad analgesic, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective benefits. Arm exercise can have some effects on heart and lung capacity, but the small muscle mass is insufficient to produce more than modest aerobic work. With functional electrical stimulation (FES), leg muscles that are paralyzed can be made to contract, thereby allowing more of the body to be exercised. The full rowing stroke is produced by both the (stimulated) legs and arms, increasing the active muscle mass and resulting in an aerobic work-out that is intensive enough to improve heart, lung, and - maybe - brain function.
In this clinical trial of sub-acute spinal cord injured subjects, the investigators will study how 12 weeks of FES-RT, in comparisons to 12 weeks of wait-list, changes pain, brain structure, endogenous opioid function and brain inflammation.
The investigators will measure changes using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The investigators hypothesize a decrease in pain interference, an increase in hippocampal volume, increased endogenous opioid transmission in the periaqueductal gray, and decreased hippocampus neuroinflammation.
Read the detailed description
This clinical trial will utilize a randomized, controlled, crossover design. Participants will be randomized to (A) 12 weeks of FES-RT followed by 12 weeks of treatment as usual or (B) 12 weeks of treatment as usual followed by 12 weeks of FES-RT.
Randomization will be computer generated and the study statistician will keep the key to appropriately conceal allocation of treatment until after obtaining baseline measures.
Exercise Intervention:
FES-RT occurs in two distinct steps - an initial strength training step, followed by FES-RT. Those with SCI can require at least two weeks and up to six weeks of strength-training. For the strength training, electrodes are placed over motor points of the quadriceps and hamstrings and intensity of the stimulus is set at the level producing full knee flexion-extension. Training is performed until subjects can complete a flexion extension protocol for 30 min without rest. During this time, the first set of PET-MR data will be obtained.
Subsequently, the FES-RT commences.
Measurements / Assessments Exercise Capacity: Volunteers will perform an incremental exercise test of FES- or arms-only rowing to determine maximal oxygen uptake on a day normally scheduled for regular exercise training. Exercise capacity and aerobic power will be determined from on-line computer-assisted open circuit spirometry. Subjects will row with increasing resistance every 2 min until volitional fatigue. To ensure attainment of maximal exercise capacity, at least 3 of these criteria will be met: 1) O2 consumption plateaus despite increasing workload, 2) respiratory exchange ratio >1.10 at end exercise, 3) age-predicted maximal heart rate is achieved, and 4) perceived exertion is rated at least 16 on the Borg scale of 6-20.
Exercise Volume: The progression of the exercise stimulus across the training program will be assessed from duration, frequency, and intensity derived from heart rate monitored during each exercise bout (i.e., Training Impulses or TRIMPs) as well as the product of average wattage and total duration for each week. TRIMPs are routinely used to quantify the exercise load and is specific to the cardiopulmonary system. The investigators will also calculate exercise load or work as the product of the weekly average of wattage and weekly total of exercise time.
PET-MR imaging
Neuroimaging metrics will be obtained at baseline, after 12 weeks and after 24 weeks. MR-PET scanning will be performed at 3 Tesla, using a Siemens whole-body MRI, whole-body PET camera (Biograph MMR). MRI data will be acquired simultaneously to the PET data.
In response to injury, microglia migrate to the site of injury, and express multiple cell surface proteins, including the translocator protein (18kDa) (TSPO). This conditional expression makes TSPO a prime target for PET imaging (127). There are multiple candidate PET tracers for glial activity , whereof 11C-PBR28 is a sensitive, second generation, high affinity TSPO radioligand suitable for imaging of microglial and astrocytic activation in neuroinflammation in humans. For glial imaging, 11C-PBR28 will be injected intravenously with a slow bolus over a 30s period (130). Dynamic data will be collected over the brain for 90 minutes in list mode, and framed post-collection. The dose will be up to 15mCi, which is equivalent to ~3.7 mSv.
For opioid imaging, 11C-diprenorphine will be injected intravenously, Dynamic data will be collected over the brain for 90 minutes in list mode, and framed post-collection. The dose will be up to 12mCi, which is equivalent to ~2.5 mSv.
For both scans, MR-based attenuation correction maps are created based on the MPRAGE data. For glial imaging, standardized uptake values (SUV), normalized to whole brain PBR28 ligand uptake, will be used. For 11CDiprenorphine, kinetic modeling is carried our using subject specific bilateral occipital cortices as the reference tissues. Nondisplaceable binding potential maps (BPND), representing the relative amount of specifically bound radioligand to that of non-displaceable radioligand, are calculated from the 90 min of dynamic PET data using a simplified reference tissue model with the occipital cortex used as the reference tissue.
A high resolution structural volume will be collected for the purposes of longitudinal structural analyses. All longitudinal data analyses will be done in native space as repeated measurements, thereby avoiding spatial normalization errors typically associated with cohort studies.
A battery of pain, quality of life and psychological well-being questionnaires to the participants on four occasions: immediately after enrollment, at the start of the 12 week wait-list or FES-RT period, at the end of the first arm, and at the end of the cross-over arm (24 weeks).
Conditioned pain modulation: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a psychophysically-based laboratory method to reliably ) evaluate the individual capabilities to inhibit pain in humans. Briefly, CPM is based on the "pain inhibits pain" phenomenon when Stimulus A (test-pain) given together with Stimulus B (conditioning pain) is perceived less painful than when Stimulus A was given alone. Although the literature is not entirely consistent, CPM can be reduced with naltrexone, suggesting at least partial dependence of inhibition on endogenous opioids. CPM will be determined at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks, with the hypothesis that FES-RT will lead to increased CPM.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exerciseOther
Full-body aerobic exercise
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FES rowing | Experimental | Exercise training sessions will be performed 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The initial training sessions will include 6 sets of FES-rowing for 5 min at 60% of VO2 peak with a work-to-rest ratio of 2:1. Participants unable to row continuously for 5 min will row for 2-4 min with 30-second breaks incorporated until they achieve sets totaling 30 min. The goal is for each volunteer to achieve an exercise intensity of 70-85% maintained for a continuous 30-40 min performed 3 times each week. Receives: Other: Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exercise |
| Wait list | No intervention | During the 12-week treatment as usual program, subjects will not participate in FES-rowing. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in PROMIS Pain Interference questionnaire
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(r)) Pain Interference instrument measure the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Pain Interference also incorporates items probing sleep and enjoyment in life.
The scale ranges from 6 to 30, with 30 being the highest pain interference.
Measured: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
Change in Hippocampal volume
MRI derived measurement of hippocampus volume
Measured: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
Change in Hippocampus glial activation
11C-PBR28 SUV uptake in the hippocampus
Measured: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
Change PAG opioid binding potential
Non-displaceable opioid binding potential of the periaqueductal gray
Measured: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2019
- Study start20 Feb 2020
- Primary completion1 Nov 2024
- Study completion1 Nov 2024
Why it stopped: Lack of recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Randomized cross-over wait-list controlled
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nils Clas Linnman, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
- Investigators
- Nils C Linnman, PhD, Principal investigator, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04137159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019P003113
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No HIPAA protects data will be shared. Neuroimaging data may be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Exercise Intervention to Educe Neuropathic Pain and Brain Inflammation After Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04137159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019P003113
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of recruitment
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) leads to alterations in brain structure and function by spinal nerve damage, secondary inflammatory responses, and by the consequences of living with paralysis and neuropathic pain. Physical inactivity due to lower body paralysis rapidly leads to loss of muscle, and risk of heart disease. The leading cause of death after a spinal cord injury is cardiovascular disease, and just a year after injury, those with SCI have a peak exercise capacity half that of the unfit general population.
The good news is that aerobic exercise reduces the risk of chronic metabolic and cardiorespiratory diseases, reduces inflammation and pain, and increases mood and quality of life. Exercise can also reduce brain inflammation, enhance endogenous analgesia, and increases the size of the hippocampus.
The issue is that muscle paralysis in SCI restricts the ability to achieve the levels of exercise that is necessary for broad analgesic, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective benefits. Arm exercise can have some effects on heart and lung capacity, but the small muscle mass is insufficient to produce more than modest aerobic work. With functional electrical stimulation (FES), leg muscles that are paralyzed can be made to contract, thereby allowing more of the body to be exercised. The full rowing stroke is produced by both the (stimulated) legs and arms, increasing the active muscle mass and resulting in an aerobic work-out that is intensive enough to improve heart, lung, and - maybe - brain function.
In this clinical trial of sub-acute spinal cord injured subjects, the investigators will study how 12 weeks of FES-RT, in comparisons to 12 weeks of wait-list, changes pain, brain structure, endogenous opioid function and brain inflammation.
The investigators will measure changes using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The investigators hypothesize a decrease in pain interference, an increase in hippocampal volume, increased endogenous opioid transmission in the periaqueductal gray, and decreased hippocampus neuroinflammation.
Detailed description
This clinical trial will utilize a randomized, controlled, crossover design. Participants will be randomized to (A) 12 weeks of FES-RT followed by 12 weeks of treatment as usual or (B) 12 weeks of treatment as usual followed by 12 weeks of FES-RT.
Randomization will be computer generated and the study statistician will keep the key to appropriately conceal allocation of treatment until after obtaining baseline measures.
Exercise Intervention:
FES-RT occurs in two distinct steps - an initial strength training step, followed by FES-RT. Those with SCI can require at least two weeks and up to six weeks of strength-training. For the strength training, electrodes are placed over motor points of the quadriceps and hamstrings and intensity of the stimulus is set at the level producing full knee flexion-extension. Training is performed until subjects can complete a flexion extension protocol for 30 min without rest. During this time, the first set of PET-MR data will be obtained.
Subsequently, the FES-RT commences.
Measurements / Assessments Exercise Capacity: Volunteers will perform an incremental exercise test of FES- or arms-only rowing to determine maximal oxygen uptake on a day normally scheduled for regular exercise training. Exercise capacity and aerobic power will be determined from on-line computer-assisted open circuit spirometry. Subjects will row with increasing resistance every 2 min until volitional fatigue. To ensure attainment of maximal exercise capacity, at least 3 of these criteria will be met: 1) O2 consumption plateaus despite increasing workload, 2) respiratory exchange ratio >1.10 at end exercise, 3) age-predicted maximal heart rate is achieved, and 4) perceived exertion is rated at least 16 on the Borg scale of 6-20.
Exercise Volume: The progression of the exercise stimulus across the training program will be assessed from duration, frequency, and intensity derived from heart rate monitored during each exercise bout (i.e., Training Impulses or TRIMPs) as well as the product of average wattage and total duration for each week. TRIMPs are routinely used to quantify the exercise load and is specific to the cardiopulmonary system. The investigators will also calculate exercise load or work as the product of the weekly average of wattage and weekly total of exercise time.
PET-MR imaging
Neuroimaging metrics will be obtained at baseline, after 12 weeks and after 24 weeks. MR-PET scanning will be performed at 3 Tesla, using a Siemens whole-body MRI, whole-body PET camera (Biograph MMR). MRI data will be acquired simultaneously to the PET data.
In response to injury, microglia migrate to the site of injury, and express multiple cell surface proteins, including the translocator protein (18kDa) (TSPO). This conditional expression makes TSPO a prime target for PET imaging (127). There are multiple candidate PET tracers for glial activity , whereof 11C-PBR28 is a sensitive, second generation, high affinity TSPO radioligand suitable for imaging of microglial and astrocytic activation in neuroinflammation in humans. For glial imaging, 11C-PBR28 will be injected intravenously with a slow bolus over a 30s period (130). Dynamic data will be collected over the brain for 90 minutes in list mode, and framed post-collection. The dose will be up to 15mCi, which is equivalent to ~3.7 mSv.
For opioid imaging, 11C-diprenorphine will be injected intravenously, Dynamic data will be collected over the brain for 90 minutes in list mode, and framed post-collection. The dose will be up to 12mCi, which is equivalent to ~2.5 mSv.
For both scans, MR-based attenuation correction maps are created based on the MPRAGE data. For glial imaging, standardized uptake values (SUV), normalized to whole brain PBR28 ligand uptake, will be used. For 11CDiprenorphine, kinetic modeling is carried our using subject specific bilateral occipital cortices as the reference tissues. Nondisplaceable binding potential maps (BPND), representing the relative amount of specifically bound radioligand to that of non-displaceable radioligand, are calculated from the 90 min of dynamic PET data using a simplified reference tissue model with the occipital cortex used as the reference tissue.
A high resolution structural volume will be collected for the purposes of longitudinal structural analyses. All longitudinal data analyses will be done in native space as repeated measurements, thereby avoiding spatial normalization errors typically associated with cohort studies.
A battery of pain, quality of life and psychological well-being questionnaires to the participants on four occasions: immediately after enrollment, at the start of the 12 week wait-list or FES-RT period, at the end of the first arm, and at the end of the cross-over arm (24 weeks).
Conditioned pain modulation: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a psychophysically-based laboratory method to reliably ) evaluate the individual capabilities to inhibit pain in humans. Briefly, CPM is based on the "pain inhibits pain" phenomenon when Stimulus A (test-pain) given together with Stimulus B (conditioning pain) is perceived less painful than when Stimulus A was given alone. Although the literature is not entirely consistent, CPM can be reduced with naltrexone, suggesting at least partial dependence of inhibition on endogenous opioids. CPM will be determined at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks, with the hypothesis that FES-RT will lead to increased CPM.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized cross-over wait-list controlled
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FES rowing | Experimental | Other: Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exerciseExercise training sessions will be performed 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The initial training sessions will include 6 sets of FES-rowing for 5 min at 60% of VO2 peak with a work-to-rest ratio of 2:1. Participants unable to row continuously for 5 min will row for 2-4 min with 30-second breaks incorporated until they achieve sets totaling 30 min. The goal is for each volunteer to achieve an exercise intensity of 70-85% maintained for a continuous 30-40 min performed 3 times each week. |
| Wait list | No intervention | –During the 12-week treatment as usual program, subjects will not participate in FES-rowing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- SCI at or below neurological level C5 with American Spinal Injury Association grade A, B or C, within 3-24 months after injury.
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- pregnancy
- breast feeding
- contraindications to MRI
- contraindications to PET current or past history of:
- major medical illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exerciseFull-body aerobic exercise | Other | FES rowing |
Primary outcome
Change in PROMIS Pain Interference questionnaire
Time frame: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(r)) Pain Interference instrument measure the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Pain Interference also incorporates items probing sleep and enjoyment in life. The scale ranges from 6 to 30, with 30 being the highest pain interference.
Change in Hippocampal volume
Time frame: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
MRI derived measurement of hippocampus volume
Change in Hippocampus glial activation
Time frame: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
11C-PBR28 SUV uptake in the hippocampus
Change PAG opioid binding potential
Time frame: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list
Non-displaceable opioid binding potential of the periaqueductal gray
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No HIPAA protects data will be shared. Neuroimaging data may be shared.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Andecaliximab in People With Spinal Cord Injury at Risk for Bone Growth Outside of the Normal Skeleton.
Heterotopic Ossification (HO)
Enrolling by invitation
Brief Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Clinical Standard to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress Post Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, PTSD
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Reticulospinal Control of Movements
Spinal Cord Injuries, Healthy
RecruitingPhase 4
Individualised Cryoneurolysis to Treat Pain in the Context of Spasticity in the Upper and Lower Extremities
Centreal Neurological Condition, Acquired Brain Injury (Including Stroke)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nils C Linnman, PhD principal investigator
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Functional Electrical Stimulation rowing exercise in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in PROMIS Pain Interference questionnaire (time frame: Change between baseline and after 12 week FES intervention, and after 12 week wait list). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2026.