AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornNCT04137783

ABCA3 Gene and RDS in Late Preterm and Term Infants

An observational study of Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory cause of mortality and morbidity in very preterm infants, but it also could be seen in late preterm and term infants. Some genetic mechanisms were involved in the pathogenesis of RDS in late preterm and term infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 6 months
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 May 2019to 1 Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 6 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: All the infants ≥34 weeks'gestation was admitted in neonatal intensive care unit of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2013 to December 2018

Who may be able to join

  • infants ≥34 weeks' gestation
  • meet the fatal respiratory distress syndrome as following: (1) manifestations and chest radiograph are compatible with RDS; (2) at least 7days on invasive ventilation with FiO2 ≥60%, or persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure on FiO2 100% regardless of duration of invasive ventilation
  • undergone exome sequencing

Who cannot join

  • culture-positive sepsis
  • cardiopulmonary malformations
  • pulmonary hypoplasia
  • known surfactant mutations such as SFTPB, SFTPC, CHPT1, LPCAT1 and PCYT1B were excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Children's hospital of Chongqing Medical University

    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400014

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: ABCA3 Gene Mutations in Late Preterm and Term Infants With Fatal Unexplained Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory cause of mortality and morbidity in very preterm infants, but it also could be seen in late preterm and term infants. Some genetic mechanisms were involved in the pathogenesis of RDS in late preterm and term infants.

ATP-binding cassette transporter A3 (ABCA3) is essential for the production of pulmonary surfactant, whose mutation is the most common monogenetic cause of RDS in newborns. It also takes a vital role on unexplained RDS (URDS) in late preterm and term infants. Some previous studies showed that URDS with homozygous or compound heterozygous ABCA3 mutations had high mortality, while different mutation types could lead to different outcomes. However, most of the study focused on URDS with ABCA3 gene mutations, and there is no evidence that URDS without confirmed gene mutations have relatively better or worse outcomes. Furthermore, all the population in previous study are non-Asian races, which indicated that all the study conclusion is not applicable in Asia.

Based on the next-generation sequencing technology, exome sequencing has been widely used in the clinic. In our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), a clinic exome sequencing was usually performed in infants with fatal URDS. The present study was designed to compare the URDS with ABCA3 gene mutations with those without confirmed gene mutations and to establish the relationship between various ABCA3 gene mutations and variant RDS severity and outcomes.

Being tested
no intervention
Keywords
respiratory distress syndrome, ABCA3 gene, exome sequencing
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • no interventionOther

    there is no intervention in this study, only observation.

Study groups in NCT04137783
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
homozygous or compound heterozygous ABCA3 mutationspatients meet the criteria for fatal respiratory distress sydrome and undergone exome sequencing, which indicated homozgyous or compound heterozygous ABCA3 mutations.
Receives: Other: no intervention
single ABCA3 mutationpatients meet the criteria for fatal respiratory distress sydrome and undergone exome sequencing, which indicated single mutations.
Receives: Other: no intervention
no ABCA3 mutationspatients meet the criteria for fatal respiratory distress sydrome and undergone exome sequencing, which exclude all gene mutations involving in the respiratory disease.
Receives: Other: no intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    the ratio of dead patients against the corresponding group population

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. the Onset of Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    the age when the patients presented with respiratory distress sydnrome

    Measured: up to 1 week

  2. the Age of Developing Severe RDS Marked With Oxygenation Index of 16

    the age when the patients develop severe RDS,which is marked with an oxygenation index of 16

    Measured: through study of completion, an average of 1 month

  3. Radiological Score

    The chest x-ray was rated in three sections on both sides of the lung: apex to the carina, carina to the lower pulmonary vein, and lower pulmonary vein to diaphragm. The incidence of radiological features, including ground-glass opacity, reticular pattern, air bronchogram, atelectasis, and air leak, was evaluated for each lung section, respectively. Each finding was scored as 0=none, 1=discrete,2=diffuse, and 3= strong at each section. An overall cumulative score was calculated by adding the individual section scores together, making a minimum of 0, and a maximum of 18 for each patient. Higher scores mean the higher severity of the radiological apperance, and commonly predict worse respiratory outcomes.

    Measured: through study of completion, an average of 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Oct 2019
  2. Study start1 May 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04137783
Sponsor's protocol ID
00020191017
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
20 Oct 2019
Last updated
6 Aug 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in