HealthyNCT04139187
Biomechanics Responses to Power and Strength Combined Training
A study testing Combined training with power and strength exercises in people with Healthy, run by Universidade Federal de Santa Maria at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament during performance of recreational activities and sports. In the United States, the annual incidence is 68.6 per 100,000 people per year and in Brazil, the estimation of ACL reconstruction increases 64%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Combined training with power and strength exercises
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2019to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male sex;
- Age between 18 and 30 years old;
- Who practice physical activity (except: strength and jump training) between 80 and 150 minute per week;
- No previous muscle lower extremity injury at least 6 months prior to recruitment;
- No previous ligament and tendon lower extremity injury or surgery;
- No auditory, vestibular, visual or musculoskeletal injuries or disease that impairment the execution of assessments or training protocol;
- No hypertension, cardiovascular or respiratory disease.
Who cannot join
- Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m².
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Karine Josibel Velasques Stoelben
Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul, 97502-772
About this study
Official title: Lower Extremities Biomechanics Responses to Power and Strength Combined Training in Adults: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament during performance of recreational activities and sports. In the United States, the annual incidence is 68.6 per 100,000 people per year and in Brazil, the estimation of ACL reconstruction increases 64%. There are different biomechanical profiles of risk factors for an ACL injury variable, the ligament dominance, the quadriceps dominance, the trunk dominance, and the leg dominance. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanics adaptations after power and strength combined training protocol in healthy individuals. A second aim is to determine the effect of the training on knee injury risk factors.
Read the detailed description
This is a parallel randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined training with power and strength exercises on lower extremity biomechanics in healthy individuals.
The sample size was calculated with G*Power software using the ANOVA: Repeated measures, within-between interaction, 90% power, alpha 0.05, and 30% drop-out. Data from the tuck jump test (knee flexion range) by Makaruk (2014) were considered for this calculation with effect size 0.46. Thus, a total of 32 individuals (16 per group) is required for this study. To ensure the proper simple size, after collecting the first five participants per group, the sample size will be checked again.
The participants will be randomized in experimental and no intervention groups inside each risk profile group. Randomization ratio will be 1:1 and interventions will last 10 weeks, with two weekly sessions for the exercise arms.
The outcomes will include functional clinical tests, kinematic and kinetic variables during landing tasks, and strength of knee and hip muscles.
The data analysis will be performed by intention to treat and per protocol. Generalized estimating equations will be used to identify interaction effects of groups and time followed by Bonferroni post-hoc. When effect are found, effect size will be estimated. Missing data will be estimate by statistical analysis.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Combined training with power and strength exercises
- Keywords
- Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Lower Extremity
- Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Combined training with power and strength exercisesOther
The training will be compose by power and strength exercises and divided in two days. One day with the exercises: vertical jumps, box jumps, sit-ups, back-extension and guided squat. The second with half squat jumps, high straight jumps, bounding jumps, drop jumps and sprint. Both days will be started with warm up on treadmill running lasting 5 minutes at 6.5-7.5 km/h.
The training protocol includes 20 sessions with 2 sessions per week during 10 weeks (2 weeks to adaptation and others 8 to training with progression of load after 4 weeks).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Individuals randomized to experimental group. Receives: Other: Combined training with power and strength exercises |
| No Intervention Control | No intervention | Individuals without quadriceps dominance randomized to no intervention group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline peak sagittal plane angle of ankle, knee and hip from both legs
Peak angle of sagittal plane during landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of sagittal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of frontal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of transverse plane angles for hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline peak frontal plane angle of knee and hip from both legs
Peak angle of frontal plane during landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline range of knee frontal plane angle from both legs
Range of frontal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline range of knee sagittal plane angle from both legs
Range of sagittal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of sagittal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of frontal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline peak of knee frontal plane joint moment from both legs
Peak of joint moment during landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs
Value at maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of loading rate from both legs
Value calculated by relation between peak of ground reaction force vertical component and time to peak from initial contact during landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline peak of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs
Peak of ground reaction force during landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline value of muscle maximal isometric strength for knee extensors and flexors, and hip aductors and abductors from both legs
Value of maximal isometric strength
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change from baseline pennation angle of muscle fibers of knee extensors and flexors from both legs
The angle between the longitudinal axis of the entire muscle and its fibers.
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline muscle fascicle length of knee extensors and flexors from both legs
The distance between the intersection composed of the superficial aponeurosis and fascicle and the intersection composed of the deep aponeurosis and the fascicle
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline muscle thickness of knee extensors and flexors from both legs
Estimation of muscle cross-sectional area
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline power value of ankle, knee and hip joints from both legs
Relation of work and velocity during landing task
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline dynamic strength of lower extremities muscles
The force developed to perform one maximal repetition to perform leg press and squat tasks
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline maximal dorsiflexion amplitude of ankle joint from both legs
Maximal dorsiflexion amplitude obtained during lunge test
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline dynamic balance of lower extremities from both legs
Dynamic balance is assessed according the displacement obtained during Star Excursion Balance Test
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline dynamic balance index of asymmetry between legs
Dynamic balance is assessed according the displacement obtained during Star Excursion Balance Test. The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs.
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline quality of dynamic movement of lower extremities from both legs
Quality of movement is assessed according the escore obtained during Lateral Step Down test performance
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline asymmetry index of quality of dynamic movement between legs
Quality of movement is assessed according the escore obtained during Lateral Step Down test performance. The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs.
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline functional physical performance of lower extremities from both legs
Assessed according the maximal distance obtained during hop tests performance (single, triple and crossover)
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline asymmetry index of functional physical performance between legs
Assessed according the maximal distance obtained during hop tests performance (single, triple and crossover). The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs.
Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Oct 2019
- Study start15 Sep 2019
- Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two groups design where one randomized group receive treatment and the other not in the same period of time.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidade Federal do Pampa, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Karine Josibel Velasques Stoelben, Universidade Federal do Pampa
- Investigators
- Felipe P Carpes, PhD, Study director, Federal University of PampaKarine JV Stoelben, Ms, Principal investigator, Federal University of PampaEliane C Guadagnin, PhD, Study chair, Federal University of Pampa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04139187
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 96793518.3.0000.5323
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The investigators intend to publish the results in an open-access journal, indexed at the Directory of Open Access Journals, with the copyrights transferred to the authors. Details regarding the study's design and statistical plan can be obtained consulting the trial's protocol. Data on other outcomes could be requested contacting the PI.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lower Extremities Biomechanics Responses to Power and Strength Combined Training in Adults: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04139187
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 96793518.3.0000.5323
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Lower Extremity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidade Federal do Pampa, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament during performance of recreational activities and sports. In the United States, the annual incidence is 68.6 per 100,000 people per year and in Brazil, the estimation of ACL reconstruction increases 64%. There are different biomechanical profiles of risk factors for an ACL injury variable, the ligament dominance, the quadriceps dominance, the trunk dominance, and the leg dominance. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanics adaptations after power and strength combined training protocol in healthy individuals. A second aim is to determine the effect of the training on knee injury risk factors.
Detailed description
This is a parallel randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined training with power and strength exercises on lower extremity biomechanics in healthy individuals.
The sample size was calculated with G*Power software using the ANOVA: Repeated measures, within-between interaction, 90% power, alpha 0.05, and 30% drop-out. Data from the tuck jump test (knee flexion range) by Makaruk (2014) were considered for this calculation with effect size 0.46. Thus, a total of 32 individuals (16 per group) is required for this study. To ensure the proper simple size, after collecting the first five participants per group, the sample size will be checked again.
The participants will be randomized in experimental and no intervention groups inside each risk profile group. Randomization ratio will be 1:1 and interventions will last 10 weeks, with two weekly sessions for the exercise arms.
The outcomes will include functional clinical tests, kinematic and kinetic variables during landing tasks, and strength of knee and hip muscles.
The data analysis will be performed by intention to treat and per protocol. Generalized estimating equations will be used to identify interaction effects of groups and time followed by Bonferroni post-hoc. When effect are found, effect size will be estimated. Missing data will be estimate by statistical analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two groups design where one randomized group receive treatment and the other not in the same period of time.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Other: Combined training with power and strength exercisesIndividuals randomized to experimental group. |
| No Intervention Control | No intervention | –Individuals without quadriceps dominance randomized to no intervention group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male sex;
- Age between 18 and 30 years old;
- Who practice physical activity (except: strength and jump training) between 80 and 150 minute per week;
- No previous muscle lower extremity injury at least 6 months prior to recruitment;
- No previous ligament and tendon lower extremity injury or surgery;
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m².
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Combined training with power and strength exercisesThe training will be compose by power and strength exercises and divided in two days. One day with the exercises: vertical jumps, box jumps, sit-ups, back-extension and guided squat. The second with half squat jumps, high straight jumps, bounding jumps, drop jumps and sprint. Both days will be started with warm up on treadmill running lasting 5 minutes at 6.5-7.5 km/h. The training protocol includes 20 sessions with 2 sessions per week during 10 weeks (2 weeks to adaptation and others 8 to training with progression of load after 4 weeks). | Other | Experimental |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline peak sagittal plane angle of ankle, knee and hip from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Peak angle of sagittal plane during landing task
Change from baseline value of sagittal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline value of frontal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline value of transverse plane angles for hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline peak frontal plane angle of knee and hip from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Peak angle of frontal plane during landing task
Change from baseline range of knee frontal plane angle from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Range of frontal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline range of knee sagittal plane angle from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Range of sagittal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline value of sagittal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline value of frontal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline peak of knee frontal plane joint moment from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Peak of joint moment during landing task
Change from baseline value of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value at maximal knee flexion instant of landing task
Change from baseline value of loading rate from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value calculated by relation between peak of ground reaction force vertical component and time to peak from initial contact during landing task
Change from baseline peak of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Peak of ground reaction force during landing task
Change from baseline value of muscle maximal isometric strength for knee extensors and flexors, and hip aductors and abductors from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Value of maximal isometric strength
12 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline pennation angle of muscle fibers of knee extensors and flexors from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline muscle fascicle length of knee extensors and flexors from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline muscle thickness of knee extensors and flexors from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline power value of ankle, knee and hip joints from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline dynamic strength of lower extremities muscles
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline maximal dorsiflexion amplitude of ankle joint from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline dynamic balance of lower extremities from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline dynamic balance index of asymmetry between legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline quality of dynamic movement of lower extremities from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline asymmetry index of quality of dynamic movement between legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline functional physical performance of lower extremities from both legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Change from baseline asymmetry index of functional physical performance between legs
Time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The investigators intend to publish the results in an open-access journal, indexed at the Directory of Open Access Journals, with the copyrights transferred to the authors. Details regarding the study's design and statistical plan can be obtained consulting the trial's protocol. Data on other outcomes could be requested contacting the PI.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Felipe P Carpes, PhD study director
Federal University of Pampa
Karine JV Stoelben, Ms principal investigator
Federal University of Pampa
Eliane C Guadagnin, PhD study chair
Federal University of Pampa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Combined training with power and strength exercises in people with Healthy, run by Universidade Federal de Santa Maria at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline peak sagittal plane angle of ankle, knee and hip from both legs (time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2020.