AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT04139187

Biomechanics Responses to Power and Strength Combined Training

A study testing Combined training with power and strength exercises in people with Healthy, run by Universidade Federal de Santa Maria at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament during performance of recreational activities and sports. In the United States, the annual incidence is 68.6 per 100,000 people per year and in Brazil, the estimation of ACL reconstruction increases 64%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Combined training with power and strength exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
15 Sep 2019to Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male sex;
  • Age between 18 and 30 years old;
  • Who practice physical activity (except: strength and jump training) between 80 and 150 minute per week;
  • No previous muscle lower extremity injury at least 6 months prior to recruitment;
  • No previous ligament and tendon lower extremity injury or surgery;
  • No auditory, vestibular, visual or musculoskeletal injuries or disease that impairment the execution of assessments or training protocol;
  • No hypertension, cardiovascular or respiratory disease.

Who cannot join

  • Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m².

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Karine Josibel Velasques Stoelben

    Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul, 97502-772

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Lower Extremities Biomechanics Responses to Power and Strength Combined Training in Adults: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament during performance of recreational activities and sports. In the United States, the annual incidence is 68.6 per 100,000 people per year and in Brazil, the estimation of ACL reconstruction increases 64%. There are different biomechanical profiles of risk factors for an ACL injury variable, the ligament dominance, the quadriceps dominance, the trunk dominance, and the leg dominance. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanics adaptations after power and strength combined training protocol in healthy individuals. A second aim is to determine the effect of the training on knee injury risk factors.

Read the detailed description

This is a parallel randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined training with power and strength exercises on lower extremity biomechanics in healthy individuals.

The sample size was calculated with G*Power software using the ANOVA: Repeated measures, within-between interaction, 90% power, alpha 0.05, and 30% drop-out. Data from the tuck jump test (knee flexion range) by Makaruk (2014) were considered for this calculation with effect size 0.46. Thus, a total of 32 individuals (16 per group) is required for this study. To ensure the proper simple size, after collecting the first five participants per group, the sample size will be checked again.

The participants will be randomized in experimental and no intervention groups inside each risk profile group. Randomization ratio will be 1:1 and interventions will last 10 weeks, with two weekly sessions for the exercise arms.

The outcomes will include functional clinical tests, kinematic and kinetic variables during landing tasks, and strength of knee and hip muscles.

The data analysis will be performed by intention to treat and per protocol. Generalized estimating equations will be used to identify interaction effects of groups and time followed by Bonferroni post-hoc. When effect are found, effect size will be estimated. Missing data will be estimate by statistical analysis.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Combined training with power and strength exercises
Keywords
Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Lower Extremity
Medical subject headings
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Combined training with power and strength exercisesOther

    The training will be compose by power and strength exercises and divided in two days. One day with the exercises: vertical jumps, box jumps, sit-ups, back-extension and guided squat. The second with half squat jumps, high straight jumps, bounding jumps, drop jumps and sprint. Both days will be started with warm up on treadmill running lasting 5 minutes at 6.5-7.5 km/h.

    The training protocol includes 20 sessions with 2 sessions per week during 10 weeks (2 weeks to adaptation and others 8 to training with progression of load after 4 weeks).

Study groups in NCT04139187
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalExperimentalIndividuals randomized to experimental group.
Receives: Other: Combined training with power and strength exercises
No Intervention ControlNo interventionIndividuals without quadriceps dominance randomized to no intervention group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline peak sagittal plane angle of ankle, knee and hip from both legs

    Peak angle of sagittal plane during landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  2. Change from baseline value of sagittal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk

    Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  3. Change from baseline value of frontal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk

    Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  4. Change from baseline value of transverse plane angles for hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk

    Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  5. Change from baseline peak frontal plane angle of knee and hip from both legs

    Peak angle of frontal plane during landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  6. Change from baseline range of knee frontal plane angle from both legs

    Range of frontal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  7. Change from baseline range of knee sagittal plane angle from both legs

    Range of sagittal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  8. Change from baseline value of sagittal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs

    Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  9. Change from baseline value of frontal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs

    Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  10. Change from baseline peak of knee frontal plane joint moment from both legs

    Peak of joint moment during landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  11. Change from baseline value of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs

    Value at maximal knee flexion instant of landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  12. Change from baseline value of loading rate from both legs

    Value calculated by relation between peak of ground reaction force vertical component and time to peak from initial contact during landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  13. Change from baseline peak of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs

    Peak of ground reaction force during landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  14. Change from baseline value of muscle maximal isometric strength for knee extensors and flexors, and hip aductors and abductors from both legs

    Value of maximal isometric strength

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change from baseline pennation angle of muscle fibers of knee extensors and flexors from both legs

    The angle between the longitudinal axis of the entire muscle and its fibers.

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  2. Change from baseline muscle fascicle length of knee extensors and flexors from both legs

    The distance between the intersection composed of the superficial aponeurosis and fascicle and the intersection composed of the deep aponeurosis and the fascicle

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  3. Change from baseline muscle thickness of knee extensors and flexors from both legs

    Estimation of muscle cross-sectional area

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  4. Change from baseline power value of ankle, knee and hip joints from both legs

    Relation of work and velocity during landing task

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  5. Change from baseline dynamic strength of lower extremities muscles

    The force developed to perform one maximal repetition to perform leg press and squat tasks

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  6. Change from baseline maximal dorsiflexion amplitude of ankle joint from both legs

    Maximal dorsiflexion amplitude obtained during lunge test

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  7. Change from baseline dynamic balance of lower extremities from both legs

    Dynamic balance is assessed according the displacement obtained during Star Excursion Balance Test

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  8. Change from baseline dynamic balance index of asymmetry between legs

    Dynamic balance is assessed according the displacement obtained during Star Excursion Balance Test. The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs.

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  9. Change from baseline quality of dynamic movement of lower extremities from both legs

    Quality of movement is assessed according the escore obtained during Lateral Step Down test performance

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  10. Change from baseline asymmetry index of quality of dynamic movement between legs

    Quality of movement is assessed according the escore obtained during Lateral Step Down test performance. The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs.

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  11. Change from baseline functional physical performance of lower extremities from both legs

    Assessed according the maximal distance obtained during hop tests performance (single, triple and crossover)

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

  12. Change from baseline asymmetry index of functional physical performance between legs

    Assessed according the maximal distance obtained during hop tests performance (single, triple and crossover). The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs.

    Measured: Baseline and up to 10 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Oct 2019
  2. Study start15 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two groups design where one randomized group receive treatment and the other not in the same period of time.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04139187
Sponsor's protocol ID
96793518.3.0000.5323
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
4 Sep 2019
Last updated
4 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The investigators intend to publish the results in an open-access journal, indexed at the Directory of Open Access Journals, with the copyrights transferred to the authors. Details regarding the study's design and statistical plan can be obtained consulting the trial's protocol. Data on other outcomes could be requested contacting the PI.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Combined training with power and strength exercises in people with Healthy, run by Universidade Federal de Santa Maria at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline peak sagittal plane angle of ankle, knee and hip from both legs (time frame: Baseline and up to 10 weeks). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in