Low Vision in ChildrenNCT04142307
Biofeedback in Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome
A study testing Biofeedback Training in people with Low Vision in Children, run by Monica Daibert Nido at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Active eye movement control training, an old and still most prevalent intervention in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) was never used in nystagmus clinically. Biofeedback training (BT) is the latest and newest technique for oculomotor control training in cases with low vision when using available modules in the new… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Vision in Children
- What is being tested?
- Biofeedback Training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2019to 30 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed as Infantile idiopathic nystagmus (IIN)
- Ability to follow the visual and auditory stimuli and training instructions
Who cannot join
- Ocular diseases not related to the nystagmus physiopathology
- Both eyes with media opacity that impairs microperimetry testing
- Peripheral nystagmus cases
- Other types of nystagmus than IIN
- Inability to perform during testing and training
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Samuel Markowitz, MD contact
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
CNIB
Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3E8
Monica Daibert-Nido, MD, 416 481 9995, monica.nido@uhn.ca
About this study
Active eye movement control training, an old and still most prevalent intervention in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) was never used in nystagmus clinically.
Biofeedback training (BT) is the latest and newest technique for oculomotor control training in cases with low vision when using available modules in the new microperimetry instruments. Laboratory studies in the literature highlighted positive benefits from using BT in nystagmus cases. The purpose of this study is to assess systematically the impact of BT in a series of cases with Infantile Idiopathic Nystagmus (IIN) and formulate guidelines for further use of this intervention in nystagmus cases in general.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Infantile idiopathic nystagmus (IIN) or congenital motor nystagmus is most common among infantile nystagmus cases. It has a characteristic waveform eye movement pattern with an exponentially increasing velocity slow-phase followed by a saccadic fast phase.
IIN is present from infancy but usually recognized few months into life and may even be evident only after the child has reached several years of age. Characteristics of IIN include the following: conjugate eye movements with equal frequency and amplitude in each eye, gaze position does not change the direction of fast phase, a null point may be present with less motor instability, convergence achieves better motor stability, head turn and head tilt present to facilitate viewing at null point and absence of oscillopsia in most cases.
When the patient is asymptomatic no treatment is required. However, if the visual acuity is decreased with abnormal head posture and oscillopsia interventions are warranted.
Traditional used therapies include muscle surgery, optical devices, drugs and botulinum toxin injections. All current available therapies aim at changing the functional balance among eye muscles responsible for eye movements with hope that they will produce better ocular stability and better foveation time for incoming images with better vision. All such cases also require Low Vision Rehabilitation interventions to improve functional vision and Quality of Life.
Rationale for the study:
Active eye movement control training, an old and still most prevalent intervention in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) was never used in nystagmus cases with low vision for various reasons. One of them was the inability to document accurately eye movements and fixation characteristics in patients with low vision, nystagmus cases included.
Biofeedback training (BT) is the latest and newest technique for oculomotor control training in cases with low vision when using available modules in the new microperimetry instruments.
Sporadic reports in the literature highlighted positive benefits from using BT in a variety of nystagmus cases. The purpose of this study is to assess systematically the impact of BT in a series of cases with IIN and formulate guidelines for further use of this intervention in nystagmus cases in general.
Study hypothesis
The visual and audio parts of the BT program improve in a synergistic way oculomotor control through attention improvement and volitional eye movements towards pre-designated targets. Improved oculomotor control results in better fixation stability of eyes. Better fixation stability in turn results in better vision for distance and near. Dual sensory BT is a therapy used in low vision for more than ten years, showing good results for near and distance vision in cases with macular degeneration and other pathologies. The study hypothesis, never tested before, is that BT in cases with IIN will impact positively oculomotor control and visual acuity as it was proven to do in cases with macular degeneration.
Significance of the study:
Most cases with IIN suffer also from poor visual acuity and in essence are visually impaired. Where as in cases with visual impairment near vision can be easily improved to functional levels using magnification in spectacle glasses, distance vision cannot be improved further with spectacle glasses and other low vision devices are required. BT in IIN cases may result in significant improvement in visual abilities for distance in a similar way that BT results in improved distance vision in cases with macular degeneration.
Clinical trial design:
This is prospective clinical randomized trial to include a control group and take place over a period of up to 24 months.
The objectives set for this trial is to verify if BT impacts on oculomotor control in cases with IIN and results in better distance visual acuity in those trained with BT.
Clinical trial population:
The intended population for this clinical trial is to be found among the Low Vision Rehabilitation (LVR) clinical practice patients. Patients will be considered for inclusion into the study if they meet the trial entry criteria.
The following is an overview of the study procedures: following obtaining consent from study participants, confirmation of eligibility, and baseline assessments (Visit1, V1), participants will undergo 4 BT sessions (V2, V3, V4 and V5). Upon completion of the 4 BT sessions participants will return for a follow up after 1 week (V6) and 3 months (V7).
Baseline procedures During the baseline visit (Visit 1) participants will be assessed for Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) for distance vision with ETDRS charts at 4 meters, preferred retinal locus (PRL) characteristics, fixation stability (FS) estimates and nystagmus amplitude with the MAIA microperimeter (Centervue, Padova, Italy). Participants will be assessed also for near vision and contrast sensitivity measured with the 2 contrast levels Colenbrander chart, stereopsis will be assessed with the Frisby Stereo Test and Quality of Life estimates will be assessed with the children's visual function questionnaire (CVFQ).
This visit may take an hour time. Training procedure during training procedure visits (V2-5) the participant is seated in front of the instrument while visual targets are presented to the eye and auditory stimuli are presented in tandem with the visual stimuli. Patient has to identify targets and respond by pressing a button.
BT includes 4 BT attempts of 5 minutes each with 5 minutes rest time between each attempt. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. A fixation training target (FTT) will be selected by the trainer at a perceived better fixation point. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage, the participant will be guided to look in the direction of the FTT and listen simultaneously to the audio feedback. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements until the audio feedback becomes more frequent and then becomes a continuous sound pattern. This continuous sound will signalize to the patient is controlling nystagmus.
Simulated BT includes presentation of a C10-2 microperimetry program. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage, the participant will be guided to look at the FT and simultaneously to be aware of any flashing lights in the periphery of vision. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements and similar to computer games, the patient has to identify targets in the peripheral field of vision and respond by pressing a button.
Participants will be given take-home efficiency reading exercises. Training visits are repeated to a total of 4 on a weekly interval.
End of study procedures Additional follow up Visits 6 and 7 will take place at 5 weeks and 4 months following visit 1. Participants will be assessed also for near vision and contrast sensitivity measured with the 2 contrast levels Colenbrander chart, stereopsis will be assessed with the Frisby Stereo Test and Quality of Life estimates will be assessed with the children's visual function questionnaire (CVFQ).
There are no known risks or side effects known from using biofeedback training. In some cases, perceived side effects observed are general fatigue, tiredness due to the efforts to fixate, discomfort or eye strain.
- Conditions
- Low Vision in Children
- Being tested
- Biofeedback Training, Sham - simulated BT
- Keywords
- biofeedback, vision rehabilitation, nystagmus, paediatric
- Medical subject headings
- Nystagmus, Pathologic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biofeedback TrainingDevice
Microperimeter biofeedback training as described provides to the patient a variable frequency sound and a luminous stimulus that vary according to the eyes position, thus guides the oculomotor control and fixation stability accordingly.
Sham - simulated BTDevice
The simulated biofeedback training for Group B involves the following: each session includes presentation of a C10-2 microperimetry program. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage the participant will be guided to look at the FT and simultaneously to be aware of any flashing lights in the periphery of vision. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements and similar to computer games, the patient has to identify targets in the peripheral field of vision and respond by pressing a button.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (treatment) | Active comparator | Each session includes 20 minutes of training each with rest as needed. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. A fixation training target (FTT) will be selected by the trainer at a perceived better fixation point. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage the participant will be guided to look in the direction of the FTT and listen simultaneously to the audio feedback. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements until the audio feedback becomes more frequent and then becomes a continuous sound pattern. This continuous sound will signalize to the patient that the FTT location was reached. Participants will be given take-home efficiency reading exercises. Receives: Device: Biofeedback Training |
| Group B (control) | Sham comparator | The simulated biofeedback training for Group B involves the following procedure:
For four weeks, presentation of a C10-2 microperimetry program. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage the participant will be guided to look at the FT and simultaneously to be aware of any flashing lights in the periphery of vision. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements and similar to computer games, the patient has to identify targets in the peripheral field of vision and respond by pressing a button. Participants will be given take-home efficiency reading exercises. Receives: Device: Sham - simulated BT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity for Distance Vision across BT sessions and post BT
Measured with the ETDRS charts at 4 m
Measured: 7 days from baseline (V2), 14 days (V3), 21 days (V4), 28 days (V5), 35 days (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Fixation Stability (Bivariate contour ellipse area) across BT sessions and post BT
Represents the area used for fixation on the retina in square degrees as given by the microperimeter
Measured: 7 days from baseline (V2), 14 days (V3), 21 days (V4), 28 days (V5), 35 days (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Changes in Contrast Sensitivity for near vision across BT sessions and post BT
Two contrast Colenbrander chart
Measured: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Stereopsis for near vision across BT and post BT
Frisby Stereotest for near with best near correction
Measured: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Quality of Life Parental Questionnaire across BT and post BT
Quality of Life estimates will be assessed with the children's visual function questionnaire (CVFQ).(16)
Measured: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Reading speed across BT sessions and post BT
Using the MNRead Test with the best near correction
Measured: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2019
- Study start30 Jan 2019
- Primary completion29 Apr 2025
- Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Vision in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A prospective randomized controlled parallel group study ratio 1:1.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Monica Daibert Nido
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Monica Daibert Nido, University of Toronto
- Investigators
- Samuel Markowitz, MD, Principal investigator, University of Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04142307
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Biofeedback Low Vision
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 1 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Abadi RV, Bjerre A. Motor and sensory characteristics of infantile nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;86(10):1152-60. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.10.1152.
PubMed 12234898Rucker JC. Current Treatment of Nystagmus. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2005 Jan;7(1):69-77. doi: 10.1007/s11940-005-0008-0.
PubMed 15610709ANDERSON JR. Causes and treatment of congenital eccentric nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1953 May;37(5):267-81. doi: 10.1136/bjo.37.5.267. No abstract available.
PubMed 13042022KESTENBAUM A. [New operation for nystagmus]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1953 Jun;6:599-602. No abstract available. Undetermined Language.
PubMed 13115959Wang ZI MS, Dell'Osso LF , Ph.D. A Review of the Tenotomy Nystagmus Surgery: Origin, Mechanism, and General Efficacy. Neuro-Ophthalmology, 31:157-165, 2007 ISSN: 0165-8107 DOI: 10.1080/01658100701647704
Yaniglos SS, Stahl JS, Leigh RJ. Evaluation of current optical methods for treating the visual consequences of nystagmus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Apr;956:598-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02893.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 11960878Lennerstrand G, Nordbo OA, Tian S, Eriksson-Derouet B, Ali T. Treatment of strabismus and nystagmus with botulinum toxin type A. An evaluation of effects and complications. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998 Feb;76(1):27-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760106.x.
PubMed 9541431Buia C, Tiesinga P. Attentional modulation of firing rate and synchrony in a model cortical network. J Comput Neurosci. 2006 Jun;20(3):247-64. doi: 10.1007/s10827-006-6358-0. Epub 2006 Apr 22.
PubMed 16683206Shtark MB, Kozlova LI, Bezmaternykh DD, Mel'nikov MY, Savelov AA, Sokhadze EM. Neuroimaging Study of Alpha and Beta EEG Biofeedback Effects on Neural Networks. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018 Jun;43(2):169-178. doi: 10.1007/s10484-018-9396-2.
PubMed 29926265Markowitz SN, Reyes SV. Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;48(5):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
PubMed 24093179Nido MD, Markowitz SN. Vision rehabilitation with biofeedback training. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;53(3):e83-e84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 29784180Ciuffreda KJ, Goldrich SG, Neary C. Use of eye movement auditory biofeedback in the control of nystagmus. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 May;59(5):396-409. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198205000-00007.
PubMed 7102798Grenga PL, Trabucco P, Meduri A, Fragiotta S, Vingolo EM. Microperimetric biofeedback in a patient with oculocutaneous albinism. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;48(5):e105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 24093197Mezawa M, Ishikawa S, Ukai K. Changes in waveform of congenital nystagmus associated with biofeedback treatment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990 Aug;74(8):472-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.8.472.
PubMed 2390522Daibert-Nido M, Patino B, Markowitz M, Markowitz SN. Rehabilitation with biofeedback training in age-related macular degeneration for improving distance vision. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;54(3):328-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.10.016. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
PubMed 31109472
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Biofeedback in Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04142307
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Biofeedback Low Vision
- Conditions
- Low Vision in Children
- Keywords
- biofeedback, vision rehabilitation, nystagmus, paediatric
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Monica Daibert NidoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Active eye movement control training, an old and still most prevalent intervention in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) was never used in nystagmus clinically.
Biofeedback training (BT) is the latest and newest technique for oculomotor control training in cases with low vision when using available modules in the new microperimetry instruments. Laboratory studies in the literature highlighted positive benefits from using BT in nystagmus cases. The purpose of this study is to assess systematically the impact of BT in a series of cases with Infantile Idiopathic Nystagmus (IIN) and formulate guidelines for further use of this intervention in nystagmus cases in general.
Detailed description
Background:
Infantile idiopathic nystagmus (IIN) or congenital motor nystagmus is most common among infantile nystagmus cases. It has a characteristic waveform eye movement pattern with an exponentially increasing velocity slow-phase followed by a saccadic fast phase.
IIN is present from infancy but usually recognized few months into life and may even be evident only after the child has reached several years of age. Characteristics of IIN include the following: conjugate eye movements with equal frequency and amplitude in each eye, gaze position does not change the direction of fast phase, a null point may be present with less motor instability, convergence achieves better motor stability, head turn and head tilt present to facilitate viewing at null point and absence of oscillopsia in most cases.
When the patient is asymptomatic no treatment is required. However, if the visual acuity is decreased with abnormal head posture and oscillopsia interventions are warranted.
Traditional used therapies include muscle surgery, optical devices, drugs and botulinum toxin injections. All current available therapies aim at changing the functional balance among eye muscles responsible for eye movements with hope that they will produce better ocular stability and better foveation time for incoming images with better vision. All such cases also require Low Vision Rehabilitation interventions to improve functional vision and Quality of Life.
Rationale for the study:
Active eye movement control training, an old and still most prevalent intervention in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) was never used in nystagmus cases with low vision for various reasons. One of them was the inability to document accurately eye movements and fixation characteristics in patients with low vision, nystagmus cases included.
Biofeedback training (BT) is the latest and newest technique for oculomotor control training in cases with low vision when using available modules in the new microperimetry instruments.
Sporadic reports in the literature highlighted positive benefits from using BT in a variety of nystagmus cases. The purpose of this study is to assess systematically the impact of BT in a series of cases with IIN and formulate guidelines for further use of this intervention in nystagmus cases in general.
Study hypothesis
The visual and audio parts of the BT program improve in a synergistic way oculomotor control through attention improvement and volitional eye movements towards pre-designated targets. Improved oculomotor control results in better fixation stability of eyes. Better fixation stability in turn results in better vision for distance and near. Dual sensory BT is a therapy used in low vision for more than ten years, showing good results for near and distance vision in cases with macular degeneration and other pathologies. The study hypothesis, never tested before, is that BT in cases with IIN will impact positively oculomotor control and visual acuity as it was proven to do in cases with macular degeneration.
Significance of the study:
Most cases with IIN suffer also from poor visual acuity and in essence are visually impaired. Where as in cases with visual impairment near vision can be easily improved to functional levels using magnification in spectacle glasses, distance vision cannot be improved further with spectacle glasses and other low vision devices are required. BT in IIN cases may result in significant improvement in visual abilities for distance in a similar way that BT results in improved distance vision in cases with macular degeneration.
Clinical trial design:
This is prospective clinical randomized trial to include a control group and take place over a period of up to 24 months.
The objectives set for this trial is to verify if BT impacts on oculomotor control in cases with IIN and results in better distance visual acuity in those trained with BT.
Clinical trial population:
The intended population for this clinical trial is to be found among the Low Vision Rehabilitation (LVR) clinical practice patients. Patients will be considered for inclusion into the study if they meet the trial entry criteria.
The following is an overview of the study procedures: following obtaining consent from study participants, confirmation of eligibility, and baseline assessments (Visit1, V1), participants will undergo 4 BT sessions (V2, V3, V4 and V5). Upon completion of the 4 BT sessions participants will return for a follow up after 1 week (V6) and 3 months (V7).
Baseline procedures During the baseline visit (Visit 1) participants will be assessed for Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) for distance vision with ETDRS charts at 4 meters, preferred retinal locus (PRL) characteristics, fixation stability (FS) estimates and nystagmus amplitude with the MAIA microperimeter (Centervue, Padova, Italy). Participants will be assessed also for near vision and contrast sensitivity measured with the 2 contrast levels Colenbrander chart, stereopsis will be assessed with the Frisby Stereo Test and Quality of Life estimates will be assessed with the children's visual function questionnaire (CVFQ).
This visit may take an hour time. Training procedure during training procedure visits (V2-5) the participant is seated in front of the instrument while visual targets are presented to the eye and auditory stimuli are presented in tandem with the visual stimuli. Patient has to identify targets and respond by pressing a button.
BT includes 4 BT attempts of 5 minutes each with 5 minutes rest time between each attempt. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. A fixation training target (FTT) will be selected by the trainer at a perceived better fixation point. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage, the participant will be guided to look in the direction of the FTT and listen simultaneously to the audio feedback. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements until the audio feedback becomes more frequent and then becomes a continuous sound pattern. This continuous sound will signalize to the patient is controlling nystagmus.
Simulated BT includes presentation of a C10-2 microperimetry program. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage, the participant will be guided to look at the FT and simultaneously to be aware of any flashing lights in the periphery of vision. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements and similar to computer games, the patient has to identify targets in the peripheral field of vision and respond by pressing a button.
Participants will be given take-home efficiency reading exercises. Training visits are repeated to a total of 4 on a weekly interval.
End of study procedures Additional follow up Visits 6 and 7 will take place at 5 weeks and 4 months following visit 1. Participants will be assessed also for near vision and contrast sensitivity measured with the 2 contrast levels Colenbrander chart, stereopsis will be assessed with the Frisby Stereo Test and Quality of Life estimates will be assessed with the children's visual function questionnaire (CVFQ).
There are no known risks or side effects known from using biofeedback training. In some cases, perceived side effects observed are general fatigue, tiredness due to the efforts to fixate, discomfort or eye strain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A prospective randomized controlled parallel group study ratio 1:1.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (treatment) | Active comparator | Device: Biofeedback TrainingEach session includes 20 minutes of training each with rest as needed. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. A fixation training target (FTT) will be selected by the trainer at a perceived better fixation point. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage the participant will be guided to look in the direction of the FTT and listen simultaneously to the audio feedback. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements until the audio feedback becomes more frequent and then becomes a continuous sound pattern. This continuous sound will signalize to the patient that the FTT location was reached. Participants will be given take-home efficiency reading exercises. |
| Group B (control) | Sham comparator | Device: Sham - simulated BTThe simulated biofeedback training for Group B involves the following procedure: For four weeks, presentation of a C10-2 microperimetry program. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage the participant will be guided to look at the FT and simultaneously to be aware of any flashing lights in the periphery of vision. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements and similar to computer games, the patient has to identify targets in the peripheral field of vision and respond by pressing a button. Participants will be given take-home efficiency reading exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosed as Infantile idiopathic nystagmus (IIN)
- Ability to follow the visual and auditory stimuli and training instructions
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Ocular diseases not related to the nystagmus physiopathology
- Both eyes with media opacity that impairs microperimetry testing
- Peripheral nystagmus cases
- Other types of nystagmus than IIN
- Inability to perform during testing and training
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biofeedback TrainingMicroperimeter biofeedback training as described provides to the patient a variable frequency sound and a luminous stimulus that vary according to the eyes position, thus guides the oculomotor control and fixation stability accordingly. | Device | Group A (treatment) |
| Sham - simulated BTThe simulated biofeedback training for Group B involves the following: each session includes presentation of a C10-2 microperimetry program. The procedure involves presentation of a standard LED fixation target (FT) consisting of a small red circle of about 0.76° diameter. Initially the participant will be instructed to stare at the FT circle. Following this stage the participant will be guided to look at the FT and simultaneously to be aware of any flashing lights in the periphery of vision. As performing this task, the participant will actively control the eye movements and similar to computer games, the patient has to identify targets in the peripheral field of vision and respond by pressing a button. | Device | Group B (control) |
Primary outcome
Changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity for Distance Vision across BT sessions and post BT
Time frame: 7 days from baseline (V2), 14 days (V3), 21 days (V4), 28 days (V5), 35 days (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Measured with the ETDRS charts at 4 m
Changes in Fixation Stability (Bivariate contour ellipse area) across BT sessions and post BT
Time frame: 7 days from baseline (V2), 14 days (V3), 21 days (V4), 28 days (V5), 35 days (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Represents the area used for fixation on the retina in square degrees as given by the microperimeter
4 secondary outcomes
Changes in Contrast Sensitivity for near vision across BT sessions and post BT
Time frame: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Stereopsis for near vision across BT and post BT
Time frame: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Quality of Life Parental Questionnaire across BT and post BT
Time frame: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Changes in Reading speed across BT sessions and post BT
Time frame: 35 days from baseline (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 12234898Abadi RV, Bjerre A. Motor and sensory characteristics of infantile nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;86(10):1152-60. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.10.1152.
- Background: PubMed 15610709Rucker JC. Current Treatment of Nystagmus. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2005 Jan;7(1):69-77. doi: 10.1007/s11940-005-0008-0.
- Background: PubMed 13042022ANDERSON JR. Causes and treatment of congenital eccentric nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1953 May;37(5):267-81. doi: 10.1136/bjo.37.5.267. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 13115959KESTENBAUM A. [New operation for nystagmus]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1953 Jun;6:599-602. No abstract available. Undetermined Language.
- BackgroundWang ZI MS, Dell'Osso LF , Ph.D. A Review of the Tenotomy Nystagmus Surgery: Origin, Mechanism, and General Efficacy. Neuro-Ophthalmology, 31:157-165, 2007 ISSN: 0165-8107 DOI: 10.1080/01658100701647704
- Background: PubMed 11960878Yaniglos SS, Stahl JS, Leigh RJ. Evaluation of current optical methods for treating the visual consequences of nystagmus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Apr;956:598-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02893.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9541431Lennerstrand G, Nordbo OA, Tian S, Eriksson-Derouet B, Ali T. Treatment of strabismus and nystagmus with botulinum toxin type A. An evaluation of effects and complications. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998 Feb;76(1):27-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760106.x.
- Background: PubMed 16683206Buia C, Tiesinga P. Attentional modulation of firing rate and synchrony in a model cortical network. J Comput Neurosci. 2006 Jun;20(3):247-64. doi: 10.1007/s10827-006-6358-0. Epub 2006 Apr 22.
- Background: PubMed 29926265Shtark MB, Kozlova LI, Bezmaternykh DD, Mel'nikov MY, Savelov AA, Sokhadze EM. Neuroimaging Study of Alpha and Beta EEG Biofeedback Effects on Neural Networks. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018 Jun;43(2):169-178. doi: 10.1007/s10484-018-9396-2.
- Background: PubMed 24093179Markowitz SN, Reyes SV. Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;48(5):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
- Background: PubMed 29784180Nido MD, Markowitz SN. Vision rehabilitation with biofeedback training. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;53(3):e83-e84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 7102798Ciuffreda KJ, Goldrich SG, Neary C. Use of eye movement auditory biofeedback in the control of nystagmus. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 May;59(5):396-409. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198205000-00007.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Vision in Children
Not yet recruiting
joyVision: The Superiority of Co-design in the Development of a Serious Game for Children With Cerebral Visual Impairment
Cerebral Visual Impairment
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Reformer Pilates and Vestibular Exercise Programs on Balance and Gait in Children With Visual Impairment
Visual Impairments
Recruiting
In-person and Telehealth Visual Rehabilitation for Children With Low Vision
Visual Rehabilitation, Oddball Design
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Digital Defocus Vision Training With Low-Concentration Atropine on the Prevention and Control of Myopia in Children: A Clinical Study
Myopia, Prevention and Control
Not yet recruiting
Promoting Psychophysical Well-being in Children and Adolescents With Visual Impairment
Visual Impairment, Cerebral Visual Impairment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Samuel Markowitz, MD contact
Samuel Markowitz, MD principal investigator
University of Toronto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biofeedback Training in people with Low Vision in Children, run by Monica Daibert Nido at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Monica Daibert-Nido, MD (4164819995, monica.nido@uhn.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity for Distance Vision across BT sessions and post BT (time frame: 7 days from baseline (V2), 14 days (V3), 21 days (V4), 28 days (V5), 35 days (V6), and 118 days from baseline (V7)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04142307, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2025.