AzTrials
AzTrials

DiscopathyMODISCNCT04142580

Correlation Between RMI of Degenerative Disk Disease and Reduction of Pain After Disk-infiltration Treatments

An observational study of Discopathy and Lumbago, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the difference in the reduction of pain at 1 month after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids depending on symmetrical or asymmetrical active discopathies with MRI examination. The difference should be judged significant if it ⩾ 2 points. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Discopathy, Lumbago
How many people
95 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
13 Nov 2019to 28 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population corresponds to patients suffering from chronic low back pain lasting for at least 3 months and disabling, in failure of the recommended drug treatment, with presence of lumbar active discopathy (Modic 1) by MRI examination, recommended by their referring physician, rheumatologist, physician reeducator, orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon in the diagnostic and interventional medical imaging department of the Raymond Poincaré Hospital in Garches, for intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids. This population corresponds to patients treated daily in routine practice by intradiscal infiltration in the institution.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ⩾ 18 years.
  • Chronic growing lumbago with duration > 3 mois.
  • Disabling lumbago with an average ⩾ 4/10 defined by numerical scale.
  • Common chronic low back pain that has been evolving for more than 3 months.
  • Disabling lumbalgia defined by an average numerical scale greater than or equal to 4/10 in the month preceding the inclusion.
  • Failure or intolerance to drug treatments (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and systemic corticosteroids).
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Absence of biological inflammatory syndrome.
  • Recent MRI of less than 6 months with active disc disease (Modic 1) defined by degenerative disc disease associated with mirror rearrangements of the subchondral bone of the adjacent vertebral endplates in hyposignal T1 and hypersignal T2.
  • Signed informed consent obtained.
  • Affiliation to social security.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy woman.
  • Immunosuppression.
  • History of allergy to iodinated contrast agents and / or prednisolone acetate.
  • Local or general infection.
  • Fever (temperature> 38).
  • History of disc surgery of less than 6 months.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • History of infectious spondylodiscitis.
  • Unbalanced psychiatric disorders.
  • Severe coagulation disorders or impossible cessation of anticoagulation or anti platelet aggregation.
  • Impossibility to obtain signed consent form.
  • Patient under guardianship and/or curatorship.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service d'imagerie médicale, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France

    Garche, 92380

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evolution of Chronic Low Back Pain of Active Discopathy After Intradiscal Corticosteroid Infiltrations According to Modic 1 Distribution and Association With Degenerative Restructuring

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the difference in the reduction of pain at 1 month after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids depending on symmetrical or asymmetrical active discopathies with MRI examination. The difference should be judged significant if it ⩾ 2 points.

Read the detailed description

As secondary objective, the study aims to study the correlation between pain reduction which will be assessed by numerical scale at 1 month and 6 months after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids and following parameters: the duration of chronic lumbago, the presence of associated root pains, the morphological characteristics with RMI examination of active discopathies, the co-existence of scoliosis, the sign of inter-somatic instability, the muscular trophicity of muscle erector of low back, the pelvic incidence, degree of lumbar lordosis, Cobb angle, wearing a corset.

Conditions
Discopathy, Lumbago
Keywords
discopathy, chronic lumbago, degenerative, Modic 1
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessement of change in pain

    The change in pain will be evaluated by numerical scale NRS (numeric rating scale) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids.

    NRS for pain: a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). RMI examination will be performed 6 months before enrollment.

    Measured: at 1 month

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Assessement of pain reduction according to the duration of evolution of chronic lumbago

    The change in pain will be evaluated by NRS for pain (numeric rating scale for pain, a scale from 0 to 10) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids, according to the duration of evolution of chronic lumbago or not will be assessed. Duration of pain before infiltration will be evaluated in months during the pre-inclusion consultation.

    Measured: at 1 month and 6 months

  2. Assessement of pain reduction according to the presence of associated root pains or not.

    The presence of associated root pains will be evaluated by NRS for pain (numerical rating scale, a scale from 0 to 10) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids, according to the presence of associated root pains or not will be assessed. Patients will be asked if there is any root pain during the pre-inclusion consultation.

    Measured: at 1 month and 6 months

  3. Assessement of pain reduction according to the co-existence of scoliosis or not.

    The pain reduction and the co-existence of scoliosis will be assessed. The change in pain will be evaluated by NRS for pain (numeric rating scale, a scale from 0 to 10) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids, according to the presence of associated scoliosis or not will be assessed. Scoliosis will be investigated by interviewing the patient and analyzing the patient's x-rays, performed as part of routine care prior to the pre-inclusion consultation. Scoliosis is any lateral spinal curvature with a Cobb angle >10° on x-rays.

    Measured: at 1 month and 6 months

  4. Assessement of pain reduction according to the presence of signs of inter-somatic instability

    The change in pain will be evaluated by NRS for pain (numeric rating scale, a scale from 0 to 10) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids, according to the presence of signs of inter-somatic instability or not will be assessed. Signs of inter-somatic instability will be investigated by interviewing the patient and analyzing the patient's x-rays and MRI, performed as part of routine care prior to the pre-inclusion consultation. Intersomatic instability is defined as the anterior, posterior or lateral translational displacement of a vertebral body against another (more than 3 mm) on x-rays or MRI.

    Measured: at 1 month and 6 months

  5. Assessement of pain reduction according to the presence of posterior articular osteoarthritis

    The change in pain will be evaluated by NRS for pain (numeric rating scale, a scale from 0 to 10) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids, according to the presence of posterior articular osteoarthritis or not will be assessed. Signs of posterior articular osteoarthritis will be investigated by interviewing the patient and analyzing the patient's x-rays and MRI, performed as part of routine care prior to the pre-inclusion consultation. Posterior articular osteoarthritis will be defined by the presence of bone protrusions, narrowing of joint space, effusion of the joint and periarticular inflammation on x-rays or MRI.

    Measured: at 1 month and 6 months

  6. Assessement of pain reduction according to the muscle trophicity of the erector muscles of the lumbar spine

    The change in pain will be evaluated by NRS for pain (numeric rating scale, a scale from 0 to 10) by phone call after intradiscal infiltration of corticosteroids, according to the presence of an atrophy of the erector muscles of the lumbar spine or not will be assessed. Signs of atrophy of the erector muscles of the lumbar spine will be investigated by interviewing the patient and analyzing the patient's MRI, performed as part of routine care prior to the pre-inclusion consultation. Atrophy of the erector muscles of the lumbar spine will be defined by the presence fat infiltration in erector muscles of the lumbar spine MRI.

    Measured: at 1 month and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Oct 2019
  2. Study start13 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion28 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion28 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
95 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04142580
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP190560
Other IDs
2019-AO1561-56
Acronym
MODISC
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
26 Sep 2019
Last updated
21 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

    PubMed 30496104
  • Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

    PubMed 22231424
  • Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005.

    PubMed 18164449
  • Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR, Wilber RG, Bohlman HH, Steinberg PM, Delamarter RB. Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1988 Jun;167(3):817-24. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.3.2966418.

    PubMed 2966418
  • Albert HB, Kjaer P, Jensen TS, Sorensen JS, Bendix T, Manniche C. Modic changes, possible causes and relation to low back pain. Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(2):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jul 10.

    PubMed 17624684
  • Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Moriya H. Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Sep;76(5):757-64.

    PubMed 8083266
  • Nguyen C, Jousse M, Poiraudeau S, Feydy A, Rannou F. Intervertebral disc and vertebral endplate subchondral changes associated with Modic 1 changes of the lumbar spine: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 23;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1407-6.

    PubMed 28114923
  • Nguyen C, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F. From Modic 1 vertebral-endplate subchondral bone signal changes detected by MRI to the concept of 'active discopathy'. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Aug;74(8):1488-94. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207317. Epub 2015 May 14.

    PubMed 25977562
  • Nguyen C, Boutron I, Baron G, Sanchez K, Palazzo C, Benchimol R, Paris G, James-Belin E, Lefevre-Colau MM, Beaudreuil J, Laredo JD, Bera-Louville A, Cotten A, Drape JL, Feydy A, Ravaud P, Rannou F, Poiraudeau S. Intradiscal Glucocorticoid Injection for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Associated With Active Discopathy: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18;166(8):547-556. doi: 10.7326/M16-1700. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

    PubMed 28319997
  • Benyahya R, Lefevre-Colau MM, Fayad F, Rannou F, Demaille-Wlodyka S, Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Poiraudeau S, Revel M. [Intradiscal injection of acetate of prednisolone in severe low back pain: complications and patients' assessment of effectiveness]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004 Nov;47(9):621-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05.020. French.

    PubMed 15539069

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Discopathy and Lumbago, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessement of change in pain (time frame: at 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04142580, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in