Perfusion; ComplicationsCRINCT04144166
Evaluation of Capillary Refill Index
An observational study of Perfusion; Complications, run by Nihon Kohden at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Comparison of a peripheral perfusion assessment method using a pulse oximeter to the conventional capillary refill time visually assessed by a clinician. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Perfusion; Complications
- What is being tested?
- capillary refill index (CRI)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Oct 2019to 23 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults in ED or admitted to ICU
Who may be able to join
- Individuals 18 years of age or older
- Patients who present to the ED or who are admitted to the ICU of North Shore University Hospital (NSUH)
Who cannot join
- Pregnant
- Prisoners
- Finger, hand or forearm anatomical anomaly or disease that may interfere with attaching a pulse oximeter sensor
- Patients' deemed clinically unstable by the clinical team
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
About this study
Comparison of a peripheral perfusion assessment method using a pulse oximeter to the conventional capillary refill time visually assessed by a clinician.
Read the detailed description
A new technology, capillary refill index (CRI), to assess peripheral perfusion status quantitatively using pulse oximeter waveforms is being developed. The conventional capillary refill time (CRT) is widely used in clinical settings as a gold standard to assess peripheral perfusion.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the capability of CRI to predict altered peripheral perfusion determined with the conventional CRT test. Predictive capability of CRI needs to be assessed to achieve a goal to provide clinicians with an alternative method to the conventional CRT.
- Conditions
- Perfusion; Complications
- Being tested
- capillary refill index (CRI)
- Keywords
- capillary refill time, peripheral perfusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
capillary refill index (CRI)Device
a waveform analysis method using a pulse oximeter to assess peripheral perfusion
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral Perfusion
The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis on CRI values to predict probability of altered peripheral perfusion determined with the CRT test.
Measured: < 30 min *right after enrollment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Correlation of Device CRI to Conventional (Visual) CRT
Spearman's correlation coefficient to assess the correlation between CRI and CRT values.
Measured: < 30 min *right after enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2019
- Study start29 Oct 2019
- Primary completion4 Dec 2019
- Study completion23 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Perfusion; ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nihon Kohden
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Timmy Li, PhD, Principal investigator, Admin Dir Clinical Research Emergency Medicine, Northwell Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04144166
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS-011-004
- Acronym
- CRI
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Capillary Refill Index
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04144166
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRI / CS-011-004
- Conditions
- Perfusion; Complications
- Keywords
- capillary refill time, peripheral perfusion
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nihon KohdenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 29 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Feb 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparison of a peripheral perfusion assessment method using a pulse oximeter to the conventional capillary refill time visually assessed by a clinician.
Detailed description
A new technology, capillary refill index (CRI), to assess peripheral perfusion status quantitatively using pulse oximeter waveforms is being developed. The conventional capillary refill time (CRT) is widely used in clinical settings as a gold standard to assess peripheral perfusion.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the capability of CRI to predict altered peripheral perfusion determined with the conventional CRT test. Predictive capability of CRI needs to be assessed to achieve a goal to provide clinicians with an alternative method to the conventional CRT.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults in ED or admitted to ICU
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Individuals 18 years of age or older
- Patients who present to the ED or who are admitted to the ICU of North Shore University Hospital (NSUH)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant
- Prisoners
- Finger, hand or forearm anatomical anomaly or disease that may interfere with attaching a pulse oximeter sensor
- Patients' deemed clinically unstable by the clinical team
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capillary refill index (CRI)a waveform analysis method using a pulse oximeter to assess peripheral perfusion | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Predictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral Perfusion
Time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment
The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis on CRI values to predict probability of altered peripheral perfusion determined with the CRT test.
1 secondary outcome
Correlation of Device CRI to Conventional (Visual) CRT
Time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Perfusion; Complications
Recruiting
Avoiding Recooling After Normothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation (LT), Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Not yet recruiting
FLuorescent Angiography in REduction of Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer Surgery
Rectal Cancer Patients, Rectal Cancer Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cumulative Intra-Abdominal Pressure Burden and Acute Kidney Injury After Emergency Abdominal Surgery
Acute Kidney Injury, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of a Multi-infusion Strategy in Neonatology on the Rate of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections
Neonatal Infection
Not yet recruiting
BrainProtect-guided, Real-time Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring and Protection of Brain During Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass Requiring Heart-lung Machine
Cerebral Autoregulation Impairment, Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Timmy Li, PhD principal investigator
Admin Dir Clinical Research Emergency Medicine, Northwell Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Perfusion; Complications, run by Nihon Kohden at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral Perfusion (time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2021.