Smoldering Multiple MyelomaCARRISMMNCT04144387
Evaluation of the Impact of the Update SMM Criteria on the Natural History of SMM to Establish New Recommendations.
A study testing Myelogram in people with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, run by Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome at 90 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective open label interventional multicenter study evaluating the impact of the update multiple myeloma criteria on the natural history of smoldering myeloma in order to establish new recommendations about follow up and prognostic evaluation of smoldering myeloma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Myelogram
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 395 participants
- Where
- 90 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2020to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- SMM defined by IMWG 2014 criteria
- Serum monoclonal protein (IgG or IgA) ≥30 g/L and/or urinary monoclonal protein ≥500 mg per 24 h and/or clonal bone marrow plasma cells 10-60%
- Absence of myeloma defining events or amyloidosis
- Diagnosed less than 1 year before the inclusion
- Able and willing to give valid written informed consent. Patients must give written informed consent (IC) in accordance with institutional and local guidelines.
Who cannot join
- Previous antimyeloma treatment including bisphosphonates
- Second Primary Malignancy and/or auto-immune disease treated by immunosuppressive drugs.
- Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying SMM:
- Hypercalcaemia: serum calcium >0.25 mmol/L (>10 mg/L) higher than the upper limit of normal or >2.75 mmol/L (>110 mg/L)
- Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance <40 mL/min or serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (>20 mg/L)
- Anaemia: haemoglobin value of >2 g/dL below the lower limit of normal, or a haemoglobin value <10 g/dL
Show all 18Show fewer
- Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography, CT, or Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT)
- Presence of one of the following biomarkers of malignancy:
- Clonal bone marrow plasmocytosis ≥60%
- Involved/uninvolved serum Free Light Chain (FLC) ratio ≥ 100 (The involved free light chain must be ≥100 mg/L)
- Presence of one or more focal lesions on MRI studies (each focal lesion must be 5 mm or more in size)
- History of malignancy other than SMM within 3 years before inclusion
- Amyloidosis
- POEMS syndrome
- Contraindication to MRI
- Pregnancy
- Nursing mother
- Legally protected adults (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision)
Trial locations and contacts
90 sites in 3 countries.
90 sites in 3 countries
France86 sites
Centre Hospitalier
Abbeville
CHU Amiens Sud
Amiens
CHRU - Hôpital du Bocage
Angers
Ch Annecy Genevois
Annecy
Centre Hospitalier d'Argenteuil Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil
CH d'Arras
Arras
Centre Hospitalier de Auch
Auch
Centre Hospitalier H. Duffaut
Avignon
Centre hospitalier de la Côte Basque
Bayonne
Hôpital Nord Franche Comté
Belfort
Centre Hospitalier Simone Veil
Blois
Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny
Institut Bergonié - Pavillon Saint Genès - 1er étage
Bordeaux
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux
Centre hospitalier Pierre Oudot
Bourgoin
CHRU Brest - Hôpital A. Morvan
Brest
CHU Caen - Côte de Nacre
Caen
Centre Hospitalier
Cannes
CH René Dubos
Cergy-Pontoise
Médipôle de Savoie
Challes-les-Eaux
Centre Hospitalier William Morey
Chalon-sur-Saône
CH Chambéry
Chambéry
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy
Clamart
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes
CHU Henri Mondor
Créteil
Centre Hospitalier
Dax
CHU François Mitterand
Dijon
Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque
Dunkirk
Hôpital de Fréjus
Fréjus
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble
Institut Daniel Hollard
Grenoble
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon
Groupe Hospitalier de La Rochelle
La Rochelle
Hospital Jacques Monod
Le Havre
Centre Hospitalier
Le Mans
Centre Hospitalier
Lens
Centre hospitalier Robert Boulin
Libourne
CHRU Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Limoges
Limoges
Hôpital du Scorff
Lorient
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Lyon
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
CH Meaux
Meaux
Hospital Sainte Blandine
Metz
Hôpital de Mercy (CHR Metz-Thionville)
Metz
Centre de Recherche Clinique / GHT des Landes
Mont-de-Marsan
Clinique du Parc
Montpellier
Hopital Saint Eloi - CHU Montpellier
Montpellier
Hôpital E. Muller
Mulhouse
CHRU Hôpitaux de Brabois
Nancy
Centre Catherine de Sienne
Nantes
CHRU Hôtel Dieu
Nantes
Hôpital Archet 1
Nice
CHU Carémeau, Institut de Cancérologie du Guard
Nîmes
CH La Source
Orléans
CHU Hôpital Saint Antoine
Paris
Hôpital Cochin
Paris
Hôpital Necker
Paris
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris
La Pitié
Paris
Centre Hospitalier de Perigueux
Périgueux
CH Saint Jean
Perpignan
CHRU - Hôpital du Haut Lévêque - Centre François Magendie
Pessac
CHU Poitiers - Pôle régional de Cancérologie
Poitiers
Centre Hospitalier de Quimper Cornouaille
Quimper
Hôpital Robert Debré
Reims
CHRU Hôpital de Pontchaillou
Rennes
Hôpital Privé Sévigné
Rennes
Centre Hospitalier Jacques Puel
Rodez
CH Roubaix
Roubaix
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen
Centre Hospitalier Yves Le Foll
Saint-Brieuc
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest
Centre Hospitalier
Saint-Quentin
CH Saint Malo
St-Malo
CHU Strasbourg - Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg
Strasbourg Oncologie Libérale
Strasbourg
Centre hospitalier de Tarbes
Tarbes
Hôpital Inter-Armées Ste Anne
Toulon
Pôle IUCT Oncopole CHU
Toulouse
CHRU Hôpital Bretonneau - Centre Henry Kaplan
Tours
Centre Hospitalier de Troyes
Troyes
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence
Centre Hospitalier
Valenciennes
CH Bretagne Atlantique Vannes et Auray - P. Chubert
Vannes
CHV André Mignot - Université de Versailles
Versailles
Belgium3 sites
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels
CHU UCL Namur ASBL Site Godinne
Yvoir
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of the Update Multiple Myeloma Criteria on the Natural History of Smoldering Myeloma in Order to Establish New Recommendations About Follow-up and Prognostic Evaluation of Smoldering Myeloma (CARRISMM)
This study is a prospective open label interventional multicenter study evaluating the impact of the update multiple myeloma criteria on the natural history of smoldering myeloma in order to establish new recommendations about follow up and prognostic evaluation of smoldering myeloma.
Read the detailed description
In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) proposed a revised classification of multiple myeloma (MM) and smoldering myeloma (SMM). Since the new definition of SMM proposed excludes "ultra-high risk SMM", the evolution profile of SMM will change. Therefore, investigators need to update their knowledge of SMM to optimize the management of patients. This project is expected to describe more precisely the new landscape of SMM.
The results will help to establish new recommendations for the standard care of SMM and especially for defining accurate follow-up and risk stratifying.
- Conditions
- Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Myelogram
- Medical subject headings
- Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MyelogramProcedure or surgery
Two additional myelograms will be performed comparing to standard of care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test group | Experimental | Each patient included in the study will be followed for 5 years Receives: Procedure: Myelogram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assess the annual risk estimated at 2 years of progression from SMM to MM
Progression to MM will be defined, according to IMWG 2014 revised classification, by the apparition of one or more myeloma defining events:
- Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying MM (CRAB criteria)
- Presence of one of the following biomarkers of malignancy (new criteria of MM introduced in 2014 IMWG recommendations)
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Assess the risk of progression to MM evaluating biological factors
- Progression of monoclonal component level (serum M component, urine M component or FLC involved/uninvolved) defined by increase of ≥ 25% from inclusion value.
- Progression of percentage of phenotypically abnormal Bone Marrow Plasma Cells defined by increase of ≥ 10 % from inclusion value or an increase to over 95%
Measured: 5 years
Assess the risk of progression to MM evaluating radiological markers
MRI progression : Progression of MRI abnormalities defined by any one or more of the following
- Appearance of new focal lesion or new diffuse infiltration of previously unaffected regions
- Growth of previously preexisting < 5mm focal(s) lesion(s)
- Progressive diffuse infiltration of already affected bones
Measured: 5 years
Describe the clonal and sub-clonal evolution of SMM
Genetic analysis of bone marrow plasma cells at inclusion and during follow up to give data about the clonal and subclonal evolution of SMM (analysis of the mutations present in the tumor plasma cells, the allele frequency of each mutations, the determination of the clonal evolution mode for patients who will evolve to overt MM, the evaluation of copy number changes enabling to detect all the prognostic changes (1p32, 1q, 17p13), and (v) all the 14q32 translocations).
Measured: 5 years
Describe annual risk of progression from SMM to MM at 5 years
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2019
- Study start11 Feb 2020
- Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Smoldering Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 395 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pr. Olivier Decaux, Principal investigator, Rennes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04144387
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IFM 2017-04
- Other IDs
- 2016-002650-20, 2016
- Acronym
- CARRISMM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Impact of the Update Multiple Myeloma Criteria on the Natural History of Smoldering Myeloma in Order to Establish New Recommendations About Follow-up and Prognostic Evaluation of Smoldering Myeloma (CARRISMM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04144387
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARRISMM / IFM 2017-04
- Conditions
- Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 395 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Intergroupe Francophone du MyelomeResearch network
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective open label interventional multicenter study evaluating the impact of the update multiple myeloma criteria on the natural history of smoldering myeloma in order to establish new recommendations about follow up and prognostic evaluation of smoldering myeloma.
Detailed description
In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) proposed a revised classification of multiple myeloma (MM) and smoldering myeloma (SMM). Since the new definition of SMM proposed excludes "ultra-high risk SMM", the evolution profile of SMM will change. Therefore, investigators need to update their knowledge of SMM to optimize the management of patients. This project is expected to describe more precisely the new landscape of SMM.
The results will help to establish new recommendations for the standard care of SMM and especially for defining accurate follow-up and risk stratifying.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test group | Experimental | Procedure: MyelogramEach patient included in the study will be followed for 5 years |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- SMM defined by IMWG 2014 criteria
- Diagnosed less than 1 year before the inclusion
- Able and willing to give valid written informed consent. Patients must give written informed consent (IC) in accordance with institutional and local guidelines.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Previous antimyeloma treatment including bisphosphonates
- Second Primary Malignancy and/or auto-immune disease treated by immunosuppressive drugs.
- Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying SMM:
- Presence of one of the following biomarkers of malignancy:
- History of malignancy other than SMM within 3 years before inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MyelogramTwo additional myelograms will be performed comparing to standard of care. | Procedure or surgery | Test group |
Primary outcome
Assess the annual risk estimated at 2 years of progression from SMM to MM
Time frame: 2 years
Progression to MM will be defined, according to IMWG 2014 revised classification, by the apparition of one or more myeloma defining events: * Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying MM (CRAB criteria) * Presence of one of the following biomarkers of malignancy (new criteria of MM introduced in 2014 IMWG recommendations)
4 secondary outcomes
Assess the risk of progression to MM evaluating biological factors
Time frame: 5 years
Assess the risk of progression to MM evaluating radiological markers
Time frame: 5 years
Describe the clonal and sub-clonal evolution of SMM
Time frame: 5 years
Describe annual risk of progression from SMM to MM at 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Linvoseltamab and Daratumumab Treatment in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (HR-SMM)
High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (HR-SMM)
RecruitingObservational study
The Indiana Myeloma Registry
Plasma Cell Dyscrasias
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for AL Amyloidosis in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
Isatuximab and Iberdomide as Immunotherapy for High Risk in Smouldering Myeloma
Smouldering Myeloma
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Prospective Research Study In Monoclonal Gammopathies leadINg to Myeloma
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance, Smoldering Plasma Cell Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pr. Olivier Decaux principal investigator
Rennes University Hospital
90 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Myelogram in people with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, run by Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome at 90 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 90 sites in France, Belgium, Monaco. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assess the annual risk estimated at 2 years of progression from SMM to MM (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.