Child DevelopmentAMCSNCT04146974
Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families
An observational study of Child Development and Family and Household, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Child Development, Family and Household
- How many people
- 416 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2019to Aug 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Staff and parents from coordinated services approaches serving low-income families and their children.
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Does not meet in the inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mathematica
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20002
Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D., 202-250-3505, ecavadel@mathematica-mpr.com
About this study
The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. These coordinated services approaches vary along a range of dimensions, including their number and types of partners, funding streams, target populations, goals and objectives, locations, services provided, and monitoring processes. This qualitative study aims to fill gaps in our knowledge by identifying and describing the features of state and local approaches to coordinating early care and education services with family economic security and/or other health and human services.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. Policymakers and program leaders across the country are experimenting with innovative approaches to combine early care and education, family economic security, and other health and human services (Hulsey et al. 2015; Ross 2018; Sama-Miller and Baumgartner 2017). This qualitative study aims to fill gaps in our knowledge by identifying and describing the features of state and local approaches to coordinating early care and education (ECE) services with family economic security and/or other health and human services.
The AMCS study has six primary research questions:
- How do state and local coordinated services approaches coordinate partnerships and service application and delivery? What are the experiences of those involved with these coordinated services approaches?
- How do coordinated services approaches intend to reduce barriers and road blocks for families to access services? Are there federal barriers to implementing such approaches?
- Are approaches that combine ECE, family economic security, and/or other health and human services able to address other child development factors beyond ECE?
- What have we learned from efforts to integrate enrollment and eligibility processes for health and human services?
- Are states and/or localities examining service delivery dynamics across ECE programs to assess availability of care slots and services to meet the needs of eligible families? How are they using data to understand service delivery dynamics?
- How is public and private ECE funding targeted to meet the needs of at-risk children and families? Are there differences in the families that are able to access services?
The study has three primary ways of collecting information: model profile creation and confirmation for up to 76 coordinated services approaches; telephone interviews with leadership from 20 approaches; and site visits to six coordinated services approaches. Site visits include interviews with staff at the coordinated services approaches and focus groups with parents served by the approach.
The information collected in this study will improve federal, state, and local policymakers', practitioners', and other stakeholders' knowledge and understanding of approaches to coordinating services to support low-income children and their families. Findings will be used to inform the federal government and support their work to set program and evaluation priorities; to inform researchers and others in the field about the state of coordinated services; and finally, to inform practitioners who are currently developing, updating and implementing coordinated services approaches.
- Conditions
- Child Development, Family and Household
- Keywords
- Social services, Coordination, Early childhood education, State and local agencies
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Features of coordinated services approaches
Study developed template describing components of state and local coordinated services approaches
Measured: up to one year
Qualitative features, service delivery, and perceptions of coordinated services approaches
Telephone interviews (study developed semi-structured telephone interview protocol for state and local coordinated services approaches)
Measured: up to one year
Leader and staff perceptions of coordinated services approaches
Site visits (study developed semi-structured in-person interview protocol with leadership and staff of state and local coordinated services approaches)
Measured: up to one year
Parent/guardian perceptions of coordinated services approaches
Focus groups (study developed semi-structured parent/guardian focus group protocol)
Measured: up to one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2019
- Study startOct 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Child DevelopmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 416 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D., Study director, Mathematica Policy Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04146974
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 50685
- Acronym
- AMCS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04146974
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMCS / 50685
- Conditions
- Child Development, Family and Household
- Keywords
- Social services, Coordination, Early childhood education, State and local agencies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 416 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. These coordinated services approaches vary along a range of dimensions, including their number and types of partners, funding streams, target populations, goals and objectives, locations, services provided, and monitoring processes. This qualitative study aims to fill gaps in our knowledge by identifying and describing the features of state and local approaches to coordinating early care and education services with family economic security and/or other health and human services.
Detailed description
The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. Policymakers and program leaders across the country are experimenting with innovative approaches to combine early care and education, family economic security, and other health and human services (Hulsey et al. 2015; Ross 2018; Sama-Miller and Baumgartner 2017). This qualitative study aims to fill gaps in our knowledge by identifying and describing the features of state and local approaches to coordinating early care and education (ECE) services with family economic security and/or other health and human services.
The AMCS study has six primary research questions:
- How do state and local coordinated services approaches coordinate partnerships and service application and delivery? What are the experiences of those involved with these coordinated services approaches?
- How do coordinated services approaches intend to reduce barriers and road blocks for families to access services? Are there federal barriers to implementing such approaches?
- Are approaches that combine ECE, family economic security, and/or other health and human services able to address other child development factors beyond ECE?
- What have we learned from efforts to integrate enrollment and eligibility processes for health and human services?
- Are states and/or localities examining service delivery dynamics across ECE programs to assess availability of care slots and services to meet the needs of eligible families? How are they using data to understand service delivery dynamics?
- How is public and private ECE funding targeted to meet the needs of at-risk children and families? Are there differences in the families that are able to access services?
The study has three primary ways of collecting information: model profile creation and confirmation for up to 76 coordinated services approaches; telephone interviews with leadership from 20 approaches; and site visits to six coordinated services approaches. Site visits include interviews with staff at the coordinated services approaches and focus groups with parents served by the approach.
The information collected in this study will improve federal, state, and local policymakers', practitioners', and other stakeholders' knowledge and understanding of approaches to coordinating services to support low-income children and their families. Findings will be used to inform the federal government and support their work to set program and evaluation priorities; to inform researchers and others in the field about the state of coordinated services; and finally, to inform practitioners who are currently developing, updating and implementing coordinated services approaches.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Staff and parents from coordinated services approaches serving low-income families and their children.
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Does not meet in the inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Features of coordinated services approaches
Time frame: up to one year
Study developed template describing components of state and local coordinated services approaches
Qualitative features, service delivery, and perceptions of coordinated services approaches
Time frame: up to one year
Telephone interviews (study developed semi-structured telephone interview protocol for state and local coordinated services approaches)
Leader and staff perceptions of coordinated services approaches
Time frame: up to one year
Site visits (study developed semi-structured in-person interview protocol with leadership and staff of state and local coordinated services approaches)
Parent/guardian perceptions of coordinated services approaches
Time frame: up to one year
Focus groups (study developed semi-structured parent/guardian focus group protocol)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2019.
Related trials for Child Development
RecruitingPhase 1
Cannabidiol (CBD) in Adults With ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Sensory-integration Therapy Verses Augumented Reality-based Training in ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Hearing Intervention Effects on Brain and Language Development in Children With Bilateral Mild Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
Recruiting
Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal tDCS in ASD Adolescents
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Autistic Spectrum Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D. study director
Mathematica Policy Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Child Development and Family and Household, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D. ((202) 250-3505, ecavadel@mathematica-mpr.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Features of coordinated services approaches (time frame: up to one year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2019.