AzTrials
AzTrials

Child DevelopmentAMCSNCT04146974

Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families

An observational study of Child Development and Family and Household, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Child Development, Family and Household
How many people
416 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2019to Aug 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Staff and parents from coordinated services approaches serving low-income families and their children.

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Does not meet in the inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D. contact

(202) 250-3505

ecavadel@mathematica-mpr.com

Emily Sama-Miller, M.P.P contact

(202) 484-4512

esamamiller@mathematica-mpr.com

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mathematica

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20002

    Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D., 202-250-3505, ecavadel@mathematica-mpr.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. These coordinated services approaches vary along a range of dimensions, including their number and types of partners, funding streams, target populations, goals and objectives, locations, services provided, and monitoring processes. This qualitative study aims to fill gaps in our knowledge by identifying and describing the features of state and local approaches to coordinating early care and education services with family economic security and/or other health and human services.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the Assessing Models of Coordinated Services for Low-Income Children and Their Families (AMCS) project is to understand how states and local communities are coordinating services across sectors to most efficiently and effectively serve low-income children and their families. Policymakers and program leaders across the country are experimenting with innovative approaches to combine early care and education, family economic security, and other health and human services (Hulsey et al. 2015; Ross 2018; Sama-Miller and Baumgartner 2017). This qualitative study aims to fill gaps in our knowledge by identifying and describing the features of state and local approaches to coordinating early care and education (ECE) services with family economic security and/or other health and human services.

The AMCS study has six primary research questions:

  1. How do state and local coordinated services approaches coordinate partnerships and service application and delivery? What are the experiences of those involved with these coordinated services approaches?
  2. How do coordinated services approaches intend to reduce barriers and road blocks for families to access services? Are there federal barriers to implementing such approaches?
  3. Are approaches that combine ECE, family economic security, and/or other health and human services able to address other child development factors beyond ECE?
  4. What have we learned from efforts to integrate enrollment and eligibility processes for health and human services?
  5. Are states and/or localities examining service delivery dynamics across ECE programs to assess availability of care slots and services to meet the needs of eligible families? How are they using data to understand service delivery dynamics?
  6. How is public and private ECE funding targeted to meet the needs of at-risk children and families? Are there differences in the families that are able to access services?

The study has three primary ways of collecting information: model profile creation and confirmation for up to 76 coordinated services approaches; telephone interviews with leadership from 20 approaches; and site visits to six coordinated services approaches. Site visits include interviews with staff at the coordinated services approaches and focus groups with parents served by the approach.

The information collected in this study will improve federal, state, and local policymakers', practitioners', and other stakeholders' knowledge and understanding of approaches to coordinating services to support low-income children and their families. Findings will be used to inform the federal government and support their work to set program and evaluation priorities; to inform researchers and others in the field about the state of coordinated services; and finally, to inform practitioners who are currently developing, updating and implementing coordinated services approaches.

Keywords
Social services, Coordination, Early childhood education, State and local agencies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Features of coordinated services approaches

    Study developed template describing components of state and local coordinated services approaches

    Measured: up to one year

  2. Qualitative features, service delivery, and perceptions of coordinated services approaches

    Telephone interviews (study developed semi-structured telephone interview protocol for state and local coordinated services approaches)

    Measured: up to one year

  3. Leader and staff perceptions of coordinated services approaches

    Site visits (study developed semi-structured in-person interview protocol with leadership and staff of state and local coordinated services approaches)

    Measured: up to one year

  4. Parent/guardian perceptions of coordinated services approaches

    Focus groups (study developed semi-structured parent/guardian focus group protocol)

    Measured: up to one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Oct 2019
  2. Study startOct 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
416 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04146974
Sponsor's protocol ID
50685
Acronym
AMCS
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
14 Oct 2019
Last updated
31 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Child Development and Family and Household, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elizabeth Cavadel, Ph.D. ((202) 250-3505, ecavadel@mathematica-mpr.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Features of coordinated services approaches (time frame: up to one year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in