AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure NYHA Class IIINCT04153890

Family Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Advanced Heart Failure

A study testing FamPALcare in people with Heart Failure NYHA Class III and Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, run by West Virginia University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Overall objective is to test whether the 5-weekly family home palliative and end-of-life care (FamPALcare) intervention educational and supportive sessions will improve rural home end-of-life and palliative care (EOLPC) for advanced heart failure at 6 months follow up. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
FamPALcare
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
78 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jan 2020to 1 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Alert and consent to participate
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Advanced HF (NYHA III or IV), diagnosed by physician

Who cannot join

  • Already received or are on a waiting list for a heart transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD)
  • Diagnosed with a terminal illness or dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • West Virginia University Hospital

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Coaching End-of-Life Palliative Care for End-Stage Heart Failure Patients and Their Family Caregivers in Rural Appalachia

Overall objective is to test whether the 5-weekly family home palliative and end-of-life care (FamPALcare) intervention educational and supportive sessions will improve rural home end-of-life and palliative care (EOLPC) for advanced heart failure at 6 months follow up.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure (HF) afflicts 6.5 million Americans with devastating consequences to patients and their family caregivers especially during severe symptoms in the long-lasting end stage. Advanced HF was defined by American Heart Association (AHA) as "the presence of progressive and/or persistent severe signs and symptoms of HF despite optimized medical, surgical, and device therapy." When patients and family members are not prepared for worsening HF and are not informed about end-of-life and palliative care (EOLPC) conservative comfort options, they experience depression, fear of painful death, home care burden, and medical expenses from anxiously seeking aggressive but futile care. Notably, West Virginia (WV) has the highest HF death in the U.S. at 32.6 per 100,000 population, where 14% of those over 65 years have HF. WV is in the large Appalachian region, which stretches across eastern North America with 25.6 million people and contains a vast number of disadvantaged rural communities. National Institutes of Health has designated Appalachia as a high priority for research as residents experience extreme health and poverty inequities and limited access to healthcare. Furthermore, home EOLPC is lacking across this disadvantaged rural area. Thus, there is a need to investigate the new family intervention (FamPALcare), where nurses coach family-managed advanced HF care at home in Appalachia.

This study addresses the National Institutes of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) priorities for conducting a low risk clinical trials to provide a foundation to advance scientific EOLPC knowledge and testing of our intervention efficacy in larger clinical trials. Additionally, effective EOLPC interventions are priorities of palliative care professionals and palliative care needs must be addressed with vulnerable and advanced HF patients and their families. This study also addresses the priority problem of the lack information for families providing advanced HF home care and preventing unwanted and unwarranted rehospitalizations at the advanced stage of HF.

This study uses a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design stratified by gender (male vs female) to determine any differences in the FamPALcare HF patients and their family caregiver outcomes versus standard care control group outcomes (N=72). Specific aims are to: (1) Test the FamPALcare nursing care intervention with patients and family members managing home supportive EOLPC for advanced HF in rural WV using a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) Assess implementation of the FamPALcare intervention and research procedures for subsequent clinical trials.

The control patients receive standard care given through the West Virginia University hospital and outpatient clinics, prescribed by the patient's cardiologist. The FamPALcare intervention group will receive standard care, plus 5-weekly FamPALcare intervention delivered by community-based nurses. FamPALcare intervention involves coaching patients and family caregivers in advanced HF home care and supporting EOLPC discussions. Data will be collected from all patients and caregivers independently at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Being tested
FamPALcare
Keywords
advanced heart failure, breathlessness, supportive care
Medical subject headings
Dyspnea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FamPALcareBehavioural

    Intervention participants will receive standard care plus five weekly coaching sessions with telephone follow-up to reinforce HF palliative home care.

Study groups in NCT04153890
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FamPALcareExperimentalFamPALcare: Intervention participants will receive standard care plus five weekly coaching sessions with telephone follow-up to reinforce HF palliative home care.
Receives: Behavioral: FamPALcare
Standard CareNo interventionThe standard care group will receive routine HF care and instruction at university hospital or at clinic.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Heart Failure Health Status (KCCQ)- Baseline

    The patients Heart Failure Health Status was measured by administering the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is a 12-item Likert scale (range 0-4). Total scores are calculated in a range of 0-100, with the higher score indicating better Heart Failure Health Status.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Patient Heart Failure Health Status (KCCQ) -3 Month

    The patients Heart Failure Health Status was measured by administering the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is a 12-item Likert scale (range 0-4). Total scores are calculated in a range of 0-100, with the higher score indicating better Heart Failure Health Status.

    Measured: 3 Month

  3. Patient Heart Failure Health Status (KCCQ)- 6 Month

    The patients Heart Failure Health Status was measured by administering the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is a 12-item Likert scale (range 0-4). Total scores are calculated in a range of 0-100, with the higher score indicating better Heart Failure Health Status.

    Measured: 6 Month

  4. Patient Mental Health - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)- Baseline

    Patient-reported mental health measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) of 4 questions. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, based on how often the respondent has been bothered by the problem 0 is not at all and 3 is nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12. The higher the score indicates a worse mental health status.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Patient Mental Health - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ4)- 3 Month

    Patient-reported mental health measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) of 4 questions. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, based on how often the respondent has been bothered by the problem 0 is not at all and 3 is nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12. The higher the score indicates a worse mental health status.

    Measured: 3 Month

  6. Patient Mental Health - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)- 6 Month

    Patient-reported mental health measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) of 4 questions. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, based on how often the respondent has been bothered by the problem 0 is not at all and 3 is nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12. The higher the score indicates a worse mental health status.

    Measured: 6 Month

  7. Caregiver Mental Health - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)- Baseline

    Caregiver mental health measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) of 4 questions. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, based on how often the respondent has been bothered by the problem 0 is not at all and 3 is nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12. The higher the score indicates a worse mental health status.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Caregiver Mental Health - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)- 3 Month

    Caregiver mental health measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) of 4 questions. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, based on how often the respondent has been bothered by the problem 0 is not at all and 3 is nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12. The higher the score indicates a worse mental health status.

    Measured: 3 Month

  9. Caregiver Mental Health - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)- 6 Month

    Caregiver mental health measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) of 4 questions. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, based on how often the respondent has been bothered by the problem 0 is not at all and 3 is nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12. The higher the score indicates a worse mental health status.

    Measured: 6 Month

  10. Caregiver Quality of Life - SF12V2 Health Survey- Baseline (MCS-12)

    The SF-12v2 Health Survey is a multipurpose short-form questionnaire with only 12 questions with two summary scores, the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). The scoring range for the PCS-12 and MCS-12 is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a poorer level of Caregiver quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Caregiver Quality of Life - SF12v2 Health Survey- 3 Month (MCS-12)

    The SF-12v2 Health Survey is a multipurpose short-form questionnaire with only 12 questions with two summary scores, the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). The scoring range for the PCS-12 and MCS-12 is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a poorer level of Caregiver quality of life.

    Measured: 3 Month

  12. Caregiver Quality of Life - SF12v2 Health Survey- 6 Month (MCS-12)

    The SF-12v2 Health Survey is a multipurpose short-form questionnaire with only 12 questions with two summary scores, the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). The scoring range for both the PCS-12 and MCS-12 is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a poorer level of Caregiver quality of life.

    Measured: 6 Months

  13. Caregiver Quality of Life - SF12V2 Health Survey- Baseline (PCS-12)

    The SF-12v2 Health Survey is a multipurpose short-form questionnaire with only 12 questions with two summary scores, the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). The scoring range for the PCS-12 and MCS-12 is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a poorer level of Caregiver quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Caregiver Quality of Life - SF12v2 Health Survey- 3 Month (PCS-12)

    The SF-12v2 Health Survey is a multipurpose short-form questionnaire with only 12 questions with two summary scores, the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). The scoring range for the PCS-12 and MCS-12 is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a poorer level of Caregiver quality of life.

    Measured: 3 Month

  15. Caregiver Quality of Life - SF12v2 Health Survey- 6 Month (PCS-12)

    The SF-12v2 Health Survey is a multipurpose short-form questionnaire with only 12 questions with two summary scores, the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). The scoring range for the PCS-12 and MCS-12 is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a poorer level of Caregiver quality of life.

    Measured: 6 Months

  16. Caregiver Burden (ZBI-12)- Baseline

    The Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) consists of 12 items that measure the emotional, physical, and social impact of caregiving. There are 12 questions and each question is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater caregiver burden.

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Caregiver Burden (ZBI-12)- 3 Month

    The Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) consists of 12 items that measure the emotional, physical, and social impact of caregiving. There are 12 questions and each question is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater caregiver burden.

    Measured: 3 Month

  18. Caregiver Burden (ZBI-12)- 6 Month

    The Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) consists of 12 items that measure the emotional, physical, and social impact of caregiving. There are 12 questions and each question is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater caregiver burden.

    Measured: 6 Month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. FamPALcare Helpfulness Scale

    This scale was completed voluntarily by participants that received the intervention (ARM Title: FamPALcare. The FamPALcare helpfulness scale is an 11-item Likert-type scale used to measure the perceived helpfulness of the FamPALcare intervention. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 (not helpful) to 5 (very helpful). This scale is used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention in improving outcomes for patients with heart failure and their caregivers.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2019
  2. Study start13 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study is a low-risk randomized control trial design to test the implementation of the FamPALcare intervention with advanced HF patients and their primary family caregivers.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
78 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04153890
Sponsor's protocol ID
1709754988
Other IDs
1R15NR018547-01
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
4 Nov 2019
Last updated
19 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The study plans to share data in aggregate and as overall study results.

Publications

  • Piamjariyakul U, Petitte T, Smothers A, Wen S, Morrissey E, Young S, Sokos G, Moss AH, Smith CE. Study protocol of coaching end-of-life palliative care for advanced heart failure patients and their family caregivers in rural appalachia: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 29;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0500-z.

    PubMed 31884945
  • Piamjariyakul U, Keener TA, Smothers A, Young S, Shafique S, McDill S, Keech K, Petitte T, Pacheco C. Mentoring Undergraduate Nursing Students in Palliative Home Care Research. Teach Learn Nurs. 2021 Oct;16(4):423-428. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 Jun 5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34720774
  • Piamjariyakul U, Shafique S, Friend DL, Adams KA, Sanghuachang W, Petitte TM, Young S. The development and evaluation of a short-term international student research and educational program. Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Dec 6;11(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.001. eCollection 2024 Jan.

    PubMed 38352285
  • Piamjariyakul U, Smothers A, Wang K, Shafique S, Wen S, Petitte T, Young S, Sokos G, Smith CE. Palliative care for patients with heart failure and family caregivers in rural Appalachia: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 3;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01531-2.

    PubMed 39097733

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FamPALcare in people with Heart Failure NYHA Class III and Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, run by West Virginia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Heart Failure Health Status (KCCQ)- Baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 18 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04153890, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in