AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteosarcomaPhase 2NCT04154189

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ifosfamide and Etoposide With or Without Lenvatinib in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma

A Phase 2 study testing Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide and Etoposide in people with Osteosarcoma, run by Eisai Inc. at 84 sites in 21 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This Is a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination with Ifosfamide and Etoposide Versus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 25 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteosarcoma
What is being tested?
Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide and Etoposide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
81 participants
Where
84 sitesin 21 countries
Study dates
23 Mar 2020to 17 Aug 2023
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of high grade osteosarcoma
  • Refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic treatments
  • Measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1.
  • Life expectancy of 12 weeks or more
  • Lansky play score greater than or equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) or Karnofsky Performance Status score >=50%. Use Karnofsky for participants >=16 years of age and Lansky for participants less than (<)16 years of age. Participants who are unable to walk because of paralysis, but who are able to perform activities of daily living while wheelchair bound, will be considered ambulatory for the purpose of assessing the performance score
  • Adequate organ function per blood work
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Adequate cardiac function as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >=50% at baseline as determined by echocardiography or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan
  • Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as:
  • BP <95th percentile for sex, age, and height/length at screening (as per National Heart Lung and Blood Institute guidelines) and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Participants >18 years of age should have BP less than or equal to (<=) 150/90 millimeters of Mercury at screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to Cycle 1 Day 1
  • Washout before Cycle 1 Day 1 of 3 weeks in case of prior chemotherapy, 6 weeks if treatment included nitrosoureas; 4 weeks for definitive radiotherapy, 2 weeks for palliative radiotherapy; and 3 months from high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue. For all other anti-cancer therapies, washout before Cycle 1 Day 1 of at least 5 half-lives (or at least 28 days, whichever is shorter). Participants must have recovered [to Grade <=1, except for alopecia, ototoxicity, and Grade <=2 peripheral neuropathy, per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0] from the acute toxic effects of all prior anticancer therapy before Cycle 1 Day 1
  • Must have no prior history of lenvatinib treatment
  • Eligibility for optional lenvatinib crossover:
  • Disease progression per RECIST 1.1 (as confirmed by IIR for all participants who crossover prior to the study data-cut)
  • No new systemic anti-cancer medication administered after the last dose of study drugs
  • Meets all safety parameters listed in the inclusion criteria and none listed in the exclusion criteria
  • Study is ongoing

Who cannot join

  • Any active infection or infectious illness unless fully recovered prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (that is, no longer requiring systemic treatment)
  • Participants with central nervous system metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy (example, whole brain radiation therapy, surgery or radiosurgery) and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 2 weeks before Cycle 1 Day 1
  • Active second malignancy within 2 years prior to enrollment ([in addition to osteosarcoma], but not including definitively treated superficial melanoma, carcinoma-in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
  • Has had major surgery within 3 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Note: Adequate wound healing after major surgery must be assessed clinically, independent of time elapsed for eligibility
  • A clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including a marked baseline prolonged QT or corrected QT (QTc) interval (example, a repeated demonstration of a QTc interval greater than [>] 480 millisecond [msec])
  • Has clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months from first dose of study intervention, including New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability. Note: Medically controlled arrhythmia would be permitted
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator might affect the absorption of lenvatinib
  • Pre-existing Grade >=3 gastrointestinal or non-gastrointestinal fistula
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least 1 divided [/] by 2 teaspoon) within 3 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1
  • Radiographic evidence of intratumoral cavitation, encasement, or invasion of a major blood vessel. Additionally, the degree of proximity to major blood vessels should be considered for exclusion because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis after lenvatinib therapy
  • History of ifosfamide-related Grade >=3 nephrotoxicity or encephalopathy
  • Known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
  • Known active Hepatitis B (example, Hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] reactive) or Hepatitis C (example, hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA] [qualitative] is detected). Note: Testing for Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C is required at screening only when mandated by local health authority

Trial locations and contacts

84 sites in 21 countries.

84 sites in 21 countries

United States16 sites
  • Childrens Hospital Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Children's of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

  • Children's Medical Center Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Cook Children's Health Care System

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Riley Hospital For Children

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • University of Mississippi Medical Center

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • Loma Linda University Medical Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County

    Orange, California, 92868

  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Children's National Medical Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

Other trials in United States

France12 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hopital Pellegrin

    Bordeaux

  • Centre Oscar Lambret

    Lille

  • Centre Léon Berard

    Lyon

  • Hopitaux de La Timone

    Marseille

  • Hôpital de La Mère Et de L'enfant

    Nantes

  • CHU de Nice

    Nice

  • Hôpital Armand Trousseau

    Paris

  • Institut Curie

    Paris

  • Hopital de Hautepierre

    Strasbourg

  • Hôpital Des Enfants

    Toulouse

  • CHRU Nancy

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy

  • Institut Gustave Roussy

    Villejuif

Other trials in France

United Kingdom10 sites
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital

    Birmingham

  • The Royal Hospital for Children

    Bristol

  • Royal Hospital for Children

    Glasgow

  • Leeds Children Hospital

    Leeds

  • Alder Hey Children's Hospital

    Liverpool

  • UCL Cancer Institute

    London

  • Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital

    Manchester

  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

    Manchester

  • Royal Victoria Infirmary

    Newcastle

  • John Radcliffe Hospital

    Oxford

Other trials in United Kingdom

Spain8 sites
  • Hospital Universitario de Cruces

    Barakaldo

  • Hospital Sant Joan de Deu

    Barcelona

  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón

    Barcelona

  • Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesus

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville

  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

Australia5 sites
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital

    Camperdown

  • Perth Childrens Hospital

    Nedlands

  • Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne

    Parkville

  • Queensland Children's Hospital

    South Brisbane

  • Children's Hospital at Westmead

    Westmead

Other trials in Australia

Italy5 sites
  • Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli

    Bologna

  • Azienda Ospedaliera A Meyer

    Florence

  • Istituto Giannina Gaslini

    Genova

  • Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori

    Milan

  • IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù

    Roma

Other trials in Italy

South Korea5 sites
  • National Cancer Center

    Goyang-si

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

  • Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Singapore3 sites
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital

    Singapore

  • National Cancer Centre

    Singapore

  • National University Hospital

    Singapore

Other trials in Singapore

Sweden3 sites
  • Drottning Silvias Barn Och Ungdomssjukhus

    Gothenburg

  • Skanes Universitetssjukhus Lund

    Lund

  • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

Czechia2 sites
  • FN Brno 2 Detska Klinika

    Brno

  • Fakultní nemocnice v Motole

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Hong Kong2 sites
  • Hong Kong Children's Hospital

    Hong Kong

  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

New Zealand2 sites
  • Auckland City Hospital

    Auckland

  • Starship Children's Hospital

    Auckland

Other trials in New Zealand

Switzerland2 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

    Lausanne

  • Kinderspital Zürich - Eleonorenstiftung

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

Taiwan2 sites
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

Austria1 site
  • St. Anna Kinderspital

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Gent

    Ghent

Other trials in Belgium

Canada1 site
  • Hospital For Sick Children

    Toronto

Other trials in Canada

Finland1 site
  • Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala

    Tampere, Länsi-Suomen Lääni, FI-33520

Other trials in Finland

Ireland1 site
  • Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

Israel1 site
  • Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel

    Petah Tikva

Other trials in Israel

Netherlands1 site
  • Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology

    Utrecht

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Ifosfamide and Etoposide Versus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma (OLIE)

This Is a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination with Ifosfamide and Etoposide Versus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma.

Conditions
Osteosarcoma
Keywords
Osteosarcoma, Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, E7080, Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma, Pediatrics, Chemotherapy
Medical subject headings
Osteosarcoma, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LenvatinibDrug

    Also called E7080

    Lenvatinib 14 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) capsules will be administered once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression (PD), development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation of study by the sponsor.

    An extemporaneous suspension of lenvatinib capsules may be used for participants unable to swallow capsules.

  • IfosfamideDrug

    Ifosfamide 3000 milligrams per square meter per day (mg/m^2/day) intravenous infusion will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles.

  • EtoposideDrug

    Etoposide 100 mg/m^2/day intravenous infusion will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles.

  • LenvatinibDrug

    Also called E7080

    Lenvatinib 14 mg/m^2 capsules will be administered once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle until the next PD (per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors [RECIST] 1.1 as assessed by investigator), development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.

Study groups in NCT04154189
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Randomization Phase: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + EtoposideExperimentalParticipants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide.
Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: Ifosfamide; Drug: Etoposide
Randomization Phase: Ifosfamide + EtoposideActive comparatorParticipants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive ifosfamide with etoposide. Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma may receive optional lenvatinib plus or minus chemotherapy (Ifosfamide and Etoposide) if disease progression is observed in study.
Receives: Drug: Ifosfamide; Drug: Etoposide; Drug: Lenvatinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR) Assessment

    PFS as assessed by IIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death (whichever occurred first), as determined using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first (up to 20.5 months)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Percentage of Participants With PFS at Month 4 (PFS-4m Rate) by IIR Assessment

    PFS rate at 4 months as assessed by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at 4 months from the randomization date using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The PFS-4m was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Month 4

  2. Percentage of Participants With PFS at 1 Year or Month 12 (PFS-1y Rate) by IIR Assessment

    PFS-1y rate as assessed by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at 1 year from randomization date using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS-1y rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Month 12 or 1 Year

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The median OS was from Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates and 2-sided 95% CIs from a generalized Brookmeyer and Crowley method.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause (up to 37.1 months)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 1 Year or Month 12 (OS-1y)

    OS-1y was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause assessed up to 1 year. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Month 12 or 1 Year

  5. Objective Response Rate at Month 4 (ORR-4m) by IIR Assessment

    ORR-4m was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by IIR using RECIST v1.1 within the first 4 months. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (<) 10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% confidence interval (CI) of ORR was calculated using the method of Clopper and Pearson.

    Measured: Month 4

  6. ORR by IIR Assessment

    ORR by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR or PR determined using RECIST v1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% CI of ORR was calculated using the method of Clopper and Pearson.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of CR or PR (up to 20.5 months)

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during time from first dose to 30 days following last dose of drug, having been absent at pretreatment or reemerged during treatment, having been present at pretreatment but stopped before treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to pretreatment state, when AE was continuous. Serious adverse events (SAE) was defined as untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability; was congenital anomaly or medically important due to other reasons than above mentioned criteria.

    Measured: From first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 40.8 months)

  8. Treatment Arm A: Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib

    Plasma concentration of lenvatinib in participants from Treatment Arm A (Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide) at different time points were reported. As planned, data for this outcome measure was analyzed for treatment arm A only. Lenvatinib concentration in plasma was quantified using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose (each Cycle length = 21 days)

  9. Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Scale: Generic Core Scale Score at Month 4

    Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale is a multidimensional scale. It included assessment of 4 dimensions: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (8 items), social functioning (8 items), and school functioning (5 items - children greater than or equal to [>=] 5 years, adults; 3 items - toddlers [aged 2-4 years]). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Generic Core Scale total score: sum of all the items divided by the number of items answered across all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 4

  10. Change From Baseline in PedsQL Scale: Cancer Module Scale Score at Month 4

    HRQoL: PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scale measured pediatric cancer-specific HRQoL. It included assessment of 8 dimensions: pain and hurt (2 items), nausea (5 items), procedural anxiety (3 items), treatment anxiety (3 items), worry (3 items), cognitive problems (3 items - toddlers [aged 2-4], 4 items - young children [aged 5-7]; 5 items for children aged >=8 years, adults), perceived physical appearance (3 items), communication (3 items). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Cancer Module total score: sum of all items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 4

  11. Number of Participants Categorized Based on Overall Palatability and Acceptability Questionnaire Responses for Suspension of Lenvatinib

    The palatability and acceptability of lenvatinib oral suspension formulation was assessed using the Palatability Questionnaire. In the questionnaire, participants were asked to answer palatability and acceptability of lenvatinib suspension considering the following elements: taste, appearance, smell, how does it feel in the mouth and overall acceptability in terms of 7 responses: Super good, really good, good, may be good or may be bad, bad, really bad, super bad. In this outcome measure, number of participants have been reported per their overall palatability and acceptability responses.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 21 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2019
  2. Study start23 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion17 Aug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
81 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04154189
Sponsor's protocol ID
E7080-G000-230
Other IDs
2019-003696-19, 2019
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
1 Nov 2019
Last updated
22 Jul 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Eisai's data sharing commitment and further information on how to request data can be found on our website http://eisaiclinicaltrials.com/.

Publications

  • Gaspar N, Hung GY, Strauss SJ, Campbell-Hewson Q, Dela Cruz FS, Glade Bender JL, Koh KN, Whittle SB, Chan GC, Gerber NU, Palmu S, Morgenstern DA, Longhi A, Baecklund F, Lee JA, Locatelli F, Marquez Vega C, Janeway KA, McCowage G, McCabe MG, Bidadi B, Huang J, McKenzie J, Okpara CE, Bautista F; OLIE Study Investigators. Lenvatinib Plus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed Osteosarcoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Dec 1;10(12):1645-1653. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.4381.

    PubMed 39418029
  • Gaspar N, Venkatramani R, Hecker-Nolting S, Melcon SG, Locatelli F, Bautista F, Longhi A, Lervat C, Entz-Werle N, Casanova M, Aerts I, Strauss SJ, Thebaud E, Morland B, Nieto AC, Marec-Berard P, Gambart M, Rossig C, Okpara CE, He C, Dutta L, Campbell-Hewson Q. Lenvatinib with etoposide plus ifosfamide in patients with refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma (ITCC-050): a multicentre, open-label, multicohort, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1312-1321. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00387-9. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

    PubMed 34416158
  • Gaspar N, Campbell-Hewson Q, Huang J, Okpara CE, Bautista F. OLIE, ITCC-082: a Phase II trial of lenvatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide in relapsed/refractory osteosarcoma. Future Oncol. 2021 Nov;17(32):4249-4261. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0743. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

    PubMed 34382412

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide and Etoposide in people with Osteosarcoma, run by Eisai Inc. at 84 sites in 21 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 84 sites in United States, France, United Kingdom, Spain, Australia and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR) Assessment (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first (up to 20.5 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04154189, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in