AzTrials
AzTrials

ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPhase 4NCT04157868

Early rhBNP on Myocardial Work in Patients With STEMI

A Phase 4 study testing rhBNP in people with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction, run by RenJi Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study intends to evaluate the efficacy of early rhBNP on myocardial work in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
rhBNP
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
30 Nov 2019to 30 Nov 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Anterior myocardial infarct (anterior myocardial infarct is defined as persistent chest pain for 30 mins at least, with ST-segment elevation of at least 0.2 mV in two or more contiguous precordial leads) within 12 hours after onsets of symptom;
  • 2. No contraindication for rhBNP;
  • 3. Left anterior descending (LAD) as culprit vessel, with TIMI 0-1 grade.

Who cannot join

  • 1.Cardiogenic shock (systolic BP <90mmHg after fluid infusion or systolic BP<100mmHg after vasoactive drugs);
  • 2. History of myocardial infarct;
  • 3.Severe arrhythmia: with III degree A-V block ,atrial fibrillation,ventricular fibrillation,ventricular tachycardia;
  • 4. Any history of severe renal or hepatic dysfunction (hepatic failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension or active hepatitis); neutropenia or thrombocytopenia; known acute pancreatitis;
  • 5. Pregnant or lactating;
  • 6. life expectancy≤12 months;
  • 7. Inability to follow the protocol and comply with follow-up requirements or any other reason the investigator feels would place the patient at increased risk;

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Song Ding, MD,Ph.D. contact

86-21-68383477

dingsong1105@163.com

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Early rhBNP on Myocardial Work in Patients With Anterior ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The study intends to evaluate the efficacy of early rhBNP on myocardial work in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Being tested
rhBNP, Control
Keywords
ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction, rhBNP, non-invasive myocardial work

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • rhBNPDrug

    rhBNP intra-coronary injection 1.5 ug/kg loading dose, with intravenous injection 0.0075-0.01 ug/kg/min persistent for 72 hour.

  • ControlDrug

    Saline intra-coronary injection 0.15ml/kg loading dose, with same intravenous injection speed for 72 hour.

Study groups in NCT04157868
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
rhBNPExperimentalrhBNP intra-coronary injection 1.5 ug/kg loading dose, with intravenous injection 0.0075-0.01 ug/kg/min persistent for 72 hour.
Receives: Drug: rhBNP
ControlPlacebo comparatorSaline intra-coronary injection 0.15ml/kg loading dose, with same intravenous injection speed for 72 hour after randomization.
Receives: Drug: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Global myocardial work efficiency by echocardiography

    Echocardial myocardial work (MW) may identify early abnormalities in left ventricular(LV) function and may establish a more sensitive index for early stage LV dysfunction.Global MW was quantified by calculating the rate of regional shortening by differentiation of the strain tracing and multiplying by instantaneous LV pressure. This instantaneous measure of power was this integrated over time to measure MW as a function of time during systole (time interval from mitral valve closure through to mitral valve opening). During LV ejection, segments were analyzed for wasted work (WW) and/or constructive work (CW), with global values determined as the averages of all segmental values and displayed on the LV pressure-strain loop diagram.

    Global myocardial work efficiency (GWE; %), constructive MW divided by the sum of CW and WW, expressed as a percentage.

    Measured: 30 days after PCI

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Global myocardial work index by echocardiography

    Global myocardial work index (GWI): total work within the area of the LV PSL calculated frommitral valve closure to mitral valve opening.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 30 after PCI

  2. Global myocardial constructive work by echocardiography

    Global myocardial constructive work (mm Hg %), an estimate of the work performed by the LV segments consisting of shortening during systole plus lengthening in isovolumic relaxation.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 30 after PCI

  3. Global myocardial waste work by echocardiography

    Global myocardial waste work (mm Hg %), an estimate of negative work of the LV segments consisting of myocardial lengthening during systole plus any shortening during isovolumic relaxation.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 30 after PCI

  4. Clinical Outcomes

    Compound endpoints of all cause death, non-fatal reinfarction, heart failure, and stroke;

    Measured: 30 days after PCI

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2019
  2. Study start30 Nov 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04157868
Sponsor's protocol ID
EARLY MYO-myocardial work
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
5 Nov 2019
Last updated
8 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Schwartz BG, Kloner RA. Coronary no reflow. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012 Apr;52(4):873-82. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jun 21.

    PubMed 21712046
  • Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054.

    PubMed 19608025
  • Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Pandey DK, Paynter NP, Reeves MJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28-e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. Epub 2013 Dec 18. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24352519
  • Kehat I, Molkentin JD. Molecular pathways underlying cardiac remodeling during pathophysiological stimulation. Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):2727-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.942268. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21173361
  • Postma S, Dambrink JH, Gosselink AT, Ottervanger JP, Kolkman E, Ten Berg JM, Suryapranata H, van 't Hof AW. The influence of system delay on 30-day and on long-term mortality in patients with anterior versus non-anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cohort study. Open Heart. 2015 Apr 10;2(1):e000201. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000201. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25893101
  • Wu GF, Wykrzykowska JJ, Rana JS, Pinto DS, Gibson CM, Li J, Sellke FW, Laham RJ. Effects of B-type natriuretic peptide (nesiritide) on coronary epicardial arteries, systemic vasculature and microvessels. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Feb;20(2):76-80.

    PubMed 18252972
  • Sjoli B, Orn S, Grenne B, Ihlen H, Edvardsen T, Brunvand H. Diagnostic capability and reproducibility of strain by Doppler and by speckle tracking in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jan;2(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.10.007.

    PubMed 19356529
  • Shimoni S, Gendelman G, Ayzenberg O, Smirin N, Lysyansky P, Edri O, Deutsch L, Caspi A, Friedman Z. Differential effects of coronary artery stenosis on myocardial function: the value of myocardial strain analysis for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jul;24(7):748-57. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

    PubMed 21511433
  • Hubert A, Le Rolle V, Leclercq C, Galli E, Samset E, Casset C, Mabo P, Hernandez A, Donal E. Estimation of myocardial work from pressure-strain loops analysis: an experimental evaluation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):1372-1379. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey024.

    PubMed 29529181
  • Donal E, Bergerot C, Thibault H, Ernande L, Loufoua J, Augeul L, Ovize M, Derumeaux G. Influence of afterload on left ventricular radial and longitudinal systolic functions: a two-dimensional strain imaging study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Dec;10(8):914-21. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep095. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

    PubMed 19666722
  • Edwards NFA, Scalia GM, Shiino K, Sabapathy S, Anderson B, Chamberlain R, Khandheria BK, Chan J. Global Myocardial Work Is Superior to Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Normal Left Ventricular Function and Wall Motion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Aug;32(8):947-957. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

    PubMed 31043359
  • Masci PG, Marinelli M, Piacenti M, Lorenzoni V, Positano V, Lombardi M, L'Abbate A, Neglia D. Myocardial structural, perfusion, and metabolic correlates of left bundle branch block mechanical derangement in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a tagged cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(4):482-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.934638. Epub 2010 May 12.

    PubMed 20463209
  • Duchenne J, Turco A, Unlu S, Pagourelias ED, Vunckx K, Degtiarova G, Bezy S, Cvijic M, Nuyts J, Claus P, Rega F, Gheysens O, Voigt JU. Left Ventricular Remodeling Results in Homogenization of Myocardial Work Distribution. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 May;12(5):e007224. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007224.

    PubMed 31023060
  • Boe E, Russell K, Eek C, Eriksen M, Remme EW, Smiseth OA, Skulstad H. Non-invasive myocardial work index identifies acute coronary occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;16(11):1247-55. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev078. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

    PubMed 25851329

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing rhBNP in people with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction, run by RenJi Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Song Ding, MD,Ph.D. (86-21-68383477, dingsong1105@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Global myocardial work efficiency by echocardiography (time frame: 30 days after PCI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04157868, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in